Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Bicycle Mechanics (https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/)
-   -   Tires too big for the rims (https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/1118776-tires-too-big-rims.html)

DaisyBell 08-16-17 07:17 AM

Tires too big for the rims
 
I have an old 1978 Schwinn metrocycle that I'm trying to fix up and the old tires I took off were 26 x1 1/4 tires I bought 26 x1 3/8. I tired to put the front tire on but the tire seems to big for the rim. Any ideas or though would be greatly appreciated thanks

rhenning 08-16-17 07:39 AM

There are 3 sizes of 26 x 1 3/8 tires. You bought the ones for Raleighs and others. You need tires specifically made for Schwinn S-6 rims. Currently Kenda is the only one making them that I know of. Roger

CliffordK 08-16-17 07:43 AM

There are several 26" tire sizes. See this page:
Tire Sizing Systems

Are your tire sizes written in fractions as above, or decimals?

Look at the original tires, and see if you see a number written on the side: 559, 571, 584, 590, or 597, or 599?

You can also measure the diameter of your rim, and add about 10mm to estimate the ISO/BSD size.

fietsbob 08-16-17 07:47 AM

Agree.. best to use ETRTO numbers , those, metric are the diameter of tire bead seat ..

Since as you found there is more than 1 fractional tire size, so using that is ambiguous..

Darth Lefty 08-16-17 07:59 AM


Originally Posted by fietsbob (Post 19795928)
Agree.. best to use ETRTO numbers , those, metric are the diameter of tire bead seat ..

Since as you found there is more than 1 fractional tire size, so using that is ambiguous..

This is great as a standard of practice, but nothing the OP has in her hands lists its own ETRTO.


These are the S-6 tires that Roger mentioned
https://www.biketiresdirect.com/prod...8x1-1-4-37-597

DaisyBell 08-16-17 08:19 AM

The tire size was in fractions and the other number on the side was 32-597
Thanks again

hokiefyd 08-16-17 08:26 AM


Originally Posted by DaisyBell (Post 19795997)
The tire size was in fractions and the other number on the side was 32-597
Thanks again

That's it -- "32-597" is the critical number in this case. You'll need to find tires that use the 597mm bead diameter. Your old tires are 32mm wide --
you'll probably want to be close to that. Suggestions given earlier in this thread.

Andrew R Stewart 08-16-17 08:30 AM

Actually a 26x1 3/8 tire at an ISO size of 590mm is smaller then the almost but not same Schwinn size 26x1 1/4 at 597mm. So the OP's statement " the old tires I took off were 26 x1 1/4 tires I bought 26 x1 3/8. I tired to put the front tire on but the tire seems to big for the rim." doesn't make sense. The 590 size won't fit on a 597 rim (or not without future removal challenges.. I've seen a number miss mounted and usually require the bead wires to be cut to remove). Andy.

DaisyBell 08-16-17 08:40 AM

The tires I bought say 37-597 I knew they weren't right

Darth Lefty 08-16-17 08:52 AM

Is the tire too wide for the rim?

DaisyBell 08-16-17 10:32 AM

The weird thing is I got the back tire on perfectly. But with front I put the one side in then the inner tuber and working the other side in, every time I end up with this gap of too much tire. Honestly I started to wonder if I have the wrong size rim due to that the bike has damage that makes me think at one time it maybe had crash or something.

CliffordK 08-16-17 11:37 AM

Do the front and rear rims have the same outer diameter? It should just take a few seconds to measure them in either inches or mm, and convert.

Bill Kapaun 08-16-17 01:03 PM

26X 1-3/8" are commonly found in 590mm & 597mm BSD's. (Schwinn is 597)
Sounds like you may have had a 597 rim replaced with a 590 and are trying a 597 tire.
7mm*PI is 22mm, or nearly an inch. (25.4mm)

DaisyBell 08-18-17 06:15 AM

Thank You everyone!! :)


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.