Sharrow lane width recomendations
#1
-=Barry=-
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Sharrow lane width recomendations
One of the cool things about Sharrows is they can be used irregardless of lane width and the do something positive for biking. But it looks like the accompanying documentation does not specify the minimal lane width where the Sharrows will function well to create some extra space for cyclists.
My observations is that on lanes 10' or less Sharrows encourage liner lane sharing and on 12' or more you get a fuzzy bike lane with sharrows. A problem has come up where the city might be changing lane widths from 10' inside and 12' outside to 11' for both lanes and sharrows and personally I would like to keep the 10' 12' combo and add sharrows to the 12' lane.
So the question is; is there any official documentation where wider lanes work better with sharrows. And as always I would be interested in your thoughts on lane widths and sharrows.
My observations is that on lanes 10' or less Sharrows encourage liner lane sharing and on 12' or more you get a fuzzy bike lane with sharrows. A problem has come up where the city might be changing lane widths from 10' inside and 12' outside to 11' for both lanes and sharrows and personally I would like to keep the 10' 12' combo and add sharrows to the 12' lane.
So the question is; is there any official documentation where wider lanes work better with sharrows. And as always I would be interested in your thoughts on lane widths and sharrows.
#2
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
i dont think the idea of a sharrow is 'creating extra space' for bicyclists, barry. You want cyclists and motorists to share a 12' lane side by side?
i believe sharrows will 'work' only on low speed 25-30 MPH, narrow laned roads with the sharrow centered in the lane, but that's my opinion.
locally the discussion has been on how far centered in the lanes they are; here in Seattle there is some movement to use both super sized sharrows as well as 'standard' size sharrows further out from their current placements...
i believe sharrows will 'work' only on low speed 25-30 MPH, narrow laned roads with the sharrow centered in the lane, but that's my opinion.
locally the discussion has been on how far centered in the lanes they are; here in Seattle there is some movement to use both super sized sharrows as well as 'standard' size sharrows further out from their current placements...
#3
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
i dont think the idea of a sharrow is 'creating extra space' for bicyclists, barry. You want cyclists and motorists to share a 12' lane side by side?
i believe sharrows will 'work' only on low speed 25-30 MPH, narrow laned roads with the sharrow centered in the lane, but that's my opinion.
locally the discussion has been on how far centered in the lanes they are; here in Seattle there is some movement to use both super sized sharrows as well as 'standard' size sharrows further out from their current placements...
i believe sharrows will 'work' only on low speed 25-30 MPH, narrow laned roads with the sharrow centered in the lane, but that's my opinion.
locally the discussion has been on how far centered in the lanes they are; here in Seattle there is some movement to use both super sized sharrows as well as 'standard' size sharrows further out from their current placements...
Al
#4
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
regarding traffic flow, noisebeam, the general consensus is that at higher speed differentials, greater traffic seperation is desired for all sorts of reasons.
this is widely accpeted in the transportation engineering community.
Sharrows in the USA need to morph into unmistakeable signs to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists have FULL use of the lane.
this is widely accpeted in the transportation engineering community.
Sharrows in the USA need to morph into unmistakeable signs to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists have FULL use of the lane.
#5
feros ferio
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,796
Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;
Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1392 Post(s)
Liked 1,324 Times
in
836 Posts
I concur w/ Bekologist.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
#6
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
regarding traffic flow, noisebeam, the general consensus is that at higher speed differentials, greater traffic seperation is desired for all sorts of reasons.
this is widely accpeted in the transportation engineering community.
Sharrows in the USA need to morph into unmistakeable signs to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists have FULL use of the lane.
this is widely accpeted in the transportation engineering community.
Sharrows in the USA need to morph into unmistakeable signs to both drivers and bicyclists that bicyclists have FULL use of the lane.
Al
#7
Part-time epistemologist
I don't know whether SHARROWs actually help people who need it -- that is, will an inexperienced cyclist actually move further away from the curb over the arrow? -- but in the few places that I have seen them here and in Santa Fe, they do seem to provide a signal to drivers that "yes, HPVs are supposed to be here."
Regarding width and placement on a narrow lane, roughly speaking, I would paint it 4-5 feet wide in a right-centerish position with no part of the arrow within 2-feet of the curb.
EDIT: I guess the other advantage is that SHARROWs are presumably cheaper to implement and maintain.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#8
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
sending the signal the cyclist should be in the right side of a narrow lane is not the message to be sent out about unshareable, substandard width lanes. off centered sharrows do not provide the message 'full use of lane'.
#9
Part-time epistemologist
I write right-centerish since, anecdotally, you are not going to get inexperienced cyclists to ride there regardless of signage, special arrows, or diety intervention. An experienced cyclist will often slide over either by preference or necessity with or without the SHARROW.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#10
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Al
#11
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times
in
3,158 Posts
Agreed, not to mention the misinterpretation of StR... "hey cyclist, move over... you're supposed to share..."
#12
Arizona Dessert
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030
Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times
in
1,288 Posts
Al
#13
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
i can't find any specific reference to recommended lane width for sharrows except for blanket statements like 'designed to be placed in lanes too narrow to be safely shared'.
since these are experimental in the US in about a dozen cities so far, perhaps some forward thinking municipal planners have a developing standard? I'd cull Sheboygan and the other cities for any design recommendations.
since these are experimental in the US in about a dozen cities so far, perhaps some forward thinking municipal planners have a developing standard? I'd cull Sheboygan and the other cities for any design recommendations.
#14
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Around here (DC and Arlington, VA) sharrows are misused to create "back-door" bike lanes on roads that are too narrow for a bike lane. The sharrow is painted next to the gutter in 11' or narrower lanes. On North Harrison Street in Arlington they've even put a "bike lane" sign next to a lane painted that way.
The DC DOT has a Bicycle Facility Design Guide (available at https://ddot.dc.gov/ddot/cwp/view,a,1245,q,640118.asp) that specifies the symbol be centered 4' from the curb without parking, 11' with parking -- even if that means putting it in the parking lane.
Some people just don't get it.
The DC DOT has a Bicycle Facility Design Guide (available at https://ddot.dc.gov/ddot/cwp/view,a,1245,q,640118.asp) that specifies the symbol be centered 4' from the curb without parking, 11' with parking -- even if that means putting it in the parking lane.
Some people just don't get it.
__________________
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
#15
Part-time epistemologist
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#16
Part-time epistemologist
Around here (DC and Arlington, VA) sharrows are misused to create "back-door" bike lanes on roads that are too narrow for a bike lane. The sharrow is painted next to the gutter in 11' or narrower lanes. On North Harrison Street in Arlington they've even put a "bike lane" sign next to a lane painted that way.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#17
-=Barry=-
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
The design specs of sharrows is such that they are placed on the right side of the lane. As much as I or anyone else would like to see sharrows in the center lane position that really is not in the stars for this treatment in the near future. So IMHO any discussion about better positioning of sharrows in the lane is mute in this thread.
So far I have not experienced any real significant negative influence of sharrows on "proper" VC style. What I have experienced is this type of "bike facility" on narrow lanes is not that effective in getting more people out on bikes (but it's still early in the season so who knows.)
So what I am thinking is if sharrows are not performing well on narrow lanes to get more people out on bikes (and is not needed for the VC) so perhaps some other treatment might be preferred on narrow lanes or narrow lanes could be widened a bit.
I will also note to my DC brethren that are concerned about side by side sharing in a 12' lane, DC law does not allow you to take the lane unless the lane is less then 12' wide.
So far I have not experienced any real significant negative influence of sharrows on "proper" VC style. What I have experienced is this type of "bike facility" on narrow lanes is not that effective in getting more people out on bikes (but it's still early in the season so who knows.)
So what I am thinking is if sharrows are not performing well on narrow lanes to get more people out on bikes (and is not needed for the VC) so perhaps some other treatment might be preferred on narrow lanes or narrow lanes could be widened a bit.
I will also note to my DC brethren that are concerned about side by side sharing in a 12' lane, DC law does not allow you to take the lane unless the lane is less then 12' wide.
#18
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
Why????
super sized sharrows are being considered for Seattle streets, Barry. Sharrows ARE experimental in about 10(?) cities right now, perhaps Toole Design could help with more forward thinking sharrow placement, they are currently advising many US cities with bicycle master plans and are forward thinking transportation engineers....
www.tooledesign.com
and a DC requirement to always share lanes that are over 12 feet wide? I'd be ignoring that 'rule' left and right. aren't there exemptions for unsafe lane conditions, turning traffic, avoiding obstacles... most of these 'requirements' have multiple conditionals that allow cyclists full use of any traffic lane regardless of width.
super sized sharrows are being considered for Seattle streets, Barry. Sharrows ARE experimental in about 10(?) cities right now, perhaps Toole Design could help with more forward thinking sharrow placement, they are currently advising many US cities with bicycle master plans and are forward thinking transportation engineers....
www.tooledesign.com
and a DC requirement to always share lanes that are over 12 feet wide? I'd be ignoring that 'rule' left and right. aren't there exemptions for unsafe lane conditions, turning traffic, avoiding obstacles... most of these 'requirements' have multiple conditionals that allow cyclists full use of any traffic lane regardless of width.
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-15-08 at 11:25 AM.
#19
Part-time epistemologist
I forget the details ... I believe that there are the typical exemptions. But yes ... we ignore the rule often.
__________________
A narrative on bicycle driving.
A narrative on bicycle driving.
#20
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
so let's see...lanes less that 12 feet wide, DC bicyclists are required to take a full lane? And sharrows are pretty much indicated only in lanes too narrow to be shared safely??
Seems a very compelling reason to have sharrow placements moved to the left a few feet IMO, and now is the time to lobby for it!! in cities that are adopting MUTCD standards for sharrows.
remember, too, municipalities are generally NOT liable for design standards in excess of MUTCD designations. or so I've read, let me search for that article...
Seems a very compelling reason to have sharrow placements moved to the left a few feet IMO, and now is the time to lobby for it!! in cities that are adopting MUTCD standards for sharrows.
remember, too, municipalities are generally NOT liable for design standards in excess of MUTCD designations. or so I've read, let me search for that article...
#21
-=Barry=-
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why????
super sized sharrows are being considered for Seattle streets, Barry. Sharrows ARE experimental in about 10(?) cities right now, perhaps Toole Design could help with more forward thinking sharrow placement, they are currently advising many US cities with bicycle master plans and are forward thinking transportation engineers....
www.tooledesign.com
and a DC requirement to always share lanes that are over 12 feet wide? I'd be ignoring that 'rule' left and right. aren't there exemptions for unsafe lane conditions, turning traffic, avoiding obstacles... most of these 'requirements' have multiple conditionals that allow cyclists full use of any traffic lane regardless of width.
super sized sharrows are being considered for Seattle streets, Barry. Sharrows ARE experimental in about 10(?) cities right now, perhaps Toole Design could help with more forward thinking sharrow placement, they are currently advising many US cities with bicycle master plans and are forward thinking transportation engineers....
www.tooledesign.com
and a DC requirement to always share lanes that are over 12 feet wide? I'd be ignoring that 'rule' left and right. aren't there exemptions for unsafe lane conditions, turning traffic, avoiding obstacles... most of these 'requirements' have multiple conditionals that allow cyclists full use of any traffic lane regardless of width.
Super Sized Sharrows are not regular sized sharrows which is why they are different.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: in bed with your mom
Posts: 13,696
Bikes: who cares?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have no idea what the MUTCD actually says about positioning of sharrows in the lane; however, for maximum effectiveness, sharrows should be placed in the middle of the lane, and not in the right tire track position, IMO.
#23
52-week commuter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,929
Bikes: Redline Conquest, Cannonday, Specialized, RANS
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
What's interesting is the design guide does not show any examples of sharrows on lanes less than 12' wide. The presumption in the design guide is that cyclists will ride in the door zone when parking is present.
__________________
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
The United States of America is the only democratic nation in the world to deny citizens living in the nation's capital representation in the national legislature. District residents have no vote in either the U.S. Senate or U.S. House of Representatives. www.dcvote.org
#24
totally louche
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023
Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
9 Posts
I think the MUTCD will be adopting the guidelines that the edge of sharrows allow 2 and a half feet for the door zone in edge striped parking, minimum of 11 feet from edge of unstriped parking.
The problem Seattle is running into is the 11 feet minimum. cars commonly park out past their expected footprints, leaving sharrows in the door zone.
Barry, check out this legal opinion re: federal design mandates on communities.....
https://www.planetizen.com/node/30681
I see absolutely no compelling reason why a community could not redesign sharrows to be larger and centered in the lane as the design intent of sharrows is indicating cyclist road position in lanes too narrow to be safely shared, meaning, bikes should be riding center lane......
it looks to be a flawed implementation, Barry, if sharrows are morphing into side of road designators in marginally wide lanes. Sharrows have the planned use for marking lanes too narrow to be safely shared on roads also too narrow to allow implementation of well designed bike lane infrastructure.
in fact, the design mandate states they may be placed further than 11 feet from the curb, so there's even allowances to have sharrows centered in the lane!
and noisebeam, sharrows will not be recommended on streets over 35 MPH. seems the traffic engineers still got some sense, eh!
The problem Seattle is running into is the 11 feet minimum. cars commonly park out past their expected footprints, leaving sharrows in the door zone.
Barry, check out this legal opinion re: federal design mandates on communities.....
https://www.planetizen.com/node/30681
I see absolutely no compelling reason why a community could not redesign sharrows to be larger and centered in the lane as the design intent of sharrows is indicating cyclist road position in lanes too narrow to be safely shared, meaning, bikes should be riding center lane......
it looks to be a flawed implementation, Barry, if sharrows are morphing into side of road designators in marginally wide lanes. Sharrows have the planned use for marking lanes too narrow to be safely shared on roads also too narrow to allow implementation of well designed bike lane infrastructure.
in fact, the design mandate states they may be placed further than 11 feet from the curb, so there's even allowances to have sharrows centered in the lane!
and noisebeam, sharrows will not be recommended on streets over 35 MPH. seems the traffic engineers still got some sense, eh!
Last edited by Bekologist; 05-15-08 at 09:40 PM.
#25
-=Barry=-
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD +/- ~100 miles
Posts: 4,077
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Good points all.
To DCCommuter: As long as you are aware that additional proof may be required in order to legally take the lane in a over 11' lane in DC.
To Bek: All good points but what do you see the advantage of a centered positioned sharrow over a BMUFL sign (Bikes May Use Full Lane) or the standard share the road signs?
For those of you who want to officially comment on Sharrows I'll direct you here: https://www.baltimorespokes.org/artic...80330163659675
And getting back to my problem in more general terms what would be the best treatment for two travel lanes (same direction) with 22' of ROW with the right lane used as off peak parking and the speed limit is 35mph (major arterial.)
To DCCommuter: As long as you are aware that additional proof may be required in order to legally take the lane in a over 11' lane in DC.
To Bek: All good points but what do you see the advantage of a centered positioned sharrow over a BMUFL sign (Bikes May Use Full Lane) or the standard share the road signs?
For those of you who want to officially comment on Sharrows I'll direct you here: https://www.baltimorespokes.org/artic...80330163659675
And getting back to my problem in more general terms what would be the best treatment for two travel lanes (same direction) with 22' of ROW with the right lane used as off peak parking and the speed limit is 35mph (major arterial.)