Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

Curiosity regarding local law enforcement's(state, county, city) policy on 3ft

Search
Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

Curiosity regarding local law enforcement's(state, county, city) policy on 3ft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-17-13, 07:23 PM
  #1  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Curiosity regarding local law enforcement's(state, county, city) policy on 3ft

Since regional law enforcement includes DC, along with the Maryland State Police and Virginia Highway Patrol, seven county(4-MD, 3-VA), seven city(DC, 2-MD, 4-VA), and nine university(Univ. of MD, Univ. of VA, Univ. of DC, American Univ., Howard Univ., Gallaudet Univ., George Washington Univ., George Mason Univ., Marymount Univ.) police forces. I thought I would ask each one about their respective policy on the 'close passing law for their respective state(and DC).

So far:

I have heard back from the Police Chief in my county who gave me a 'standard' answer.

But when I talked with a Sgt. with the City of Fairfax, I not only had a terrific conversation with the officer. He is a cyclist himself and definitely supported having a helmetcam. Saying that would definitely help in getting a violator(of course that is presuming the cyclist gets' the license plate number). He did say one thing that bothered me. When they changed their computer system in 2006, that since then, they have not filed charges against driver involved in a collision with a cyclist.

My curiosity stems from the reactions I have seen from officers' with city, county, and state police.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 07:32 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times in 1,407 Posts
IMO this is a basically unenforceable law passed simply to pacify bicycle advocates. Like many laws passed thse days it's main intent is so the sponsor and supporters can tell interested votes, that they were concerned about their issues, and did something for them.

Even with a helmet cam video, it'll be hard to prove a close pass, unless the helmet is aimed down and to the side.

Of course, in the event of a broadside during a pass, the collision itself would prove that the pass was too close. But here again it just duplicated existing law about right of way and safe passing.

We've had a 3' law in New York for 3 years, and to my knowledge there has been zero effort to publicize the law, which goes to show how serious the state is. These laws don't do us one bit of good via enforcement. They might via publicity, instructing motorists about how to pass safely.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 07:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Posts: 7,048
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 509 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Around here, I just have three cities, one university, five county sheriffs and the state police departments in my normal riding zone. None of them will enforce our great/nonexistent passing law. (Great: "room to fall" on roads without a bike lane and with speeds of 35 mph or greater. Nonexistent: everywhere else.)

There aren't may cyclists among those crews. The local city had a handful a few years back, but they would only do training rides together with clothing that clearly labeled them as Police. After one of them got killed (not on a bike), that seemed to take the wind out of their sails and I haven't seen them riding these past two years.
B. Carfree is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 08:51 PM
  #4  
Full Member
 
Pibber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AdMo
Posts: 474

Bikes: cannondales 84 ST500; 87SR500; 95 CAAD 3 Silk Road 500; 99 CAAD 3 Frameset(project)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Chris516
they have not filed charges against driver involved in a collision with a cyclist.

not surprising. the driver that hit me wasn't charged. that was in arlington, the courthouse neighborhood.
Pibber is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 09:03 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times in 443 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
We've had a 3' law in New York for 3 years, and to my knowledge there has been zero effort to publicize the law, which goes to show how serious the state is. These laws don't do us one bit of good via enforcement. They might via publicity, instructing motorists about how to pass safely.
§ 1122-a. Overtaking a bicycle. The operator of a vehicle overtaking, from behind, a bicycle proceeding on the same side of a roadway shall pass to the left of such bicycle at a safe distance until safely clear thereof.

Yeah, other than passing bicycles safely is in the New York State driver's manual, and other than New York, like Massachusetts, has a safe passing law, rather than a 3 foot law, these laws do no good at all when advocates can't even quote them correctly.

-mr. bill
mr_bill is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 09:27 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
IMO this is a basically unenforceable law passed simply to pacify bicycle advocates. Like many laws passed thse days it's main intent is so the sponsor and supporters can tell interested votes, that they were concerned about their issues, and did something for them.

Even with a helmet cam video, it'll be hard to prove a close pass, unless the helmet is aimed down and to the side.

Of course, in the event of a broadside during a pass, the collision itself would prove that the pass was too close. But here again it just duplicated existing law about right of way and safe passing.

We've had a 3' law in New York for 3 years, and to my knowledge there has been zero effort to publicize the law, which goes to show how serious the state is. These laws don't do us one bit of good via enforcement. They might via publicity, instructing motorists about how to pass safely.
I use a rearward facing video camera, and I have videos of a couple of motorists that passed me within inches. In one video, one can see my tire tracks on the wet pavement, and it can be easily gauged on how close the vehicle was from me, in the other video, the bike lane stripe is clearly visible, with the motorist a foot over the line of a 5ft bike lane, with a curb on the other side. If our 3ft law was in effect, it would definitely have been enforceable upon being viewed by law enforcement.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 09:42 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
it would definitely have been enforceable upon being viewed by law enforcement.
There's a big difference between what may be enforceable in theory, and what will actually be enforced. The video would be evidence if there's an accident, but I doubt you could get the police or DA interested in pursuing it if you brought it in to file a complaint on the violation alone.

In any case, citing and fining handfuls of drivers doesn't do anything except put a few dollars into state coffers, and possibly have a few more drivers miffed at the "bicycle lobby" (doesn't matter what you do wrong, it's the fault of the guy that catches you). Even if the drivers learn a lesson and never pass close again, it's a drop in the bucket.

IMO if the states are going to pass laws intended to change conduct -- ANY laws intended to change conduct -- it's a meaningless gesture unless they spend the dollars to make sure citizens know the new law.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 10:40 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 4,336

Bikes: Canyon Endurace SLX 8Di2

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 510 Post(s)
Liked 30 Times in 14 Posts
And enforce the new laws. Without the threat of credible penalty, there will not be widespread compliance.
howsteepisit is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 11:29 PM
  #9  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
There's a big difference between what may be enforceable in theory, and what will actually be enforced. The video would be evidence if there's an accident, but I doubt you could get the police or DA interested in pursuing it if you brought it in to file a complaint on the violation alone.
Seeing other cyclists on BF getting law enforcement to act by seeing a video of a close pass, and in the fact that my locale's high collision rate, hovering between number 1 and 2 out of nearly 100 cities of similar size in our state, gives me more than ample assurance that local law enforcement will not completely ignore our state's 3 foot law when it is enacted.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 11:40 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
Seeing other cyclists on BF getting law enforcement to act by seeing a video of a close pass, and in the fact that my locale's high collision rate, hovering between number 1 and 2 out of nearly 100 cities of similar size in our state, gives me more than ample assurance that local law enforcement will not completely ignore our state's 3 foot law when it is enacted.
I'll go out on a limb and bet you 3 beers to one, that nothing changes significantly after the law is passed. I'll trust you as a man of honor to give me an accurate report when the time comes to settle the bet.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-17-13, 11:54 PM
  #11  
Banned
 
dynodonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: U.S. of A.
Posts: 7,466
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1268 Post(s)
Liked 78 Times in 67 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY
I'll go out on a limb and bet you 3 beers to one, that nothing changes significantly after the law is passed. I'll trust you as a man of honor to give me an accurate report when the time comes to settle the bet.
I let you know when the time comes and what the outcome is when I happen to make my next report. I have been averaging 1 to 2 close passing reports annually.
dynodonn is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 12:20 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,671

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5767 Post(s)
Liked 2,541 Times in 1,407 Posts
Originally Posted by dynodonn
I let you know when the time comes and what the outcome is when I happen to make my next report. I have been averaging 1 to 2 close passing reports annually.
Just so there's no arguments later--- foreign or domestic?
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 03:06 AM
  #13  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by FBinNY
IMO this is a basically unenforceable law passed simply to pacify bicycle advocates. Like many laws passed thse days it's main intent is so the sponsor and supporters can tell interested votes, that they were concerned about their issues, and did something for them.

Even with a helmet cam video, it'll be hard to prove a close pass, unless the helmet is aimed down and to the side.

Of course, in the event of a broadside during a pass, the collision itself would prove that the pass was too close. But here again it just duplicated existing law about right of way and safe passing.

We've had a 3' law in New York for 3 years, and to my knowledge there has been zero effort to publicize the law, which goes to show how serious the state is. These laws don't do us one bit of good via enforcement. They might via publicity, instructing motorists about how to pass safely.
When I finally able to get a helmetcam from GoPro, I will also get their Chest Harness, so the camera will always be facing the road.
Originally Posted by B. Carfree
Around here, I just have three cities, one university, five county sheriffs and the state police departments in my normal riding zone. None of them will enforce our great/nonexistent passing law. (Great: "room to fall" on roads without a bike lane and with speeds of 35 mph or greater. Nonexistent: everywhere else.)

There aren't many cyclists among those crews. The local city had a handful a few years back, but they would only do training rides together with clothing that clearly labeled them as Police. After one of them got killed (not on a bike), that seemed to take the wind out of their sails and I haven't seen them riding these past two years.
That is sad.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 10:12 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
I reported a pass where passengers struck me with arms out a window as an assault.

When cops caught up to the offender they admitted the hit, but said it was accidental. I accepted issuance of a 3' passing violation as a resolution instead of assault. If I'd been thinking more clearly when talking to the cop, I'd have pushed for a charge of hit and run. But I was just thrilled that they'd get hit with the 3' violation.

Wouldn't have happened without them being stupid and admitting to the cop that they did in fact hit me.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 06:21 PM
  #15  
DancesWithSUVs
 
dynaryder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Griffin Cycle Bethesda,MD
Posts: 6,983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Chris: you forgot a few.

Uniformed Secret Service;unless it involves a diplomat or VIP,they won't get involved.

Capitol Police;around the Capitol and National Mall.

Park Police;most parkways and many city parks(get mugged in 14th & K,don't call MPD).

Metro Transit Police;anything involving Metro Buses(think MPD covers the Circulator) and bike theft at stations.

Various Agency Police. Friend got left-hooked near Union Station,and some Treasury Police showed up. They were actually really helpful.

You would think that with all the 'police' we have around here,people would drive better.
__________________

C'dale BBU('05 and '09)/Super Six/Hooligan8and 3,Kona Dew Deluxe,Novara Buzz/Safari,Surly Big Dummy,Marin Pt Reyes,Giant Defy 1,Schwinn DBX SuperSport,Dahon Speed Pro TT,Brompton S6L/S2E-X
dynaryder is offline  
Old 12-18-13, 07:22 PM
  #16  
24-Speed Machine
Thread Starter
 
Chris516's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Wash. Grove, MD
Posts: 6,058

Bikes: 2003 Specialized Allez 24-Speed Road Bike

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by dynaryder
Chris: you forgot a few.

Uniformed Secret Service;unless it involves a diplomat or VIP,they won't get involved.

Capitol Police;around the Capitol and National Mall.

Park Police;most parkways and many city parks(get mugged in 14th & K,don't call MPD).

Metro Transit Police;anything involving Metro Buses(think MPD covers the Circulator) and bike theft at stations.

Various Agency Police. Friend got left-hooked near Union Station,and some Treasury Police showed up. They were actually really helpful.

You would think that with all the 'police' we have around here,people would drive better.
Yes, I did forget a bunch, lol.
Chris516 is offline  
Old 12-19-13, 11:49 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA, USA
Posts: 1,851

Bikes: 2012 Trek Allant, 2016 Bianchi Volpe Disc

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
PA has a 4' law and they did a fair job publicizing it (newspaper articles, TV news reports, etc.). I still get passed closer than 4' by roughly 80% of motorists, but I'd say only 1% are dangerously close (<2'), and only 0.1% are a true threat (<1').

I have never heard of anyone receiving a ticket for it.
spivonious is offline  
Old 12-19-13, 01:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,558
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7148 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times in 92 Posts
Originally Posted by mconlonx
I reported a pass where passengers struck me with arms out a window as an assault.

When cops caught up to the offender they admitted the hit, but said it was accidental. I accepted issuance of a 3' passing violation as a resolution instead of assault. If I'd been thinking more clearly when talking to the cop, I'd have pushed for a charge of hit and run. But I was just thrilled that they'd get hit with the 3' violation.

Wouldn't have happened without them being stupid and admitting to the cop that they did in fact hit me.
The above was Berwick ME local police dept.

I know ME has added a required segment dealing with cyclists in their driver's ed curriculum, so everyone who gets a license has at least had it taught to them.

A cop to whom I reported some jackhole merging into my lane, getting way closer than 3' in Portsmouth NH had never heard of the 3' statute in his state, nor had his immediate supervisor.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 12-19-13, 02:27 PM
  #19  
Arizona Dessert
 
noisebeam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 15,030

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5345 Post(s)
Liked 2,169 Times in 1,288 Posts
Read the very bottom of this: https://azbikelaw.org/articles/ThreeFoot.html

There have been a couple local MV-bike crashes in the last few years where the focus is now on if the cyclist was in bike lane or not when hit, since if they are not the 3ft law doesn't apply.
noisebeam is offline  
Old 12-28-13, 09:22 AM
  #20  
Resident smartass.
 
Fargo Wolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kamloops, BC, Canada
Posts: 488
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 32 Post(s)
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I'm not in the US, but Provincial/Territorial law generally requires that motorists pass cyclists at a minimum, 1m (3ft). However, drivers will give a lot more room if they can do so. Often a full lane in some cases.
Fargo Wolf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seeker333
Advocacy & Safety
32
04-01-17 04:28 PM
merlinextraligh
Advocacy & Safety
6
04-17-12 07:08 PM
Pobble.808
Advocacy & Safety
1
01-31-12 03:43 PM
cyclezealot
Advocacy & Safety
3
07-23-11 01:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.