How much play in frame sizing? 55cm vs 57cm
10-09-15, 09:23 AM
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 230
Bikes: '88 Peugot 12 spd road bike, Nishiki hybrid, JC Penney 10 spd
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 61 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
How much play in frame sizing? 55cm vs 57cm
Seen several really nice road bikes on CL that are listed at 55cm. I’m 5’10’ and normally ride ~57-58cm with the saddle raised ~2-3 inches, have always been comfortable riding this way. Was wondering how much play there is in the sizing. Would it be as simple as raising the seat an extra inch or should I expect stem/crank… mods?
Thanks.
Thanks.
10-09-15, 09:41 AM
#2
Constant tinkerer
You'll have to try it yourself and see. There won't be any modifications to the crank, but possibly to the stem if you want the same riding position.
In my experience sellers ALWAYS get the size wrong. I don't know why. So take some measurements on a bike that fits you and bring a tape measure when looking at a bike. It could be closer than you think, or it could be way off.
In my experience sellers ALWAYS get the size wrong. I don't know why. So take some measurements on a bike that fits you and bring a tape measure when looking at a bike. It could be closer than you think, or it could be way off.
10-09-15, 09:41 AM
#3
Banned
Depends.. Some frames the seat tube extends taller above the top tube.. some it does not.
" size " is roughly BB center axis to top of seat tube . a C to C measuring goes to centerline of the Top tube.
Bring a TAPE MEASURE .
" size " is roughly BB center axis to top of seat tube . a C to C measuring goes to centerline of the Top tube.
Bring a TAPE MEASURE .
10-09-15, 09:41 AM
#4
multimodal commuter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NJ, NYC, LI
Posts: 19,808
Bikes: 1940s Fothergill, 1959 Allegro Special, 1963? Claud Butler Olympic Sprint, Lambert 'Clubman', 1974 Fuji "the Ace", 1976 Holdsworth 650b conversion rando bike, 1983 Trek 720 tourer, 1984 Counterpoint Opus II, 1993 Basso Gap, 2010 Downtube 8h, and...
Mentioned: 584 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1908 Post(s)
Liked 574 Times
in
339 Posts
That depends on a lot of factors, mainly because "55cm" doesn't necessarily tell us anything. Different people measure frames differently, and at different times/places bicycles were designed to fit differently. There's a lot more play in seat tube height than there is in top tube length.
The smaller frame may fit better; or not. You may be able to make it fit better by changing the stem or something; or not. It's hard to predict!
The smaller frame may fit better; or not. You may be able to make it fit better by changing the stem or something; or not. It's hard to predict!
__________________
www.rhmsaddles.com.
www.rhmsaddles.com.
10-09-15, 10:19 AM
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,073
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4201 Post(s)
Liked 3,857 Times
in
2,305 Posts
Agree with all the above. Also when trying out the bike consider the seat set back. A dimension not often mentioned but very important for how the body is balanced on the 3 contact points. Andy.
10-09-15, 10:29 AM
#6
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lincoln Ne
Posts: 9,924
Bikes: RANS Stratus TerraTrike Tour II
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3352 Post(s)
Liked 1,056 Times
in
635 Posts
For those that care (weight weenies) a smaller frame would be lighter. If it can be made to fit with a longer seatpost and or HB stems, it should be fine.
