Bottom bracket spacing/ front derailleur
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bottom bracket spacing/ front derailleur
I'm having an issue with a build I am doing. This is the first time I have built a bike and I have it all together, but I am having issues with tech front derailleur. I can not get it to adjust out far enough to shift into the large chainring. I have a 3x9 shimano setup. I am wondering if I need to move the spacers on the bottom bracket from one side to the other to allow the derailleur to reach all the way out to the large chainring. The derailleur I bought is a deore and the crank is a xtr. Any help would be appreciated.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 6,015
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 584 Post(s)
What model crankset, bottom bracket and derailleur are you using? Can you move the derailleur far enough by hand?
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,526
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1419 Post(s)
Measure very carefully from the center line of your frame (probably the middle of your seat tube will work best) to the center of the middle ring and let us know what that number is.
It should be around 47.5mm, but if it is not, then that will help know how to proceed.
The exact model of your crank and FD will help. It will stamped on somewhere FC-XXXX and FD-XXXX.
It should be around 47.5mm, but if it is not, then that will help know how to proceed.
The exact model of your crank and FD will help. It will stamped on somewhere FC-XXXX and FD-XXXX.
#4
coprolite
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 39,028
Bikes: 8
Mentioned: 157 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6030 Post(s)
the seat tube diameter relocates the FD as well , over size seat tubes change that. outward
#5
Hammer and tongs
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 17,486
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers)
Mentioned: 54 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1648 Post(s)
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I will look at the part numbers tonight and measure the distance to the middle ring. Pulling the derailleur out by hand and setting the limit screws all the way out, still does not get me out far enough.
#7
Mechanic/Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,504
Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Your dilemma is a prime example of what happens when you "put together" a bike without understanding the relationship between interacting parts, as well as between parts and the frame. The problem is not likely the front derailleur but rather the frame/BB setup. The first step you need to do is determine the rear chainline. The next step is to match the front chainline as close as possible to the rear, taking into account which gears you will tend to favor (lower or higher). Make sure that the BB you use is matched to the crank arms. Once you have done that the likelihood is that the front derailleur will work.
__________________
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok, the parts list for what I have is as follows,
shimano sm-bb90 bottom bracket
fc-m970 crank
fd-m590-10 front derailleur
I also measured the spacing and it at about 53.75 mm. I am guessing that is where my problem is. Right now I have two spacers on the crank side, is switching the spacers to the other side the appropriate solution to change the spacing? Thanks for all the input!
shimano sm-bb90 bottom bracket
fc-m970 crank
fd-m590-10 front derailleur
I also measured the spacing and it at about 53.75 mm. I am guessing that is where my problem is. Right now I have two spacers on the crank side, is switching the spacers to the other side the appropriate solution to change the spacing? Thanks for all the input!
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Your dilemma is a prime example of what happens when you "put together" a bike without understanding the relationship between interacting parts, as well as between parts and the frame. The problem is not likely the front derailleur but rather the frame/BB setup. The first step you need to do is determine the rear chainline. The next step is to match the front chainline as close as possible to the rear, taking into account which gears you will tend to favor (lower or higher). Make sure that the BB you use is matched to the crank arms. Once you have done that the likelihood is that the front derailleur will work.
#10
Mechanic/Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,504
Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
The word "chainline" in my post is a link to Sheldon's explanation, including how chainline is measured. No sense in redoing it here. Another page discusses chainline specific to multi-speed bikes.
__________________
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
#11
Mechanic/Tourist
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,504
Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 472 Post(s)
Depends on what the width of the spacers is and the difference in chainline you need to make. It's simple math, addition/subtraction.
__________________
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
There's no such thing as a routine repair.
Don't tell me what "should" be - either it is, it isn't, or do something about it.
If you think I'm being blunt take it as a compliment - if I thought you were too weak to handle the truth or a strong opinion I would not bother.
Please respect others by taking the time to post clearly so we can answer quickly. All lowercase and multiple typos makes for a hard read. Thanks!
#12
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Ok I see that now. Thanks.
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»