dropout hanger dims, Broken dropout related
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
dropout hanger dims, Broken dropout related
Hi,
I will try to repair a cervelo r3 2011. This frame had a bad desigt anfdthin carbon dropout and many of them broke.
I couldnt find so much info on google. As I understand it, most og the dropout hangers has aroun 26-28 mm from axel center to bolt center. I tested this on 3 of my bike. I see my felt has 26mm, my bianchi 28 and my mtb 30.
Half of the cervelo dropout is missing so I need to be sure about this before
My second question. If the dropout I make is thinner or thicker than the origianal one (2-3 mm). Is that a problem? Could I adjust this via limit screws?
I will appreciate all the info from you guys.

I will try to repair a cervelo r3 2011. This frame had a bad desigt anfdthin carbon dropout and many of them broke.
I couldnt find so much info on google. As I understand it, most og the dropout hangers has aroun 26-28 mm from axel center to bolt center. I tested this on 3 of my bike. I see my felt has 26mm, my bianchi 28 and my mtb 30.
Half of the cervelo dropout is missing so I need to be sure about this before
My second question. If the dropout I make is thinner or thicker than the origianal one (2-3 mm). Is that a problem? Could I adjust this via limit screws?
I will appreciate all the info from you guys.


#2
Banned
If it is a replaceable Hanger contact the dealer that sells the bikes.
There are Hundreds of different hangers Made.
How many Carbon fiber frames have you repaired ? none?
If the rear is broken either A send the frame off to get it repaired, Or B saw it up so no one else will try to use it.
Then throw it away.
Or this will be your experiment in your 1st repair Maybe never to ride again?
./.
There are Hundreds of different hangers Made.
How many Carbon fiber frames have you repaired ? none?
If the rear is broken either A send the frame off to get it repaired, Or B saw it up so no one else will try to use it.
Then throw it away.
Or this will be your experiment in your 1st repair Maybe never to ride again?
./.
Last edited by fietsbob; 09-24-16 at 01:38 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17872 Post(s)
Liked 4,285 Times
in
3,197 Posts
Are you the original owner? What happened?
There should be a removable derailleur hanger (hard to see it in the photo). But, look for some screws holding it in place. Do you also have the missing part?
It appears as if both the derailleur hanger broke, as well as taking with it a piece of the frame. If you source the correct replacement hanger, it may support your wheel just fine, or it may be missing an attachment point.
If you are the original owner, contact Cervello. I'd argue that while the broken hanger may be "damage", there is a design defect in the frame that allowed the rear half of the dropout to also be damaged in whatever incident occurred.
Thickness of the derailleur hanger (within reason) shouldn't affect the bike, as long as it is parallel to the wheel axis. Just mount it up and adjust the derailleur.
There should be a removable derailleur hanger (hard to see it in the photo). But, look for some screws holding it in place. Do you also have the missing part?
It appears as if both the derailleur hanger broke, as well as taking with it a piece of the frame. If you source the correct replacement hanger, it may support your wheel just fine, or it may be missing an attachment point.
If you are the original owner, contact Cervello. I'd argue that while the broken hanger may be "damage", there is a design defect in the frame that allowed the rear half of the dropout to also be damaged in whatever incident occurred.
Thickness of the derailleur hanger (within reason) shouldn't affect the bike, as long as it is parallel to the wheel axis. Just mount it up and adjust the derailleur.
#5
Old fart
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,591
Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.
Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3411 Post(s)
Liked 3,023 Times
in
1,736 Posts

Cervélos are expensive enough bikes that at least getting a quote on repair is reasonable. Replacing a dropout is one of the easier repairs and may be significantly less than replacing the entire frame.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
It was my friend's bike that brok during a flight. I have repaired some bikes, and have built/repaired carbon things as kiteboards, windsurf boards. I've seen people doing this repair before ( several different sources shown via google)
This frame used the number 156, worst design ever.
https://wheelsmfg.com/derailleur-hangers.html
My concern is about the position of the hanger and dims of them. Can I use another hanger designed for another frame? I dont want to use this jumber 156. Then how can easily measure the degrees?
Are road dropout hangers " standard", not in shape but in degrees and spacing between axl and center of the bolt. Is the information ( only source i have found) in my pic correct? 26-28 mm for road. And more fore mtb since the derailleur cage is longer?
Everything in composites can be repaired, always!
This frame used the number 156, worst design ever.
https://wheelsmfg.com/derailleur-hangers.html
My concern is about the position of the hanger and dims of them. Can I use another hanger designed for another frame? I dont want to use this jumber 156. Then how can easily measure the degrees?
Are road dropout hangers " standard", not in shape but in degrees and spacing between axl and center of the bolt. Is the information ( only source i have found) in my pic correct? 26-28 mm for road. And more fore mtb since the derailleur cage is longer?
Everything in composites can be repaired, always!
#7
Banned
Can I use another hanger designed for another frame?

'/,
Last edited by fietsbob; 10-12-16 at 02:11 PM.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17872 Post(s)
Liked 4,285 Times
in
3,197 Posts
Were the wheels removed during the flight?
Part of the derailleur hanger design is to use the hubs to hold it in place.
No reason not to try a different style of hanger. Just don't drill out to much of the dropout. However, without the shipping stresses, it is quite possible the original hanger would have lasted a long time.
Part of the derailleur hanger design is to use the hubs to hold it in place.
No reason not to try a different style of hanger. Just don't drill out to much of the dropout. However, without the shipping stresses, it is quite possible the original hanger would have lasted a long time.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,231
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,423 Times
in
2,219 Posts
A couple of thought here. 1) You and your friend know that you want an axle made up with cones and locknuts in the dropouts (both front and rear) before you ship or fly a bike, don't you? (Or cut a piece of wood to the hub locknut to locknut dimension and keep in place with a couple of say 5/16" lag screws.) That prevents what you are seeing almost always. Removing the rear derailleur from the hanger will also help. Granted, this is useless after the fact info here.
2) If done with care, your repair will be clamped evenly with the QR skewer. Then if it breaks while riding, the rider won't notice it until he stops and opens the quick release. So, make sure the finished repair has flat surfaces on both sides so the axle lockwasher and QR nut both sit evenly and nicely on the dropout, effectively being a clamp to hold it all together. This means time and care with either grinding/sanding or epoxy filling (or more likely - both) to get that even surface needs to be addressed.
3) as long as your repair keeps the derailleur in a plane parallel to the frame and chainrings and is reasonably close vertically, fore and aft and inboard-outboard so that B-screw and limit screws work, exact placement isn't needed. Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout.
Ben
2) If done with care, your repair will be clamped evenly with the QR skewer. Then if it breaks while riding, the rider won't notice it until he stops and opens the quick release. So, make sure the finished repair has flat surfaces on both sides so the axle lockwasher and QR nut both sit evenly and nicely on the dropout, effectively being a clamp to hold it all together. This means time and care with either grinding/sanding or epoxy filling (or more likely - both) to get that even surface needs to be addressed.
3) as long as your repair keeps the derailleur in a plane parallel to the frame and chainrings and is reasonably close vertically, fore and aft and inboard-outboard so that B-screw and limit screws work, exact placement isn't needed. Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout.
Ben
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,570
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17872 Post(s)
Liked 4,285 Times
in
3,197 Posts
#12
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Good info here. I'm sure he forgot the it
Need to ask him hehehe
Good points here:
1- I wil try to modify the new dropout so I don't add these 2 mm in the inside.
2- I need a perfect finish (flat surface)

Good points here:
1- I wil try to modify the new dropout so I don't add these 2 mm in the inside.
2- I need a perfect finish (flat surface)
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
A couple of thought here. 1) You and your friend know that you want an axle made up with cones and locknuts in the dropouts (both front and rear) before you ship or fly a bike, don't you? (Or cut a piece of wood to the hub locknut to locknut dimension and keep in place with a couple of say 5/16" lag screws.) That prevents what you are seeing almost always. Removing the rear derailleur from the hanger will also help. Granted, this is useless after the fact info here.
2) If done with care, your repair will be clamped evenly with the QR skewer. Then if it breaks while riding, the rider won't notice it until he stops and opens the quick release. So, make sure the finished repair has flat surfaces on both sides so the axle lockwasher and QR nut both sit evenly and nicely on the dropout, effectively being a clamp to hold it all together. This means time and care with either grinding/sanding or epoxy filling (or more likely - both) to get that even surface needs to be addressed.
3) as long as your repair keeps the derailleur in a plane parallel to the frame and chainrings and is reasonably close vertically, fore and aft and inboard-outboard so that B-screw and limit screws work, exact placement isn't needed. Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout.
Ben
2) If done with care, your repair will be clamped evenly with the QR skewer. Then if it breaks while riding, the rider won't notice it until he stops and opens the quick release. So, make sure the finished repair has flat surfaces on both sides so the axle lockwasher and QR nut both sit evenly and nicely on the dropout, effectively being a clamp to hold it all together. This means time and care with either grinding/sanding or epoxy filling (or more likely - both) to get that even surface needs to be addressed.
3) as long as your repair keeps the derailleur in a plane parallel to the frame and chainrings and is reasonably close vertically, fore and aft and inboard-outboard so that B-screw and limit screws work, exact placement isn't needed. Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout.
Ben
So in point 3. I understand that it needs to be paralell to the frame. And then placement can be around 2 mm more outboard (I want to make a thicker dropout)
I'm not sure if I understand this last sentence "Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout. "
Which is the inboard limit? småll cog?
"bit low" = YOu are saying here that the L distance (distance between axel and ceneter of bolt) should be 28mm or 30mm and not 26mm.
thank you very much
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,231
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4355 Post(s)
Liked 3,423 Times
in
2,219 Posts
So in point 3. I understand that it needs to be paralell to the frame. And then placement can be around 2 mm more outboard (I want to make a thicker dropout)
I'm not sure if I understand this last sentence "Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout. "
Which is the inboard limit? småll cog?
"bit low" = YOu are saying here that the L distance (distance between axel and ceneter of bolt) should be 28mm or 30mm and not 26mm.
thank you very much
I'm not sure if I understand this last sentence "Being a bit low will make the inboard limit less critical as it will keep the derailleur mounting nut further from the last cog, chain and dropout. "
Which is the inboard limit? småll cog?
"bit low" = YOu are saying here that the L distance (distance between axel and ceneter of bolt) should be 28mm or 30mm and not 26mm.
thank you very much
And, yes I am talking about the L distance. Increasing it will make your shifts a little sloppier, especially on a cassette with small cogs, but it will also give you more clearance between the inboard end of the derailleur mounting bolt (the big 6mm allen head bolt that screws into the hanger) and the chain, cog and dropout above. (Remember the chain has to jump off and therefore down com the cogs to change gears so the actual clearance is a lot less than it looks at rest.) If you are making the hanger itself as part of your repair, the nut you use to thread into may require more clearance than a standard threaded hanger.
A related aside - many decades ago I had a decent bike that did not have a built in derailleur hanger but used the hanger that came with the derailleur. I replaced the freewheel with a racing "corncob" and made my own custom hanger as short as possible to improve shifting. (A lot of work for very small gains, but it was fun!) That was the old 5-speed FW days when there were acres of free space between the last cog and the dropout. Not so now.
Ben
#15
Banned
I usually unscrew the RD & zip tie it to the wheel when shipping a bike,
so the RD is not putting leverage on the drop out if hit while in transit..
so the RD is not putting leverage on the drop out if hit while in transit..
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose (Willow Glen) Ca
Posts: 9,564
Bikes: Kirk Custom JK Special, '84 Team Miyata,(dura ace old school) 80?? SR Semi-Pro 600 Arabesque
Mentioned: 103 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2158 Post(s)
Liked 2,437 Times
in
1,347 Posts
this got me curious so did a little looking around.
Known problem
there is a metal derailler hanger, the carbon drop out breaks just above the top screw for attaching the hanger.
It seems to me that this is a nice frame and as so much is involved in getting everthing perfect (safety, indexed shifting) it would really seem to be better to find a professional (with bike experience) to fix it.
Known problem
there is a metal derailler hanger, the carbon drop out breaks just above the top screw for attaching the hanger.
It seems to me that this is a nice frame and as so much is involved in getting everthing perfect (safety, indexed shifting) it would really seem to be better to find a professional (with bike experience) to fix it.
__________________
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
Life is too short not to ride the best bike you have, as much as you can
(looking for Torpado Super light frame/fork or for Raleigh International frame fork 58cm)
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
The funny thing is that yesterday I found out that My bianchi has a 30 mm (L) dropout hanger. Long history... I forgot that When I got that frame I had to use a hanger from a mtb i had laying around.
So my bianchi with a longer mtb hanger and shimano 7800 shifts very well, maibe even better than with the original (maibe 26-27 mm) one. I thing I have heard somebody saying that new bikes uses longer hangers than in the past.
So my bianchi with a longer mtb hanger and shimano 7800 shifts very well, maibe even better than with the original (maibe 26-27 mm) one. I thing I have heard somebody saying that new bikes uses longer hangers than in the past.
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,573
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3983 Post(s)
Liked 3,364 Times
in
2,041 Posts
The funny thing is that yesterday I found out that My bianchi has a 30 mm (L) dropout hanger. Long history... I forgot that When I got that frame I had to use a hanger from a mtb i had laying around.
So my bianchi with a longer mtb hanger and shimano 7800 shifts very well, maibe even better than with the original (maibe 26-27 mm) one. I thing I have heard somebody saying that new bikes uses longer hangers than in the past.
So my bianchi with a longer mtb hanger and shimano 7800 shifts very well, maibe even better than with the original (maibe 26-27 mm) one. I thing I have heard somebody saying that new bikes uses longer hangers than in the past.
Hanger "length" (or maybe "drop" is the more descriptive term) is a spec that is part of the 17 or so details that control how well an indexed system works. In going to greater shifting "precision" Shimano shortened this dimension from what was sometimes just over 30mm to the now common 26mm (or so). This brings the guide pulley closer to the underside of the cog set and with less open chain spanning this gap the shifting can be quicker.
But a loss is that when using a low gear with a large cog there's greater chance that the pulley will contact the cog, "pulley knock" results and a hesitation to shift off the large cog results. Hence all the threads that talk about the "B" screw's needing adjustment or replacement with a longer one.
As a tourist I like low gears so my frames usually use drop outs with as long a hanger drop as I can find and that also meets the other needs of my drop outs. Andy.
#20
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ffld Cnty Connecticut
Posts: 21,803
Bikes: Old Steelies I made, Old Cannondales
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1160 Post(s)
Liked 840 Times
in
558 Posts
Looks like "Wall Art" to me. There's not enough material left to attach a new hanger.
__________________
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
Bikes: Old steel race bikes, old Cannondale race bikes, less old Cannondale race bike, crappy old mtn bike.
FYI: https://www.bikeforums.net/forum-sugg...ad-please.html
#21
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Hanger "length" (or maybe "drop" is the more descriptive term) is a spec that is part of the 17 or so details that control how well an indexed system works. In going to greater shifting "precision" Shimano shortened this dimension from what was sometimes just over 30mm to the now common 26mm (or so). This brings the guide pulley closer to the underside of the cog set and with less open chain spanning this gap the shifting can be quicker.
But a loss is that when using a low gear with a large cog there's greater chance that the pulley will contact the cog, "pulley knock" results and a hesitation to shift off the large cog results. Hence all the threads that talk about the "B" screw's needing adjustment or replacement with a longer one.
As a tourist I like low gears so my frames usually use drop outs with as long a hanger drop as I can find and that also meets the other needs of my drop outs. Andy.
But a loss is that when using a low gear with a large cog there's greater chance that the pulley will contact the cog, "pulley knock" results and a hesitation to shift off the large cog results. Hence all the threads that talk about the "B" screw's needing adjustment or replacement with a longer one.
As a tourist I like low gears so my frames usually use drop outs with as long a hanger drop as I can find and that also meets the other needs of my drop outs. Andy.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,573
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3983 Post(s)
Liked 3,364 Times
in
2,041 Posts
One of the problems when one looks at a system which is mature (design revisions and market life span) is that the current users rarely have the history to have seen the system as it first comes to the market. And as such don't attribute the details as being anything different or contributing to the way the new system works. The current design must have been the way things have been forever (said with some assumption in one's voice).
But when Shimano introduced their early indexed systems the bike industry was a FAR way from the narrow design standard that it is today. What wasn't different was the market places wish to not have to change, or spend money, yet still get all the new system's benefits. So early on there were many attempts to have the big/key elements of the new system present but the minor elements were still missing (or sub par). As a result indexing would work, sort of, when all was new and not worn/dirty/lacking lube. Today the most common examples of this lack of a complete system (but with claims of indexing) are found on the big box store bikes that sub freewheels, chains, cable casings for non system ones. Talk to your LBS wrench about the improvement gained by replacing said parts with Shimano spec ones.
It's been nearly 30 years since the initial Shimano instructions and guide lines were published so my memory isn't crisp. In a few minutes I only came up with 16 details of indexing systems. Here they are, some with follow up notes.
- Chain- width, side plate contouring, side to side flexibility
- Cog Teeth- thickness, shifting point shaping and placement WRT adjacent cogs' shift points
- Cog to Cog spacing- Shimano's design required the same spacing across the cog set
- Axle to Der Mount- What we've called drop out length or drop
- Der Mount Stop Tab Placement- At what angle will the der hang at
- Pulley Teeth Shape- Shimano has different tooth profiles for the guide and the tension pulleys
- Guide Pulley Float- To help absorb system tolerance drift and quiet chain/cog meshing noise
- Guide Pulley/Cog Underside Gap- And the ability to adjust this gap for best shifting
- Der swing/Cable Pull Amount- What we call actuation ratio or cable pull ratio
- Cable Diameter- Which first was 1.6mm then shortly later with lower grade groups became 1.2mm
- Casing Compression- Or the lack of. First SIS casing was single square wire wound but soon became multi wire helix wound.
- Casing End Caps- Both how they fit the casing and how they seat into the frame/der stops
- Frame Cable Stops- Placement and shape WRT how the casing end caps fit
- Cable Route Friction- BB cable guides became low friction instead of bare metal. Casings used low friction liners
- Shift Lever Detent Spacing and Over Shifting Aspect- Detents (and the first frame mounted levers used detents not ratchets) needed to be properly spaced WRT each other. The need to slightly over shift then trim back.
- Shift lever Cable Spool Diameter- how much cable pull per lever/detent position
As you can see the system is far more complex them most today will consider. But back then there were so many ways that bike brands dealt with these factors. Cable stops were all over the place. Cable guides were often bare metal and flexible clamped on units. casings were often same as brake cables or were lacking low friction liners. Chains and cog teeth were not designed for ease of shifting to anywhere the same degree that SIS used. Pulleys were the same and the only float came from worn out bushings. And so on. When all but one or two of the minor elements are correct a drivetrain will work reasonably well. But have one of the major ones be off or a lot of the minor ones wrong and...
Shimano, to their credit, realized that for them to win over the OEM spec they needed to have the test ride experience be better then Campy's or Sun Tour's (not to forget about Simplex, Huret and the other bit players). This meant that from the frame up each aspect needed to be just so for the total to be greater then the parts. So Shimano began to publish their frame design specs as well as the component ones. Shimano pushed bike companies to use the entire Shimano groupo to help insure all played together as well as it could. That Shimano is the industry leader proves how well they did not just their part designs but also their marketing (to both the consumer and the bike companies). Andy.
#24
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
One of the problems when one looks at a system which is mature (design revisions and market life span) is that the current users rarely have the history to have seen the system as it first comes to the market. And as such don't attribute the details as being anything different or contributing to the way the new system works. The current design must have been the way things have been forever (said with some assumption in one's voice).
But when Shimano introduced their early indexed systems the bike industry was a FAR way from the narrow design standard that it is today. What wasn't different was the market places wish to not have to change, or spend money, yet still get all the new system's benefits. So early on there were many attempts to have the big/key elements of the new system present but the minor elements were still missing (or sub par). As a result indexing would work, sort of, when all was new and not worn/dirty/lacking lube. Today the most common examples of this lack of a complete system (but with claims of indexing) are found on the big box store bikes that sub freewheels, chains, cable casings for non system ones. Talk to your LBS wrench about the improvement gained by replacing said parts with Shimano spec ones.
It's been nearly 30 years since the initial Shimano instructions and guide lines were published so my memory isn't crisp. In a few minutes I only came up with 16 details of indexing systems. Here they are, some with follow up notes.
- Chain- width, side plate contouring, side to side flexibility
- Cog Teeth- thickness, shifting point shaping and placement WRT adjacent cogs' shift points
- Cog to Cog spacing- Shimano's design required the same spacing across the cog set
- Axle to Der Mount- What we've called drop out length or drop
- Der Mount Stop Tab Placement- At what angle will the der hang at
- Pulley Teeth Shape- Shimano has different tooth profiles for the guide and the tension pulleys
- Guide Pulley Float- To help absorb system tolerance drift and quiet chain/cog meshing noise
- Guide Pulley/Cog Underside Gap- And the ability to adjust this gap for best shifting
- Der swing/Cable Pull Amount- What we call actuation ratio or cable pull ratio
- Cable Diameter- Which first was 1.6mm then shortly later with lower grade groups became 1.2mm
- Casing Compression- Or the lack of. First SIS casing was single square wire wound but soon became multi wire helix wound.
- Casing End Caps- Both how they fit the casing and how they seat into the frame/der stops
- Frame Cable Stops- Placement and shape WRT how the casing end caps fit
- Cable Route Friction- BB cable guides became low friction instead of bare metal. Casings used low friction liners
- Shift Lever Detent Spacing and Over Shifting Aspect- Detents (and the first frame mounted levers used detents not ratchets) needed to be properly spaced WRT each other. The need to slightly over shift then trim back.
- Shift lever Cable Spool Diameter- how much cable pull per lever/detent position
As you can see the system is far more complex them most today will consider. But back then there were so many ways that bike brands dealt with these factors. Cable stops were all over the place. Cable guides were often bare metal and flexible clamped on units. casings were often same as brake cables or were lacking low friction liners. Chains and cog teeth were not designed for ease of shifting to anywhere the same degree that SIS used. Pulleys were the same and the only float came from worn out bushings. And so on. When all but one or two of the minor elements are correct a drivetrain will work reasonably well. But have one of the major ones be off or a lot of the minor ones wrong and...
Shimano, to their credit, realized that for them to win over the OEM spec they needed to have the test ride experience be better then Campy's or Sun Tour's (not to forget about Simplex, Huret and the other bit players). This meant that from the frame up each aspect needed to be just so for the total to be greater then the parts. So Shimano began to publish their frame design specs as well as the component ones. Shimano pushed bike companies to use the entire Shimano groupo to help insure all played together as well as it could. That Shimano is the industry leader proves how well they did not just their part designs but also their marketing (to both the consumer and the bike companies). Andy.
But when Shimano introduced their early indexed systems the bike industry was a FAR way from the narrow design standard that it is today. What wasn't different was the market places wish to not have to change, or spend money, yet still get all the new system's benefits. So early on there were many attempts to have the big/key elements of the new system present but the minor elements were still missing (or sub par). As a result indexing would work, sort of, when all was new and not worn/dirty/lacking lube. Today the most common examples of this lack of a complete system (but with claims of indexing) are found on the big box store bikes that sub freewheels, chains, cable casings for non system ones. Talk to your LBS wrench about the improvement gained by replacing said parts with Shimano spec ones.
It's been nearly 30 years since the initial Shimano instructions and guide lines were published so my memory isn't crisp. In a few minutes I only came up with 16 details of indexing systems. Here they are, some with follow up notes.
- Chain- width, side plate contouring, side to side flexibility
- Cog Teeth- thickness, shifting point shaping and placement WRT adjacent cogs' shift points
- Cog to Cog spacing- Shimano's design required the same spacing across the cog set
- Axle to Der Mount- What we've called drop out length or drop
- Der Mount Stop Tab Placement- At what angle will the der hang at
- Pulley Teeth Shape- Shimano has different tooth profiles for the guide and the tension pulleys
- Guide Pulley Float- To help absorb system tolerance drift and quiet chain/cog meshing noise
- Guide Pulley/Cog Underside Gap- And the ability to adjust this gap for best shifting
- Der swing/Cable Pull Amount- What we call actuation ratio or cable pull ratio
- Cable Diameter- Which first was 1.6mm then shortly later with lower grade groups became 1.2mm
- Casing Compression- Or the lack of. First SIS casing was single square wire wound but soon became multi wire helix wound.
- Casing End Caps- Both how they fit the casing and how they seat into the frame/der stops
- Frame Cable Stops- Placement and shape WRT how the casing end caps fit
- Cable Route Friction- BB cable guides became low friction instead of bare metal. Casings used low friction liners
- Shift Lever Detent Spacing and Over Shifting Aspect- Detents (and the first frame mounted levers used detents not ratchets) needed to be properly spaced WRT each other. The need to slightly over shift then trim back.
- Shift lever Cable Spool Diameter- how much cable pull per lever/detent position
As you can see the system is far more complex them most today will consider. But back then there were so many ways that bike brands dealt with these factors. Cable stops were all over the place. Cable guides were often bare metal and flexible clamped on units. casings were often same as brake cables or were lacking low friction liners. Chains and cog teeth were not designed for ease of shifting to anywhere the same degree that SIS used. Pulleys were the same and the only float came from worn out bushings. And so on. When all but one or two of the minor elements are correct a drivetrain will work reasonably well. But have one of the major ones be off or a lot of the minor ones wrong and...
Shimano, to their credit, realized that for them to win over the OEM spec they needed to have the test ride experience be better then Campy's or Sun Tour's (not to forget about Simplex, Huret and the other bit players). This meant that from the frame up each aspect needed to be just so for the total to be greater then the parts. So Shimano began to publish their frame design specs as well as the component ones. Shimano pushed bike companies to use the entire Shimano groupo to help insure all played together as well as it could. That Shimano is the industry leader proves how well they did not just their part designs but also their marketing (to both the consumer and the bike companies). Andy.
#25
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6841 Post(s)
Liked 731 Times
in
465 Posts
Cervelo crash replacement?
Just asking.
Probably won't be much.
-Tim-
Just asking.
Probably won't be much.
-Tim-