Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Dropbars crossing the top of wheels?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Dropbars crossing the top of wheels?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-11-09, 06:41 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleepykitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Dropbars crossing the top of wheels?



As you can see, the drops cross the horizontal line as to where the top of the wheels are. Is it ok to have the bars set like ones in the picture above?
It's got a -6 degree stem in place. I plan to get a -10 degree stem to make it even lower. Is it safe to do so? Thanks
sleepykitty is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 06:44 AM
  #2  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
yes, do it.

you're the first person I've seen asking this question.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 06:46 AM
  #3  
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 840

Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't see why it would matter?
timster is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 07:00 AM
  #4  
Carpe Diem
 
bdcheung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MABRA
Posts: 13,149

Bikes: 2007 CAAD9; 2014 CAADX; PedalForce CG1

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
It's not UCI legal, but why do you care?
__________________
"When you are chewing the bars at the business end of a 90 mile road race you really dont care what gear you have hanging from your bike so long as it works."
ΛΧΑ ΔΞ179 - 15% off your first Hammer Nutrition order!
bdcheung is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 07:11 AM
  #5  
Quarq shill
 
cslone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,962

Bikes: 08 Felt F4, 05 Fuji Team SL, 08 Planet X Stealth, 10 Kona Jake the Snake, 03 Giant OCR flat bar.

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Unless your bars turn independently of the wheel, then it should be fine.
cslone is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 07:37 AM
  #6  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by bdcheung
It's not UCI legal, but why do you care?
It's not?
umd is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:04 AM
  #7  
Large Member
 
urodacus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Okinawa
Posts: 1,186

Bikes: 05 Giant TCR 0; 94 Le Mond Alpe d'Huez; 83 Colnago Saronni; 81 San Rensho Katana Super Export track bike, #A116-56; 97 GT Zaskar

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i don't think it's UCI legal to have your bars turn independently of the wheel, or advised under any code! level with or lower than the wheel is probably OK.
urodacus is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:16 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Duke of Kent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 4,850

Bikes: Yeti ASRc, Focus Raven 29er, Flyxii FR316

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
It's not?
I think this rule is intended for the handlebars of TT bikes, but I'm not sure how the UCI applies it to mass start bikes.

My bars are pretty damn low, but not that low. Maybe 1/2" off the top of the tire, should you draw a line between the drops and measure down to the tire. I burned my hand on someone's rear wheel last season, leaning in a corner.
Duke of Kent is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:16 AM
  #9  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
It's not?
I think it's legal. I can't find anything about it in the rulebook. The only ruling that comes close to applying is that the front of your handlebars can't go past a vertical line drawn from your front hub.

Originally Posted by uci
In other races, the handlebar type shall be "classic" and no part of the handlebar may protrude forward of a vertical line passing through the front wheel axle
I wonder if your hoods count as part of your handlebar; the end of my hoods definitely goes in front of my hub...

Here's the rules I was using.

https://www.slowtwitch.com/mainheadin.../ucirules.html
Flatballer is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:25 AM
  #10  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Interesting, my bars definitely go forward of my hub and the bottom of my drops is right at the top of my wheel.

umd is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:28 AM
  #11  
ɹǝʇsɯıʇ
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MD
Posts: 840

Bikes: 2011 Focus Whistler // 2011 Cannondale CAAD10 // 2009 Scattante XRL TT // 1993 Cannondale R400

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Rule 1.3.013 is what is used for road races, I believe....

The overall length [forward projection] of the handlebars may not exceed a limit set 15 cm forward of a vertical line passing through the front wheel spindle.
timster is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:30 AM
  #12  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,340

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1472 Post(s)
Liked 758 Times in 390 Posts
1.3.013 .....The overall length [forward projection] of the handlebars may not exceed a limit set 15 cm forward of a vertical line passing through the front wheel spindle.

I think your ok.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:30 AM
  #13  
NYC
 
nycphotography's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,714
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1169 Post(s)
Liked 107 Times in 62 Posts
Originally Posted by umd
Interesting, my bars definitely go forward of my hub and the bottom of my drops is right at the top of my wheel.

Comparing your setup to mine and trying to figure out the difference....



I think you are shooting a wide lens up close, where I was shooting a long lens and gettign as far back as possible....

If you look at your rear bar, it (barely) crosses neither line.
nycphotography is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:31 AM
  #14  
pan y agua
 
merlinextraligh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,340

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1472 Post(s)
Liked 758 Times in 390 Posts
I'm slow
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:37 AM
  #15  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by nycphotography
I think you are shooting a wide lens up close, where I was shooting a long lens and gettign as far back as possible....

If you look at your rear bar, it crosses neither line.
It was a wide lens up close but I just measured it and it is a few cm ahead of the hub. Well within 15cm including the levers though
umd is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:40 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleepykitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Alright thanks for giving the green light. The reason I asked is because I went through pics of the bikes posted here and every single on of them didn't have the bottom of the bars protrude below the top of the wheels. So I figured that doing so would be wrong.

I wish I could have more drop though. I removed all the spacers and still feel that I could go lower. Sucks being only 164cm and stuck with an XS bike..
sleepykitty is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 08:52 AM
  #17  
umd
Banned
 
umd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 28,387

Bikes: Specialized Tarmac SL2, Specialized Tarmac SL, Giant TCR Composite, Specialized StumpJumper Expert HT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepykitty
Alright thanks for giving the green light. The reason I asked is because I went through pics of the bikes posted here and every single on of them didn't have the bottom of the bars protrude below the top of the wheels. So I figured that doing so would be wrong.

I wish I could have more drop though. I removed all the spacers and still feel that I could go lower. Sucks being only 164cm and stuck with an XS bike..
You can get a -17 stem instead of the -10 you are thinking of getting.
umd is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:14 AM
  #18  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
there's even -20 stems available. they're generally for MTB, so the logo might be upside down.
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:23 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Tariffville, CT
Posts: 15,406

Bikes: Tsunami road bikes, Dolan DF4 track

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 385 Post(s)
Liked 181 Times in 103 Posts
Keep in mind pictures can be deceiving. If you can see the far side of the bar the lens has distorted something, whether you're centered on the BB (normal) or you have some wide angle lens.

Having the bars low is nice, you can reach over with your thumb to wipe the tire off. Mine is similar in set up but not as low.

cdr
carpediemracing is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:27 AM
  #20  
Banned.
 
timmyquest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Woodstock
Posts: 5,761
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bdcheung
It's not UCI legal, but why do you care?
What do incredibly short schmucks do then?
timmyquest is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:32 AM
  #21  
AEO
Senior Member
 
AEO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: A Coffin Called Earth. or Toronto, ON
Posts: 12,257

Bikes: Bianchi, Miyata, Dahon, Rossin

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Originally Posted by timmyquest
What do incredibly short schmucks do then?
well, you're smaller so you don't need to hunch over as far to get the same sort of wind resistance.
I mean, the aim is to get a flat back, as opposed to tilting downward, isn't it?
__________________
Food for thought: if you aren't dead by 2050, you and your entire family will be within a few years from starvation. Now that is a cruel gift to leave for your offspring. ;)
https://sanfrancisco.ibtimes.com/arti...ger-photos.htm
AEO is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:34 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
big john's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In the foothills of Los Angeles County
Posts: 25,518
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8422 Post(s)
Liked 9,331 Times in 4,585 Posts
Originally Posted by sleepykitty
Alright thanks for giving the green light. The reason I asked is because I went through pics of the bikes posted here and every single on of them didn't have the bottom of the bars protrude below the top of the wheels. So I figured that doing so would be wrong.

I wish I could have more drop though. I removed all the spacers and still feel that I could go lower. Sucks being only 164cm and stuck with an XS bike..
You're a giant compared to some riders. Have you tried a bike with 650 wheels?
big john is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 09:49 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleepykitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Singapore
Posts: 69
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by umd
You can get a -17 stem instead of the -10 you are thinking of getting.
Yea but wouldn't it present a huge change in reach too? I already got the reach dialed in on my current set-up, but just wanted a little more drop. I figured that a -10 would do that without messing with my reach too much.

Originally Posted by big john
You're a giant compared to some riders. Have you tried a bike with 650 wheels?
I commute on my 26'-wheeled mountain bike, does that count?
sleepykitty is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 10:00 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cornhole, Iowa
Posts: 1,890
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AEO
there's even -20 stems available. they're generally for MTB, so the logo might be upside down.
OR the Deda Newton Pista! It's a -23* stem. It's the hotness.
__________________
Get on a cross bike.... you'll like it ;)
briscoelab is offline  
Old 03-11-09, 11:51 AM
  #25  
No matches
 
Flatballer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 11,647

Bikes: two wheeled ones

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1398 Post(s)
Liked 444 Times in 250 Posts
Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
1.3.013 .....The overall length [forward projection] of the handlebars may not exceed a limit set 15 cm forward of a vertical line passing through the front wheel spindle.

I think your ok.
So what is the modification referring to? The part about handlebars not in front of the vertical line.

The UCI is so confusing and vague in their writing. Is English not their first language or something?
Flatballer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.