Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Another chain discussion - hopefully something new

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Another chain discussion - hopefully something new

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-24-17, 12:16 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times in 570 Posts
Originally Posted by debade
Bornman suggests chains do not have to wear.
I get what he's saying. Sure, you place something in an ideal environment and then proclaim: look, it doesn't fail! To me, this is the same as placing some naked steel in a de-humidified room and then telling people that steel doesn't need paint to prevent rust -- it just needs to be put in the correct environment.

Right.

To his point about chains and wear prevention. Oil generally needs pressurization to maintain separation between the two metal surfaces (though not always). We don't have that in a bicycle chain. This can be somewhat mitigated in an oil bath situation because you're literally re-bathing the part in lubricant with every revolution, and you have a continual supply of oil. We don't have this in a bike chain, either (in 99.9% of cases). The chain has to live on whatever lubricant is supplied and at whatever interval that's done. You start cranking on a chain and you WILL get metal-to-metal contact. You can attempt to prevent it all you want, but the oil's boundary layer cannot be sustained. That's generally the case in this situation, regardless of viscosity. I suppose one could imagine some super-viscous oil that could somehow be applied to inside the rollers and kept there. But that's not what Mr. Bornman is suggesting. He's suggesting pouring a mix of bar oil and Havoline on your chain.

I'm sure it'll work. It'll work as well as a wax lube. It'll work as well as a dry lube. It'll work about as well as any other lube. As long as you're lubricating the chain at intervals rather than continually in a bath, you will get break-downs in the lubricant and you will experience wear.

Last edited by hokiefyd; 07-24-17 at 12:25 PM.
hokiefyd is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 03:23 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588

Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Oil does not need pressure to separate moving parts; it creates its own. How oil works is not a mystery -- do some research ----.

Here are a couple of links (there are many, many more).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...9910021217.pdf

Joe

Last edited by Joe Minton; 07-24-17 at 03:27 PM.
Joe Minton is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 03:25 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 38,710

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 140 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5781 Post(s)
Liked 2,576 Times in 1,427 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Minton
Oil does not need pressure to separate moving parts; it creates its own. How oil works is not a mystery -- do some research ----.

Here are a couple of links.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_bearing
https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/c...9910021217.pdf

Joe
Fixed it for clarity (assuming it was a typo originally).
__________________
FB
Chain-L site

An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.

Just because I'm tired of arguing, doesn't mean you're right.

“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN

WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FBinNY is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 04:02 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588

Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
FBinNY:

I fixed it too! Dunno which of us did it first. Anyway -- thanks LOL ;o)

Joe
Joe Minton is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 05:55 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times in 570 Posts
Originally Posted by Joe Minton
Oil does not need pressure to separate moving parts; it creates its own.
In a bike chain application, separation can occur with the hydrodynamic wedge created by the relative movement of the two parts. There is also a boundary layer that works to keep parts separated at slow speeds, where a hydrodynamic wedge isn't relevant. Neither is creating an ideal separation in this case. Sufficient separation between precision parts would likely result in much longer chain life. We don't have either one in this application (sufficient separation OR precision parts). There's only so much a drop of oil on each link of a $15 chain can do.

You'll note that I said that oil "generally needs pressurization to maintain separation between the two metal surfaces (though not always)". I didn't intend for that statement to be taken out of context and used as a general thesis on lubrication theory. Rather, the challenges of a lack of pressurization and wet bath are very relevant to low-speed high-shear applications like a bicycle chain.

My post is intended to be in agreement with most others in this thread, which is both: Mr. Bornman is applying ideal theory to a relatively severe application (with respect to the type and amount of lubrication we can apply to the chain) and, also, it doesn't much matter what type of lubricant is used in a chain. Chain life is somewhat predictable and consistent, due to the lubrication challenges noted above.
hokiefyd is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 06:06 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
hokiefyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,141

Bikes: More bikes than riders

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 762 Times in 570 Posts
Note that fluid bearings aren't really relevant to bicycle chains. The article correctly speaks of lubrication wedges developed due to pressure from either the moving parts themselves (in a hydrodynamic situation) or from a pressurized delivery system such as a pump (in a hydrostatic situation). This is generally a high-speed scenario, of which a bike chain is not. Fluid bearings also have an incredibly long life due to a TRUE fluid separation between the moving parts. Again, not terribly relevant to a bike chain.

Although I will admit to not having read every one of the 676 pages of the NASA document, it's going to talk about the same types of stuff as above. Hydrodynamic wedges developed by the rapid movement of two parts, hydrostatic wedges developed by external pressurization, and boundary layers (also called thin film lubrication).

You're absolutely right: this not voodoo science. Lubrication theory is pretty established. Which is why there are no "miracle" cures for bike chains like most of us have (save for special situations like wet bath systems). Bike chains are harsh environments imposed on, let's face it, inexpensive mass-produced components. It's not an ideal environment, no lubricant performs especially well here, and chains are thusly considered a consumable.

This is, clearly, in contrast with chains in an application like an automotive engine cam drive or oil pump drive. These are wet bath situations with components engineered and manufactured to much better standards. They are, in exchange, usually "lifetime" components.
hokiefyd is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 08:24 PM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 588

Bikes: Gary Fisher Hi-Fi Deluxe, Giant Stance, Cannondale Synapse, Diamondback 8sp IGH, 1989 Merckx

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 51 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Bottom line:

If there is oil between two metal parts, they will not touch and they will not wear. It gets complicated after that. ;o)

Joe
Joe Minton is offline  
Old 07-24-17, 09:46 PM
  #33  
- Soli Deo Gloria -
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779

Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix

Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times in 469 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
About 20 years ago, I tried the dreaded "wax" lubricant known as White Lightning and I haven't gone back.
@cyccommute, I'd like to try this.

Are you using Clean Ride or one of the other Epic, Wet or Easy products?


-Tim-
TimothyH is offline  
Old 07-25-17, 07:15 AM
  #34  
Mad bike riding scientist
 
cyccommute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,362

Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones

Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6219 Post(s)
Liked 4,218 Times in 2,365 Posts
Originally Posted by TimothyH
@cyccommute, I'd like to try this.

Are you using Clean Ride or one of the other Epic, Wet or Easy products?


-Tim-
Just the Clean Ride. I've tried the Epic in the past...I may still have part of a bottle but didn't find it to perform any differently than just normal Clean Ride.

Be aware that your chain will have a different sound...louder... than when you use an oil based lubricant. I've gotten used to it (and my hearing has changed over the years) but that is often the complaint that many people make. But even with the different sound, I've not seen any change in durability of the chain.

I would also suggest that you strip as much of other lubricants off first before applying. This will give the cleanest results.

Finally, I've not found that the instructions on the bottle of applying it every 100 miles to be necessary. I apply it about every 500 to 700 miles and, again, haven't noticed any lack of chain durability.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!



cyccommute is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mickey2
Bicycle Mechanics
3
08-01-19 05:21 PM
Seizedpost
Classic & Vintage
17
09-15-16 05:46 AM
MNBikeCommuter
Bicycle Mechanics
38
10-30-11 07:06 PM
Gerry Hull
Bicycle Mechanics
3
03-12-11 05:19 PM
rydabent
Bicycle Mechanics
6
03-07-11 01:30 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.