Police: Bike mechanical issues contributed to fatal van collision
Times Colonist, Oct. 3, 2014:
The tire pressure on the bike was found to be low and a pedal might have malfunctioned as well. - See more at: Bicycle in fatal highway crash was faulty: RCMP - Local - Times Colonist For Immediate Release 2014JAG0254-001300 September 4, 2014 VICTORIA – The BC Coroners Service has confirmed the identity of a male who died following a cycling incident in North Saanich on Sept. 3, 2014. He was Michael John Sanders, aged 64. Mr. Sanders is originally from England, but was visiting the Victoria area during recent months. Mr. Sanders was riding his bicycle southbound on the Patricia Bay Highway (Highway 17) just before noon on Sept. 3 when, south of the McTavish overpass, he was struck by a van in the southbound-travelled portion of the roadway. Mr. Sanders was immediately transported to Saanich Peninsula Hospital, but could not be resuscitated. The BC Coroners Service and RCMP Traffic Services continue to investigate this incident. The family of Mr. Sanders has been notified of his death. On behalf of family members, the BC Coroners Service asks that the media respect their privacy at this difficult time. |
Sounds like he fell off, then got hit. Maybe a really low tire rolled off the rim during a turn.
|
Or, because it was a car/cycle collision, authority people need something, anything as a reason to dismiss it and let the driver off.
Tire and pedal :lol: is as good as any. |
maybe he flatted and was trying to unclip when he fell into traffic?
|
Low pressure based on what?
Tire sidewall reads 120psi, and he had 105psi?? |
Video clip: (warning: embedded auto-play with ad): Cyclist Dies After a Crash on the Pat Bay Highway - CHEK
It looks like a straightaway between two turns. I do know that when these incidents occur the local cops are out there for hours on their hands and knees measuring and gathering evidence. It comes down to finding exactly where the impact occurred. I've biked that route before--you do have to keep your wits about you as an interchange is nearby and drivers are coming off the highway at high speed. |
Two possible scenarios.
The first is that he had a solo crash possibly from a flat, a pedal strike or simple loss of traction or balance, fell and was struck while down. The other is that he was struck first then fell. There's a big difference between the two, and it's not clear which from the reports. If he was struck before falling, then it's a question as to why and how. For example, a broken pedal or simply his foot slipping off could have caused a sudden lane change (my record is the full width of the road, when a pedal broke during a sprint), or a very low tire making handling sloppy. Of course, he could be one of the thousands struck from behind while riding a perfectly straight line. |
All I see wrong with the van is the bumper is tilted down a bit. Not likely an upright hit from behind.
My 35c tires going flat never bothered my steering on a flat road, slowed braking some. I had a fast leak one day and was pumping it up every 1/2 mile. 4 wires and mised one. A lot different from 23c of course, never used them. Maybe he just passed out. |
Originally Posted by cderalow
(Post 17195459)
maybe he flatted and was trying to unclip when he fell into traffic?
|
I'm surprised they didn't say his chain had rust and his reflectors were missing also.
|
RIP to the cyclist
|
Originally Posted by cderalow
(Post 17195459)
maybe he flatted and was trying to unclip when he fell into traffic?
|
When I am driving and encounter any vulnerable road user, I give more than enough berth for error. If I can't, I slow appreciably.
|
I assume investigators have more info than we do. If the pedal came off, that would definitely make him fall. Low tire pressure could have led to tire failure, also causing the bike to change direction rapidly.
|
Originally Posted by Paul Barnard
(Post 17197948)
Why would he be unclipping when traffic is moving?
I don't know about you, but when I get a flat tire, I normally unclip and attempt to stop at what is the most convenient place possible in that particular instant. Be it where I am on the shoulder or turned off a bit further or in the grass... where ever. I generally associate the potential risks of a flat clincher as needing relative immediate attention and not something I'm going to continue to ride upon. irregardless of if traffic is moving or not. Having experienced a lose cleat and the resulting inability to unclip because of it (and the ensuing fall), I could see how a pedal issue and being able to unclip combined with some mechanical issue with the tire, being flat or other failure... could cause a person to accidentally fall down.. potentially into moving traffic given the potential suddenness of such fall, I could see how a driver may not have time to react to it and thus hit the cyclist. in either case, hopefully the rider's family can overcome and deal with their loss. |
Originally Posted by -=(8)=-
(Post 17195381)
Or, because it was a car/cycle collision, authority people need something, anything as a reason to dismiss it and let the driver off.
Tire and pedal :lol: is as good as any. |
If hey don't know the condition of the pedal, and the tire pressure, before the incident ------- it's all speculation and dreams. What about eyewitnesses????
|
Originally Posted by FBinNY
(Post 17196079)
Two possible scenarios.
The first is that he had a solo crash possibly from a flat, a pedal strike or simple loss of traction or balance, fell and was struck while down. The other is that he was struck first then fell. There's a big difference between the two, and it's not clear which from the reports. If he was struck before falling, then it's a question as to why and how. For example, a broken pedal or simply his foot slipping off could have caused a sudden lane change (my record is the full width of the road, when a pedal broke during a sprint), or a very low tire making handling sloppy. Of course, he could be one of the thousands struck from behind while riding a perfectly straight line. |
. . . quote deleted by moderator . . . |
I'm going to point out something that won't be so popular yet is a really sore point at A&S.
People die in accidents every second. They are tragic. Ways to prevent future occurrences should be of the highest priority. That is why A&S exists. We are here to discuss these problems and how to find solutions. One thing we get a bad reputation for is having more bad attitudes about authorities then all of the 1960s. We aren't here to avenge everyone who dies in a bicycle-related accident. We aren't here to go off the rails and spit out obscenities at other people we don't even know, especially based on a text or video story...we probably don't have every angle in all but a few cases that might be more obvious. We get no respect when we give none. If you really need to rant we have forums for just that. Those kinds of threads tend to get closed here or burn out quickly, or they get repeated over and over. Nobody has given you the right to act like this in the TOS, everyone must act to the same rules...we are not an elite group and we are here for EVERYONE to see, even unregistered users. If this is to be the 'morals and spirit' of Bike Forums, it must have morals and spirit. I don't care if you dislike cops or anyone else, you do not call them fornicating pigs. You have no right to. All of us at Bike Forums demand that our name be honored and upheld with dignity. This is not your coffee break. I have said this enough. |
I don't know about you, but can we blindly speculate some more? Not sure, but I am thinking Iran and drones here.
Further, can we go truly status quo now and get at least a dozen responses solely written as delivery factories for the personal anecdotes of unknown cyclists the world over? |
Most of us have had many many experiences where motorists behave badly, putting our lives at risk. Luck and perhaps skill keep us alive. Sometimes their behavior is combined with words or gestures that make it clear their actions were intentional. At the same time, we see when cyclists are killed in traffic, the cyclist is often blamed.
The reaction is a heavy dose of skepticism in each and every case we see, even though we don't know what actually happened. |
Originally Posted by Rollfast
(Post 17241490)
You have no right to.
|
Originally Posted by Rollfast
(Post 17241490)
...We are here to discuss these problems and how to find solutions. One thing we get a bad reputation for is having more bad attitudes about authorities then all of the 1960s.
We aren't here to avenge everyone who dies in a bicycle-related accident. We aren't here to go off the rails and spit out obscenities at other people we don't even know, especially based on a text or video story...we probably don't have every angle in all but a few cases that might be more obvious. We get no respect when we give none. ... Nobody has given you the right to act like this in the TOS, everyone must act to the same rules...we are not an elite group and we are here for EVERYONE to see, even unregistered users. If this is to be the 'morals and spirit' of Bike Forums, it must have morals and spirit. I don't care if you dislike cops or anyone else, you do not call them [*********]. You have no right to. All of us at Bike Forums demand that our name be honored and upheld with dignity. This is not your coffee break. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 PM. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.