Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Important new law proposed in Minnesota

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Important new law proposed in Minnesota

Old 02-04-11, 09:50 PM
  #1  
trek2.3bike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trek2.3bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 5.2 and Trek 2.3 WSD upgraded to full Ultegra.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Important new law proposed in Minnesota

We, individually and through bike clubs, should support enactment of HF68(Garofalo)/SF201(DeKruif). This proposed legislation at the Minnesota legislature is designed to eliminate the defense of "I didn't see (although I had a duty to look) the cyclist I killed before I turned." Since there is only one story, the cyclist being dead, the jury believes the driver and does not find the "GROSS negligence" required by existing criminal law. This bill requires only driving "carelessly or heedlessly" so if the driver was breaching his duty by failing to look before he or she "right hooked" the cyclist, they are careless and thus guilty. It's only a gross misdemeanor but it's a start on justice.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/bin/bldbi...l&session=ls87
trek2.3bike is offline  
Old 02-05-11, 10:07 AM
  #2  
trek2.3bike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trek2.3bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 5.2 and Trek 2.3 WSD upgraded to full Ultegra.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Contact them more than once. Get other cyclists to so as well.
More is better!

Weekly send an e-mail, make a phone call, and WRITE a short note on paper (it really impresses them).

This week target the House Judiciary Committee.
https://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/com...asp?comm=87014
trek2.3bike is offline  
Old 02-06-11, 01:26 PM
  #3  
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 4,568

Bikes: '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Sounds like how negligence law should already be interpreted. Great! I hope DA's don't drop the ball and refuse to prosecute if it goes through.
crhilton is offline  
Old 02-06-11, 06:05 PM
  #4  
trek2.3bike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trek2.3bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 5.2 and Trek 2.3 WSD upgraded to full Ultegra.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crhilton View Post
Sounds like how negligence law should already be interpreted. Great! I hope DA's don't drop the ball and refuse to prosecute if it goes through.
The Prosecutors have opposed it in the past. They'd rather the Jury think that manslaughter is the only available crime than give them the option of convicting on a lesser offense. So they get handed an acquittal more often than not. That lets them claim that there is "Insufficient evidence" (of the felony) to be bothered with the effort of prosecuting. After all, the vic was just a cyclist, pedestrian, child, etc.
trek2.3bike is offline  
Old 02-07-11, 09:15 AM
  #5  
crhilton
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lincoln, Nebraska
Posts: 4,568

Bikes: '07 Trek 1500, '08 Surly Cross Check, '09 Masi Speciale Sprint custom build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by trek2.3bike View Post
The Prosecutors have opposed it in the past. They'd rather the Jury think that manslaughter is the only available crime than give them the option of convicting on a lesser offense. So they get handed an acquittal more often than not. That lets them claim that there is "Insufficient evidence" (of the felony) to be bothered with the effort of prosecuting. After all, the vic was just a cyclist, pedestrian, child, etc.
*sigh*
crhilton is offline  
Old 02-08-11, 07:51 PM
  #6  
trek2.3bike
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trek2.3bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 255

Bikes: Trek 5.2 and Trek 2.3 WSD upgraded to full Ultegra.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
There is another Hearing on HF68 on Thursday at 8:15am in the House Judiciary committee. Representatives, including me, of several bicycle groups are expected to testify in favor of the bill.
trek2.3bike is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwalther
Advocacy & Safety
7
09-03-15 12:38 PM
Saving Hawaii
Advocacy & Safety
8
03-12-15 06:26 PM
Old Sarge
Advocacy & Safety
15
12-26-14 08:14 PM
rydabent
Advocacy & Safety
28
12-10-12 02:12 PM
merlinextraligh
Advocacy & Safety
6
04-17-12 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.