Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Bill protects ‘vulnerable’ road users

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Bill protects ‘vulnerable’ road users

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-09, 11:18 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
wheel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Crystal MN
Posts: 2,147
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bill protects ‘vulnerable’ road users

Bill protects ‘vulnerable’ road users
By ROSANNA RUIZ
Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle
Feb. 15, 2009, 6:42PM
Bicyclist Peter Wang considers Houston traffic a tameable wilderness.

He’s dodged his share of open car doors, but over the years, he’s learned how to maneuver around unaccommodating drivers.

"You might be expecting me to say that drivers in Houston are awful and bicycling is unsafe," said Wang, a Bike Houston board member. "What I found is, if you’re trained properly, you make your own safety to a large extent."

That’s where Sen. Rodney Ellis rides in.

The Houston Democrat, also an avid cyclist, has penned a bill to protect his fellow bicyclists, along with pedestrians, motorcyclists, runners, horse riders and farmers. In Ellis’ bill they are considered "vulnerable road users."

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics support the descriptor. In 2007, the last year for which statistics are available, 698 cyclists were killed in the United States, 48 of them in Texas. Also that year, 4,833 motorcyclists, 375 of them in Texas, and 4,654 pedestrians were killed.

Under Ellis’ bill, co-authored by state Sen. John Carona, D-Dallas, drivers would have to get out of a traffic lane used by a vulnerable road user if another is available. Motorists should pass them at a "safe distance" of more than 3 feet if the motorist is in a car or light truck. Six feet would be considered safe for heavy trucks or commercial vehicles. Seven states, including Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma have similar laws on their books, according to Ellis’ office.

The bill also would require drivers making left turns at intersections to yield to bicyclists or other road users approaching in the opposite direction. Motorists also would be barred from intimidating or harassing bicyclists and pedestrians and would be prohibited from opening a vehicle door that interferes with their ride or walk.

"Everyone is affected by this bill," Wang said, "because everyone has been broken down by the side of the road before. … No one has the right to harass you or throw things at you."

Fines of up to $500

If the bill passes, violators who cause property damage would be cited with a misdemeanor and fined up to $500. If the violation results in injury, a driver could be cited for a Class B misdemeanor.

Enforcement could be tricky, as with other traffic violations, unless an officer happens to observe the infraction.

If you think its a needless law, consider the last time you saw someone behind the wheel make way for a bicyclist. For that matter, consider the last time you saw drivers getting out of the way of an ambulance trying to get an accident site.

It’s not a matter of courtesy, it’s the law.

As someone who has had a family member rushed to a hospital in an ambulance, laws that apply to emergency vehicles have particular importance for me.

While most drivers are aware they must yield to moving emergency vehicles rushing to scenes or hospitals, there’s a separate law that applies to parked ambulance, fire and police vehicles. Under that law, which took effect in 2003, motorists are required to move over one lane or slow down to 20 mph below the speed limit when passing a parked emergency vehicle.

This week, area law enforcement agencies will do their part to remind Houston-area motorists about that law. Violators may find themselves pulled over by a stern-faced officer who remembers too well how one of their own recently died.

In 2007, Precinct 5 Deputy Constable Jason Norling was killed while conducting a traffic stop on the Westpark Tollway when a sport utility vehicle swerved onto the shoulder, into his path.

"This is a huge safety issue for officers," said Capt. Carl Driskell, of the Houston Police Department’s traffic enforcement division.

One day last week, 52 verbal warnings were issued by HPD officers, he said.

But this week, tickets will be issued instead.

HPD as well as law enforcement officers in Pasadena, Sugar Land, Jersey Village and Humble will "vigorously enforce" the law. Harris and Fort Bend County sheriff’s offices and deputy constables from those counties also will take part.

Consider yourself warned.

If passed, Ellis’ bill effectively would put vulnerable road users into a protected class similar emergency vehicles.

"Sen. Ellis understands the need," spokesman Jeremy Warren said. "He’s had cars drive right up to him when he’s been on his bicycle."

Even if Ellis’ bill is passed, Wang will remain on alert when he’s on his bike.

As he should be.

***********
This looks pretty good.
wheel is offline  
Old 02-16-09, 11:24 AM
  #2  
www.theheadbadge.com
 
cudak888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern Florida
Posts: 28,513

Bikes: https://www.theheadbadge.com

Mentioned: 124 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2422 Post(s)
Liked 4,391 Times in 2,092 Posts
Sounds it, but I'd like to see the actual wording of the proposed bill beforehand.

-Kurt
__________________












cudak888 is offline  
Old 02-16-09, 11:32 AM
  #3  
Rumblefish
 
jtarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 687

Bikes: 1973 Crescent Pepita Single Speed,1978 Raleigh Competition G.S.,1976 Raleigh Super Course MKII,1970's Motobecane Super Touring Fixed Gear, 1980's Denti Road Tech Five,Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo,1973 Atala Giro,Cheap MTB Tandem,Schwinn World Sport

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Good point: You are your own best advocate regarding your personal safety while riding.
jtarver is offline  
Old 02-16-09, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 6,521

Bikes: Peugeot Hybrid, Minelli Hybrid

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by wheel
In 2007, the last year for which statistics are available, 698 cyclists were killed in the United States, 48 of them in Texas. Also that year, 4,833 motorcyclists, 375 of them in Texas, and 4,654 pedestrians were killed.

Seven states, including Arizona, Florida and Oklahoma have similar laws on their books, according to Ellis’ office.
Texas which has 8% of the US population has 7% of the cyclist deaths. Is it much better in the 7 states that have such a law?
AndrewP is offline  
Old 02-16-09, 04:12 PM
  #5  
Can't ride enough!
 
Da Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 1,235

Bikes: IFab Crown Jewel, Giant Defy, Hardtail MTB, Fuji finest, Bianchi FG conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Wait one. Under the terms of this bill, hitting a cyclist with your car, which many consider assault with a deadly weapon, could be considered a Class B misdemeanor.

Instead of more laws, how about we just have fair, level enforcement of the laws on the books. You know, One Road, One Law.

Da Tinker is offline  
Old 02-16-09, 06:34 PM
  #6  
You gonna eat that?
 
Doohickie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Worth, Texas Church of Hopeful Uncertainty
Posts: 14,715

Bikes: 1966 Raleigh DL-1 Tourist, 1973 Schwinn Varsity, 1983 Raleigh Marathon, 1994 Nishiki Sport XRS

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 164 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times in 44 Posts
Originally Posted by cudak888
Sounds it, but I'd like to see the actual wording of the proposed bill beforehand.

-Kurt
Click here for the wording of the bill.

The main thing the bill does is require cars to give at least 3 feet of room when passing. Even a close call (less than 3 feet) would be a ticketable offense under this law. It doesn't take anything away, and gives cyclists some formal, lawful cushion from the cagers.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.


Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Doohickie is offline  
Old 02-17-09, 05:49 PM
  #7  
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,026

Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It is a redundant law. Motorists already have to yield to oncoming traffic when turning left. Motorists are required to pass slower vehicles with due care and in a safe manner already. Just enforce existing law.

Demanding six feet of clearance from trucks is excessive. Simply overtaking in the next lane would be fine, and on the roads I ride on in Texas, doing so will still not be six feet of clearance when I am taking the lane.

If you want to help Texas cyclists, get rid of the far to the right law, and the must use bike lane laws.
ChipSeal is offline  
Old 02-17-09, 06:19 PM
  #8  
www.chipsea.blogspot.com
 
ChipSeal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South of Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,026

Bikes: Giant OCR C0 road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
The Texas law referred to in the above link is:

"GENERAL OPERATION.

(a) A person operating a bicycle shall ride only on or astride a permanent and regular seat attached to the bicycle.
(b) A person may not use a bicycle to carry more persons than the bicycle is designed or equipped to carry.
(c) A person operating a bicycle may not use the bicycle to carry an object that prevents the person from operating the bicycle with at least one hand on the handlebars of the bicycle.
(d) A person operating a bicycle, coaster, sled, or toy vehicle or using roller skates may not attach either the person or the bicycle, coaster, sled, toy vehicle, or roller skates to a streetcar or vehicle on a roadway.
Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995. § 551.103.
"

And:

"551.104(a) a person operating a bicycle on a roadway who is moving slower than the other traffic on the roadway shall ride as near as practicable to the right curb or edge of the roadway, unless: (b)(2) the person is preparing to turn left at an intersection or onto a private road or driveway"

So if a cyclist is doing any of these things, or turning left from the right side of the road, it is a defense against prosecution under this statute.
ChipSeal is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.