Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Bicyclist warned about night riding, then killed a little bit later by a car

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Bicyclist warned about night riding, then killed a little bit later by a car

Old 08-05-10, 09:59 AM
  #1  
Walmart bike rider
Thread Starter
 
gpsblake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,117
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 127 Post(s)
Liked 29 Times in 24 Posts
Bicyclist warned about night riding, then killed a little bit later by a car

https://www.islandpacket.com/2010/08/...bicyclist.html

At about 11:45 p.m. Tuesday, a Beaufort County Sheriff's deputy stopped 21-year-old Detron Jenkins as he pedaled down Trask Parkway on a bike with no lights or reflectors, clad in all-black clothing.

Jenkins told the deputy he was riding to his mother's house in Shell Point about 8 miles away. The deputy reported having trouble seeing Jenkins and told him to stay out of the road before sending Jenkins on his way, according to a Sheriff's Office incident report.

About an hour and a half later, Jenkins was struck by a car and killed.

He was traveling northbound on Trask Parkway near the air station at about 1:15 a.m. when he was struck from behind by a 2001 Honda Accord driven by a 21-year-old Beaufort woman, said Cpl. Paul Brouthers, spokesman for the S.C. Highway Patrol.

Jenkins suffered severe head trauma in the crash, and was pronounced dead at the scene, according to the Beaufort County Coroner's Office.

The driver of the Honda, who was not injured in the crash, will not be charged, Brouthers said.

"(The driver) will not be charged due to the fact that the bicyclist was unable to be seen in the darkness," he said.
gpsblake is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 10:12 AM
  #2  
Son of Fred
 
Bander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 123
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Proving that the widely held belief that ninjas are invincible is erroneous.
Bander is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 10:19 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 4,556
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sad.
crhilton is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 10:24 AM
  #4  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
SC law requires a front light and rear reflector when riding at night. The deputy stopped him but then let him go on his way...I smell a civil suit coming.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 11:26 AM
  #5  
3speed
 
CitiZen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Posts: 128

Bikes: Breezer Citizen

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sad news.
I've often wondered if it's somehow a badge of pride not to ride with lights of any kind...it seems so in my town.
CitiZen is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 11:44 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Any chance that the deputy will receive any kind of punishment for not issuing a citation and/or requiring the cyclist to call his mother to come and pick him up?
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 11:46 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
SC law requires a front light and rear reflector when riding at night. The deputy stopped him but then let him go on his way...I smell a civil suit coming.
And possibly a wrongful death suit as well.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 11:49 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by CitiZen
Sad news.
I've often wondered if it's somehow a badge of pride not to ride with lights of any kind...it seems so in my town.
Given how many who ride like that it must be. Last light at about 2030hrs there was a two car collision by my apartment. And most of the people on bikes that went past didn't have any lights on them. Given the number of LEOs that were around I would have thought that one of them could have said something to those cyclists who didn't have lights or reflectors, but they didn't.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 11:59 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
SC law requires a front light and rear reflector when riding at night. The deputy stopped him but then let him go on his way...I smell a civil suit coming.
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
And possibly a wrongful death suit as well.
A wrongful death suit is a civil suit, DC -- unless you've fallen back into your old habit of making up random laws, believing that they're real, and complaining that they're not enforced.

But seriously, why would the cop or the county be liable? The cop told the guy that what he was doing is dangerous, and presumably told him it's also illegal. Issuing a citation rather than a warning wouldn't have saved the guy. Physically impounding the bike or arresting the cyclist are the only things that would have guaranteed he get off the road, and I hope no one is going to argue that a cop should do these things every time they see a violation.

Cops issue warnings all the time; it would be a terrible idea to say that makes their city or county liable for the consequences if someone disregards the warning.

Given the number of LEOs that were around I would have thought that one of them could have said something to those cyclists who didn't have lights or reflectors, but they didn't.
But you just argued that if the cops do say something, they should become liable if the cyclists ignore their warnings.

Last edited by sanitycheck; 08-05-10 at 12:04 PM.
sanitycheck is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 12:51 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
canopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kingwood, TX
Posts: 1,592

Bikes: Road, Touring, BMX, Cruisers...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Liked 172 Times in 110 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Cowboy
Given how many who ride like that it must be. Last light at about 2030hrs there was a two car collision by my apartment. And most of the people on bikes that went past didn't have any lights on them. Given the number of LEOs that were around I would have thought that one of them could have said something to those cyclists who didn't have lights or reflectors, but they didn't.
No, I figure people ought to be mostly responsible for themselves. If you can't do the basics, I don't consider a little Darwinism a bad thing.
__________________
1984 Cannondale ST
1985 Cannondale SR300
1980 Gary Littlejohn Cruiser
1984 Trek 760
1981 Trek 710
Pics
canopus is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 01:07 PM
  #11  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sanitycheck
But seriously, why would the cop or the county be liable? The cop told the guy that what he was doing is dangerous, and presumably told him it's also illegal. Issuing a citation rather than a warning wouldn't have saved the guy. Physically impounding the bike or arresting the cyclist are the only things that would have guaranteed he get off the road, and I hope no one is going to argue that a cop should do these things every time they see a violation.
In this case, yes, that is exactly what they will probably argue at some point in a court. Whether they win or not...who knows...but think hot Mickey D's coffee and you'll see that it isn't at all far-fetched that the argument might fly.

We're not dealing with truth or justice here, we're dealing with the sad reality of our litigious society and the fact that no deed, good or otherwise, gets away for free.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 01:27 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 225
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, you're right Chip -- it's totally possible the guy's family will sue the county, and they might win. I was just saying it shouldn't happen, not that it won't...
sanitycheck is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 02:01 PM
  #13  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,229

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
In this case, yes, that is exactly what they will probably argue at some point in a court. Whether they win or not...who knows...but think hot Mickey D's coffee and you'll see that it isn't at all far-fetched that the argument might fly.

We're not dealing with truth or justice here, we're dealing with the sad reality of our litigious society and the fact that no deed, good or otherwise, gets away for free.
The McDonalds coffee example is frequently used...and also a classic example of why tort reform is ridiculous. The woman who sued had second degree burns as I recall and required extensive medical attention. If memory serves, she might have even needed a skin graft. It wasn't a frivolous suit and that McDonalds had received a warning to fix the coffee maker twice before by a Government agency. It was substantially hotter than normal coffee and was deemed unsafe prior to the accident. This case has become this legendary myth and few of the peiople who quote it seem to actually know anything about it.

You can sue anybody for anything...and yes...there is a chance there could be a suit here...I wouldn't give it much chance of going anywhere. There are built in protections against frivolous suits...lawyers want to get paid, so they aren;t going to take a case they can't win without a large chunk up front. Most people aren;t going to waste that money on something unwinnable up front. As a practical matter, it's extremely difficult to sue most Government agencies in most states...most attorneys won't touch it unless it's truly gross conduct.

It's easy to say a case is frivolous when you aren't the one burned. Most of the tort reform arguers would be first in line sueing if they were injured. Having the right to a trial and having access to a legal system is part of what makes our country what it is. I'd much rather have some frivlous suits than lose my right to unfettered court access. I want a judge and/or jury deciding what's frivolous...not public opinion or politicians.

Last edited by KonAaron Snake; 08-05-10 at 02:13 PM.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 02:40 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Chicago Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,656

Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 125 Post(s)
Liked 150 Times in 74 Posts
+1 KAS The infamous McDonald's coffee case rears its ugly head again. BTW that case only went to court because McDonald's refused to pay the womans' medical bills.

https://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?eve...wPage&pg=facts
__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.

- Dr Samuel Johnson
Chicago Al is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 02:42 PM
  #15  
Fat Guy on a Little Bike
 
KonAaron Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 17,229

Bikes: Two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 42 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1254 Post(s)
Liked 345 Times in 174 Posts
Originally Posted by Chicago Al
+1 KAS The infamous McDonald's coffee case rears its ugly head again. BTW that case only went to court because McDonald's refused to pay the womans' medical bills.

https://www.caoc.com/CA/index.cfm?eve...wPage&pg=facts
It's this weird myth that people just accept as fact...and the truth is that the reason McDonalds got hit so hard in that case is because their actions were so gross and irresponsible.
KonAaron Snake is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 02:51 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Digital_Cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Tampa/St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 9,352

Bikes: Specialized Hardrock Mountain (Stolen); Giant Seek 2 (Stolen); Diamondback Ascent mid 1980 - 1997

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 62 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sanitycheck
A wrongful death suit is a civil suit, DC -- unless you've fallen back into your old habit of making up random laws, believing that they're real, and complaining that they're not enforced.

But seriously, why would the cop or the county be liable? The cop told the guy that what he was doing is dangerous, and presumably told him it's also illegal. Issuing a citation rather than a warning wouldn't have saved the guy. Physically impounding the bike or arresting the cyclist are the only things that would have guaranteed he get off the road, and I hope no one is going to argue that a cop should do these things every time they see a violation.

Cops issue warnings all the time; it would be a terrible idea to say that makes their city or county liable for the consequences if someone disregards the warning.
In this case as I said the cop in question could have had the cyclist call his mother (or someone else) for a ride to his mother's. This is also good example of how in those cities where the cops that carry light sets to hand out to "ninjas" could have saved a life. Or the cop could have ordered the cyclist in question to get off of his bike and walk it.

Originally Posted by sanitycheck
But you just argued that if the cops do say something, they should become liable if the cyclists ignore their warnings.
In the situation reported in the OP the deputy acknowledged that he himself had difficulty in seeing the cyclist. And he should have known that any other motorist coming upon said cyclist would also have difficulty in seeing the cyclist. And should have either instructed him to call his mother, a friend, a cab or even offered to drive him to his mothers house.
Digital_Cowboy is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 02:54 PM
  #17  
Seat Sniffer
 
Biker395's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,617

Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti; 2006 Schwinn Fastback Pro and 1996 Colnago Decor Super C96; 2003 Univega Alpina 700; 2000 Schwinn Super Sport

Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 1,967 Times in 562 Posts
True dat. The bottom line is that for the average joe/jane, the only recourse you have in a lot of cases is through a contingency fee tort attorney. And they're not stupid. They don't take cases if there isn't:

1. a good case on the facts and law
2. significant damages
3. a defendant who can pay

I doubt the family of the deceased could recover here. He's of age and capable of making his own decisions. Now as for the poor woman who struck him ...
__________________
Proud parent of a happy inner child ...

Biker395 is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 03:13 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 138

Bikes: Meercat

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It makes me think of all the cars parked on pavements that could cause accidents, and the police do nothing. Its done so often that no-one complains, because there are so many cars.
But yet if you park on double yellow lines, 9am-5pm, u could get a £50 ticket.
sevenhills is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 03:16 PM
  #19  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,398

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Sad to hear about another cyclist dying. I'm surprised at the arguments here. Mr. Jenkins was a 21 year old grown man, responsible for his own actions. What kind of nanny state do you want to run here?

Making a grown man "call his mother?" Is this because the name of the deceased is African American? I don't really like to bring race into things like this, but there is a long history of treating grown African American men like children.

It's not a simple black and white issue. Drivers ought to always take the most care possible-- actively defensive drivers expect unexpected and even illegal activity in the road ahead and plan for it. Even pedestrians and cyclists in black.

Warning a citizen and telling him to stay off the road certainly fulfills the LEO's responsibility. This is a case of an adult making a mistake. The price paid is undeserved and tragic, but not the fault of anyone else. Canopus-- this should not be seen as "darwinism..."



People who make these kinds of errors do not deserve death, and it is not the job of motorists to mete out capital punishment for traffic violations.

The discussion of bike ninjas and events such as this one here in A&S seems to perpetuate the assumption that executing and maiming people is part of the role of motorists in our society.

Unfortunately for all of us, it is also a belief obviously held by far too many motorists.

May we all evolve beyond looking at tragedies like this as "the darwin effect."
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 03:21 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
mikeybikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Edgewater, CO
Posts: 3,214

Bikes: Tons

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What he ^ said.
mikeybikes is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 04:03 PM
  #21  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by KonAaron Snake
The McDonalds coffee example is frequently used...and also a classic example of why tort reform is ridiculous. The woman who sued had second degree burns as I recall and required extensive medical attention. If memory serves, she might have even needed a skin graft. It wasn't a frivolous suit and that McDonalds had received a warning to fix the coffee maker twice before by a Government agency. It was substantially hotter than normal coffee and was deemed unsafe prior to the accident. This case has become this legendary myth and few of the peiople who quote it seem to actually know anything about it.

You can sue anybody for anything...and yes...there is a chance there could be a suit here...I wouldn't give it much chance of going anywhere. There are built in protections against frivolous suits...lawyers want to get paid, so they aren;t going to take a case they can't win without a large chunk up front. Most people aren;t going to waste that money on something unwinnable up front. As a practical matter, it's extremely difficult to sue most Government agencies in most states...most attorneys won't touch it unless it's truly gross conduct.

It's easy to say a case is frivolous when you aren't the one burned. Most of the tort reform arguers would be first in line sueing if they were injured. Having the right to a trial and having access to a legal system is part of what makes our country what it is. I'd much rather have some frivlous suits than lose my right to unfettered court access. I want a judge and/or jury deciding what's frivolous...not public opinion or politicians.
One could easily make the case that the deputy was negligent and could have possibly prevented the boy's death if he had used better judgment without it being considered frivolous. In the eyes of many the deputy's non-action is just as gross and irresponsible as Mickey D's. That is my point.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 04:12 PM
  #22  
Infamous Member
 
chipcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360

Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Standalone
Warning a citizen and telling him to stay off the road certainly fulfills the LEO's responsibility.
Sorry, but you are incorrect. If this had been a drunk driver, rather than a lack of legal lighting, do you really think any DA, judge or jury would think that the LEO had fulfilled his responsibility? How about if he was stopped for carrying a gun? The key issue here is that violation of the applicable law might endanger lives...and it was obviously more than a might in this case.

Cutting someone some slack then finding that doing so cost a life is one of a cop's worst nightmares.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
chipcom is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 04:37 PM
  #23  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,398

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom
Sorry, but you are incorrect. If this had been a drunk driver, rather than a lack of legal lighting, do you really think any DA, judge or jury would think that the LEO had fulfilled his responsibility? How about if he was stopped for carrying a gun? The key issue here is that violation of the applicable law might endanger lives...and it was obviously more than a might in this case.

Cutting someone some slack then finding that doing so cost a life is one of a cop's worst nightmares.
Was this a drunk driver? No, it wasn't. Neither was he a serial killer.

Your argument is absurd. Cops are not there to police the town down to the tiniest infraction. I mean, what do you say... every accident that happens downstream of a speed trap makes the officers-- who didn't pull over the 56 mph scofflaws-- liable? Ridiculous.
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley
Standalone is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 04:37 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
dougmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,040

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro, Strada

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by chipcom
Sorry, but you are incorrect. If this had been a drunk driver, rather than a lack of legal lighting, do you really think any DA, judge or jury would think that the LEO had fulfilled his responsibility?
Drunk driving is a serious crime. The standard procedure is to arrest the driver and impound the car (unless there's another sober driver available, then maybe.)

A lack of lights is a simple "ticket" offense, and the only time people are arrested for it and their bikes impounded is when either 1) there's other crimes involved or 2) the cops are trying to be dicks.

Taking your poor analogy further, when you see a driver that you *know* is drunk on the road, do you call the police and give the plates and location every time? Do you do the same when you see a bike ninja?

If the answer to both is true, how do the police respond to being called six times every time you go out riding at night?

As I see it, the cop did his job in an appropriate manner, and I hope he doesn't get in any trouble for it. He's likely to have to do some soul-searching, but I see nothing wrong with what he did. I'm not a fan of bike ninjas, and I wouldn't mind them all getting tickets (but giving them lights would be even better) but I do realize it's pretty minor on the list of bad things cyclists do.

Cutting someone some slack then finding that doing so cost a life is one of a cop's worst nightmares.
Probably true, but that still doesn't mean he did anything wrong.
dougmc is offline  
Old 08-05-10, 04:45 PM
  #25  
The Drive Side is Within
 
Standalone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New Haven, CT, USA
Posts: 3,398

Bikes: Road, Cargo, Tandem, Etc.

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 120 Post(s)
Liked 42 Times in 27 Posts
Originally Posted by chipcom in another thread
I don't bother with a bell....I'm not a mute and I find that a simple "passing" or "bike passing" or "x bikes passing" works best for me.
MUPs are nice when you are not in a hurry and just out to enjoy the ride, the day and the scenery.

I kinda like veering into the path of muppet racers too....the looks of fear and panic on their wittle faces is priceless!
All state laws that I have looked into have included front light, rear reflector, and bell. If this is the case in your state, every last cop that has come across you has been derelict in their duty.

chipcom, you liked this video in the "Educating LEOs" thread...
Originally Posted by BianchiDave
Yup!
what about the ones the cops let by first? are they bad cops? what about tickets? No tickets for anyone?
__________________
The bicycle, the bicycle surely, should always be the vehicle of novelists and poets. Christopher Morley

Last edited by Standalone; 08-05-10 at 04:52 PM.
Standalone is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.