Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Advocacy & Safety (https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-safety/)
-   -   Drivers Get Rolled Bicyclists are making unreasonable claims to the road—and winning (https://www.bikeforums.net/advocacy-safety/922458-drivers-get-rolled-bicyclists-making-unreasonable-claims-road-winning.html)

Grillparzer 11-16-13 01:19 AM

Drivers Get Rolled Bicyclists are making unreasonable claims to the road—and winning
 
http://www.weeklystandard.com/print/...25.html?page=1

CB HI 11-16-13 02:18 AM

Best written article of the same old BS that I have read.

Matariki 11-16-13 06:28 AM

Lot of stereotyping in that article. Of course, that's typical.

irwin7638 11-16-13 06:49 AM

That was the best organized and well written compilation of stereo typical stupidity I have seen. I only found 5 grammatical mistakes. It is nice that the author reaffirmed our "powerful lobby," presumably to support the demented Dorothy Rabinowitz . I wonder what any of these people will think when they realize we ride bikes because it's fun. It will dilute their conspiracy theories.

Marc

Chief 11-16-13 07:23 AM

So chock full of fail... or maybe it was an attempt at parody? But it fails at that too!

FenderTL5 11-16-13 07:48 AM


Originally Posted by irwin7638 (Post 16251288)
That was the best organized and well written compilation of stereo typical stupidity I have seen. I only found 5 grammatical mistakes. It is nice that the author reaffirmed our "powerful lobby," presumably to support the demented Dorothy Rabinowitz . I wonder what any of these people will think when they realize we ride bikes because it's fun. It will dilute their conspiracy theories.

Marc

..or ride to and from work as a mere utilitarian concept that's immensely more enjoyable and practical than driving a car.
If you squint real tight and think real hard.. you can almost see the stereotypical biker in the article. It's so far from me that it's past insulting and on to laughable.
Oh, and I'm paying more than my fair share of 'road taxes'.

RaleighSport 11-16-13 08:02 AM

I was looking for a parody disclaimer anywhere... if that's how the thought process works inside his mind,oh boy.

dynodonn 11-16-13 08:09 AM

Didn't read the whole article, I pretty much shut down after reading the article's author state that cyclist's don't pay taxes to maintain the road, insinuating that the posted speed limit is the designated average speed that must be maintained, that many roads currently in use were "unfortunately" designed autocentric, and for the safety of cyclists, and motorists needs, that cyclists should stay off them, and that cyclists "take over" the road when it "suits" them.

tigrpal 11-16-13 08:10 AM

I just want to ride my bike. Sometimes to go to work. Always for fun. I don't want to lead a revolution. I'm not asserting anything. I'm not protesting anything. I don't despise drivers of automobiles. I am one myself. I'm not wealthy. There's no innate psychology involved except simply that it's fun for me. When I drive, I don't care if cyclists go through red lights-no skin off my back. I'm never in such a hurry that I can't wait a few seconds to pass slow moving vehicles or cyclists, or pedestrians. I get honked at when I ride. I get honked at when I drive. I don't understand all the contentiousness. I just want to ride. I drive alert for cyclists, deer, squirrals, pedestrians, other autos, et al. Other cars are more dangerous than anything else I encounter on the road. I ride where it's legal and safe.

RaleighSport 11-16-13 08:10 AM


Originally Posted by dynodonn (Post 16251394)
Didn't read the whole article, I pretty much shut down after reading the article's author state that cyclist's don't pay taxes to maintain the road, insinuating that the posted speed limit is the designated average speed that must be maintained, and that many roads currently in use were "unfortunately" designed autocentric, and for the safety of cyclists, and motorists needs, that cyclists should stay off them.

I'll break it down real quick, dribble dribble, rant, cyclists suck, dribble dribble, rant.

Looigi 11-16-13 08:52 AM

"""Bicyclists are exactly like cars when it suits them—as when they occupy the middle of a lane in rush hour. But they are different when it suits them—going 18 mph in that very same lane even though the posted speed is 45, riding two abreast, running red lights if there’s nothing coming either way, passing vehicles on the right when there’s a right turn coming up."""

Of course. These are among the principle advantages and joys of riding a bike.

genec 11-16-13 08:57 AM

Biggest line of BS probably right here...

So, except in a few spots where roads were built too wide and can now accommodate bike paths, adding bicycles to the mix means squeezing cars. Bike-riders don’t “share” the road so much as take it over. Their wish is generally that the right-hand lane of any major or medium-sized road be turned into a bike lane or, at best, a shared-use lane. This would place drivers in a position of second-class citizenship on roads that were purpose-built for them. There are simply not enough cyclists to make that a reasonable idea. What is going on is the attempt of an organized private interest to claim a public good. Cyclists remind one of those residents in exurban subdivisions who, over years, allow grass and shrubbery to encroach on dirt public sidewalk until it becomes indistinguishable from their yards, and then sneakily fence it in.
And here is another heap of a steaming load:


If bicyclists have a more highly developed sense that they can boss others around, this is because they disproportionately belong to the classes from which bosses come. They are, to judge from their blogs, more aggrieved by delivery trucks parked in bike lanes than drivers are by delivery trucks parked in car lanes. This may be because proportionately fewer of them have ever met a person who drives a delivery truck.
Gee I almost don't know how to follow that up except to mention that cyclists come from a wide range of classes... from the most poor who can't afford cars to students to well educated professors... cyclists might include your aunt Beth or your dentist... and yes, there are truck drivers that bike. And most cyclists drive, so it is quite likely they have shared the road with a delivery guy... and may even have one for a neighbor, like I do.

Now this next quote is interesting... yet sad, as it first points out that there is a "lump" of cyclists going through the "pipeline" so to speak and that we don't seem to be well followed by the youth of the nation... second it points out that the data is rather limited, and based only on those cyclists killed in some manner... perhaps the only reliable statistic that can be readily obtained about cyclists. (something of a Heisenberg Principle Phenomena exists for cyclists... they can't be measured unless they are "dead still")


The 2011 accident data of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration give us a hint that ardent bicycling is not, for the most part, a youthful avocation, as those whose biking days ended in the 1970s or ’80s might assume. The average age of those killed cycling—presumably a rough proxy for those doing the most grueling road riding—has been rising by close to a year annually. In 2003 it was 36; in 2011 it was 43. Cyclists are heavily weighted towards the baby boom generation. The group involved in the most fatal accidents in 2011 is ages 45-54, followed by ages 55-64. The two cohorts make up those born between 1947 and 1966.

And to close, again, the writer misses the whole point of PUBLIC roadways by indicating that cyclists are trying to take over, and that motorists are being duped. No, the sad fact is that if we really tried, we could easily get along by simply SHARING the roadways. You know sharing, right...? Something learned in Kindergarten.

Maybe if motorists thought of cyclists as just human individuals, just as they are, just trying to get somewhere, just like each individual motorist, rather than some interloper on "car streets," we might just all get along.


While it is wrong to call bicyclists a downtrodden minority, they are a minority in one sense. They are one of those compact, issue-oriented small groups that, as the economist Mancur Olson warned in his classic The Logic of Collective Action (1965), generally take unmotivated majorities to the cleaners. There are probably a million dedicated cyclists in this country, bent on taking over a quarter or a third of the nation’s road space, built at the price of, let us repeat, trillions. They are ranged against the 200 million drivers who have a vague sense they are being duped. But this sense is only vague, and because motorists, like other American voters, have developed the habit of being talked into giving up what is theirs, any wise person would bet on the bicyclists’ winning all they ask for. A small collection of elite hobbyists will continue, as Tacitus might have put it, to make a traffic jam and call it peace.

Nobody is trying to "take over;" we cyclists just need a bit of space to get where we are going and we use less resources than a big ole giant car... for some reason, writers of this ilk fail to realize that another cyclist on the road means just a bit more room for motorists, one more parking space for a car, and just a bit less pollution for all of us.

gcottay 11-16-13 06:05 PM

I willingly accept the burden of membership in a powerful and privileged class. It's not easy but someone has to do it.

Chris516 11-16-13 08:11 PM

More of the same kind of stupid stuff from the anti-bike crowd.

howsteepisit 11-16-13 11:08 PM

One thing I really do not understand - Where did the belief that road users have the right ( or even duty in some peoples beliefs) to travel the speed limit? Excepting Interstate Highways with posted minimums, somehow going slower then the posted limit is now deemed obstructing traffic. Even my 75 Y/O mother believes she should be driving at the posted limit. That belief fuels the anti-share motorists, who feel unjustly hindered by slower traveling cyclist. But where did that belief come from?

Chris516 11-17-13 01:16 AM


Originally Posted by howsteepisit (Post 16252945)
One thing I really do not understand - Where did the belief that road users have the right ( or even duty in some peoples beliefs) to travel the speed limit? Excepting Interstate Highways with posted minimums, somehow going slower then the posted limit is now deemed obstructing traffic. Even my 75 Y/O mother believes she should be driving at the posted limit. That belief fuels the anti-share motorists, who feel unjustly hindered by slower traveling cyclist. But where did that belief come from?

:thumb:

Pibber 11-17-13 01:35 AM

and we're giving a **** rag like the weekly standard page views and links for what reason? seriously, delete this thread. i've never read a rag with worse "analysis" than this POS, and i live in the area. a little scrutiny, please.

CB HI 11-17-13 02:28 AM


Originally Posted by Pibber (Post 16253073)
and we're giving a **** rag like the weekly standard page views and links for what reason? seriously, delete this thread. i've never read a rag with worse "analysis" than this POS, and i live in the area. a little scrutiny, please.

Do you really think that the anti-cycling crazies come into BFs and that is how they find that article? To stay ahead of the whack jobs, we need to know how their most recent attacks are misconstructed.

unterhausen 11-17-13 10:48 AM


Originally Posted by tigrpal (Post 16251398)
I just want to ride my bike.

thanks for a nice post. I also just want to ride my bike. I expect to be able to ride my bike like I drive my car, without worrying about someone's ego problems. There is some small percentage motorists that think they own the road and can't make themselves share without expressing their selfishness.

dynodonn 11-17-13 10:56 AM


Originally Posted by unterhausen (Post 16253580)
...... There is some small percentage motorists that think they own the road and can't make themselves share without expressing their selfishness.

Whenever motorists start expressing their personal views about my particular way of bicycle riding via intimidation with sheet metal, I then express my views via contacting law enforcement.

genec 11-17-13 02:04 PM


Originally Posted by howsteepisit (Post 16252945)
One thing I really do not understand - Where did the belief that road users have the right ( or even duty in some peoples beliefs) to travel the speed limit? Excepting Interstate Highways with posted minimums, somehow going slower then the posted limit is now deemed obstructing traffic. Even my 75 Y/O mother believes she should be driving at the posted limit. That belief fuels the anti-share motorists, who feel unjustly hindered by slower traveling cyclist. But where did that belief come from?

Yeah this is something that I argue with my wife over and over again.... speed LIMIT is not "you must drive this speed..."

And motorists often don't realize (or perhaps don't care) that to drive the speed limit they are likely also driving over the LIMIT.

quicky 11-18-13 09:57 AM

I read the article and found the video of the confrontation in NH.
About me:
I run stop signs and red lights sometimes. I am very lower middle class. I ride old beater bikes. I live on a island with 14 miles of paved road from side to side. I know and sometimes party with truck drivers. Big trucks and a few cars scare me. I try to ride defensively. I have flipped off and yelled at a few drivers in my life. And I have had a few close calls. All in all, I guess I am just a regular guy riding a bike.

Hey folks it's a big world out there, let's ALL try to play nice. Cut the vehicles some slack when you can and they will cut you some slack maybe. Piss them off and they will go out their way to piss off all bikes. I cringe at some of the behavior I see other bicyclists exhibit, they just make it harder for all bicyclists to co-exist on the roads with cars.

One of my truck driving buddies drives a 18 or 20 wheel gravel truck that is overloaded most of the time. He says bikes almost freak him out. His truck is not "nimble" overloaded or not. He is certain his career and ability to sleep well would be over if he hit a bike. Most bikes work with him and get over as far as possible when it is possible. He does the same in return. What goes around, comes around.

Was on vacation in the Tucson area a few years ago. My god were some of the bicyclists were ****** just cause they could be. They even made me angry in my car with they way they rode. These type of riders, just like the riders in NH, set back biking.

I guess what I am trying to say is a little courtesy and humility will go very far when dealing with people. Just because you "can", doesn't mean you "should".

spivonious 11-18-13 10:14 AM

@genec As my dad told me when I was learning to drive, "It's a limit, not a goal."

PatrickGSR94 11-18-13 10:30 AM

Read it earlier this morning after seeing it posted on FB. Got to page 3 and had to quit.

That whole deal about cyclists making drivers become 2nd class road users is the biggest pile of BS I've ever read! But perhaps it would be a good thing if drivers DID turn into 2nd class users!

ItsJustMe 11-18-13 02:37 PM

It's interesting that in the cartoon accompanying the article, about 5 people in motorized vehicles are still taking up more room than the 18 people on bikes - because being big means you deserve that space and the smaller do not deserve their space.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.