View Poll Results: Helmet wearing habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
178
10.66%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
94
5.63%
I've always worn a helmet
648
38.80%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
408
24.43%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
342
20.48%
Voters: 1670. You may not vote on this poll
The helmet thread
#6351
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,845
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12776 Post(s)
Liked 7,693 Times
in
4,082 Posts
Riding in a group, at high speed, possibly experiencing hypoxia or bonking can increase your chances of crashing. If you remove those factors from your daily riding regimen then you'll be much safer indeed.
Last edited by LesterOfPuppets; 12-09-13 at 12:46 AM.
#6352
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Well, that really is the heart of the debate, IMO. I personally feel that the rights of the individual are paramount and that there really is no "collective society". That's just a name for a bunch of individuals, used primarily by people who think argumentum ad populum is a legitimate appeal and justifies their attempts to make everyone else behave in a particular way.
#6353
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
YES, Unfortunately you are right and as long as you don't crash it's your skill that counts the most, but most people's lives are still ruled by "luck"...( you know, s*** just happens) You can do EVERYTHING right and still end up on your head in the gutter, where having a helmet on "could" make a difference to the overall outcome to that particular experience... JMO
EDIT; Oh, I used the word "unfortunately" because people think that skill is enough to avoid all things that involve a smack to the head...
EDIT; Oh, I used the word "unfortunately" because people think that skill is enough to avoid all things that involve a smack to the head...
So the question should not be "what could possibly happen?" but rather "what could be reasonably foreseen to happen?" You can no more answer that for me than I can for you, which is why we all need to butt out of everyone else's business.
#6354
Senior Member
Well, that really is the heart of the debate, IMO. I personally feel that the rights of the individual are paramount and that there really is no "collective society". That's just a name for a bunch of individuals, used primarily by people who think argumentum ad populum is a legitimate appeal and justifies their attempts to make everyone else behave in a particular way.
I suppose my opinion is coloured by the medical system we have in Canada. I know I can get treatment for those medical ailments that can and do happen to many people, but I often ask myself why I, as a taxpayer, should subsidize the medical treatment to treat those who choose not to take basic, reasonable decisions to safeguard their own health and safety? I think of my wife, who if she found out that I suffered a debilitating head injury because I did not wear a helmet, would chide me and probably curse me being so selfish to think of my choice, but not the consequence to her and my family. For me, and I suspect many others, I would not want to impose that cost upon anybody else because of the decision I chose to make. I am not against taking risks - life is about risk - but I like to lessen what risks I am exposed to.
And I seriously doubt half the helmet or other safety laws are passed because some group thinks they are necessarily "better": they're probably passed so that a third party isn't liable and so that somebody does not have to pay! It's always about the money it seems in the end.
Well, it's been enlightening to hear the various perspectives. I'm not sorry I jumped into this fray, but I can see there is no end in sight to this thread...
#6355
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,719
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
.....
I suppose my opinion is coloured by the medical system we have in Canada. I know I can get treatment for those medical ailments that can and do happen to many people, but I often ask myself why I, as a taxpayer, should subsidize the medical treatment to treat those who choose not to take basic, reasonable decisions to safeguard their own health and safety? .....
Of course there are externalities to everything we do, but if we focus on them we'll Balkanize society. Better to arrange things so folks take a greater stake in the consequences of their individual behavior (not saying a total stake, that's unworkable), so we can shift out focus from what others do and worry about what we'll do.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#6356
Senior Member
I agree completely, and you've just made the best and most important argument against socialized medicine. Suddenly everybody is looking at others' risky behavior, be it bicycling without a helmet, being over weight, eating too much salt, drinking, participation in dangerous sports, etc. and saying "that no good, irresponsible SOB is running up my tab".
Of course there are externalities to everything we do, but if we focus on them we'll Balkanize society. Better to arrange things so folks take a greater stake in the consequences of their individual behavior (not saying a total stake, that's unworkable), so we can shift out focus from what others do and worry about what we'll do.
Of course there are externalities to everything we do, but if we focus on them we'll Balkanize society. Better to arrange things so folks take a greater stake in the consequences of their individual behavior (not saying a total stake, that's unworkable), so we can shift out focus from what others do and worry about what we'll do.
Given all that, I would still rather see people make better decisions for themselves: universal "anything" should not be an excuse to do anything one wants without consequence.
Last edited by Ozonation; 12-09-13 at 07:13 AM.
#6357
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
lester
The point still remains that the "greatest bike handler" WILL still meet the unexpected. On an unfamiliar road, he might meet up with sand or gravel in a turn and go down. A stone not seen may cause an instant blowout.
The bottom line here is you are talking about the .0001% of the worlds greatest bike handlers. Those of us that support wearing helmets are talking about the 99.0099% of the rest of cyclist. To put it simply, try to argue with the phrase--------------"schidt happents"!!!!!!!
The point still remains that the "greatest bike handler" WILL still meet the unexpected. On an unfamiliar road, he might meet up with sand or gravel in a turn and go down. A stone not seen may cause an instant blowout.
The bottom line here is you are talking about the .0001% of the worlds greatest bike handlers. Those of us that support wearing helmets are talking about the 99.0099% of the rest of cyclist. To put it simply, try to argue with the phrase--------------"schidt happents"!!!!!!!
#6358
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
What if you suffered a debilitating head injury while wearing a helmet? Would she curse you being so selfish to get on a bike at all?
#6360
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't wear helmets because I don't feel the risks warrant it. That said, I agree that there is no valid anti-helmet argument.
You can see that under most conditions, mandatory helmet laws kill people.
I propose that peer pressure isn't that different from a mandatory helmet law--you've all seen the pro-helmet crowd try to shame those who don't share their mythology, and it seems likely that some of the reasons through which helmet laws interfere with cycling (increasing the perception that cycling is dangerous, and thus reducing the amount of cycling; creating an environment receptive to helmet mythology) would work through peer pressure as well (I can't be the only one who feels pressure even without legislation, from cyclists _and_ from trained professionals who ought to know better).
It may be inferred from the linked paper that pushing helmets on people kills people. Wearing a helmet probably does push people, even if only a little. I haven't done the math yet to find out what the range is, but there will be some range of values for peer-pressure effects in which my wearing a helmet does hurt the average person.
Last edited by fugue137; 12-09-13 at 12:29 PM. Reason: someone thought the link didn't work
#6361
pro in someone's theory
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 3,236
Bikes: FTP
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 72 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
First, read this: https://cyclehelmets.org/1249.html
#6362
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Your link doesn't seem to work.
#6363
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,719
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
As I said in the quote you cited, I don't feel the injury risk warrants wearing a helmet (personal decision), I don't challenge that helmets will mitigate head injuries.
My only concern about helmet boosters is that it could lead to mandatory use laws, which I agree is bad policy for a variety of reasons. I also fear that the helmet argument, coupled with advocacy for segregated bicycle facilities reinforces the notion that bicycling is unsafe, and if this becomes generally accepted (true or not) it will lead to restrictions --- for our own good.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#6364
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,845
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12776 Post(s)
Liked 7,693 Times
in
4,082 Posts
The bottom line here is you are talking about the .0001% of the worlds greatest bike handlers. Those of us that support wearing helmets are talking about the 99.0099% of the rest of cyclist. To put it simply, try to argue with the phrase--------------"schidt happents"!!!!!!!
I wore one all through my 20s - probably good since I usually rode like a maniac. For the past several years only for snow days, races and group rides but now I'm back to full time wearing.
I still don't feel that many safe-riding, well-seasoned bicycle riders need to wear a helmet for all bike rides.
YMMV.
People that don't ride with helmets for all rides aren't stupid. Aren't gonna increase your healthcare costs. Aren't gonna win a Darwin award. Aren't gonna save lives with the organs. Aren't gonna do any other silly thing that helmet purists claim they're gonna do.
#6365
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We have to separate the possible benefits of helmets for their wearers from the societal impact from mandatory helmet laws.
Wait--do I have the honour of speaking with Piet de Jong?
#6366
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,719
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5788 Post(s)
Liked 2,581 Times
in
1,431 Posts
However the negative of bicycling as dangerous projected by self-styles advocates is a serious issue, not only because it discourages participation but because it invites (and in some cases actually demands) government intervention.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#6367
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
What I want to make a stab at is separating the societal impact of increased pressure to wear helmets from the mechanism by which that pressure is applied. My observation is that peer pressure functions similarly to law (we could go into governmentality theory here ), although it will probably (maybe? possibly? what about religion or bigotry or musical taste?) be less chilling. It looks trivial to compute the ranges of "compliance with the mechanism" over which de Jong's model still shows societal costs, but the slope (change in compliance) / (change in one rider's choice) is a dynamic network reminiscent of epidemiology. I know neither how sensitive it will be to system parameters nor how to put an approximate value on those parameters from real-world data.
Wait--do I have the honour of speaking with Piet de Jong?
Wait--do I have the honour of speaking with Piet de Jong?
#6368
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know that peer pressure on already active cyclists has the same effect. It might, but probably not to the same extent.
Actually, I still think that there are plenty of cyclists who are "in transition"--light recreational users who don't yet identify as Cyclists, who might go either way based on perceptions of risk/benefit, and who still make a significant contribution to any system dynamics that might be caused by the presence or absence of foam on everybody's head.
Last edited by fugue137; 12-09-13 at 12:49 PM.
#6369
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
fugue137, your insinuation that wearing a helmet indirectly "peer-pressures" others is basically eliminating free choice from the equation. By wearing a helmet, I'm giving the impression that cycling is a dangerous activity. This impression is discouraging new cyclists. This reduces the number of cyclists, thus making cycling more dangerous.
So individual choice is no longer about the individual. My wearing a helmet endangers all other cyclists. For the greater good, your logic would make mandatory non-helmet laws seem reasonable.
So individual choice is no longer about the individual. My wearing a helmet endangers all other cyclists. For the greater good, your logic would make mandatory non-helmet laws seem reasonable.
#6370
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So individual choice is no longer about the individual.
My wearing a helmet endangers all other cyclists. For the greater good, your logic would make mandatory non-helmet laws seem reasonable.
I don't know you, so I can't tell, but you sound like you don't like these conclusions? Just remember that they depend on some assumptions and some math, and if those don't pan out I'll be the first to dismiss my argument.
#6371
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
#6372
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 15
Bikes: Reynolds Wishbone
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This doesn't mean that every action a person takes becomes peer pressure to coerce others to follow suit.
I meant that your logic makes room for making helmets illegal. Are you arguing that it would be reasonable to ticket people who decide to wear helmets?
Honestly, I'm not sure what I think of this. I'm no expert on the ramifications of free speech law; perhaps I should have educated myself further before responding, but for now I'll leave it at I don't know yet. What do you think? Is the USA's free speech law the Correct One? Should it protect your right to wear a helmet?
#6373
Cycle Dallas
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Land of Gar, TX
Posts: 3,777
Bikes: Dulcinea--2017 Kona Rove & a few others
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 197 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times
in
5 Posts
I think we should absolutely have the choice to either wear a helmet or not wear a helmet. It is an interesting angle to discuss helmets as a free speech issue.
#6374
Senior Member
Please do. You're up against many studies by serious people who make it their life's work, who have found different. Bicycle helmets as currently marketed do not do a great job at protecting against severe injury. If you have data to the contrary, by all means post it.
#6375
Senior Member
League of American Bicyclists lists five contributors to riding safely. Wearing a helmet is #5 , last on the list.
Before there should be mandatory helmet laws, there should very obviously be mandatory bicycle riding operation and safety courses, which includes vehicle law regarding public road use.
Just like you need to be educated to drive a car, motorcycle, or moped, a bicycle rider should also face mandatory training in order to operate their bicycle in a safe manner on public roads.
As soon as the mandatory helmet use law ninnies fall into line with actual safety practice, I will get on board with them. But MHLs as some kind of safety-theater are not to be tolerated.
When it comes to actual bicycle safety, helmet laws are the least effective.
Before there should be mandatory helmet laws, there should very obviously be mandatory bicycle riding operation and safety courses, which includes vehicle law regarding public road use.
Just like you need to be educated to drive a car, motorcycle, or moped, a bicycle rider should also face mandatory training in order to operate their bicycle in a safe manner on public roads.
As soon as the mandatory helmet use law ninnies fall into line with actual safety practice, I will get on board with them. But MHLs as some kind of safety-theater are not to be tolerated.
When it comes to actual bicycle safety, helmet laws are the least effective.