Was I wrong to yell?
06-13-12, 07:22 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Was I wrong to yell?
Moving along at 22 mph on a 55 mph road, a van approaches me from behind. Passes me, cuts me off and proceeds to immediately turn on their blinker, and immediately starts to slow down. I catch up to her *very* quickly, slow down to a stop along her passenger side rear quarter panel. Said driver has came to a complete stop as well. I don't pass for fear of a right hook (and illegal to pass on the right, especially when the vehicle is turning), but I'm getting pi$$ed because the driver is not completing the right turn and we have traffic behind us. I yell out 'wtf go!'. So the driver completes the turn, all the while I can see the lady throw her hands up out of frustration. I continue forward while she slows down on her turn, rolls down the window and screams at me 'i was giving you the right of way you a$$!'. What a strange confrontation. I am used to people passing me up and immediately turning in front of me. I haven't been right hooked so far, and don't want to be right hooked in the future, which is why I didn't even TRY to pass this lady up. Was I correct telling her to friggin go? It was out of courtesy that she shouldn't have passed me up that close to her turn in the first place, correct? It was out of law (and safety) that I didn't pass her on the right as she was in the middle of a turn - when she has a blinker on! I don't have a death wish.
Edit: right away... ooops... I meant right 'of way' :-) I'm tired this morning.
Edit: right away... ooops... I meant right 'of way' :-) I'm tired this morning.
Last edited by kevmk81; 06-13-12 at 07:46 AM.
06-13-12, 07:26 AM
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 420
Bikes: 198? Sport Racing Frame of unknown origins, 1992 Marin Bear Valley, 1970 Raleigh Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Were you in the lane or on the shoulder?
06-13-12, 07:43 AM
#3
You gonna eat that?
Assuming you were taking the lane, when she said she was giving you ROW, you should have replied that the right way to do that was to move in behind you, the cyclist, and wait until you go by before making her turn. If you were in the bike lane, though, she kind of was right; a motor vehicle is supposed to yield to cyclists in the bike lane. If it was a non-bike lane shoulder, she's still right to make sure the shoulder is clear before she moves into it.
If you were in a shoulder/bike lane, though, it simply points to one of the problems with that type of infrastructure: It is not always clear who has the ROW. If both people yield ROW to the other person, you end up with a situation like you experienced. If neither one yields, we'd be reading a linked article about you right now.
Assuming you were taking the lane, I think she was technically right, but you did the wise thing by waiting because that is the type of situation where most of the time the driver will ignore the cyclist.
If you were in a shoulder/bike lane, though, it simply points to one of the problems with that type of infrastructure: It is not always clear who has the ROW. If both people yield ROW to the other person, you end up with a situation like you experienced. If neither one yields, we'd be reading a linked article about you right now.
Assuming you were taking the lane, I think she was technically right, but you did the wise thing by waiting because that is the type of situation where most of the time the driver will ignore the cyclist.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi 
"However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
06-13-12, 07:43 AM
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by PJCB
Were you in the lane or on the shoulder?
06-13-12, 07:49 AM
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Doohickie
Assuming you were taking the lane, when she said she was giving you ROW, you should have replied that the right way to do that was to move in behind you, the cyclist, and wait until you go by before making her turn. If you were in the bike lane, though, she kind of was right; a motor vehicle is supposed to yield to cyclists in the bike lane. If it was a non-bike lane shoulder, she's still right to make sure the shoulder is clear before she moves into it.
If you were in a shoulder/bike lane, though, it simply points to one of the problems with that type of infrastructure: It is not always clear who has the ROW. If both people yield ROW to the other person, you end up with a situation like you experienced. If neither one yields, we'd be reading a linked article about you right now.
Assuming you were taking the lane, I think she was technically right, but you did the wise thing by waiting because that is the type of situation where most of the time the driver will ignore the cyclist.
If you were in a shoulder/bike lane, though, it simply points to one of the problems with that type of infrastructure: It is not always clear who has the ROW. If both people yield ROW to the other person, you end up with a situation like you experienced. If neither one yields, we'd be reading a linked article about you right now.
Assuming you were taking the lane, I think she was technically right, but you did the wise thing by waiting because that is the type of situation where most of the time the driver will ignore the cyclist.
06-13-12, 07:52 AM
#6
Banned
Usually in a situation like the OP's, if possible, I try to position myself behind the motorist where they can see me in their center rear view mirror, or in their driver's mirror. So far, all the motorists I've encountered in this fashion have figured out rather quickly to just make the turn like if they just had another motor vehicle behind them.
06-13-12, 07:58 AM
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 420
Bikes: 198? Sport Racing Frame of unknown origins, 1992 Marin Bear Valley, 1970 Raleigh Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If you are on a 55mph road, going 22mph, I'd imagine that many cars would pass you. When I can't keep up with the speed limit, I move as far to the side as possible, unless I need to make a left turn. I don't like to take entire lanes under the speed limit, its just unsafe.
06-13-12, 08:09 AM
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by PJCB
If you are on a 55mph road, going 22mph, I'd imagine that many cars would pass you. When I can't keep up with the speed limit, I move as far to the side as possible, unless I need to make a left turn. I don't like to take entire lanes under the speed limit, its just unsafe.
06-13-12, 08:11 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 420
Bikes: 198? Sport Racing Frame of unknown origins, 1992 Marin Bear Valley, 1970 Raleigh Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fair enough, fair enough. Different strokes for different folks (and roads). I think as long as it all worked out in the end, maybe yelling was beneficial.
Originally Posted by kevmk81
I don't like to be buzzed by drivers not slowing down and not attempting to move over, which is what they would do if I weren't taking the lane. If something were to cause me to fall to the left, I won't be around anymore because they'll use my body as a 55 mph speed bump.
06-13-12, 08:18 AM
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by PJCB
Fair enough, fair enough. Different strokes for different folks (and roads). I think as long as it all worked out in the end, maybe yelling was beneficial.
06-13-12, 08:45 AM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
If you were in the bike lane, though, she kind of was right; a motor vehicle is supposed to yield to cyclists in the bike lane.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
06-13-12, 08:50 AM
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by prathmann
Unfortunately the laws with regard to bike lanes vary by state. In California when there's a bike lane present the vehicle code requires motor vehicles to first merge into the bike lane when safe to do so and then make their right turn from the bike lane. So in this situation the driver should have merged into the bike lane behind the cyclist and then made her turn.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
06-13-12, 08:59 AM
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840
Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Kind of like this?
Many motorists do not think ahead, and slowing down is not an option, the result is stuff like this.
Many motorists do not think ahead, and slowing down is not an option, the result is stuff like this.
06-13-12, 08:59 AM
#14
genec
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Coast
Posts: 27,079
Bikes: custom built, sannino, beachbike, giant trance x2
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13536 Post(s)
Liked 4,451 Times
in
3,106 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann
Unfortunately the laws with regard to bike lanes vary by state. In California when there's a bike lane present the vehicle code requires motor vehicles to first merge into the bike lane when safe to do so and then make their right turn from the bike lane. So in this situation the driver should have merged into the bike lane behind the cyclist and then made her turn.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
As a cyclist I would not have passed on her right, but would have stayed behind her... and likely in my case, would have sounded the airzounds for the stupid move in the first place.
On a 55MPH road, it would be highly unlikely that I would take the lane. That sets up a whole set of other issues... and unless there is no other choice, such as lane too narrow to share, I just wouldn't take the lane.
06-13-12, 09:19 AM
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by sauerwald
Kind of like this?
Many motorists do not think ahead, and slowing down is not an option, the result is stuff like this.
Many motorists do not think ahead, and slowing down is not an option, the result is stuff like this.
06-13-12, 09:20 AM
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by genec
I believe only Oregon has this strange crossing law. Otherwise I fully agree, she should have merged behind the cyclist, that would have made everything perfectly clear... the van driver set up the awkward situation by passing, then trying to turn right and then stopping. She knew she was going to turn right, and tried to "beat the train," thus setting up the "who goes first" problem.
As a cyclist I would not have passed on her right, but would have stayed behind her... and likely in my case, would have sounded the airzounds for the stupid move in the first place.
On a 55MPH road, it would be highly unlikely that I would take the lane. That sets up a whole set of other issues... and unless there is no other choice, such as lane too narrow to share, I just wouldn't take the lane.
As a cyclist I would not have passed on her right, but would have stayed behind her... and likely in my case, would have sounded the airzounds for the stupid move in the first place.
On a 55MPH road, it would be highly unlikely that I would take the lane. That sets up a whole set of other issues... and unless there is no other choice, such as lane too narrow to share, I just wouldn't take the lane.
06-13-12, 09:21 AM
#17
Senior Member
While yelling is satisfying, I've found that offering a Death Stare seems to have a better effect.
Case in point, my son and I were taking the lane single file as we approached an intersection. Guy in a BMW blows by us, swerves in front, and then is about to right hook my son ( and both my son and I were decked out in full Fredly regalia ). He slams on his brakes as his bumper is inches from my kid - and then proceeds to start yelling at him. I motioned my son to complete his crossing while I planted myself in front of the car, saying nothing, but staring daggers.
The guy shuts up, apparently realizes he nearly killed a 10-year-old, and mumbles an apology. I continued to stare for a while just to get the point across, and then moved on.
It's pretty much guaranteed if I had started screaming at him that he would have taken nothing away from the situation other than *****ing to his friends about cyclists.
Case in point, my son and I were taking the lane single file as we approached an intersection. Guy in a BMW blows by us, swerves in front, and then is about to right hook my son ( and both my son and I were decked out in full Fredly regalia ). He slams on his brakes as his bumper is inches from my kid - and then proceeds to start yelling at him. I motioned my son to complete his crossing while I planted myself in front of the car, saying nothing, but staring daggers.
The guy shuts up, apparently realizes he nearly killed a 10-year-old, and mumbles an apology. I continued to stare for a while just to get the point across, and then moved on.
It's pretty much guaranteed if I had started screaming at him that he would have taken nothing away from the situation other than *****ing to his friends about cyclists.
__________________
Knows the weight of my bike to the nearest 10 pounds.
Knows the weight of my bike to the nearest 10 pounds.
06-13-12, 09:37 AM
#18
24-Speed Machine
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kevmk81
I don't like to be buzzed by drivers not slowing down and not attempting to move over, which is what they would do if I weren't taking the lane. If something were to cause me to fall to the left, I won't be around anymore because they'll use my body as a 55 mph speed bump.
Every time I moved over in the past, I have ended up getting hit. So that is why I 'take the lane'. Especially if a passing lane is available. Because if a passing lane is available, motorists should use that when passing a cyclist. Instead of passing so close, that could reach out n' touch you.
06-13-12, 09:47 AM
#19
24-Speed Machine
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by mulveyr
While yelling is satisfying, I've found that offering a Death Stare seems to have a better effect.
Case in point, my son and I were taking the lane single file as we approached an intersection. Guy in a BMW blows by us, swerves in front, and then is about to right hook my son ( and both my son and I were decked out in full Fredly regalia ). He slams on his brakes as his bumper is inches from my kid - and then proceeds to start yelling at him. I motioned my son to complete his crossing while I planted myself in front of the car, saying nothing, but staring daggers.
The guy shuts up, apparently realizes he nearly killed a 10-year-old, and mumbles an apology. I continued to stare for a while just to get the point across, and then moved on.
It's pretty much guaranteed if I had started screaming at him that he would have taken nothing away from the situation other than *****ing to his friends about cyclists.
Case in point, my son and I were taking the lane single file as we approached an intersection. Guy in a BMW blows by us, swerves in front, and then is about to right hook my son ( and both my son and I were decked out in full Fredly regalia ). He slams on his brakes as his bumper is inches from my kid - and then proceeds to start yelling at him. I motioned my son to complete his crossing while I planted myself in front of the car, saying nothing, but staring daggers.
The guy shuts up, apparently realizes he nearly killed a 10-year-old, and mumbles an apology. I continued to stare for a while just to get the point across, and then moved on.
It's pretty much guaranteed if I had started screaming at him that he would have taken nothing away from the situation other than *****ing to his friends about cyclists.
06-13-12, 10:38 AM
#20
You gonna eat that?
Originally Posted by kevmk81
Passes me, cuts me off and proceeds to immediately turn on their blinker, and immediately starts to slow down. I catch up to her *very* quickly, slow down to a stop along her passenger side rear quarter panel.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
Last edited by Doohickie; 06-13-12 at 10:41 AM.
06-13-12, 10:40 AM
#21
You gonna eat that?
Originally Posted by prathmann
Unfortunately the laws with regard to bike lanes vary by state. In California when there's a bike lane present the vehicle code requires motor vehicles to first merge into the bike lane when safe to do so and then make their right turn from the bike lane. So in this situation the driver should have merged into the bike lane behind the cyclist and then made her turn.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
But in some other states motor vehicles are prohibited from merging into the bike lane and are supposed to make their right turn across it when safe to do so. Not sure what the Illinois rule is regarding bike lanes and right turns.
__________________
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
I stop for people / whose right of way I honor / but not for no one.
Originally Posted by bragi "However, it's never a good idea to overgeneralize."
06-13-12, 11:26 AM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,621
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
12 Posts
Originally Posted by Doohickie
After re-reading, my suggestion: Next time, veer to the left tail light so she knows she will not be passed on the right. If there is room, pass her on the left. In sauerwald's video, while he doesn't veer fully to the left, his positioning makes it pretty clear that he is not going to pass on the right, and the car completes its turn. Lane position is a subtle but effective means of communication.
06-13-12, 11:54 AM
#23
Senior Member
Not only would I have yelled, I would have pointed at her as I called into question her parentage.
06-13-12, 12:03 PM
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: You have really nice furniture
Posts: 821
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Sam thing happened to me today as well. Guy sped passed me, slowed down to turn and realized he didn't have as much room as he thought to turn. I recognized it and went to his right. Not the safest thing but I think our non-verbal communication worked out pretty good. As I reviewed my GoPro footage I saw that he even had a cell phone in his hands as he was driving. Today must be my lucky day.
06-13-12, 12:31 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 600
Bikes: All-City Space Horse!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That situation is super frustrating. If they paid attention then it would be no issue. Instead they cause themselves, you and anyone else following to stop in the middle of the road. If there is room or I can tell they are going to do that, I'll move left and pass on their left side. Often times they/you are much to close to them to make that happen. I have continued before after they stop but I never feel safe doing it and always regret it.
