Vancouver WA Poised to Enact All-Ages Helmet Law
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Vancouver WA Poised to Enact All-Ages Helmet Law
Originally Posted by BikePortland.org
Last night, Vancouver City Council decided to postpone their vote on a new helmet ordinance. The ordinance, which initially sought to only apply to kids under 18 years old, is now likely to apply to everyone.
Jan Bader at the City Manager’s office told me that the Council did not pass the ordinance last night and instead, “sent it back to staff for revisions to make it all ages.”
“We’re going to rework it,” she said, “and look at suggestions from testimony received last night from local bike clubs.”
One of those clubs is the Vancouver Bicycle Club. I spoke to club President Corey Rose yesterday. He said “I just think everyone on a bike should have a helmet,” and he confirmed that the club sent a letter recommending the all-ages provision to Council.
City Manager Bader added that she thinks the Council is unanimous in its support for an all-ages provision and that the issue will likely be back in front of council for a vote by the end of February.
Jan Bader at the City Manager’s office told me that the Council did not pass the ordinance last night and instead, “sent it back to staff for revisions to make it all ages.”
“We’re going to rework it,” she said, “and look at suggestions from testimony received last night from local bike clubs.”
One of those clubs is the Vancouver Bicycle Club. I spoke to club President Corey Rose yesterday. He said “I just think everyone on a bike should have a helmet,” and he confirmed that the club sent a letter recommending the all-ages provision to Council.
City Manager Bader added that she thinks the Council is unanimous in its support for an all-ages provision and that the issue will likely be back in front of council for a vote by the end of February.
https://bikeportland.org/2008/01/29/v...es-helmet-law/
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
They should be repealing the mandatory helmet laws up there, not adding new ones.
Robert
The Industrialized Cyclist
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Vancouver Bicycle Club President Corey Rose
I just think everyone on a bike should have a helmet
Maybe I should try to make it a law.
#4
Rider
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Exactly. Helmet laws increase gross head injury rates and reduce bicycling, hardly things we should be supporting.
Forcing bike helmets=more injuries, and less bicyclists. Also, bike helmets=kiss your bikeshare program goodbye, as has happened in a couple cities. 'Hey, we want to increase livability with rental bikes like we see in bike-friendly European cities! Um... but we can't rent hygenic helmets at the same time. Damn all!'
I don't wear a helmet; helmets screw up my layering strategies, and they're no more helpful on a bicycle than they are driving a car. car drivers should be forced to wear helmets before bikes should; they get all sorts of head injuries.
The correlation is demonstrated all the time, but people still want to make it a law to stick a piece of plastic on your head like it will make you safe. Why don't they mandate something like effective lights or reflective clothing? Those would save a hell of a lot more lives than helmets would, no matter how you slice the numbers. I'd support an ANSI vest law long before a helmet law. Why doesn't anyone try to push an ANSI reflective clothing law somewhere? How about legal standards for head and tail lights? We all see some stupidly huge correlations in that regard.
Forcing bike helmets=more injuries, and less bicyclists. Also, bike helmets=kiss your bikeshare program goodbye, as has happened in a couple cities. 'Hey, we want to increase livability with rental bikes like we see in bike-friendly European cities! Um... but we can't rent hygenic helmets at the same time. Damn all!'
I don't wear a helmet; helmets screw up my layering strategies, and they're no more helpful on a bicycle than they are driving a car. car drivers should be forced to wear helmets before bikes should; they get all sorts of head injuries.
The correlation is demonstrated all the time, but people still want to make it a law to stick a piece of plastic on your head like it will make you safe. Why don't they mandate something like effective lights or reflective clothing? Those would save a hell of a lot more lives than helmets would, no matter how you slice the numbers. I'd support an ANSI vest law long before a helmet law. Why doesn't anyone try to push an ANSI reflective clothing law somewhere? How about legal standards for head and tail lights? We all see some stupidly huge correlations in that regard.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Three questions:
Aren't head and tail lights from dusk to dawn mandatory already?
What's the source for the claim about increases to gross head injury rates?
What's a "layering strategy"?
Aren't head and tail lights from dusk to dawn mandatory already?
What's the source for the claim about increases to gross head injury rates?
What's a "layering strategy"?
#6
Bent_Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: SF Bay area
Posts: 1,248
Bikes: Bacchetta Aero, BikeE, Bruce Gordon Rock n Road
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That sucks, definitely anti-bike, and will be used selectively. And how can a locality such as a city make such a law anyhow, what about riders coming from other places, are they supposed to get a helmet when they enter the town.
If they want to make cycling safe, just slow down the motor traffic, hold drivers strictly liable for any injury to cyclist or ped. Permanent revocation of driving privileges for DUI's.
If they want to make cycling safe, just slow down the motor traffic, hold drivers strictly liable for any injury to cyclist or ped. Permanent revocation of driving privileges for DUI's.
#7
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Why just the opnions of bicycle clubs ?
Bicycle clubs hardly represent the interests of
any majority.
Lets get the NRA to write up some gun laws or developers
to design infrastructure while we're at it
Bicycle clubs hardly represent the interests of
any majority.
Lets get the NRA to write up some gun laws or developers
to design infrastructure while we're at it
__________________
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
#9
♋ ☮♂ ☭ ☯
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 40205 'ViLLeBiLLie
Posts: 7,902
Bikes: Sngl Spd's, 70's- 80's vintage, D-tube Folder
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
'zackily !
See how well its working out ?
See how well its working out ?
__________________
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
☞-ADVOCACY-☜ Radical VC = Car people on bikes. Just say "NO"
#10
Rider
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Matanuska-Susitna Borough, AK
Posts: 1,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
2: New York Times article. I saw it in a different form before, I currently see it at https://bicycleuniverse.info/eqp/helmets-nyt.html They reduce the severity of head injuries, but they increase the rate of all injuries, so they mitigate better against head injuries that statistical evidence indicates would not have happened otherwise. This is, I might add, the same thing that I saw in studying motorcycle helmets in college in a statistics course.
3: I live in Alaska. I commute. I have to adjust my clothes based on the weather. Helmets make it really damned hard to keep my ears warm unless I wear balaclavas that are far too uncomfortably warm for the weather that day; I often wear a fleece ear covering that does NOT work with a helmet (i've tried) in order to keep my head uncovered so that I will be losing heat more controllably, given the difficulty of adding and removing layers under a reflective vest and windshell compared to pausing briefly to switch hats.
I consider helmet law afficionadoes to be "The Enemy". I'm doing my damnedest to get people out of their cars and onto bikes, and the helmet law people are doing their damnedest to get people off of their bikes and into cars. It really is that simple; there are a lot of things that can be done to increase bike safety that would be more effective and less damaging to bike ridership than helmets, but I don't see people pushing hard for them, I mostly see the car lobby pushing harder for bike helmets and drowning anyone else out. Where are my mandatory bike safety courses in driver ed and schools? Where are my standards for head and tail light visibility? A TOY safety standard? What a joke. Where is my requirement for ANSI reflective materials on the outer layer of bike clothes? Where are my police flashing lights at people biking against traffic? All those things would save a hell of a lot of lives. Helmets? If those were HALF as effective as any of the things I just listed would be at saving lives, there WOULDN'T BE ANY CONTROVERSY.
#13
Cycle Year Round
Everyone should watch the video of the council meeting to see how foolish these people are (including the cycling club members). Only one person even knew the ANSI standard included in the law has been outdated for several years.
https://www.cityofvancouver.us/cvtv/c..._Ordinance.wmv
https://www.cityofvancouver.us/cvtv/c..._Ordinance.wmv
#16
Senior Member
that's one thing I've learned through all my helmet postings. Even if a person is very pro-helmet, it's most likely that he/she is pro-choice. I've found very few pro adult helmet law types..
These days, after the examples of all the various places where they have enacted a MHL law, you've got to wonder where this MHL lobby comes from? I think there are various interests involved that don't include promoting cycling as a safe, viable means of transportation.
In Canada, there hasn't been a MHL for adults enacted in years and we were the first ones (outside of NZ and Australia) to go with them. After the first 4 provinces passed the laws, 6 have turned them down. The helmet lobby switched directions are trying to get cities to pass by laws, but after a couple passed them, now they are being turned down now too. The latest city to turn one down was Saskatoon and the city council there turned it down because of input from the public. Councilors said in media after the defeat of the by law that they were amazed at how much opposition there was to the proposed by law. They had no idea the public felt that way. They just knew what the lobbyists told them.
Funny to see one of the main sponsors of the helmet lobby group was Bell Sports.
These days, after the examples of all the various places where they have enacted a MHL law, you've got to wonder where this MHL lobby comes from? I think there are various interests involved that don't include promoting cycling as a safe, viable means of transportation.
In Canada, there hasn't been a MHL for adults enacted in years and we were the first ones (outside of NZ and Australia) to go with them. After the first 4 provinces passed the laws, 6 have turned them down. The helmet lobby switched directions are trying to get cities to pass by laws, but after a couple passed them, now they are being turned down now too. The latest city to turn one down was Saskatoon and the city council there turned it down because of input from the public. Councilors said in media after the defeat of the by law that they were amazed at how much opposition there was to the proposed by law. They had no idea the public felt that way. They just knew what the lobbyists told them.
Funny to see one of the main sponsors of the helmet lobby group was Bell Sports.
#17
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
To me, the larger issue is whether any city should have the authority to make its own traffic rules, including mandatory helmet laws. I thought that was, with good reason, the purview of the states, with some federal guidance.
Consider the plight of an unhelmeted nonresident adult bicyclist approaching Vancouver to pass through town -- shall we help the Sheriff assemble a posse to head him off at the pass, arrest him at the city limits, or perhaps run him out of town on a rail?
___
Disclosure: I strongly advocate helmet use for those who do not practice risk compensation, and I always practice what I preach. I equally strongly oppose mandatory helmet laws.
Consider the plight of an unhelmeted nonresident adult bicyclist approaching Vancouver to pass through town -- shall we help the Sheriff assemble a posse to head him off at the pass, arrest him at the city limits, or perhaps run him out of town on a rail?
___
Disclosure: I strongly advocate helmet use for those who do not practice risk compensation, and I always practice what I preach. I equally strongly oppose mandatory helmet laws.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#18
Banned.
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: western Washington
Posts: 293
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This idea is a bunch of horse feces--a helmet law without much tougher control over the behavior of motor vehicle operators is like asking women to wear chastity belts to reduce ****. Break the behavior of drivers first, then worry about what safety equipment is used by bicyclists.
#19
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
This idea is a bunch of horse feces--a helmet law without much tougher control over the behavior of motor vehicle operators is like asking women to wear chastity belts to reduce ****. Break the behavior of drivers first, then worry about what safety equipment is used by bicyclists.
When in Oulu Finland, I asked about helmets, and was told that they are recommended, but not mandatory, and few few people wore them.
But here in AutoAmerica, helmets are practically mandatory.
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
3: I live in Alaska. I commute. I have to adjust my clothes based on the weather. Helmets make it really damned hard to keep my ears warm unless I wear balaclavas that are far too uncomfortably warm for the weather that day; I often wear a fleece ear covering that does NOT work with a helmet (i've tried) in order to keep my head uncovered so that I will be losing heat more controllably, given the difficulty of adding and removing layers under a reflective vest and windshell compared to pausing briefly to switch hats.
#21
Pwnerer
I'm sure that many cyclists that have studied this issue for any time would come to the same conclusion: Making criminals out of anyone not wearing a helmet benefits only the municipal courts by the fines it generates (and it's questionable whether that will even cover the costs of enforcement), manufacturers of helmets and the insurance companies that will no longer have to pay out on claims because the injured party was breaking the law. Like many "good ideas" that are made into law by those that do not engage in the activity subject to the law, all this will accomplish is marginalizing the cycling populace even further.
If Corey Rose feels that every cyclist should have a helmet, he should buy them one out of his own pocket, educate them on proper usage and pay for any claims should it fail to protect them as promised.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,063
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
3: I live in Alaska. I commute. I have to adjust my clothes based on the weather. Helmets make it really damned hard to keep my ears warm unless I wear balaclavas that are far too uncomfortably warm for the weather that day; I often wear a fleece ear covering that does NOT work with a helmet (i've tried) in order to keep my head uncovered so that I will be losing heat more controllably, given the difficulty of adding and removing layers under a reflective vest and windshell compared to pausing briefly to switch hats.
My snowsports helmet says it is okay for bicycle use, however it is more than a few years old. Most of the newer snowsports helmets I see are explicitly stated "NOT for bicycle use".
I've also seen a few bicycle helmet manufacturers give a temperature range for bike helmets, and the range rarely runs down to the freezing mark.
It seems unlikely that a mandatory bicycle helmet law would take any of this into account.
#23
Senior Member
Here, in BC where it is law to wear a helmet, if you are not wearing one and are involved in a collision and receive a head injury, insurance will not cover the injury to the head no matter what the circumstances or where the blame lies in the collision.
Head injuries can cost a lot to treat and despite the makers of helmets stating clearly and legally (read the disclaimers in the box and on the stickers in the helmet) that a bicycle helmet is not made to withstand these types of impacts, insurance will not compensate the cyclist.
It's all about money.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,508
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
that's a significant point.
Here, in BC where it is law to wear a helmet, if you are not wearing one and are involved in a collision and receive a head injury, insurance will not cover the injury to the head no matter what the circumstances or where the blame lies in the collision.
Head injuries can cost a lot to treat and despite the makers of helmets stating clearly and legally (read the disclaimers in the box and on the stickers in the helmet) that a bicycle helmet is not made to withstand these types of impacts, insurance will not compensate the cyclist.
It's all about money.
Here, in BC where it is law to wear a helmet, if you are not wearing one and are involved in a collision and receive a head injury, insurance will not cover the injury to the head no matter what the circumstances or where the blame lies in the collision.
Head injuries can cost a lot to treat and despite the makers of helmets stating clearly and legally (read the disclaimers in the box and on the stickers in the helmet) that a bicycle helmet is not made to withstand these types of impacts, insurance will not compensate the cyclist.
It's all about money.
#25
Senior Member
did I also mention that a cyclist not only faces a fine for going helmetless, the police can seize the bicycle too (to protect the cyclist from himself).
Break other laws (wrong side of the road, no lights, going through a red light, etc, etc,) and they can't. But they can without a lid. The local cycling advocacy reviewed the legislation and decided to keep that part in. Some "advocates", eh?
Break other laws (wrong side of the road, no lights, going through a red light, etc, etc,) and they can't. But they can without a lid. The local cycling advocacy reviewed the legislation and decided to keep that part in. Some "advocates", eh?