![]() |
Please help with crankset replacement
I am thinking of changing the stock chainring (Shimano FC-T551, 26/36/48t) on my Surly Ogre to Shimano Deore XT M782 (22/30/40t), which I found online for a 35% discount. Depending on how much needs changed, I might just ask my LBS to do the work as I am a complete patzer. But I would like to have a notion of how much would be involved before proceeding.
First question. It doesn't come with a bottom bracket. Will I need to replace the stock BB? Second question. Will I need to change the FD? Third question. Will I need to change shifters/cables? Fourth question. I guess I will need a different chain for running such a different number of teeth, right? Any suggestions? Fifth question. Anything else I should be aware of before I start? For reference: http://surlybikes.com/bikes/ogre/bike_specs |
Why would you want to change it?
|
# 2 - no
# 3 - no # 4 - no, because you are going to smaller chainrings. You may need to remove a link or 2 so the chain does not go slack in small-smallish combinations. If you were switching to larger chainrings, you would need a longer chain to handle big-big.
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 18585764)
Why would you want to change it?
|
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 18585764)
Why would you want to change it?
|
If you do this, you will need to shorten your chain. What BB/axle you need will depend on what the new crank needs. Could possibly be the same. Switch would give you much lower gearing overall. Is that your intent? 40t is pretty small for a large ring ridden on roads, but I don't know what your riding is.
|
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
(Post 18585797)
# 2 - no
# 3 - no # 4 - no, because you are going to smaller chainrings. You may need to remove a link or 2 so the chain does not go slack in small-smallish combinations. If you were switching to larger chainrings, you would need a longer chain to handle big-big. Now it sounds like I might be able to handle the swap myself and save some money! |
Originally Posted by Aidoneus
(Post 18585799)
Lower gear for hills while loaded touring. Plus, I really don't have much need for any gears as high as the stock 48t allows. Of course, I have no idea if this change will produce less or more redundancy in gear choices.
# 1 - I don't know, but someone here probably does. # 5 - Don't think so |
Your cassette has a 36t cog. 36x26 is already pretty low for your lowest gear. Could you just replace the current small chain ring with a smaller one?
|
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
(Post 18585807)
Redundancy is probaly the same. You can enter your chainring and cog sizes into an online gear chart if you want to see the specifics.
# 1 - I don't know, but someone here probably does. # 5 - Don't think so |
Originally Posted by Aidoneus
(Post 18585799)
Lower gear for hills while loaded touring. Plus, I really don't have much need for any gears as high as the stock 48t allows. Of course, I have no idea if this change will produce less or more redundancy in gear choices.
Replace the 26 Chain Ring with a 22 Chain Ring and you are good to go. |
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 18585810)
Your cassette has a 36t cog. 36x26 is already pretty low for your lowest gear. Could you just replace the current small chain ring with a smaller one?
|
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 18585832)
You only need one change.
Replace the 26 Chain Ring with a 22 Chain Ring and you are good to go. Kind of starting over, then, with my questions. Anything else need replacement to change just the smallest chain ring? |
Originally Posted by Aidoneus
(Post 18585843)
OK, second person to tell me this, so I need to look into this.
Kind of starting over, then, with my questions. Anything else need replacement to change just the smallest chain ring? Try going down Two Size Smaller tires. I rolled Fully Loaded on 700 X 28's http://i256.photobucket.com/albums/h...ril2010046.jpg |
Originally Posted by ajis
(Post 18585844)
that buy now man this discount ,n black friday ,come onehttp://laissezachats.net/132/o.png
|
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 18585848)
Try going down Two Size Smaller tires. I rolled Fully Loaded on 700 X 28's
|
Originally Posted by Aidoneus
(Post 18585843)
OK, second person to tell me this, so I need to look into this.
Kind of starting over, then, with my questions. Anything else need replacement to change just the smallest chain ring? You would have to remove the drive side crank structure to get to the inner ring. You would have to first locate an appropriate smaller inner ring. FD would likely need fine tuning with smaller ring. |
Originally Posted by 10 Wheels
(Post 18585832)
You only need one change.
Replace the 26 Chain Ring with a 22 Chain Ring and you are good to go. |
Originally Posted by Homebrew01
(Post 18586030)
The front derailleur MAY have trouble with the range from a 22 to a 48 large ..... not sure
|
Originally Posted by Aidoneus
(Post 18585884)
I hope that my 29 x 2.1 will work well on the Katy Trail. After that, I may consider a tire change, depending on wear with riding from Indiana to the St. Louis trailhead. Since purchasing my bike at Christmas, I only have about 600 miles on it so far, so I'd rather not buy any new tires yet.
|
I agree, changing just the smallest chainring is easier. 2.1 tires will do well on the Katy Trail - I don't know what tread you have, but it doesn't have to be very aggressive. Larger air volume, somewhat lower pressure works well on the Katy's surface. I also find a 36 chainring works well for me on my touring bike in flat land (which is what you have mostly between Indiana and Missouri), but that's purely subjective.
|
I'm not up on all the new BB styles, but it appears the 2 cranks use different TYPES of BB's.
|
Originally Posted by JanMM
(Post 18586029)
If this is what you have, looks to be of decent quality. (I'm not familiar with it.) http://cycle.shimano.co.jp/media/tec...9830799952.pdf
You would have to remove the drive side crank structure to get to the inner ring. You would have to first locate an appropriate smaller inner ring. FD would likely need fine tuning with smaller ring. |
Originally Posted by tcarl
(Post 18586096)
I agree, changing just the smallest chainring is easier. 2.1 tires will do well on the Katy Trail - I don't know what tread you have, but it doesn't have to be very aggressive. Larger air volume, somewhat lower pressure works well on the Katy's surface. I also find a 36 chainring works well for me on my touring bike in flat land (which is what you have mostly between Indiana and Missouri), but that's purely subjective.
|
Aidoneus, Replacing the inner ring for a 22T or a 24T is the best and least expensive option. You may want to order a chain catcher to keep the chain from falling onto the bottom bracket shell (it very well may not) during the down shift. While you may not use the small cassette cog with the outer chain ring, it can be handy when using the middle chain ring.
Brad |
BTW, another reason I was (am?) considering the full change is to change the crank length. The stock arm is 175 mm, and I wonder if it would be easier on this old man's knees to go with a shorter crank. I've read several posts online (e.g., BikeDynamics - Bike Fitting Specialists - Crank Arm Lengths) that suggest a shorter crank makes higher cadence easier. I have improved somewhat over these two months to an average cadence of about 80 rpm, but much faster makes me feel like a fishing bob. Of course, it might just mean I need to raise or adjust my seat--before I leave for a tour in May, I think I will see about a professional fit.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:49 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.