Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Drift happens / Hit and run in bike lane / San Diego

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Drift happens / Hit and run in bike lane / San Diego

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-09, 11:52 PM
  #1  
Avatar out of order.
Thread Starter
 
MarkS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North of the border, just
Posts: 895

Bikes: Fuji Absolut '04 / Fuji 'Marlboro' Folder

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Drift happens / Hit and run in bike lane / San Diego

https://www3.signonsandiego.com/stori...-safety/?metro

Driver arrested, accused of hitting bicyclist, fleeing

MIRA MESA: A 19-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of felony hit-and-run yesterday morning after allegedly striking a bicyclist with her car and then returning to the scene a half-hour later, San Diego police said.

The woman was driving a Volvo on Calle Cristobal near Camino Miranda about 9:20 a.m. when she drifted into the bike lane and struck the bicyclist from behind, police said.

The bicyclist, 51, suffered a serious head injury, as well as injuries to his back and sides, and was hospitalized.

The driver didn't stop but returned to the scene 30 minutes later, when she was arrested. Alcohol did not appear to be a factor in the crash, police said. –K.D.
__________________
Cars kill 45,000 Americans every year.
This is like losing a war every year, except without the parades.
MarkS is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 12:05 AM
  #2  
Hello :D
 
kidonabike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 143
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im not surprised, everyone in mira mesa drives like crap.
kidonabike is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 03:03 PM
  #3  
SSP
Software for Cyclists
 
SSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Redding, California
Posts: 4,618

Bikes: Trek 5200, Specialized MTB

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Volvo's are the worst. I hope they check her cell phone records - I'd bet that she was talking or texting at the time of the incident.
SSP is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 03:04 PM
  #4  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by SSP
Volvo's are the worst. I hope they check her cell phone records - I'd bet that she was talking or texting at the time of the incident.
Apparently when she returned to the scene of the crime, she was yacking away on the cell phone... right up to the moment police took her away.
genec is offline  
Old 02-09-09, 05:47 PM
  #5  
Cycle Year Round
 
CB HI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 13,644
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1316 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 59 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Apparently when she returned to the scene of the crime, she was yacking away on the cell phone... right up to the moment police took her away.
Did she turn herself in, or was she just coming back to watch the pain and suffering she caused?

I was a secondary witness of two people that returned to a hit and run of a cyclist. I did not even know about the collision until after these 2 scum bags got in the car again and left.
CB HI is offline  
Old 02-10-09, 01:06 AM
  #6  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times in 2,510 Posts
this is reminiscent of the TOSROV incident where the woman "thought she hit a sign," but went home and then came back to check. It doesn't have to be a cellphone, there was an incident in California where a driver drifted onto the shoulder and severely injured a cyclist. The operating theory is that she was grabbing something to eat out of her recently purchased groceries.
unterhausen is offline  
Old 02-10-09, 07:48 AM
  #7  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
Did she turn herself in, or was she just coming back to watch the pain and suffering she caused?

I was a secondary witness of two people that returned to a hit and run of a cyclist. I did not even know about the collision until after these 2 scum bags got in the car again and left.
She just came back into the area. Apparently there were witnesses that reported the car and the police were investigating when she drove back to the scene...

I got this from an email that circulated via the local advocacy group.
On the morning of the incident we noticed a
helicopter and many police cars searching the area (we live about 2
miles west of the site). We were walking our dog on SV Blvd when a
police car pulled to the side, we thought he might be wanting to ask
us a question (we didn't yet know what was going on) - but he didn't,
he was waiting, and the driver soon pulled up behind him, seemingly
headed back toward the crash site. I saw the smashed in passenger
side windshield, and realized that she had probably hit a cyclist or
pedestrian. She was on her phone as she pulled up, and was still on
the phone as she got out and and approached the officer, mumbling
something about the reason she didn't stop being that she "was worried
she might get in trouble". At that point we thought maybe the crash
had just occurred, further down the hill in Sorrento Valley,
eastbound, but later we realized that was not consistent with how long
the search had been going on. By the time we were 100 yards further
along there were 5 police vehicles there. When we returned from our
walk, I walked back up that way and the vehicle and 3 police cars were
still there (again, this is 2 miles from the crash site), the driver
had been taken away.

Last edited by genec; 02-10-09 at 07:52 AM.
genec is offline  
Old 02-10-09, 08:42 AM
  #8  
totally louche
 
Bekologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: A land that time forgot
Posts: 18,023

Bikes: the ever shifting stable loaded with comfortable road bikes and city and winter bikes

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
driver, cellphone, or bikelane?

which was the greatest contributing factor to this incident?

I am confident (to use a catch phrase of John Forester below)

if the road users had been following the rules of the road for drivers of vehicles the rider would have been left unharmed in the preferred class lane.
Bekologist is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 11:55 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CB HI
Did she turn herself in, or was she just coming back to watch the pain and suffering she caused?

I was a secondary witness of two people that returned to a hit and run of a cyclist. I did not even know about the collision until after these 2 scum bags got in the car again and left.
Be a BPI

Was the car damaged they got into, you could have taken license plate #s of every one leaving the scene? Description of people?
That is all free.

Last edited by wheel; 02-11-09 at 12:00 PM.
wheel is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 12:03 PM
  #10  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
driver, cellphone, or bikelane?

which was the greatest contributing factor to this incident?

I am confident (to use a catch phrase of John Forester below)

if the road users had been following the rules of the road for drivers of vehicles the rider would have been left unharmed in the preferred class lane.
Well there are those that insist that the bike lane is to blame...

Personally I feel that regardless of the stripe, the cyclist would still be riding on the side of the road and would still be subject to motorist drift... especially in light of the cell phone use.
genec is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 12:05 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Well there are those that insist that the bike lane is to blame...

Personally I feel that regardless of the stripe, the cyclist would still be riding on the side of the road and would still be subject to motorist drift... especially in light of the cell phone use.
Not if it was a narrow lane.

To me this looks like the tunnel vision that is happening to our motorists. Only looking straight ahead.
wheel is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 12:24 PM
  #12  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by wheel
Not if it was a narrow lane.

To me this looks like the tunnel vision that is happening to our motorists. Only looking straight ahead.
Not a narrow lane... a fast modern divided arterial road... speed limit 45MPH near the accident scene, and 50MPH further on. Bike lanes are well marked. Visibility is pretty good, although there are some curve areas where the distance vis can be limited.

Road is fast downhill and very steep uphill... I don't know which way the cyclist was going.

You mentioned tunnel vision... tends to happen at higher speeds to all humans... not to mention the issues also associated with distraction by cell phone.
genec is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 12:29 PM
  #13  
feros ferio
 
John E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: www.ci.encinitas.ca.us
Posts: 21,793

Bikes: 1959 Capo Modell Campagnolo; 1960 Capo Sieger (2); 1962 Carlton Franco Suisse; 1970 Peugeot UO-8; 1982 Bianchi Campione d'Italia; 1988 Schwinn Project KOM-10;

Mentioned: 44 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1391 Post(s)
Liked 1,322 Times in 835 Posts
Originally Posted by wheel
Not if it was a narrow lane.

To me this looks like the tunnel vision that is happening to our motorists. Only looking straight ahead.
You are talking about a pretty extreme case of tunnel vision. If the motorist is centered in a 12-foot lane and the cyclist is centered in a 5-foot adjacent bike lane, the lateral displacement between the two is less than 10 feet. When the motorist is 200 feet back, the cyclist easily falls within the central +/-3 degrees (10/200 = 0.05 radians) of his/her vision field.
__________________
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324; 1960 Sieger (2), S/N 42624, 42597
Carlton: 1962 Franco Suisse, S/N K7911
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1982 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 06:01 PM
  #14  
On Two Wheels
 
sam83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 514

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Bianchi Volpe, 2 Salsa Casserolls (fixed & Triple), 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso, 1983 Schwinn Supersport, Schwinn Mesa MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
Well there are those that insist that the bike lane is to blame...

Personally I feel that regardless of the stripe, the cyclist would still be riding on the side of the road and would still be subject to motorist drift... especially in light of the cell phone use.
No bike lanes in my area.

Do they breed a false sense of security? I've read so many times in the last couple years where people are hit from behind in bike lanes, but not so much hit from behind while in the normal traffic lane. And some that were hit in the traffic lane confirmed that they were hugging the white line.

With my mirror, I can always tell if a car sees me - when I'm way out in the lane. They adjust way before they get to me. The further right I go, the less I can tell because the adjustments are more subtle and closer to me. Forget it if I'm 6" to the right of the white line. They just whiz by within 3', no adjustments.
sam83 is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 07:41 PM
  #15  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by sam83
No bike lanes in my area.

Do they breed a false sense of security? I've read so many times in the last couple years where people are hit from behind in bike lanes, but not so much hit from behind while in the normal traffic lane. And some that were hit in the traffic lane confirmed that they were hugging the white line.

With my mirror, I can always tell if a car sees me - when I'm way out in the lane. They adjust way before they get to me. The further right I go, the less I can tell because the adjustments are more subtle and closer to me. Forget it if I'm 6" to the right of the white line. They just whiz by within 3', no adjustments.
And if the motorist doesn't adjust... because they are distracted on a cell phone... what then do you do?
genec is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 07:46 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Dchiefransom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Newark, CA. San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 6,251
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Bekologist
driver, cellphone, or bikelane?

which was the greatest contributing factor to this incident?

I am confident (to use a catch phrase of John Forester below)

if the road users had been following the rules of the road for drivers of vehicles the rider would have been left unharmed in the preferred class lane.
I would be just as confident that if he was taking the lane, she'd have driven right over him from behind.
Dchiefransom is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 08:34 PM
  #17  
On Two Wheels
 
sam83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 514

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Bianchi Volpe, 2 Salsa Casserolls (fixed & Triple), 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso, 1983 Schwinn Supersport, Schwinn Mesa MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by genec
And if the motorist doesn't adjust... because they are distracted on a cell phone... what then do you do?
Honestly, I believe there's time to ditch.

But that's in my area, my lane position (right tire track), on narrow, lightly travelled 2-lane 55 MPH roads with basically 0 shoulder. Adjustments happen pretty far back, and it is proportional to how far into the lane I am.

May not apply everywhere. For instance, we probably don't get too much drift because you'd find a ditch, and I believe that a ditch is unfortunately more of a deterrent to inattentiveness than a smelly biker.

But, FWIW I doubt there are any clues as to motorist's attention when you are in a bike lane.
sam83 is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 08:47 PM
  #18  
On Two Wheels
 
sam83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Middle Tennessee
Posts: 514

Bikes: Moots Vamoots, Bianchi Volpe, 2 Salsa Casserolls (fixed & Triple), 2011 Salsa Chili Con Crosso, 1983 Schwinn Supersport, Schwinn Mesa MTB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dchiefransom
I would be just as confident that if he was taking the lane, she'd have driven right over him from behind.
Perhaps not that time, since she was in the bike lane.
sam83 is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 08:53 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by John E
You are talking about a pretty extreme case of tunnel vision. If the motorist is centered in a 12-foot lane and the cyclist is centered in a 5-foot adjacent bike lane, the lateral displacement between the two is less than 10 feet. When the motorist is 200 feet back, the cyclist easily falls within the central +/-3 degrees (10/200 = 0.05 radians) of his/her vision field.
When I wear a mirror my surroundings make up for a small part I don't see due to the mirror blocking this. People not paying close attention to looking forward while driving fast will need to scan the moving scene rather than simply monitor the progress. Hence only a small picture can be digested.
wheel is offline  
Old 02-11-09, 09:18 PM
  #20  
----
 
buzzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Becket, MA
Posts: 4,579
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Liked 17 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Dchiefransom
I would be just as confident that if he was taking the lane, she'd have driven right over him from behind.
me, too.

The other day I was on a 2 lane road taking the whole right lane and a car passed me in the left lane and I am absolutely certain the driver was completely unaware of my presence he was so busy texting. The guy looked up at the last minute in time to see that he was about to plow through a red light and jammed on his brakes. The only difference I can see between this driver and the one who hit the cyclist was he managed to stay in a straight line but I was glad I wasn't in the left lane slowing for the light and /or about to turn left or that he was in the right lane.
buzzman is offline  
Old 02-12-09, 05:23 AM
  #21  
genec
 
genec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079

Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2

Mentioned: 86 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13658 Post(s)
Liked 4,532 Times in 3,158 Posts
Originally Posted by wheel
When I wear a mirror my surroundings make up for a small part I don't see due to the mirror blocking this. People not paying close attention to looking forward while driving fast will need to scan the moving scene rather than simply monitor the progress. Hence only a small picture can be digested.
If you are "not paying close attention to looking forward while driving fast" you should not be driving, much less driving fast.
genec is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.