View Poll Results: What Are Your Helmet Wearing Habits?
I've never worn a bike helmet
52
10.40%
I used to wear a helmet, but have stopped
24
4.80%
I've always worn a helmet
208
41.60%
I didn't wear a helmet, but now do
126
25.20%
I sometimes wear a helmet depending on the conditions
90
18.00%
Voters: 500. You may not vote on this poll
The Helmet Thread 2
#2676
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,030
Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Write on, but you accept that if people disobey the law, they will face a penalty, no matter whether the law concerns compulsory bike helmet wear or breaking and entering. Let's face it, if people had the right to disobey gun laws banning kalashnikovs, what do you think the point would be, not to mention the impact on a country which already has a high rate of gun violence?
#2677
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,030
Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Perhaps a simpler way to explain it: if people had the right to disobey a law, what would be the point of having the law in the first place?
#2679
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
It boils down to this: the State has the right to enforce the State's interests, and every law arises from that right. We, individuals, have the right to enforce our own interests. Rights are pretty well delineated but sometimes, not often but sometimes, these interests come into conflict. At some point an individual's right to safeguard his interest may supersede the State's interest. It's the courts' job to decide where that is, when the situation arises.
#2680
Banned.
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: France
Posts: 1,030
Bikes: Brompton, Time, Bianchi, Jan Janssen, Peugeot
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 598 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
5 Posts
Ah, so hypothetically, if it is my interest to murder my current wife and replace her with a new, more friendly model, I can go ahead as it is clearly in my interest to do so?
No wonder the US justice system isn't the envy of the rest of the world
No wonder the US justice system isn't the envy of the rest of the world
#2681
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,658
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,224 Posts
Raised hand on the joke. Those that write laws don't always have your rights in mind. As far as the justice system, larger cities seem to get overwhelmed with more serious crimes, ie~people killing their wives, that heads are turned when smaller infractions occur. I've been known to ride my bike in a crosswalk...
#2682
Homey
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,499
Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2427 Post(s)
Liked 1,406 Times
in
900 Posts
Okay everyone, time to take a breather. I'm getting too many complaints about this long thread due to the arguing. This is a discussion forum, not one where people are supposed to one up each other, challenge each other or try to make fools of one another. That stuff is for elementary school.
Closed temporarily until people get a chance to cool down.
Closed temporarily until people get a chance to cool down.
#2683
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hudson Valley, NY
Posts: 33,001
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene '04; Bridgestone RB-1 '92
Mentioned: 325 Post(s)
Tagged: 2 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11967 Post(s)
Liked 6,637 Times
in
3,480 Posts
Reopened, let’s please try to maintain reasonable decorum.
__________________
See, this is why we can't have nice things. - - smarkinson
Where else but the internet can a bunch of cyclists go and be the tough guy? - - jdon
#2684
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 648
Bikes: Canyon, Bowman & Colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 39 Times
in
20 Posts
Helmet Safety Standards
I understand there are basically three safety standards for bicycle helmets: USA, European, and Australian. From what I've read the European standards seem to be a bit less stringent than the the USA and Australian standards, while the Australian is the strictest.
If you lived in the USA, would you have reservations about using a non-CPSC (USA) safety compliant bicycle helmet if it was only CE (European) compliant, and not Australian? For recreational road riding, not racing, CX, or MTB.
If you lived in the USA, would you have reservations about using a non-CPSC (USA) safety compliant bicycle helmet if it was only CE (European) compliant, and not Australian? For recreational road riding, not racing, CX, or MTB.
Last edited by mrblue; 07-29-18 at 05:10 PM.
#2685
Forum Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo MI
Posts: 20,650
Bikes: Fuji SL2.1 Carbon Di2 Cannondale Synapse Alloy 4 Trek Checkpoint ALR-5 Viscount Aerospace Pro Colnago Classic Rabobank Schwinn Waterford PMount Raleigh C50 Cromoly Hybrid Legnano Tipo Roma Pista
Mentioned: 58 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3090 Post(s)
Liked 6,594 Times
in
3,781 Posts
#2686
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,658
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,224 Posts
#2687
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Most "valuable" I could see, given the brain and sense organs, or a pretty face perhaps. Most "vulnerable" though, I think needs to be justified, don't you?
#2689
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: SF Bay Area, East bay
Posts: 7,658
Bikes: Miyata 618 GT, Marinoni, Kestral 200 2002 Trek 5200, KHS Flite, Koga Miyata, Schwinn Spitfire 5, Mondia Special, Univega Alpina, Miyata team Ti, Santa Cruz Highball
Mentioned: 53 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1609 Post(s)
Liked 2,590 Times
in
1,224 Posts
This guy replied that he has never worn a helmet...
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xk2v6W...outu.be#dialog
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xk2v6W...outu.be#dialog
#2690
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Groningen
Posts: 1,308
Bikes: Gazelle rod brakes, Batavus compact, Peugeot hybrid
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5997 Post(s)
Liked 956 Times
in
730 Posts
One thing that surprised me, the claim in the opening paragraph that the head was the most vulnerable part of the body. I assume in the context of bike crashes. I wonder where that comes from, how it's justified that the head is the most vulnerable. I'd say skin is the most vulnerable, and if you had to pick a location perhaps the hands, or collarbone.
Most "valuable" I could see, given the brain and sense organs, or a pretty face perhaps. Most "vulnerable" though, I think needs to be justified, don't you?
Most "valuable" I could see, given the brain and sense organs, or a pretty face perhaps. Most "vulnerable" though, I think needs to be justified, don't you?
I don't believe studies have indicated that bicycle helmets are very effective in decreasing the risk of head and brain injuries. The Netherlands is not stimulating cycling as a general health measure, the suggestion it's about the health risk and the health benefits is false. They falsely suggest there is scientific evidence that in case of a fall a helmet reduces head injury, that's only the case when the cyclists lands on his head. The anti helmet group they speak of is probably a anti mandatory bike helmet group, allthough there is case to be made to outlaw bicycle helmets.
Obviously, it's written by compulsive regulators, bureaucratic control freaks who desperately want to make cycling regulations and will take anything that looks like a justification.
#2691
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 15,280
Bikes: Nashbar Road
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2934 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times
in
228 Posts
Everything else being equal, you'd rather have the higher safety standard. If the CE standard helmet has a desirable benefit in style, comfort, price or some other quality then probably not.
#2692
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
Detailed comparison of helmet standards
Each standard has pluses and minuses. If you are of an age and/or in a jursidiction that REQUIRES a CPSC certified helmet, then they have made your choice for you. (When in Seattle....) If you are in a jurisdiction that REQUIRES an AS/NZS then they have made your choice for you. (When you are on a continent in the Pacific and can you see the Southern Cross....)
Otherwise, read the standards, the testing methods, and make your own choice.
I’ve worn a CPSC helmet in the EU. I’ve worn an EN 1078 helmet in the US. I have had zero reservations.
You have to ask yourself if you would have reservations.
-mr. bill
Each standard has pluses and minuses. If you are of an age and/or in a jursidiction that REQUIRES a CPSC certified helmet, then they have made your choice for you. (When in Seattle....) If you are in a jurisdiction that REQUIRES an AS/NZS then they have made your choice for you. (When you are on a continent in the Pacific and can you see the Southern Cross....)
Otherwise, read the standards, the testing methods, and make your own choice.
I’ve worn a CPSC helmet in the EU. I’ve worn an EN 1078 helmet in the US. I have had zero reservations.
You have to ask yourself if you would have reservations.
-mr. bill
Last edited by mr_bill; 08-04-18 at 03:51 PM.
#2693
Senior Member
I understand there are basically three safety standards for bicycle helmets: USA, European, and Australian. From what I've read the European standards seem to be a bit less stringent than the the USA and Australian standards, while the Australian is the strictest.
If you lived in the USA, would you have reservations about using a non-CPSC (USA) safety compliant bicycle helmet if it was only CE (European) compliant, and not Australian? For recreational road riding, not racing, CX, or MTB.
If you lived in the USA, would you have reservations about using a non-CPSC (USA) safety compliant bicycle helmet if it was only CE (European) compliant, and not Australian? For recreational road riding, not racing, CX, or MTB.
There are different testing standards between the EU and USA for motorcycle helmets, too. In the USA, they have to be DOT certified for street use, and manufacturers also usually get SNELL certification for marketing purposes. EU has ECE standards. Sometimes, a helmet will meet all requirements, but if a smaller manufacturer doesn't want to be bothered with certification in a market in which they choose not to compete, why bother? So there are Euro-certified helmets which are not exported to the USA and which would technically not meet US helmet use requirements.
However, years ago, I bought a Roof helmet in England because it was so cool. EU/UK certified, but never DOT or SNELL tested. Full-face helmet and I have all faith in the protective capabilities of the helmet should it ever be crashed, but legally not up to snuff in the USA. Not, however, a target where cops are concerned -- there are too many yahoos wearing helmets which skirt the rules for them to go after than to bother with someone who for all intents and purposes appears to be following the law. I trust it. Good enough for me.
#2694
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2696
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#2699
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 9
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So, this is the argument? :
1. The decision to wear a helmet indicates that someone doesn't trust him/herself.
2. This lack of trust in one's self means they cannot then be trusted to avoid other cyclists or pedestrians.
3. Helmet wearing thus protects the untrustworthy while exposing others to heightened risk.
4. No helmets should be used at all.
Please correct this because, as is, this suggests that a) everyone should wear helmets and b) taking your helmet off makes you trustworthy.
Edited numbering.
#2700
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,530
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2112 Post(s)
Liked 663 Times
in
443 Posts
So, this is the argument? :
1. The decision to wear a helmet indicates that someone doesn't trust him/herself.
2. This lack of trust in one's self means they cannot then be trusted to avoid other cyclists or pedestrians.
3. Helmet wearing thus protects the untrustworthy while exposing others to heightened risk.
4. No helmets should be used at all.
Please correct this because, as is, this suggests that a) everyone should wear helmets and b) taking your helmet off makes you trustworthy.
Edited numbering.
1. The decision to wear a helmet indicates that someone doesn't trust him/herself.
2. This lack of trust in one's self means they cannot then be trusted to avoid other cyclists or pedestrians.
3. Helmet wearing thus protects the untrustworthy while exposing others to heightened risk.
4. No helmets should be used at all.
Please correct this because, as is, this suggests that a) everyone should wear helmets and b) taking your helmet off makes you trustworthy.
Edited numbering.
-mr, bill