Any 28 tires lower than others?
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Any 28 tires lower than others?
I bought my Robaix a few years back and was told it would take up to 28mm tires. Finally got around to putting some on and the difference was just incredible. Feel like I'm rolling so much better, lower pressure is real comfortable, feels faster although don't really know if thats true. One holdup is that the front tire barely clears the frame, had to let a little air out so it didn't rub. Still, when the tire picks up grit/sand, I can hear it getting rubbed off by the frame/top of the fork. Probably not so good for the long term. What I'd like to know is whether there are 28's around that have a lower profile than others or should I just go back to a 25 on the front. The 28's on there now are Continentals.
Thanks
Thanks
Last edited by Champlaincycler; 07-08-17 at 01:28 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,535
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17534 Post(s)
Liked 4,144 Times
in
3,081 Posts
There would be no problem riding 25 in front and 28 in rear, other than not being able to rotate a worn front to the rear.
I'm seeing a Specialized S-Works Turbo Tire listed in 22mm, 24mm, 26mm, and 28mm sizes. I haven't seen one, but perhaps it would be worth looking at.
The Challenge Paris-Roubaix Tire (120TPI or 300TPI) are listed as 700x27c.
Oops, never mind on the Challenge tires. According to this page, they were the largest ones he measured.
28mm Tire Shootout - Slowtwitch.com
Ok, tire size seems to vary tremendously depending on the rim choice. That may be an option is to try your existing tires on a narrow front rim.
Here is another comparision that I found.
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...michelin.htmlv
Vittoria Rubino came in as the smallest.
Also note, the tires apparently stretch a little over time, so a barely fitting tire could become worse with time.
I'm seeing a Specialized S-Works Turbo Tire listed in 22mm, 24mm, 26mm, and 28mm sizes. I haven't seen one, but perhaps it would be worth looking at.
The Challenge Paris-Roubaix Tire (120TPI or 300TPI) are listed as 700x27c.
Oops, never mind on the Challenge tires. According to this page, they were the largest ones he measured.
28mm Tire Shootout - Slowtwitch.com
Ok, tire size seems to vary tremendously depending on the rim choice. That may be an option is to try your existing tires on a narrow front rim.
Here is another comparision that I found.
https://www.bikeforums.net/road-cycli...michelin.htmlv
Vittoria Rubino came in as the smallest.
Also note, the tires apparently stretch a little over time, so a barely fitting tire could become worse with time.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 932
Bikes: '04 LeMond Buenos Aires, '82 Bianchi Nuova Racing, De Rosa SLX, Bridgestone MB-1, Guerciotti TSX, Torpado Aelle, LeMond Tourmalet 853, Bridgestone Radac
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 101 Post(s)
Liked 45 Times
in
35 Posts
I bought a set of inexpensive Continental Ultra Sport tires and they run big (maybe tall is the correct term). I've been riding Serfas SECA tires in 28 for a few years and they fit all my bikes, the most current one a 2004 LeMond Buenos Aires. I can't use the Continentals on that bike.
If you're open to trying something else, Serfas may fit the bill.
If you're open to trying something else, Serfas may fit the bill.
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks ,
Maybe I should be looking for 25's or 26's that run big. I just love the feel of the 28's though. Little disappointed that Specialized would market these bikes as accepting up to 28's when they may or may not. Its still a pretty nice ride though.
Maybe I should be looking for 25's or 26's that run big. I just love the feel of the 28's though. Little disappointed that Specialized would market these bikes as accepting up to 28's when they may or may not. Its still a pretty nice ride though.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 292 Times
in
219 Posts
And I think you overexaggerate the risk of marginal clearance.
The studded tires on my commuter runs tight to the fenders.
But for probably more than 10 000 miles, all that has ever created is quickly passing noise.
My MTB once managed to pick up a pine cone and pinch it between rear tire and brake bridge. That did indeed cause an unexpected wheel lock.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 443
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 21 Times
in
17 Posts
I've never tried it but i have read of people adding some kind of spacer material to the dropouts, so to nudge the wheel away from the frame and fork. It could give you an extra vital 1-3mm of clearance. This would only work on QR frames and forks.
What exact material they used im not sure, but my idea would be to glue rubber pieces to the inside area of the dropouts.
You would also need to account for moving the brake holders further down the brake arms.
What exact material they used im not sure, but my idea would be to glue rubber pieces to the inside area of the dropouts.
You would also need to account for moving the brake holders further down the brake arms.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,535
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17534 Post(s)
Liked 4,144 Times
in
3,081 Posts
An opposite tactic might be to add something like propeller/helicopter tape to the bottom of the fork crown to provide a minimal amount of protection, although it would decrease clearance slightly/
#8
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,347
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3748 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times
in
1,447 Posts
@Champlaincycler, it does suck that your Roubaix can't accommodate all 28mm tires (and 28 is the smallest I use on any bike), but all is not lost. What pressure do you typically pump to? If you are not particularly heavy, you may be able to use less pressure in your 25's than the max listed on the sidewall. Search for "15% tire drop chart".

#9
Full Member
Thread Starter
Thanks TS, that's what I was planning on. I'm 190 lbs, could probably soften up a 25 on the front to 85 psi or so. No big deal as I've ridden 25's for the last few years but had no idea how much of a difference 28's make in ride quality. Its still a great bike.
#10
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,347
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 97 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3748 Post(s)
Liked 2,308 Times
in
1,447 Posts
Here's a copy of that article I had in mind. I was on my phone earlier, so not as easy to dig up and post links: https://www.adventurecycling.org/def...SIRX_Heine.pdf
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 07-09-17 at 03:53 PM.
#11
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,414
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4498 Post(s)
Liked 2,659 Times
in
1,723 Posts
The cheap Vittoria Zaffiros on the bike now have only a mediocre rating from the rolling resistance review site, and much worse with pressure below 120 psi. Yet I have noticed that lowering the pressure doesn't seem slower and it's more comfortable. I'm wondering whether the reality of riding on chipseal and bad pavement makes those rolling resistance tests irrelevant to some real world conditions.
We don't have many long stretches of good smooth asphalt to test the theory. There's a nearby neighborhood with some smooth pavement for up to half a mile at a stretch, so I might experiment with various pressures. But I'd need to repeat the tests over a long period to even out the influences of my own so-so conditioning.
Anyway, I'm waiting for an order of Continental Ones with V Guard in 700x23 to see how they feel compared with the Zaffiros. I'd rather have had the 700x25, but Jenson had the 23s on sale cheap.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,535
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17534 Post(s)
Liked 4,144 Times
in
3,081 Posts
The cheap Vittoria Zaffiros on the bike now have only a mediocre rating from the rolling resistance review site, and much worse with pressure below 120 psi. Yet I have noticed that lowering the pressure doesn't seem slower and it's more comfortable. I'm wondering whether the reality of riding on chipseal and bad pavement makes those rolling resistance tests irrelevant to some real world conditions.
I'm surprised they don't just build a rig to tow around on roads at 25 MPH or so.
#13
Me duelen las nalgas
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,414
Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel
Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4498 Post(s)
Liked 2,659 Times
in
1,723 Posts
In my case I'm not expecting tires to magically make me faster. I already know from trying various wider tires on my hybrids that I'm faster when I'm more comfortable, so a tire that doesn't tire me out will be "faster" over the long haul.
However I would like to find a road bike tire that will help me at least equal my best times on my hybrid with 700x42 tires over rural chipseal and rough roads. So far the road bike is faster only over smooth asphalt and hill climbs, since it's lighter.
However I would like to find a road bike tire that will help me at least equal my best times on my hybrid with 700x42 tires over rural chipseal and rough roads. So far the road bike is faster only over smooth asphalt and hill climbs, since it's lighter.
#14
Senior Member
I'm using 28mm GravelKings and am really pleased. They roll way nicer than those Flinstones -wheel- quality Gatorskins. They measured 26.5 on the stock 19(?) mm rims and an impressive 28.7 on the Son Plus Archetype. My $0.02 (Canadian)
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 28,983
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5046 Post(s)
Liked 3,259 Times
in
2,145 Posts
or take an angle grinder to the bottom of the fork crown to shape it a little concavely giving you another mm or two of clearance
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,535
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17534 Post(s)
Liked 4,144 Times
in
3,081 Posts
Solid or hollow?
I don't think grinding the crown of my carbon fiber road bike would be my first choice.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 25 miles northwest of Boston
Posts: 28,983
Bikes: Bottecchia Sprint, GT Timberline 29r, Marin Muirwoods 29er, Trek FX Alpha 7.0
Mentioned: 109 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5046 Post(s)
Liked 3,259 Times
in
2,145 Posts
right of course. I did that to an old steel bike this winter to get some fenders to squeeze in. eventually cut the fenders so the grinding was ultimately unnecessary
#19
Senior Member
How much clearance is considered enough? I imagine front would be more crucial than rear. I can almost fit a 32 gravelking in my Defy's fork. Almost.