Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Is it possible for us to all get along and advocate for cyclists?

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Is it possible for us to all get along and advocate for cyclists?

Old 03-20-07, 06:31 PM
  #26  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In the real world, yes. On an Internet forum, no.
sbhikes is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 06:32 PM
  #27  
Striving for Fredness
 
deputyjones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,190

Bikes: Old Giant Rincon

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
Of course I won't work for what you imagine to be "the greater good" when I believe both that it is not and that it is against my interests (and yours). That would be truly irrational.

I'll continue to work vigorously to oppose measures I believe to be ill-conceived.
What about this thread or what it would attempt to do is against your best interest? The only thing that has been asked so far is that we try to come up with some sort of compromise and for you to "lose the arrogant a-hole attitude". Seems pretty reasonable to me.
deputyjones is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 06:47 PM
  #28  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: clipped in & pedaling
Posts: 283

Bikes: jamis dakar xlt 1.9, weyless sp

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
I think every word I've posted here is exactly on-topic. Perhaps you believe it is off-topic to answer the OP in the negative?
no--every word you've posted here is NOT on topic -- what does your assessment of chip's behavior have to do with whether or not we can all come together? if you have a problem with chip, then you have a problem that YOU need to work out. and what I IMAGINE is the greater good is open to compromise...unlike you, obviously.

you're free to say, "no we can't." do so, and move on; there are others of us who disagree, and might actually come together and make a step in the right direction, whatever it may be.
bigpedaler is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:01 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Tempe, AZ
Posts: 2,968
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oh, yeah, I forgot about the Chip comment.
Kal, that's going on your permanent record!
and you're banned from Delta House.
__________________
"Think of bicycles as rideable art that can just about save the world". ~Grant Petersen

Cyclists fare best when they recognize that there are times when acting vehicularly is not the best practice, and are flexible enough to do what is necessary as the situation warrants.--Me
rando is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:03 PM
  #30  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
When will you be adopting this practice yourself, Chip?
The quoted post, my friends, is a good example of what we want to avoid...it is an attempt to disrupt and bait, rather than commit to discussion towards compromise.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey

Last edited by chipcom; 03-20-07 at 07:10 PM.
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:07 PM
  #31  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by randya
Chip, you've had some governing experience, I think you should take a stab at drafting a resolution, complete with a section of whereas's and therefore be it resolved's, that spells out the agreements and disagreements between the VCers and the rest of us, and which concludes with some concrete resolutions in which we can all agree to what we have in common and gives some direction towards addressing what we still don't know and/or disagree on. Then maybe we can put all this idiocy to rest and move on in a positive fashion.
In the words of the immortal Doctor 'Bones' McCoy...
"Damn it Jim, I'm a doctor, not a busboy!"

I don't think any resolution of that type would have much value. I think a commitment to compromise and not get baited into BS, followed by discussion of a specfic issue of contention, might be more appropriate and would spare us all my long-winded oration.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:08 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
kalliergo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 708

Bikes: Trek Valencia+, Dutch cargo bike, Karate Monkey, etc.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
You see my commitment...where is yours?
I have never engaged in the kind of angry, insulting behavior I've complained about, not even in my most frustrated responses to vicious attacks.

I will continue to be as respectful as I can, while arguing vigorously the points and issues I consider important. I will also continue to point out, and object to, childish nastiness.
kalliergo is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:12 PM
  #33  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
Chip's "olive branch" will be meaningful when his nasty, assaultive behavior changes. Not before.
The commitment is in black and white. Can we expect yours?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:23 PM
  #34  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by randya
I think you're misjudging Chip, and failing to account for your own lousy attitude; anyway, DJ's comment was aimed at me, not Chip; Chip is being good with the olive branch.
I think you're misjudging Chip, and perhaps yourself.

Originally Posted by chipcom
Lord knows most of us, especially me, seem to not be able to just ignore the BS and continue with an otherwise productive discussion.
Until Chipcom stops seeing the VC perspective as "BS", and you recognize him referring to it as "BS" is not "being good with the olive branch", a future of getting along does not look good.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:24 PM
  #35  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
I have never engaged in the kind of angry, insulting behavior I've complained about, not even in my most frustrated responses to vicious attacks.

I will continue to be as respectful as I can, while arguing vigorously the points and issues I consider important. I will also continue to point out, and object to, childish nastiness.
I won't comment on your behavior in other threads, but I will ask that you confirm if the following quote is your attitude on this subject:
Originally Posted by kalliergo
Of course I won't work for what you imagine to be "the greater good" when I believe both that it is not and that it is against my interests (and yours). That would be truly irrational.

I'll continue to work vigorously to oppose measures I believe to be ill-conceived.
This does not indicate a commitment to compromise. Would you like to take this opportunity to restate your position?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:25 PM
  #36  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,957

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,527 Times in 1,040 Posts
Originally Posted by kalliergo
Of course I won't work for what you imagine to be "the greater good" when I believe both that it is not and that it is against my interests (and yours). That would be truly irrational.

I'll continue to work vigorously to oppose measures I believe to be ill-conceived.
There is one firm answer to the OP's question. No surprise.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:27 PM
  #37  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
I think you're misjudging Chip, and perhaps yourself.


Until Chipcom stops seeing the VC perspective as "BS", and you recognize him referring to it as "BS" is not "being good with the olive branch", a future of getting along does not look good.
The BS is not vehicular cycling...the BS is what threads turn into that we are GOING to avoid. We have you down as a NO as wanting to participate and make the same commitment that I have. Would you like to take this opportunity to restate your position?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:29 PM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696

Bikes: who cares?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Arrogance and self-assured self-righteousness seems to be the commonality amongst all the VC proponents. Perhaps that's the only thing that keeps these guys going (and it's always guys, I have yet to see one woman advocate for VC). I will continue to mock it whenever and wherever I see it; it won't always be pretty, and sometimes it will even be childish.

randya is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:30 PM
  #39  
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,957

Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,527 Times in 1,040 Posts
Originally Posted by sbhikes
In the real world, yes. On an Internet forum, no.
I've got to agree with you. In the real world such arrogance/obnoxiousness as proudly displayed on this thread is not tolerated for long by any organization that has a say in its membership.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:30 PM
  #40  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike
There is one firm answer to the OP's question. No surprise.
To be fair, in the context of what we are discussing - commitment to compromise and not getting baited into the usual BS, how say ye, I-Like-To-Bike? Ya know what they say, what's good for the goose...
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:32 PM
  #41  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
You guys are falling into the same old trap. You're letting people bait you into the same old BS. Don't go into the light, Carol Anne!

For the benefit of Diane and others, this commitment is not trying to bind you from doing whatever the heck you want in other threads, but in the threads designed to look for compromise, it's going to be a requirement to participate. No tickee, no washee in those threads. If it carries over to others, all the better (I'm sure Joe and the mods will appreciate it), but nobody is trying to run your life outside of a few selected threads...kinda like we tried for AS.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:33 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696

Bikes: who cares?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Ooops!
randya is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:46 PM
  #43  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Not sure that I got your 'loyalty oath' in the vault yet, Randy.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:55 PM
  #44  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sorry I didn't realize this thread was about all of us trying to get along and advocate for cyclists. I find it hard to keep up with all that's actually said lately.

I still don't think it's possible to get along and advocate given the venue (Internet forum) and the people involved. I do know that in my real world, there are people among the Bicycle Coalition who are John Forester/John Allen VC cyclists, but when we get together for meetings those people don't argue like people do here. I don't know why that is, but maybe they are smarter than the Internet variety of JF/JA acolytes.

In any case, I put K on ignore one day after he joined this forum. As soon as I realized what he was all about. Sock-puppet nasty alter-ego of HH. I recommend it.
sbhikes is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 07:57 PM
  #45  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rando
Mkay, seems like there's two definite "no" votes, one from HH, one from Kal.
thanks for your input, guys.
My vote is not a definite "no". I simply explained why I don't see much common ground. If someone disagrees, I'd love to be shown that I'm wrong, and my reasoning is flawed.

Originally Posted by chipcom
The BS is not vehicular cycling...the BS is what threads turn into that we are GOING to avoid.
Fair enough. I misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying for me. And I applaud your efforts to avoid the usual BS here.

We have you down as a NO as wanting to participate and make the same commitment that I have. Would you like to take this opportunity to restate your position?
Again, I'd love to be shown my reasoning in #4 is flawed.

But no one except for Kal has even addressed that post, much less explained how it might be flawed.
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 08:02 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
barba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Helmet Head
Advocating for more cyclists is also a relatively low priority, particularly considering that more cyclists probably means more cyclists doing stupid stuff out there, and making acceptance of cyclists on roadways less tolerable for many, and seem more dangerous that it is.
Are you serious?
barba is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 08:03 PM
  #47  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
HH, refer to post number 6 and let us know if you are in or out. Thanks.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 08:04 PM
  #48  
Banned.
 
Helmet Head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13,075
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by randya
(and it's always guys, I have yet to see one woman advocate for VC).
See https://www.cyclemedia.org (the website of Ms. Lauren Cooper, Teacher & Vehicular Cyclist)
Helmet Head is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 08:07 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
randya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696

Bikes: who cares?

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chipcom
Not sure that I got your 'loyalty oath' in the vault yet, Randy.
see post #38

randya is offline  
Old 03-20-07, 08:08 PM
  #50  
Dominatrikes
 
sbhikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Still in Santa Barbara
Posts: 4,920

Bikes: Catrike Pocket, Lightning Thunderbold recumbent, Trek 3000 MTB.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Advocating for more cyclists is the only reason to advocate for cycling, in my opinion. Otherwise it's just an act of self-gratification.
sbhikes is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.