Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Cyclists react with anger after no indictment in fatal bike crash

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Cyclists react with anger after no indictment in fatal bike crash

Old 02-15-13, 08:33 AM
  #1  
crazy_lazy_bear
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
crazy_lazy_bear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 49

Bikes: 2009 Trek 7.3 Hybrid, 2010 Specialized Secteur Road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Cyclists react with anger after no indictment in fatal bike crash

https://www.boston.com/news/local/mas...ZhI/story.html
crazy_lazy_bear is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 08:50 AM
  #2  
K'Tesh
Commander, UFO Bike
 
K'Tesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Subject to change
Posts: 1,413

Bikes: Giant, Trek

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
They had video, and still didn't indict? The Grand Jury should be indicted...
K'Tesh is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:07 AM
  #3  
jerseyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hawthorne NJ
Posts: 377

Bikes: Surly LHT, Wabi Special, All City Big Block, 1933 Iver Johnson Mobicycle, Giant TCR Advanced

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
All the details here including accident reports with transcripts of the police interviews with the driver of the truck.

https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread.php/871247-No-Charges-For-Driver-In-Fatal-Wellesley-Bike-Crash


I have been thinking about this accident for a couple of days and while this scumbag of a truck driver deserves to rot in jail for a long long time I think it is important to point out that this accident could possibly been avoided by the cyclist if he had taken the lane.

It took me a while to realize that you can't depend on motorists to not try to pass you where it is not safe. You can count on them trying. The only way to stop them is to take the whole lane for as long as you need to to prevent anyone from attempting to make an unsafe pass.

Now I am not saying that this cyclist has any responsibility in this accident at all. And who know this ******* might have run him down anyway.

I am just saying that he might be alive today if he had taken the lane.
jerseyJim is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:25 AM
  #4  
FrenchFit 
The Left Coast, USA
 
FrenchFit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,757

Bikes: Bulls, Bianchi, Koga, Trek, Miyata

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 361 Post(s)
Liked 23 Times in 16 Posts
Lots have cyclists have been killed "taking the lane", I don't think that's a universal solution to the problem. Drivers need to be re-educated, and that starts in drivers ed and the DMV testing. Heck, when I took the written drivers test a millenium ago, I don't think there was single question about yielding to cyclists or their rights on the road. Frankly, I think that all drivers should be forced to go through the full written and driving test every five years, I bet the failure rate would be pretty high. Currently, any fool can get a driver's license.
FrenchFit is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:27 AM
  #5  
dynodonn 
Banned.
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,464
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Taking the lane is no guarantee either, bad driving motorists will still be bad drivers regardless.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:31 AM
  #6  
dynodonn 
Banned.
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,464
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 26 Posts
One can only speculate on what type of decision outcome would have been made if the same grand jurists had to deliberate on an incident where a cyclist had caused the death of a motorist.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:46 AM
  #7  
jerseyJim
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hawthorne NJ
Posts: 377

Bikes: Surly LHT, Wabi Special, All City Big Block, 1933 Iver Johnson Mobicycle, Giant TCR Advanced

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
Taking the lane is no guarantee either, bad driving motorists will still be bad drivers regardless.

Right no point in looking at doing all we can do to make us safer on the road.
jerseyJim is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:18 AM
  #8  
ItsJustMe
Seńior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
I think when they say that people "don't care about the safety of cyclists" what is really happening is that people think that riding a bike in traffic is just asking to get killed, so they think the cyclist clearly doesn't care about his own safety, he's doing something incredibly reckless, it's his own fault.

I think for that reason people think that a cyclist getting killed is inevitable and for the most part don't blame the driver any more than they'd blame the ground that killed someone that jumped off a cliff.

They don't seem to be willing to admit to the fact that it's dangerous because people drive like selfish, distracted morons; rather, they think that the existence of drivers like that is an immutable law of nature, can't be changed, and the only thing to do about it is to surround yourself with battle armor (IE buy an SUV)
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:23 AM
  #9  
GrouchoWretch
Slob
 
GrouchoWretch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 497

Bikes: 1970s AMF Roadmaster 3 speed, Bianchi Volpe, 2012 GT Zum City

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
One can only speculate on what type of decision outcome would have been made if the same grand jurists had to deliberate on an incident where a cyclist had caused the death of a motorist.
I keep trying, but I just taco my front wheel against the car and go flying over the handlebars. Can't lay a glove on the driver.
GrouchoWretch is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 11:26 AM
  #10  
Notso_fastLane
Senior Member
 
Notso_fastLane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Layton, UT
Posts: 1,596

Bikes: 2011 Bent TW Elegance 2014 Carbon Strada Velomobile

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 622 Post(s)
Liked 684 Times in 411 Posts
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
I keep trying, but I just taco my front wheel against the car and go flying over the handlebars. Can't lay a glove on the driver.
Notso_fastLane is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 12:28 PM
  #11  
gmt13
Half way there
 
gmt13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,110

Bikes: 69 Hercules, 73 Raleigh Sports, 74 Raliegh Competition, 78 Nishiki Professional, 79 Nishiki International, 83 Colnago Super, 83 Viner Junior

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Are they dropping this case or will they revise the charges and try again. Juries are sometimes spooked by homicide charges and hesitate to step up.

-G
gmt13 is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 12:59 PM
  #12  
howsteepisit
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,305

Bikes: Mecian

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 500 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IT was a grand jury, who's role is to decide if there is sufficient reason to bring charges. As long as this kind of result happens, the just did not see them defense will continue to succeed. Frankly though, I have no clue as to how to change the public perception that these kind of things "just happen" when bicycles mix with cars. For the foreseeable future It is the case that when cycling, if you get run over it will be seen as an unfortunate but inevitable consequence of bicycling.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 08:29 PM
  #13  
spare_wheel
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NA
Posts: 4,267

Bikes: NA

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by FrenchFit View Post
Lots have cyclists have been killed "taking the lane"
link please.
spare_wheel is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 09:28 PM
  #14  
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
I keep trying, but I just taco my front wheel against the car and go flying over the handlebars. Can't lay a glove on the driver.
You need a longer lance and maybe some work on your jousting skills.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:01 PM
  #15  
prathmann
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bay Area, Calif.
Posts: 7,239
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 659 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by gmt13 View Post
Are they dropping this case or will they revise the charges and try again. Juries are sometimes spooked by homicide charges and hesitate to step up.
They already offered the grand jury three options on charges:
- vehicular manslaughter
- something about endangering other road users
- unsafe passing of a cyclist.

The jury refused to indict on any of the charges.
prathmann is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:28 PM
  #16  
dynodonn 
Banned.
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,464
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by prathmann View Post
They already offered the grand jury three options on charges:
- vehicular manslaughter
- something about endangering other road users
- unsafe passing of a cyclist.

The jury refused to indict on any of the charges.
Not like that the prosecution was swinging for the fences......... sucks to be a cyclist in that area.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:39 PM
  #17  
dynodonn 
Banned.
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,464
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by GrouchoWretch View Post
I keep trying, but I just taco my front wheel against the car and go flying over the handlebars. Can't lay a glove on the driver.

One could cause a motorist to swerve and cause the motorist to collide with an inanimate object or another vehicle.

In a situation that a cyclist had a history of numerous traffic violations like the motorist in the OP article, then caused the death of a motorist due to the cyclist's poor riding habits, would the same grand jurists return with the same decision?
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-15-13, 10:47 PM
  #18  
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is another example of why, I Take The Lane, along with wearing bright clothing, and using extra-bright lights.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 02-16-13, 10:52 PM
  #19  
Lanza
Newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 2

Bikes: Guerciotti

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It was a lousy DA. Any DA worth their salt can indict a ham sandwich.
Lanza is offline  
Old 02-17-13, 11:13 AM
  #20  
alhedges
Senior Member
 
alhedges's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Naptown
Posts: 1,133

Bikes: NWT 24sp DD; Brompton M6R

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Originally Posted by Lanza View Post
It was a lousy DA. Any DA worth their salt can indict a ham sandwich.
It's easier to indict a ham sandwich than someone who killed a biker.
alhedges is offline  
Old 02-17-13, 05:36 PM
  #21  
gpsblake
Walmart bike rider
 
gpsblake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,059
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 95 Post(s)
Liked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Originally Posted by howsteepisit View Post
IT was a grand jury, who's role is to decide if there is sufficient reason to bring charges.
Yea, and the defense doesn't present anything in a grand jury hearing. Either the prosecution was really lazy or despite what the media reports, not enough hard evidence to take to court.

And sad to say, a civil suit against the driver means nothing, it will never get paid, and they can be discharged in bankruptcy.
gpsblake is offline  
Old 02-17-13, 06:10 PM
  #22  
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jerseyJim View Post
Right no point in looking at doing all we can do to make us safer on the road.
Agreed!!

We don't take the lane for kicks. We do it, as a form of being noticed in traffic.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 02-17-13, 09:40 PM
  #23  
wsbob
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 317
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 5 Times in 2 Posts
Hopefully before faulting the grand jury's finding, some of those here who have faulted it or are thinking to do so, also have actually sorted through the Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Laws to read the elements of the laws the driver was charged with, and which the grand jury was obliged to find the details of the incident met before it could indict the driver. Here's a link to a page with links to Massachusetts Motor Vehicle Law: https://www.dmv.org/ma-massachusetts/...hicle-code.php


Accompanying the story linked in the OP's post, is a link to another story about the incident: https://www.boston.com/yourtown/news/...ruck_that.html

An excerpt from that story (Cunningham is Wellesley Police Chief Terrence Cunningham): "...The grand jury, said Cunningham, is not required to explain why it chose not to indict. ..."

My experience has been that DA's and ADA's give grand jurists a presentation of the laws the suspect is charged with, by carefully specifying and explaining elements that each individual law contains, and which the jurists have to find grounds for, exist, before they can conclude 'true bill'. In my area, Washington County, Oregon, the text of the laws and their elements are such that they're able to be laid out simply enough to read and understand on about two or three pages for each law. The language of each law though, may be critical to whether the jurists can rightfully find grounds for a charge against a suspect. A single word in a whole paragraph or page can make the difference in whether grounds to indict will be valid. How it was with Massachusettes law regarding this incident and these jurists, is especially hard to say without looking at that state's law, and all the exhibits and testimony the jurists had presented to them.
wsbob is offline  
Old 02-17-13, 09:55 PM
  #24  
dynodonn 
Banned.
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,464
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1253 Post(s)
Liked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Originally Posted by wsbob View Post

An excerpt from that story (Cunningham is Wellesley Police Chief Terrence Cunningham): "...The grand jury, said Cunningham, is not required to explain why it chose not to indict. ..."
With that type of accountability, the jurists could have made their decision based on the cyclist wore the wrong jersey.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 02-18-13, 12:06 AM
  #25  
Chris516
24-Speed Machine
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn View Post
With that type of accountability, the jurists could have made their decision based on the cyclist wore the wrong jersey.
Excuses, excuses

If it was another vehicle driver, they would have chose to indict. But the death of a cyclist means nothing to them. If it had been a vehicle driver, involuntary manslaughter probably would have been the best they could get. But they would still go for it. When a cyclist ends up being the deceased, they will just wash their hands of the whole thing, and not file any charges.
Chris516 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.