Watch out for teen drivers...
01-25-07, 09:36 AM
#1
genec
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Watch out for teen drivers...
https://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070125/..._driving_study
Study: Distractions fuel teens' crashes
Study: Distractions fuel teens' crashes
But teens reported a host of other in-car distractions that researchers say help make traffic accidents the No. 1 killer of U.S. teens, with a fatality rate four times higher than drivers aged 25-69, based on miles driven. About 5,600 teens died in traffic accidents in 2005, and about 7,500 were driving cars involved in fatal accidents.
Researchers found that one teenage passenger with a teen driver doubles the risk of a fatal crash, while the risk is five times higher when two or more teens ride along. Most states have laws restricting passengers when teens drive, but 15 states do not.
Nearly 90 percent of teens reported seeing peers drive while talking on cell phones and more than half spotted drivers using hand-held games, listening devices or sending text messages.
Researchers found that one teenage passenger with a teen driver doubles the risk of a fatal crash, while the risk is five times higher when two or more teens ride along. Most states have laws restricting passengers when teens drive, but 15 states do not.
Nearly 90 percent of teens reported seeing peers drive while talking on cell phones and more than half spotted drivers using hand-held games, listening devices or sending text messages.
01-25-07, 09:40 AM
#2
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,508
Bikes: spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
And here I was not watching out for teen drivers... silly me!
01-25-07, 10:16 AM
#3
genec
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Shiznaz
And here I was not watching out for teen drivers... silly me!
What I can't help but wonder is why the study focused on only teens.
01-25-07, 10:18 AM
#4
Tiocfáidh ár Lá
That is pretty scary. When I was a teen there were no cell phones but we also had mustangs and chevelles. Going up to 130MPH was not unheard of 
01-25-07, 10:46 AM
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 189
Bikes: Gary Fischer mtb, Specialized Allez, Cannondale Jekyl, Trek 8700, Motobecane Sprint (just ordered)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Must have been a slow news day for some to write that up, kinda a no brainer.
01-25-07, 02:55 PM
#7
My bicycle is fixed
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 1,026
Bikes: '08 Surly Steamroller, '07 Surly Cross Check
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Overheard from a co-worker's phone call to her 16-year-old daughter, who was operating a motor vehicle at the time:
"Don't play with the radio while you're on the cell phone."
"Don't play with the radio while you're on the cell phone."
01-25-07, 03:55 PM
#8
del dot
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Santa Cruz CA
Posts: 211
Bikes: Tour Easy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Brian Sorrell
Overheard from a co-worker's phone call to her 16-year-old daughter, who was operating a motor vehicle at the time:
"Don't play with the radio while you're on the cell phone."
"Don't play with the radio while you're on the cell phone."
01-25-07, 04:57 PM
#9
Speed Demon *roll eyes*
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Waterloo, Ontario
Posts: 982
Bikes: 1998 specialized s-works mtn bike / 2005 Kona Jake the Snake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Yeah, OK, yet another reason to watch for Teen drivers.
What I can't help but wonder is why the study focused on only teens.
What I can't help but wonder is why the study focused on only teens.
Besides which, "teens" are supposed to be unsafe and reckless, right?
In reality, it is the new driver that is a problem, regardless of age. It is just that most of the new drivers happen to be teens.
01-25-07, 06:00 PM
#10
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trying to ascertain the age of a driver and then treating him accordingly doesn't make sense to me.
The fact that a teen driver is more likely to be distracted, and is more likely to overlook your presence is irrelevant to the fact that if you need a particular driver's attention, you should make sure you have it before you are in a situation where your safety depends on his or her attention. That's what you should do whether the driver is a teen or not.
In other words:
The logic here is the same as in the texting thread, and with respect to cell phone users, and all distracted drivers.
The generalities don't mean squat when you're dealing with one particular driver whose attention you need to aquire.
What matters is whether your safety is about to depend on their attention, and, if it does, whether you have verified that you have their attention, not whether they're on the phone or are a teen or just about anything else.
The fact that a teen driver is more likely to be distracted, and is more likely to overlook your presence is irrelevant to the fact that if you need a particular driver's attention, you should make sure you have it before you are in a situation where your safety depends on his or her attention. That's what you should do whether the driver is a teen or not.
In other words:
- If the driver is NOT a teen, you still need to verify you have his attention before you put yourself in a situation where your safety depends on his or her attention.
- If the driver IS a teen, it's still okay to put yourself in a situation where your safety depends on his or her attention as long as you have verified that they are aware of your presence.
The logic here is the same as in the texting thread, and with respect to cell phone users, and all distracted drivers.
The generalities don't mean squat when you're dealing with one particular driver whose attention you need to aquire.
What matters is whether your safety is about to depend on their attention, and, if it does, whether you have verified that you have their attention, not whether they're on the phone or are a teen or just about anything else.
01-25-07, 06:03 PM
#11
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,508
Bikes: spicer fixie, Haro BMX, cyclops track, Soma Double Cross, KHS Flite 100
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Its just a nice statistic to know you're likely going to be creamed by a teeny bopper. Because you probably won't know what hit you!
01-25-07, 06:17 PM
#12
Out fishing with Annie on his lap, a cigar in one hand and a ginger ale in the other, watching the sunset.
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: South Florida
Posts: 16,056
Bikes: Techna Wheelchair and a Sun EZ 3 Recumbent Trike
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times
in
17 Posts
Originally Posted by jfmckenna
That is pretty scary. When I was a teen there were no cell phones but we also had mustangs and chevelles. Going up to 130MPH was not unheard of
__________________
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
. “He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.”- Fredrick Nietzsche
"We can judge the heart of a man by his treatment of animals." - Immanuel Kant
01-25-07, 06:22 PM
#13
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
Only 130? I lost my license till I was 21 when I was 16.......173 in a 55 on I69 north of Fort Wayne! Not one of the smarter things I ever did, granted.......
01-25-07, 06:37 PM
#14
Conservative Hippie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wakulla Co. FL
Posts: 4,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The last time I got any grief was a "Get off the road."
By, get this, a teen passenger. Didn't even look old enough to have a DL. WTF does he know about driving or traffic law?
By, get this, a teen passenger. Didn't even look old enough to have a DL. WTF does he know about driving or traffic law?
01-25-07, 07:20 PM
#15
genec
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by CommuterRun
The last time I got any grief was a "Get off the road."
By, get this, a teen passenger. Didn't even look old enough to have a DL. WTF does he know about driving or traffic law?
By, get this, a teen passenger. Didn't even look old enough to have a DL. WTF does he know about driving or traffic law?
01-25-07, 07:39 PM
#16
Senior Member
I find focussing on one set of drivers amusing. Everyone has their own top pick:
Teens: too young, inexperienced and distracted
20-30somethings: bunch of spoiled college grads driving graduation gift SUVs and sports cars thinking they own the road
middle aged: distracted by all the kids in the car, yuppies driving Benz's and Beemers
seniors: can't see the road, don't know the traffic laws any more, plowing through everything in their way
In other words, we should all be dead by now.
Teens: too young, inexperienced and distracted
20-30somethings: bunch of spoiled college grads driving graduation gift SUVs and sports cars thinking they own the road
middle aged: distracted by all the kids in the car, yuppies driving Benz's and Beemers
seniors: can't see the road, don't know the traffic laws any more, plowing through everything in their way
In other words, we should all be dead by now.
01-25-07, 07:57 PM
#17
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by Tom Stormcrowe
Only 130? I lost my license till I was 21 when I was 16.......173 in a 55 on I69 north of Fort Wayne! Not one of the smarter things I ever did, granted.......
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
