Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Advocacy & Safety
Reload this Page >

How about creating a law that says---

Notices
Advocacy & Safety Cyclists should expect and demand safe accommodation on every public road, just as do all other users. Discuss your bicycle advocacy and safety concerns here.

How about creating a law that says---

Old 07-09-14, 06:54 AM
  #1  
rydabent
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,546

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2902 Post(s)
Liked 908 Times in 535 Posts
How about creating a law that says---

How about creating a law that says anyone that causes an accident who was found to be on a cell phone will have his or her penality doubled. This would apply both to car, property and cycling accidents.
rydabent is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:04 AM
  #2  
spdracr39
Senior Member
 
spdracr39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538

Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Rather than creating more laws how about just making the devices inactive while moving unless on hands free.
spdracr39 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:19 AM
  #3  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 13 Posts
How about just enforcing current law, tacking on a distracted driving ticket, leaving cell phones alone, and moving this thread to A&S?
RPK79 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:34 AM
  #4  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,336 Times in 844 Posts
So what is the current vehicle code where you live?
fietsbob is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:39 AM
  #5  
Homebrew01
Super Moderator
 
Homebrew01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,745

Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1121 Post(s)
Liked 684 Times in 464 Posts
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
How about just enforcing current law, tacking on a distracted driving ticket, leaving cell phones alone, and moving this thread to A&S?
Any minute now.

Or is this about the "mechanics" of creating laws ?
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.

FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Homebrew01 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:53 AM
  #6  
FBinNY 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 36,166

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 126 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4465 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 221 Times in 147 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracr39 View Post
Rather than creating more laws how about just making the devices inactive while moving unless on hands free.
What about those on a bus or train? Or even passengers in a car?

Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.

If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:57 AM
  #7  
spdracr39
Senior Member
 
spdracr39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Cabot, Arkansas
Posts: 1,538

Bikes: Lynskey Twisted Helix Di2 Ti, 1987 Orbea steel single speed/fixie, Orbea Avant M30, Trek Fuel EX9.8 29, Trek Madone 5 series, Specialized Epic Carbon Comp 29er, Trek 7.1F

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
A hands free headset would still be a good idea even in those situations but you make an excellent point. You can't make anything idiot proof because they just come up with better idiots.
spdracr39 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 07:58 AM
  #8  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
What about those on a bus or train? Or even passengers in a car?

Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.

If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
Solid argument, but what wrench would be proper for this?
RPK79 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 08:28 AM
  #9  
CbadRider
Senior Member
 
CbadRider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: On the bridge with Picard
Posts: 5,935

Bikes: Specialized Allez, Specialized Sirrus

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Moved from Mechanics to A&S.
__________________
Originally Posted by Xerum 525 View Post
Now get on your cheap bike and give me a double century. You walking can of Crisco!!

Forum Guidelines *click here*
CbadRider is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 08:32 AM
  #10  
bmontgomery87
Senior Member
 
bmontgomery87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997

Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracr39 View Post
Rather than creating more laws how about just making the devices inactive while moving unless on hands free.

Because it's a terrible idea. If that we're the case:
You couldn't report reckless drivers and be able to get their plate number.
You couldn't call 911 while escaping from a robbery,mugging,assault, etc.

There are loads of other situations but I don't feel like typing a list.
bmontgomery87 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 08:53 AM
  #11  
sauerwald
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840

Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The fundamental problem is that the vast majority of drivers know that their driving skill is well above average, and that driving does not require 100% of their attention. I still believe that the best solution would be to mount a 6" long, sharpened steel spike to the center of the steering wheel of every vehicle - it would make drivers pay more attention, and those who didn't wouldn't become repeat offenders.
sauerwald is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 08:55 AM
  #12  
mconlonx 
Str*t*gic *quivoc*tor
 
mconlonx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,552
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7071 Post(s)
Liked 88 Times in 63 Posts
Originally Posted by rydabent View Post
How about creating a law that says anyone that causes an accident who was found to be on a cell phone will have his or her penality doubled. This would apply both to car, property and cycling accidents.
How 'bout actually pursuing legislation in real life instead of harping about it online? Have you contacted your state legislators regarding this?
__________________
I know next to nothing. I am frequently wrong.
mconlonx is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 08:56 AM
  #13  
RPK79
Custom User Title
 
RPK79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239

Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo

Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 30 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by sauerwald View Post
The fundamental problem is that the vast majority of drivers know that their driving skill is well above average, and that driving does not require 100% of their attention. I still believe that the best solution would be to mount a 6" long, sharpened steel spike to the center of the steering wheel of every vehicle - it would make drivers pay more attention, and those who didn't wouldn't become repeat offenders.
Don't forget bicycles are vehicles, too.
RPK79 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 09:17 AM
  #14  
sauerwald
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840

Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
Don't forget bicycles are vehicles, too.
I believe that a bicycle is a vehicle in MN, but if you ride it into CA, it is no longer a vehicle. - but point taken.
sauerwald is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 09:49 AM
  #15  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2933 Post(s)
Liked 339 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by bmontgomery87 View Post
Because it's a terrible idea. If that we're the case:
You couldn't report reckless drivers and be able to get their plate number.
You couldn't call 911 while escaping from a robbery,mugging,assault, etc.

There are loads of other situations but I don't feel like typing a list.
It's possible to disable cell service but still have them 911 capable.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 10:37 AM
  #16  
bmontgomery87
Senior Member
 
bmontgomery87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Roanoke, Va
Posts: 997

Bikes: 2013 leader 721. 2015 leader 725. 2012 fuji feather

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wphamilton View Post
It's possible to disable cell service but still have them 911 capable.
I guess if you could also make it to where you could call 1 emergency contact on your contact list + local police (non emergency numbers).
Just from personal experience, I encountered a very reckless motorist a few weeks ago (I was driving as well) that was running red lights and changing lanes erratically. I was able to telephone the police, follow them at a safe distance, and relay their direction of travel and vehicle description so that the local police could stop them.

In instances like that, crazy drivers get away with crimes.

I'm all for stopping distracted driving, but I think it would be better to tackle the problem with high fines and strict enforcement versus putting people at risk by taking away cell phones.
bmontgomery87 is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 11:02 AM
  #17  
wphamilton
Senior Member
 
wphamilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280

Bikes: Nashbar Road

Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2933 Post(s)
Liked 339 Times in 226 Posts
Originally Posted by bmontgomery87 View Post
I guess if you could also make it to where you could call 1 emergency contact on your contact list + local police (non emergency numbers).
Just from personal experience, I encountered a very reckless motorist a few weeks ago (I was driving as well) that was running red lights and changing lanes erratically. I was able to telephone the police, follow them at a safe distance, and relay their direction of travel and vehicle description so that the local police could stop them.

In instances like that, crazy drivers get away with crimes.

I'm all for stopping distracted driving, but I think it would be better to tackle the problem with high fines and strict enforcement versus putting people at risk by taking away cell phones.
Yes I'd rather see legitimate enforcement triggered by bad behavior than restrictions on everyone - in fact, there are a lot of "victimless crimes" on the books that shouldn't be infractions until someone's actions are actually dangerous or are an active infraction (rather than potentially lead to an infraction). But if people are unwilling to exercise care, and law enforcement unwilling to enforce, then maybe some pragmatic approach is in order. Maybe not this one, but when ideas like this get traction someone somewhere will come up with a better one.
wphamilton is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 11:11 AM
  #18  
dabac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1073 Post(s)
Liked 289 Times in 216 Posts
Originally Posted by FBinNY View Post
What about those on a bus or train? Or even passengers in a car?

Make all the laws you want, or apply technical fixes like this but it won't change anything. Cell phones are the latest issue and it's trendy to blame them for everything, but there has always been distracted driving. Things like trying to read a map, eating/drinking (coffee/soda), children/pets, tuning the radio/adjusting the a/c, applying makeup, daydreaming, even reading the morning paper propped up on the steering wheel.

If I had to name the single biggest problem, I'd say it's that we've socialized the cost of driving stupidity (or lack of skill) through insurance. Folks are nearly 100% insulated from the harm they cause. IMO the way to get drivers to be more responsible isn't through technology or criminalization, but by making them more exposed financially. Things like higher minimum deductibles, and/or co-insurance for liability (up to a limit) would lower driving costs for responsible drivers and put more of the cost of poor driving back on those who are the problem. I'm not saying it would magically solve the problem, but it would be a step in the right direction.
I dunno.
Usually, probability of "getting caught" is a much more important factor for behaviour modification than the severity of the punishment. You could have instant beheading with a rusty saw as punishment for an offense, but unless people acknowledge the possibility that it could happen to them, it won't matter.
So sure, a steep cost MIGHT reduce the number of repeat offenders, but it won't do much for the first timers. And among those, it'll hit equally hard regardless if it's an accident stemming from avoidable carelessness, or from truly unforeseeable circumstances.
A less painful, but more frequently applied correction will be kinder on the "innocents" and still provide good reason for the deliberate sinners to get their act together.
dabac is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 01:22 PM
  #19  
ItsJustMe
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by spdracr39 View Post
Rather than creating more laws how about just making the devices inactive while moving unless on hands free.
That's going to be great for people riding busses and trains, and passengers. We were recently on vacation and had a 10 hour drive each way with 6 people in a van across hundreds of miles of interstate. Using the phone was great, including texting, catching up on various sites, etc.

You can't legislate away stupidity. People will just root their phones and work around the block.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 01:23 PM
  #20  
ItsJustMe
Señior Member
 
ItsJustMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13,749

Bikes: Windsor Fens, Giant Seek 0 (2014, Alfine 8 + discs)

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 446 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times in 7 Posts
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
How about just enforcing current law
That's the thing. Any cop could issue as many tickets as he could write in a day if he just decided to actually enforce this. It's almost to the point where it's unusual to see someone on the expressway that is NOT holding a phone to their ear.
__________________
Work: the 8 hours that separates bike rides.
ItsJustMe is offline  
Old 07-09-14, 05:33 PM
  #21  
turbo1889
Transportation Cyclist
 
turbo1889's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montana U.S.A.
Posts: 1,206

Bikes: Too many to list, some I built myself including the frame. I "do" ~ Human-Only-Pedal-Powered-Cycles, Human-Electric-Hybrid-Cycles, Human-IC-Hybrid-Cycles, and one Human-IC-Electric-3way-Hybrid-Cycle

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It's not the cell phone that is the problem. If it weren't the cell phone it would be something else.

How about instead of doing this piece meal and banning this and that specific behavior we just start treating driving an automobile on the public right of ways as the narrow privilege it legally is and start charging those who willfully engage in criminal negligence in the operation of a highly dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people with exactly that along with full civil liability along with the criminal charges ? Showing that the driver was drunk or high or texting would only serve as evidence of being willfully criminally negligent and the resulting public endangerment.

As to insurance that should be about ensuring victims and/or their families are compensated. Anything major and its a one time payout because your not going to be allowed to drive ever again because you have proven you can't handle the responsibility of the narrow privilege of being permitted to operate a dangerous lethal machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways.


I look forward to the day when the self driving car technology gets good enough and wide spread enough that the scales get tipped far enough that manually driving such a dangerous machine around other innocent people on the public right of ways actually gets treated like the narrow privilege with full responsibility that it actually is.
turbo1889 is offline  
Old 07-10-14, 10:26 AM
  #22  
Keith99
Senior Member
 
Keith99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,866
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by sauerwald View Post
I believe that a bicycle is a vehicle in MN, but if you ride it into CA, it is no longer a vehicle. - but point taken.
Wrong. Bikes are vehicles in California and in most states.

Vehicle =/= Motorvehicle.
Keith99 is offline  
Old 07-11-14, 05:24 PM
  #23  
sauerwald
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,840

Bikes: Bianchi San Remo - set up as a utility bike, Peter Mooney Road bike, Peter Mooney commute bike,Dahon Folder,Schwinn Paramount Tandem

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Keith99 View Post
Wrong. Bikes are vehicles in California and in most states.

Vehicle =/= Motorvehicle.
California Vehicle Code, section 670, definition of a vehicle:

670. A "vehicle" is a device by which any person or property may be propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks.

Section 231 defines a bicycle:

231. A bicycle is a device upon which any person may ride, propelled exclusively by human power through a belt, chain, or gears, and having one or more wheels. Persons riding bicycles are subject to the provisions of this code specified in Sections 21200 and 21200.5.

So although in most states a bicycle is a vehicle, in California, it is a device.
sauerwald is offline  
Old 07-11-14, 08:13 PM
  #24  
Chicago Al 
Senior Member
 
Chicago Al's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Chicago, the leafy NW side
Posts: 2,533

Bikes: 1974 Motobecane Grand Record, 1987 Miyata Pro, 1988 Bob Jackson Lady Mixte (wife's), others in the family

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 75 Post(s)
Liked 74 Times in 40 Posts
How about creating a law (or at least a stipulation on this forum) that says that anyone who spends much of his time complaining about overreaching 'gubmint' and 'bureaucrats' should not be promoting impractical, impossible to enforce ordinances, which would be a matter for local government anyway, and which he has no intention of actually making the slightest effort to get introduced?

Also, anyone who posts about cycling advocacy matters (like legal ones) in a forum other than A&S (like, say, Bike Mechanics) should be horse-whipped.
__________________
I never think I have hit hard, unless it rebounds.

- Dr Samuel Johnson
Chicago Al is offline  
Old 07-11-14, 09:20 PM
  #25  
rydabent
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rydabent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,546

Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2902 Post(s)
Liked 908 Times in 535 Posts
chicago

Wrong. I have talked to my legislators about this.
rydabent is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.