Tubeless
#26
Senior Member
So, it's a thing.
That said (and perhaps I have poor technique), tubeless are a pain for me to set up.
I'm in the process of doing it now. I got a second wheelset (tubeless) for my gravel bike a few months ago and thoughtlessly put my less knobby tires on. I'm finally getting around to switching the knobbies on. But... The ordinary clincher wheelset? 10 minutes and both are done. The tubeless wheelset? Having a hell of a time trying to get the bead seated. It's a real question whether it's worth it.
Last edited by athrowawaynic; 04-25-17 at 08:35 AM. Reason: a letter
#27
Senior Member
Theory is that higher volume, lower pressures provide a more comfortable and faster ride for roadies. For mountain bikers, the lower pressure/squish helps with traction. The main problem with lower pressures is the risk of pinch flats, which tubeless helps to remedy. And it has an added benefit that the sealant also closes up small punctures.
So, it's a thing.
That said (and perhaps I have poor technique), tubeless are a pain for me to set up.
I'm in the process of doing it now. I got a second wheelset (tubeless) for my gravel bike a few months ago and thoughtlessly put my less knobby tires on. I'm finally getting around to switching the knobbies on. But... The ordinary clincher wheelset? 10 minutes and both are done. The tubeless wheelset? Having a hell of a time trying to get the bead seated. It's a real question whether it's worth it.
So, it's a thing.
That said (and perhaps I have poor technique), tubeless are a pain for me to set up.
I'm in the process of doing it now. I got a second wheelset (tubeless) for my gravel bike a few months ago and thoughtlessly put my less knobby tires on. I'm finally getting around to switching the knobbies on. But... The ordinary clincher wheelset? 10 minutes and both are done. The tubeless wheelset? Having a hell of a time trying to get the bead seated. It's a real question whether it's worth it.
#28
Cries on hills
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Central NH
Posts: 1,088
Bikes: 2007 Trek Pilot 1.2, 1969 Raleigh Sprite 5
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Dunno what the right way is, but when I was seating car tires, I used one of the cheapo airgun sprayer things--meant to blow dust off stuff. I found I could shove it into the schrader valve (sans core) and it would seat the beads. Just like this.
#29
Senior Member
I've been trying with a FlashCharger pump. But compressor may be necessary.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
I'm undecided about rim width. Am looking at WTB KOM rims, and either 23mm or 25mm inside rim width. Both are within the ETRTO bounds. Any thoughts? The 23mm inner rim width is more toward the center of the range for 47mm tires. 25mm is a close to the widest that's recommended. I've flip-flopped several times this past week. Right now I'm leaning toward 23mm inside width. Tough call. What do you think?
#31
Senior Member
I never worry much about low pressure limits on tires. Last fall I ran the Horizons at 30 psi, and then at 20 psi. I don't recall at the moment which of those pressures I liked better.
I'm undecided about rim width. Am looking at WTB KOM rims, and either 23mm or 25mm inside rim width. Both are within the ETRTO bounds. Any thoughts? The 23mm inner rim width is more toward the center of the range for 47mm tires. 25mm is a close to the widest that's recommended. I've flip-flopped several times this past week. Right now I'm leaning toward 23mm inside width. Tough call. What do you think?
I'm undecided about rim width. Am looking at WTB KOM rims, and either 23mm or 25mm inside rim width. Both are within the ETRTO bounds. Any thoughts? The 23mm inner rim width is more toward the center of the range for 47mm tires. 25mm is a close to the widest that's recommended. I've flip-flopped several times this past week. Right now I'm leaning toward 23mm inside width. Tough call. What do you think?
#32
Senior Member
Garage or car wash nearby?
#33
Senior Member
I'm sure at least one of my neighbors has a compressor.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
Nope, you misread me. Low MAX limits. Maximum tire pressures ( my wording could have been better) Some tires and rims for tubeless won't go over say 40 psi. Again, range of widths expected for your tires? I would look to the tire or rim maker for guidelines. My thoughts? Wider is better for lower pressure. 28mm ?
#35
Senior Member
The tubeless versions typically say TL-easy on the logo.
FlashCharger should work great, I've never had an issue with mine.
Try using some soapy water on the beads to get it to seat, it helps lubricate things.
#36
Senior Member
It is possible though--just not painless. The first time around, I managed to get a pair of Sammy Slicks set up tubeless (also with the P logo). I'll suffer it. Live and learn.
EDIT: Aaaaand... 16 hours after starting the process, tires are now holding air. I'm assuming partly technique and partly non-tubeless tires on tubeless rim.
Last edited by athrowawaynic; 04-25-17 at 12:42 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
3speed
Mountain Biking
8
08-29-11 02:19 PM