Helmets cramp my style
#4501
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
The grim reaper returns.
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#4502
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Absecon, NJ
Posts: 2,947
Bikes: Puch Luzern, Puch Mistral SLE, Bianchi Pista, Motobecane Grand Touring, Austro-Daimler Ultima, Legnano, Raleigh MountainTour, Cannondale SM600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Wow, in 5 years here on these boards I've never once considered putting someone on ignore. Guess you should feel honored.
#4503
Infamous Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 24,360
Bikes: Surly Big Dummy, Fuji World, 80ish Bianchi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
3 Posts
Give the man a cigar, he gets it...or would you rather have a beer?
__________________
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
"Let us hope our weapons are never needed --but do not forget what the common people knew when they demanded the Bill of Rights: An armed citizenry is the first defense, the best defense, and the final defense against tyranny. If guns are outlawed, only the government will have guns. Only the police, the secret police, the military, the hired servants of our rulers. Only the government -- and a few outlaws. I intend to be among the outlaws" - Edward Abbey
#4506
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Absecon, NJ
Posts: 2,947
Bikes: Puch Luzern, Puch Mistral SLE, Bianchi Pista, Motobecane Grand Touring, Austro-Daimler Ultima, Legnano, Raleigh MountainTour, Cannondale SM600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
#4507
Senior Member
I've put John on and taken him off a few times.
Zeuser is by far, easier to ignore than John.
#4508
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: western Oklahoma
Posts: 144
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If the concern is that cyclists are exposing their heads to bumps, bruises, and scrapes, then I don't think there is any question that helmet can help prevent those things. Yet I never see people passionately argue for the use of elbow and knee pads, which are at least as good at preventing bumps, bruises and scrapes as helmets are. So don't they fall under the same definition of "common sense" that you have used to determine the value of helmets?
#4509
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Professional Keirin riders wear elbow and shoulder pads, and pro downhillers wear what amounts to full body armor. Now they have even begun to wear neck braces with their full-face helmets, and they seem to go okay.
#4510
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm still not convinced that it is a 'reasonable assumption'. Indeed, the whole point of research is that one avoids assumptions. The conclusion in the abstract you quote smacks of a research who started out with that assumption in mind. I haven't read the study, of course, but i suspect that is does not, for example, put the risks being taken by unhelmeted ATV riders in context (for example, comparing it with other activities, or looking at the effect of different styles of riding - is ATV racing particularly dangerous, for example?)...
...Here's an example of how study design can be used to reinforce a pre-determined conclusion. Lets' take the fixie analogy i used earlier...
...You see the problem? it's back to my original point. Demonstrating that activity A is more dangerous than activity B isn't terribly helpful. Eating seafood is more dangerous than eating potatoes, for example, so perhaps we should ban seafood. Unless the overall risk level is put in context it's dangerous to make 'reasonable assumptions'.
...Here's an example of how study design can be used to reinforce a pre-determined conclusion. Lets' take the fixie analogy i used earlier...
...You see the problem? it's back to my original point. Demonstrating that activity A is more dangerous than activity B isn't terribly helpful. Eating seafood is more dangerous than eating potatoes, for example, so perhaps we should ban seafood. Unless the overall risk level is put in context it's dangerous to make 'reasonable assumptions'.
I went ahead and downloaded the paper in question. Here's their purpose statement:
The purpose of this study was to compare injury patterns between helmeted and unhelmeted patients hospitalized due to ATV-related injuries. We examined whether lack of helmet use is associated with significant injuries to the head, neck, and face regions. We also assessed the likelihood of in-hospital death for helmeted versus unhelmeted ATV riders and the likelihood of arriving at the hospital with a depressed level of consciousness (ie, low Glasgow Coma Score (GCS)). Finally, we compared hospital utilization and procedures by helmet use.
You state that "putting the risk into context" would have been nice; well they did that by using a different comparison, economic and the number of children killed. This is for a "recreational" activity. The adjusted odds ratio measured against the helmeted group for intracranial procedures at the hospital for the unhelmeted group was 3.41; for pressure monitor: craniotomy, 3.26 and skull, 1.82; for any procedure, 2.60; for a blood transfusion, 1.49; for ICU admission, 1.42. (I know Trombone understands these numbers, but for others, any number over 1.00 is a greater risk than the control group--in this case the helmeted ATV people.) So overall, they did a pretty good job. You have again jumped onto an abstract and ignored the data that they reported, looking only at their "agenda." But what if there were no agenda other than injury prevention?
Closetbiker,
I confess that you have been remarkably good in your responses in the recent past. So my only excuse is saying that you were jumping on people who wear helmets is that I was bringing my impressions from the past. I reviewed quite a few recent responses and could not find any out-of-line ones at all. Thanks for calling me on that one.
I will do a bit more of my own analysis, but will probably be tapering this off, as there are a lot of things happening, and I have some of my own research to do (occupational noise) and a paper to write. So you don't need to put me on the ignore list again. But sometime in the future, I'll return.
John
#4511
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This is a very good point. However, using knee pads/elbow pads would almost certainly cause a person's ability to pedal and steer to be hindered. Possibly to the point of making it MORE dangerous, but maybe not. But certainly enough to cause one to tire much more quickly when riding. I just don't think you can say the same thing about the helmet. And besides, I've taken many a scrape/bruise/bump on my elbows and knees, and always been able to keep going. My head is a much more fragile part of my body, and I choose to protect it as much as possible.
(emphasis added jcr)
(emphasis added jcr)
John
#4512
No lugs? No hugs.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 1,115
Bikes: '85 Miyata 310, '06 GT Performer
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Why this is being turned into an argument, I've no idea. I've already stated that I don't wear a helmet either; it's just very obvious why helmets are considered more useful than kneepads.
#4514
Senior Member
This is an issue because the protection of the brain, and not the bone, is what's most important and where controversy lies.
#4515
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Absecon, NJ
Posts: 2,947
Bikes: Puch Luzern, Puch Mistral SLE, Bianchi Pista, Motobecane Grand Touring, Austro-Daimler Ultima, Legnano, Raleigh MountainTour, Cannondale SM600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Ok, I'll spell it out since probably the only who understands my angle is closetbiker. So what if no one wears a helmet when they drive a car, paint a house or pick fruit. We are here talking about wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle. Other acitivities are irrelevent to the discussion, we need to stay focused.
It seems to me the same talking points are being replayed ad nauseum with absolutely no progress. One side brings case studies, the other side says they are flawed. There is absolutely no question a helmet will protect a bicycle rider from injury to the head. Even if it means just bumps, scrapes, cuts, or bruises. It could mean the difference from getting up and brushing yourself off, than having to stop your ride and make a trip to the emergency room for stiches. Many people are looking at a helmet to serve only that purpose. Yes there are gullible people out there who might think that they can sail through a windshield or into a tree and come out unfazed because of their helmet, but so what? There are people who think putting a Tornado Vortex into their car's air intake is going to give them better gas mileage. I think the average person should be given more credit that they understand no helmet will protect them from severe injury in a violent accident. Certainly anyone who rides motorcycles, skydives, or plays football understands that.
No one is forcing anyone to wear a helmet. If people tell you you should, who cares? I get jeered at in the neighborhoods I ride through on my commute very frequently, certainly not just for the fact that I'm wearing a helmet, but I'm sure it doesn't help. No one I see riding there ever wears one. No one. And frankly, I don't care if they do or don't. And I don't care if they mock me because I choose to wear one.
If your town, state, or country has a mantory helmet law, perhaps energies should be focused at the people who introduced the legislation in an attempt to convince them to overturn it.
Ok, I've had my fill of this thread. I'm sure this post will get lost in the course of the next 5000 posts, but have fun! It's been mildly entertaining.
It seems to me the same talking points are being replayed ad nauseum with absolutely no progress. One side brings case studies, the other side says they are flawed. There is absolutely no question a helmet will protect a bicycle rider from injury to the head. Even if it means just bumps, scrapes, cuts, or bruises. It could mean the difference from getting up and brushing yourself off, than having to stop your ride and make a trip to the emergency room for stiches. Many people are looking at a helmet to serve only that purpose. Yes there are gullible people out there who might think that they can sail through a windshield or into a tree and come out unfazed because of their helmet, but so what? There are people who think putting a Tornado Vortex into their car's air intake is going to give them better gas mileage. I think the average person should be given more credit that they understand no helmet will protect them from severe injury in a violent accident. Certainly anyone who rides motorcycles, skydives, or plays football understands that.
No one is forcing anyone to wear a helmet. If people tell you you should, who cares? I get jeered at in the neighborhoods I ride through on my commute very frequently, certainly not just for the fact that I'm wearing a helmet, but I'm sure it doesn't help. No one I see riding there ever wears one. No one. And frankly, I don't care if they do or don't. And I don't care if they mock me because I choose to wear one.
If your town, state, or country has a mantory helmet law, perhaps energies should be focused at the people who introduced the legislation in an attempt to convince them to overturn it.
Ok, I've had my fill of this thread. I'm sure this post will get lost in the course of the next 5000 posts, but have fun! It's been mildly entertaining.
#4516
e-Biker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951
Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
It's not so much the high speed collision where i think a helmet is going to help, it probably won't. It's the slow speed falling off the bike where I know bike helmets work. And as we've seen this week, a light fall can indeed kill you.
My position has always been: Some protection is better than no protection at all!
#4517
Strong Walker
Ok, I'll spell it out since probably the only who understands my angle is closetbiker. So what if no one wears a helmet when they drive a car, paint a house or pick fruit. We are here talking about wearing a helmet while riding a bicycle. Other acitivities are irrelevent to the discussion, we need to stay focused.
If you want to find out whether it is a matter of good sense to wear a helmet for safety, the question: "How dangerous is cycling compared to other ordinary activities" becomes a vital one.
#4518
Strong Walker
You may feel more endangered on your unstable bike, but in fact, you got a better chance of knocking your head in when you ride your 2t airbag equipped SUV. Eerie, eh?
And as we've seen this week, a light fall can indeed kill you.
#4519
e-Biker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 951
Bikes: Gary Fisher, Strong GT-S eBike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This is a nice example to explain the difference between things that *feel* dangerous and things that *are* dangerous.
You may feel more endangered on your unstable bike, but in fact, you got a better chance of knocking your head in when you ride your 2t airbag equipped SUV. Eerie, eh?
That kind of fall could have happened indoors. while walking. while taking stairs. Of course, it only makes bike and ski helmets to something sensible people wear, and people who tongue-in-cheek propose walking- car- and stairwalkig-helmets complete nutters.
You may feel more endangered on your unstable bike, but in fact, you got a better chance of knocking your head in when you ride your 2t airbag equipped SUV. Eerie, eh?
That kind of fall could have happened indoors. while walking. while taking stairs. Of course, it only makes bike and ski helmets to something sensible people wear, and people who tongue-in-cheek propose walking- car- and stairwalkig-helmets complete nutters.
yes, it could've happened while walking, taking the stairs and so on. But the reality is that she was on skis. Skis are plenty unstable. You rarely see any beginners *NOT* fall. They always fall when learning how to ski.
The point i'm making is that certain activities are riskier than others and as such mandate more protection for one self. Skiing is risker than walking and biking is probably just a bit less risky than skiing or maybe at par.
Biking is riskier because you're one two wheels, one behind the other, which is very unstable at low speeds. Most people fall off their bike at low speeds. High speed accidents do happen but helmet or no, the result is usually the same. but falling off the bike at low speeds, you'll far better survival chances with a helmet.
Richardson probably would've survived that fall on the bunny hill if she had worn a helmet.
One argument us pro-helmet guys always have is: it's better to look silly than to be dead.
My argument has always been: some protection is better than no protection. It's better to risk the chance that a helmet might work than not take that chance at all. or as it's more commonly said: "better safe than sorry"
#4520
Surf Bum
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
The point i'm making is that certain activities are riskier than others and as such mandate more protection for one self. Skiing is risker than walking and biking is probably just a bit less risky than skiing or maybe at par.
Biking is riskier because you're one two wheels, one behind the other, which is very unstable at low speeds.
Biking is riskier because you're one two wheels, one behind the other, which is very unstable at low speeds.
So why keep making people think it is so dangerous that they need to wear protective equipment when you know the effect of that is to scare some people away from riding bikes (especially parents keeping their kids off bikes, who then grow up to be adults who don't bike but drive cars and therefore increase pollution, get fat, etc.)?
#4521
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Zeuser created a "My helmet saved my life" thread a while back. In it, he detailed a fall he had while straddling his bike and attempting to lower his kickstand with his foot.
So you should understand his POV: being anywhere near a bicycle is extremely dangerous for some folks. He just doesn't seem to understand that his experience is not universal.
So you should understand his POV: being anywhere near a bicycle is extremely dangerous for some folks. He just doesn't seem to understand that his experience is not universal.
#4522
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,973
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,536 Times
in
1,045 Posts
One argument us pro-helmet guys always have is: it's better to look silly than to be dead.
My argument has always been: some protection is better than no protection. It's better to risk the chance that a helmet might work than not take that chance at all. or as it's more commonly said: "better safe than sorry"
My argument has always been: some protection is better than no protection. It's better to risk the chance that a helmet might work than not take that chance at all. or as it's more commonly said: "better safe than sorry"
#4523
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times
in
13 Posts
Skis are plenty unstable. You rarely see any beginners *NOT* fall. They always fall when learning how to ski.
About 34 skiiers die each in America, which is about half the number of Americans killed by lightning. Whoever pointed out that humans are lousy at evaluating risks was right on.
#4524
Surf Bum
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 2,184
Bikes: Lapierre Pulsium 500 FdJ, Ritchey breakaway cyclocross, vintage trek mtb.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
Zeuser created a "My helmet saved my life" thread a while back. In it, he detailed a fall he had while straddling his bike and attempting to lower his kickstand with his foot.
So you should understand his POV: being anywhere near a bicycle is extremely dangerous for some folks. He just doesn't seem to understand that his experience is not universal.
So you should understand his POV: being anywhere near a bicycle is extremely dangerous for some folks. He just doesn't seem to understand that his experience is not universal.
Ah, I see. I suppose I'm just at the other extreme. I'm in my 40s and have never hit my head in a bike crash. I've also ridden skateboards in pools, ramps, downhill, and skateparks for 30+ years and have never hit my head either. (i did finally break a bone though: broke my arm/elbow last year!). Of course I've probably jinxed myself now and will probably fall down the stairs tonight and crack my head open, ha!
#4525
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
Posts: 1,914
Bikes: Rans Stratus, Trek 1420, Rivendell Rambouillet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ah, I see. I suppose I'm just at the other extreme. I'm in my 40s and have never hit my head in a bike crash. I've also ridden skateboards in pools, ramps, downhill, and skateparks for 30+ years and have never hit my head either. (i did finally break a bone though: broke my arm/elbow last year!). Of course I've probably jinxed myself now and will probably fall down the stairs tonight and crack my head open, ha!
John