Helmets cramp my style
#4176
Senior Member
and yet Ian Walkers research shows motorists give cyclists wearing helmets less room when passing.
I think the pertinent point here is that it is the motorists that need to exert a level of care around cyclists that they haven't been doing. No doubt cyclists should do the same but too much emphasis is given to the helmet in place of responsible behavior.
It's also odd that the emphasis is on the helmet in collisions with motor vehicles when helmets are made for simple falls without involvement of motor vehicles.
I think the pertinent point here is that it is the motorists that need to exert a level of care around cyclists that they haven't been doing. No doubt cyclists should do the same but too much emphasis is given to the helmet in place of responsible behavior.
It's also odd that the emphasis is on the helmet in collisions with motor vehicles when helmets are made for simple falls without involvement of motor vehicles.
#4177
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
and yet Ian Walkers research shows motorists give cyclists wearing helmets less room when passing.
I think the pertinent point here is that it is the motorists that need to exert a level of care around cyclists that they haven't been doing. No doubt cyclists should do the same but too much emphasis is given to the helmet in place of responsible behavior.
It's also odd that the emphasis is on the helmet in collisions with motor vehicles when helmets are made for simple falls without involvement of motor vehicles.
I think the pertinent point here is that it is the motorists that need to exert a level of care around cyclists that they haven't been doing. No doubt cyclists should do the same but too much emphasis is given to the helmet in place of responsible behavior.
It's also odd that the emphasis is on the helmet in collisions with motor vehicles when helmets are made for simple falls without involvement of motor vehicles.
Is the amount of space while passing really a concern to anyone? According to Dr. Walker's reasearch, helmeted cyclists are still passed by an average of over three feet (by busses, it is closer to 4 feet for cars). Three feet is still plenty of space. Dr. Walker also stated that drivers percieve helmeted riders as more experienced and predictable, which is a good thing. Any predictabilty on the road adds to safety. It seems to me the danger is when drivers think a cyclist is going to act predictable, and they don't. I am worried about drivers pulling out quickly from stop signs, giving me a right hook, cutting me off at a light, NOT being hit while someone is passing me. I still hold that in all of those situations, the perception of an experienced rider adds to respect and safety of those on the road.
Sure, we can say drivers need to show more awareness around cyclists, but that philosophy won't save a trip to the hospital. Wearing a helmet is about safety, it seems you are talking about helmets like they are a social statement...to be honest I don't understand that. Going without a helmet because cars SHOULD be more responsible isn't the smartest position, in my opinion.
#4178
Senior Member
but it's the collisions with motor vehicles that are the problem, and drivers need to take more care around cyclists.
The most successful way to lower injury rates is through traffic management, not helmet use.
A helmet helps in a fall to the ground, but were never made to protect in a fall after a collision with a motor vehicle
The most successful way to lower injury rates is through traffic management, not helmet use.
A helmet helps in a fall to the ground, but were never made to protect in a fall after a collision with a motor vehicle
#4179
Senior Member
And FWIW, I spend most of my time watching how a driver reacts to my presence (by watching what they do with their vehicle) as I'm approaching rather than trying count dents.
#4180
Bike ≠ Car ≠ Ped.
You really cannot think of a single reason why somebody would not want to put foam and plastic on their head? Let me help you brainstorm a few.
It is an extra item to buy
It is an extra item to carry with your or leave on your bike
It makes your head sweaty
It chaffs your chin and makes your head itch
Many people think they are ugly
It prevents the wearing of many types of hats
I also don't like wearing a helmet, or anything near my ears when I am in city traffic because it affects the diffraction of sound around your ears, making it harder to locate cars and other sounds. And it cuts off the top of your vision when your head is down.
It is an extra item to buy
It is an extra item to carry with your or leave on your bike
It makes your head sweaty
It chaffs your chin and makes your head itch
Many people think they are ugly
It prevents the wearing of many types of hats
I also don't like wearing a helmet, or anything near my ears when I am in city traffic because it affects the diffraction of sound around your ears, making it harder to locate cars and other sounds. And it cuts off the top of your vision when your head is down.
Wear it right and it won't impede your vision or hearing.
Now grow up.
#4181
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4182
Bicycle Adventurer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,514
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I found an old Univega stamped helmet that matches my bike.
I'm going to use it, although its protective merit is in question.
I'm going to use it, although its protective merit is in question.
#4184
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You are confusing two kinds of "thinking." A motorist could be thinking about anything while driving whether. What they are thinking about during the periods when they aren't thinking about driving their vehicle is something you'll probably never know and really have no need to know. How they feel about whether I'm wearing a helmet or not, to me, falls into that category. I have noticed zero difference in how motorists actually drive (that other type of thinking) around me whether I'm wearing a helmet or not. They generally drive respectfully and treat me like a driver of a vehicle. Acting like a driver of a vehicle while I'm on the roads may have a lot to do with that (I like to and generally do believe it does).
And FWIW, I spend most of my time watching how a driver reacts to my presence (by watching what they do with their vehicle) as I'm approaching rather than trying count dents.
And FWIW, I spend most of my time watching how a driver reacts to my presence (by watching what they do with their vehicle) as I'm approaching rather than trying count dents.
And closetbiker, can you explain what you mean? It IS kind of a weak arguement that a bike helmet impedes hearing. I hear and see just fine while wearing my motorcycle helmet (full face) and people try to claim a bike helmet impedes my hearing? Come on...
#4185
Senior Member
At any rate, I think the point made in my second argument linked bears reviewing
Originally Posted by chapmancentral
if helmets prevent a high proportion of cut heads but no serious injuries or deaths in crashes involving cars, for example, that would explain the disparity between the population-level figures and the prospective studies right away. It would also be consistent with the claims of the helmet manufacturers, which are much more modest than those of the campaigners, presumably for legal reasons, and with the published standards for helmets, which involve impacts equivalent to a very low speed crash or a fall from a stationary riding position. All this makes perfect sense. The logical disconnect comes when you say "helmets prevent 85% of injuries, therefore they would prevent 85% of deaths". I don't think it requires particularly acute critical faculties to see the flaw in that chain of logic. You can call cuts and bruises lacerations and contusions, to make them sound worse, and you can lump everything from a cut ear to acute neurological trauma into one basket of "scary head injuries", but trivial injuries remain trivial; a device which protects against such injuries cannot without substantial additional evidence be assumed to prevent more serious consequences.
#4186
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,215
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have repeated this twice now. I never once ever said that a bicycle impedes hearing. I said it impedes the localization of sound. The ability to tell where a sound is coming from. The same is true for your motorcycle helmet. The ability to gauge the direction and distance of that revving engine is very important on busy city streets with hundreds of sounds coming at you.
#4187
Senior Member
I have repeated this twice now. I never once ever said that a bicycle impedes hearing. I said it impedes the localization of sound. The ability to tell where a sound is coming from. The same is true for your motorcycle helmet. The ability to gauge the direction and distance of that revving engine is very important on busy city streets with hundreds of sounds coming at you.
I know there are a lot of people who say they don't need ears to be safe but to me (and I was a musician for years, so maybe I have a higher awarness of the sublties of various sounds) that identification of localization of certain types of sounds have bailed me out many times.
Most often in typical right hook situations a motor vehicle can come up from behind me, slow up for the turn and I've picked it up via my ears far in advance of my eyes.
I can't imagine that a motorcycle helmet doesn't make things much quieter inside. The differring speeds between bikes and motor cycles also has it's effects.
I don't find wearing a helmet has any effect on my hearing but I wouldn't dismiss that it does for others.
For me, I just don't see any evidence that wearing a helmet makes any injury difference in what is important to me. It might for others, but not for me
#4188
Senior Member
I won't tell you what to do, but watching what kind of car, what condition their car is in, etc. is very helpful. Are you telling me you assume someone driving a minivan with four kids in it is as attentive as someone in a car by themselves? It is absolutely a good thing to watch how a driver reacts to you, but there is more you can do (in my opinion).
#4189
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why would I spend so much time trying to figure out who is in a car that I'm approaching? If they aren't moving, they aren't moving, etc. With all the tinted windows out there, it's next to impossible to determine who's in a car anyway. What little I can glean from the look on a driver's face tells me very little about how attentive they are.
#4190
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,972
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
#4191
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4194
Senior Member
I've brought the point up in the past, but with a thread as long as this is, it'd be easy to miss.
Basic sales is to create a demand by creating a need.
It doesn't have to be a real need, just a perceived need.
*the relevance directly relates to the original post. Mentioning that children have more sense than the women is based on the perception of safety.
Ironically, women as a group injure themselves far less than children, even without helmets, because their behavior is safer. That's reality, not perception.*
Basic sales is to create a demand by creating a need.
It doesn't have to be a real need, just a perceived need.
*the relevance directly relates to the original post. Mentioning that children have more sense than the women is based on the perception of safety.
Ironically, women as a group injure themselves far less than children, even without helmets, because their behavior is safer. That's reality, not perception.*
Last edited by closetbiker; 10-30-08 at 03:48 PM.
#4195
Senior Member
#4196
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 472
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmmm, might want to clear some more mind space for paying attention out on the road. There are plenty of high performance Volvo's: https://www.t5r.org/pages/frameset.htm
I need to 'clear some mind space for paying attention'? If you aren't paying attention to these things on the road, what exactly are you thinking about? This is exactly what I am doing. I am able to pay attention to more than the car in front of and behind me.
#4197
e-Biker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951
Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
but it's the collisions with motor vehicles that are the problem, and drivers need to take more care around cyclists.
The most successful way to lower injury rates is through traffic management, not helmet use.
A helmet helps in a fall to the ground, but were never made to protect in a fall after a collision with a motor vehicle
The most successful way to lower injury rates is through traffic management, not helmet use.
A helmet helps in a fall to the ground, but were never made to protect in a fall after a collision with a motor vehicle
Car collisions are a whole different matter and helmet or no helmet, the outcome will be almost identical. The relevancy of helmets in a car vs. bike situation has little to do with this thread.
What you've simply done all along in this thread amounts to nothing more than a THREAD JACK!
#4198
Galveston County Texas
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In The Wind
Posts: 33,221
Bikes: 02 GTO, 2011 Magnum
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1350 Post(s)
Liked 1,243 Times
in
621 Posts
Saw **** guy in Alvin Texas today on a 64 mille ride. No Straps Needed, Neck Mount:
__________________
Fred "The Real Fred"
Fred "The Real Fred"
Last edited by 10 Wheels; 10-31-08 at 07:05 PM.
#4200
Older "newbie"
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Hudson Valley of NY
Posts: 157
Bikes: Fuji Newest 4.0 just bought 7/26/08!
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts