![]() |
Originally Posted by Johnny Rebel
(Post 12639863)
Uhhhh, are you just picking a fight for no reason or did you draw the short straw in some bizarre "devil's advocate for a day" contest?
So, with minimal visibility the guy is 1) riding against traffic 2) on the sidewalk 3) switching from sidewalk to the road willy-nilly while crossing intersections and 4) not using lights or wearing anything to make him more visible. By all means, let's stand up for this guy! OK, you object to the word "stupid" -- fine, I get it. If that's what bugs you, how about calling him "objectively clueless," "undeniably death-wishy," or "without a doubt lacking in common sense" instead? Feel better now? Here's the thing...we lived. Hell most of us got around pretty damned good on the sidewalks and making our own rules...what we learned we learned from experience or by some teaching. These people who scare you so might too, or they might continue to muddle along their own way - oh well. Lighten up, all you Francises out there, there are plenty of other things in this life our ours to get all hot and bothered over. ;) As far as ILTB goes, I always get a giggle when noobs get offended by him. Heck he and I about killed each other when we first 'met' years ago...till we actually talked to each other and got over it...now he's my character indicator. Those who can get past how he says things to understand what he's saying have a clue...those that can't, don't. He's a good guy...and we need his perspective on things around here when so many seem to follow and parrot the Joneses. ;) |
Originally Posted by Johnny Rebel
(Post 12639863)
So, with minimal visibility the guy is 1) riding against traffic 2) on the sidewalk 3) switching from sidewalk to the road willy-nilly while crossing intersections and 4) not using lights or wearing anything to make him more visible.
Originally Posted by Johnny Rebel
(Post 12639863)
Uhhhh, are you just picking a fight for no reason or did you draw the short straw in some bizarre "devil's advocate for a day" contest?
===============
Originally Posted by chipcom
(Post 12639894)
How about understanding that this guy is pretty much at the point most, if not all, of us were when we were little kids and didn't know any better. KILL THE BASTARD!
|
chipcom,
Yes, I did stupid stuff kind of like that when I was a kid, too. But then I guess I hit whatever magic age is it when you no longer want to die recklessly (25, perhaps? The car rental companies must have a reason for that cut-off). And, yes I agree that the guy must be a newb (otherwise he never would have survived for too long), so your point is taken. I'm not really trying to "pile on," but the gist of the thread is, as Forrest Gump so sagely said, "Stupid is as stupid does." As for your character-reference for ILTB, I guess I'll take your word for it! |
Just wanted to check if the ones slamming ladyraestewart, have met their objective of feeling superior.
|
Originally Posted by ladyraestewart
(Post 12638394)
There was no smirking nor feeling of superiority on my part, in spite of what anyone might think to the contrary. Nor do I feel someone is beneath me because they are not wearing clothing for "correct cycling." HOWEVER, this guy did five stupid things and three illegal things (unfortunately in Austin it is legal to ride on the sidewalks except in a section of downtown and that's not where this occurred) so yes, that makes him stupid.
Don in Austin |
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 12637101)
Calling another person stupid without knowing all the circumstances of the persons life is stupid.
|
Originally Posted by ladyraestewart
(Post 12637078)
I've seen cyclists being their own worse enemies but yesterday morning took the prize for how many things one person could do wrong.
We had hellicious rains yesterday morning during rush hour - it wasn't just raining it was raining so hard it felt we were getting our annual rainfall all at once. Sitting at a traffic light I watched a man on a bike, approaching (1) riding the sidewalk; (2) riding against traffic; (3) riding off the curb to cross against the light (people to his left and right had a green turn arrow); (4) no lights on his bike (it was dark enough lights were required); and (5) he was wearing clothing that blended in more than stood out. The cyclist then ran right into a car that pulling forward to turn left. Luckily no one was hurt and apparently no damage but there were so many way that entire situation could have gone so far south. Sometimes I think the stupid really do want to thin out the gene pool but get protected in spite of themselves. |
Originally Posted by gcottay
(Post 12640733)
Do you have any estimate on how often this very sort of thing has been posted here? In light of your estimate, what added value did you propose making with this thread?
|
Originally Posted by gcottay
(Post 12640733)
Do you have any estimate on how often this very sort of thing has been posted here? In light of your estimate, what added value did you propose making with this thread?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.