Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Proper procedure for square taper BB

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Proper procedure for square taper BB

Old 02-07-18, 01:26 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,589
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 239 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
I used to use grease, following the Jobst Brandt argument.

However nowadays I use thick chain oil instead, serves the same purpose for anti-galling during the install and avoids starting arguments with the other mechanics in the shop.


and no locktite, plenty of grease on those threads though.
xenologer is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 01:42 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by samkl
Not to revive the greased spindle controversy or anything, but the Shimano UN-55 BB I got in the mail recently arrived with the spindles already covered in a thin film of grease. Don't know what to make of that.
That is purely for rust prevention. You don't want to start out with a rusty taper.

I don't think it's the end of the world if someone installs a crankarm on a slightly oiled taper. But grease or anti-seize just isn't the tool for the job. IMPO
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 01:55 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 439 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 363 Posts
Not to fan the flames. This is from a Campagnolo user manual:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
campy.jpg (577.8 KB, 145 views)
gearbasher is online now  
Old 02-07-18, 02:05 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
It doesn't reach the bearing grease - there's about 1+ cm of axle between them. Of course it should never mix with other greases, especially inside the bearings. It is put on the axle part where the cranks are placed, nowhere near the bearings. Dirt and water are a lot more likely to contaminate the bearings, than the mounting paste - especially if the excess is wiped off after mounting (as it should).
Of course.
Like I said, even if it does reach the bearing, it's not going to damage anything. It's just oil with some very soft sacrificial materials in it like copper and zinc oxide. Neither of those will do any damage to a bearing or race.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
Kontact's argument that mounting paste will somehow hinder the engagement is something that both the theory (it's a mounting paste, that's what it's made for) and my practical experience so far do not agree with.
My argument is not that it "hinders the engagement." It's that it is rarely necessary, and more often can lead to overtightening.

Either choice has possible downsides. Yes, a dry taper can gall. Yes, a "wet" taper can be overtightened. IMPE the latter is more common and has worse consequences than the former. And I've worked on a LOT of very old bikes in my time. I've never not been able to extract a crankarm from a dry taper. Ever. Given, of course, intact extractor threads. Sometimes a minute with a propane torch is all it needs to come off.
OTOH I've seen more than a few crankarms pushed on so far that they are not usable. In most cases, they were greased.

A deft trained touch, or a torque wrench, will usually prevent overtightening. But there are far more people in the "tighter is better" club than have either of those things.

The only time I could see using anti-seize on a taper is for a bike that will see extremely wet and salty conditions. Even in that case, you'll probably be chewing through BBs often enough that galling won't be a problem.

FWIW, Barnett's recommends dry tapers. It's not the Bible, but it's the Book.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
On the other hand, it's better than grease for preventing the interface getting stuck together through rust, and it should provide better protection from fretting damage compared to most "multipurpose greases".
On that we are in total agreement. Grease is for moving parts. Anti-seize is for non-moving parts.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
Having said all this - using any old grease should do the job - just not do it "dry" - crank mounting that is.
Let's keep religion out of this, ok?
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 02:31 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 519

Bikes: 2004 Trek 520, resto-modded 1987 Cannondale SR400, rando-modded 1976 AD Vent Noir; 2019 Wabi Classic; 1989? Burley Duet

Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 213 Post(s)
Liked 93 Times in 51 Posts
That brings up another thing, which I never heard of: that you shouldn't grease the crank arm bolts before tightening. What could possibly be the rationale?

Originally Posted by gearbasher
Not to fan the flames. This is from a Campagnolo user manual:
samkl is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 02:55 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,825

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 128 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4741 Post(s)
Liked 3,860 Times in 2,509 Posts
I've done both over the years. But I have stopped greasing the tapers and if chainline is important (and esp if I do not want the cranks creeping in further) I clean the tapers with solvent. I have observed that greased tapers lead to the crank moving inboard after enough re-mounts to the point where I have to start using longer spindles or shimming the tapers. I have even split a crank.

Now I have a bike set up where I want the chainrings as far inboard as possible to best line up with track hub cogs. So I am using a Phil Wood BB to dial in the chainline so the ring doesn't quite scrape the chainstay paint. I want everything to stay right there. Really dry fits only on that bike.

Like others above, I have never had issues getting the cranks off. And I have never seen evidence of galling in 50 years. So I see little plus to using grease/oil/anti-seize. Just downside; the slow demise of of the crank's tapers. Not an issue if you never re-install the cranks.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 04:00 PM
  #32  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Of course.
Like I said, even if it does reach the bearing, it's not going to damage anything. It's just oil with some very soft sacrificial materials in it like copper and zinc oxide. Neither of those will do any damage to a bearing or race.

My argument is not that it "hinders the engagement." It's that it is rarely necessary, and more often can lead to overtightening.
This is incorrect. Lubricant will allow a proper crank to axle engagement using appropriate bolt torque. It will not help overtightening. I mean - you can overtighten and strip bolts if not paying attention, of course, but having a crank to axle interface lubed won't make any difference there.

Torquing it without lube on the interface, on the other hand, does cause problems, as was nicely explained in the link from Sheldon Brown's site.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
The only time I could see using anti-seize on a taper is for a bike that will see extremely wet and salty conditions. Even in that case, you'll probably be chewing through BBs often enough that galling won't be a problem.
Shimano cartridge square taper BBs last surprisingly long, even with salty winter roads. I've been very happy, even with the "lower middle end" models.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 05:04 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
This is incorrect. Lubricant will allow a proper crank to axle engagement using appropriate bolt torque. It will not help overtightening. I mean - you can overtighten and strip bolts if not paying attention, of course, but having a crank to axle interface lubed won't make any difference there.
Maybe I wasn't clear about what is being overtightened. I'm talking about the taper fit, not the bolt or nut. IOW, pushing the crank too far onto the taper.

A lubricated bolt will gall and seize up if not lubricated and overtorqued. So yes, always anti-seize your bolts. But you'll almost certainly either bottom out the crankarm or the bolt itself, or crack the crankarm before you strip the threads on a crank axle, bolt, or nut from overtightening it. I'm sure it's happened, not that I've tried.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
Torquing it without lube on the interface, on the other hand, does cause problems, as was nicely explained in the link from Sheldon Brown's site.
Jobst Brandt had lots of opinions, the most important one being that he was always right.

In this case, as I was implying before, it's not about right or wrong. It's about tradeoffs. When manufacturers and bicycle service institutes make recommendations, I think it's fair to say they've weighed the options and done their testing, engineering, and reverse-engineering, and don't make those recommendations because someone BITD told them that's how it's done. Their collective experience is considerable, and well earned.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 06:16 PM
  #34  
Old Legs
 
kcblair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Mass.
Posts: 1,212

Bikes: '80 Strayvaigin, '84 Ciocc Aelle-Shimano 105, '90 Concorde Astore /Campy Triple ,85 Bridgestone 500/Suntour, 2005 Jamis Quest, 2017 Raleigh Merit 1, Raleigh Carbon Clubman

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 302 Post(s)
Liked 33 Times in 22 Posts
Originally Posted by gearbasher
Not to fan the flames. This is from a Campagnolo user manual:
That's what I have been doing for decades, never had an issue with any of my BB's. Torque is also important, every shop mechanic should have one. KB
kcblair is offline  
Old 02-07-18, 08:34 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by samkl
That brings up another thing, which I never heard of: that you shouldn't grease the crank arm bolts before tightening. What could possibly be the rationale?
I can think of one or two.

First, if a bolt is not going to be torqued anywhere near its maximum, then it's highly unlikely it will gall. That is the case with crank bolts. Torque values tend to be around 60-70% of yield strength. Campagnolo's torque spec is in line with general torque values for 8mm dry bolts.

Second, A dry bolt is less likely to loosen than a lubed one if under-torqued, because of friction. (BTW tapered fits maintain their hold through friction, so this is also an argument for dry tapers.) Bolts also maintain their hold by being in tension, and an under-torqued bolt might not have enough tension to stay secure.
A dry bolt is also less likely to be over-torqued. So maybe their recommendation is to build in a margin of safety against both those problems.

To that point: Torque values for lubricated bolts are 10% lower than dry because there is less friction. So if you want to lube your Campagnolo crank bolts, you can, but reduce that torque by the 10% so you don't overdo it. If you want to lube your tapers, you can, but reduce the torque even more to keep from over-installing the crankarms.

Or you can just follow Campagnolo's recommendations. It really is about manufacturer recommendations when it comes to such things. Some bolts are tightened to a torque spec, whether dry or lubed. Some are tightened to snug, then clocked an additional fraction of a turn. (This is the best way to keep from over-tightening pedals, BTW. Take them 1/16 turn past snug. No more is necessary.)

The square taper crank has been around for about 80 years. Campy's been making them for about 60 years. Engineers generally have this stuff figured out. So if you deviate from their recommendations, you should have some idea of how to compensate.

Different materials also require different torque values. If you use titanium crank bolts, they will have a much different torque spec than an 8.8 steel bolt. Much lower, in fact, about a third of 8.8 steel. (Which is why you should tighten the cranks on the taper with a steel bolt, then remove the steel bolt, and then put on the titanium.)
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 12:47 AM
  #36  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Maybe I wasn't clear about what is being overtightened. I'm talking about the taper fit, not the bolt or nut. IOW, pushing the crank too far onto the taper.
This also won't happen. Don't take my word for it. If you have an old set, try doing it in one go. Lube it with any lube and try pushing it too far. Bolt will strip first.

The way to push the cranks too far is to put them on dry. They will get a bit (more) damage in the process. Then ride a bit, let the fretting do it's thing. Then re-tighten the bolts. And repeat that several times. Finally, the cranks will be pushed too far, resulting in a split crank interface if you go far enough.

You can do that even with lubed ones, of course. Just keep riding-re-tightening the bolts.


Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
In this case, as I was implying before, it's not about right or wrong. It's about tradeoffs. When manufacturers and bicycle service institutes make recommendations, I think it's fair to say they've weighed the options and done their testing, engineering, and reverse-engineering, and don't make those recommendations because someone BITD told them that's how it's done. Their collective experience is considerable, and well earned.
Some recommend lubing. Some recommend dry mounting. Bike industry, IMO, is mostly about marketing, which mostly relies on looks and low mass (weight). Good engineers are in auto and aeroplane industry.

I have quite strong hands. Never have I been able to tighten the bolts so that the cranks are split in one go, or they "climb" too high. Lubed, or not. So, at least mine, experience confirms what I've said. Could it all be wrong? I guess it's possible. Only after 20 more years could I claim my experience to have any sort of statistically valid value - it's about big numbers. Also, if I find/hear an explanation explaining the "opposing" (dry mount) theory that holds water, I'd be happy I've learned something new and correct my views and practice.

Off topic: about 9 years old, overhauling an old lawnmower with my father. He told me to tighten some (rather large) bolts. I asked how tight? He said "as tight as you can". Considering the tool I'm using is not a long lever and I'm a kid, so he'd probably have to check and re-tighten the bolts. I had stripped the first one, realized it and let him know, before doing any more damage. He just laughed and couldn't believe. "I underestimated you, it's my fault". Afterwords he would always joke about it when we worked on something: "tighten with small force, you know, NOT stripping the bolts..."

@gearbasher I have the manual in the shop. Was "delighted" with the instructions. That, and the right hand thread on the right side of bottom brackets are the jewels of Italian engineering IMO. Though I'm yet to test the infamous Campagnolo delta brakes.
Nothing against Campagnolo, really, love their brifters, love how they made the whole system shift nicely (Shimano got it right in 2nd go with 10 speed, and with 11 speed road), and the design is lovely as well.

Last edited by Bike Gremlin; 02-08-18 at 12:53 AM.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 06:42 AM
  #37  
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 439 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 363 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
@gearbasher I have the manual in the shop. Was "delighted" with the instructions. That, and the right hand thread on the right side of bottom brackets are the jewels of Italian engineering IMO. Though I'm yet to test the infamous Campagnolo delta brakes.
Nothing against Campagnolo, really, love their brifters, love how they made the whole system shift nicely (Shimano got it right in 2nd go with 10 speed, and with 11 speed road), and the design is lovely as well.
I've been riding only Campagnolo equipped Italian steel frames since the early '80s. My BB method is: grease on the threads of the cups, dry tapers, one drop of blue locktite on the crank bolts and everything torqued to Campy's specs. I've never had a cup unscrew or a crank arm come loose. Let me add, I have a C-Record era Chorus crankset that has over 70,000 miles on it and is still in use.
gearbasher is online now  
Old 02-08-18, 07:32 AM
  #38  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New Jersry the beautiful Garden State
Posts: 1,942

Bikes: 2007 Ridley Excalibur, 2003 Orbea Orca, 199? Cannondale Headshock MTB hardtail

Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 520 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 10 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
A deft trained touch, or a torque wrench, will usually prevent overtightening. But there are far more people in the "tighter is better" club than have either of those things.
I agree. I don't use a torque wrench but still remind myself to not be a "gorilla" and tighten the crap out of the crank bolt. One technique might be to tighten with an open hand. When you palm starts to hurt, then its tight enough.
ptempel is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 08:31 AM
  #39  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by gearbasher
I've been riding only Campagnolo equipped Italian steel frames since the early '80s. My BB method is: grease on the threads of the cups, dry tapers, one drop of blue locktite on the crank bolts and everything torqued to Campy's specs. I've never had a cup unscrew or a crank arm come loose. Let me add, I have a C-Record era Chorus crankset that has over 70,000 miles on it and is still in use.
Dry as degreaser used on the axle and cranks before mounting them?
Are you a heavy rider?

I still see no benefits in mounting them dry. Just (potential) problems. Why they wrote such manual is beyond me, really.

Last edited by Bike Gremlin; 02-08-18 at 08:35 AM.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 08:43 AM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,660
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 171 Times in 138 Posts
Originally Posted by trail_monkey
I think grease makes sense. The main question I wanted to know about was if I needed to re torque one time after the first ride even with loctite. I just added that I believe in grease
If you properly torqued the arms don't retorque. The arms will climb up the taper slightly each time you torque the bolts until you may crack the arms.
Installing Cranks by Jobst Brandt
davidad is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 11:00 AM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
gearbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sitting on my butt in front of a computer
Posts: 1,535
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 439 Post(s)
Liked 833 Times in 363 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Dry as degreaser used on the axle and cranks before mounting them?
Are you a heavy rider?

I still see no benefits in mounting them dry. Just (potential) problems. Why they wrote such manual is beyond me, really.
Yes, I use a degreaser on them. I'm a light "spinner". I've never worn out a large chainring in my entire life.
Campy also recommends putting their sealed bearing, square taper BB cups in dry. They come new with some yellow looking compound on them. I tried them dry and after a few hundred miles they start to creak. So, that's one Campy recommendation I don't follow.
gearbasher is online now  
Old 02-08-18, 01:22 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
This also won't happen. Don't take my word for it. If you have an old set, try doing it in one go. Lube it with any lube and try pushing it too far. Bolt will strip first.

The way to push the cranks too far is to put them on dry. They will get a bit (more) damage in the process. Then ride a bit, let the fretting do it's thing. Then re-tighten the bolts. And repeat that several times. Finally, the cranks will be pushed too far, resulting in a split crank interface if you go far enough.

You can do that even with lubed ones, of course. Just keep riding-re-tightening the bolts.
I didn't imply dry tapers prevent anything, much less say so. (I don't speak in absolutes. I've been around bikes long enough not to do that.)

In your opinion, dry tapers make this more likely. I don't want to speak for Campagnolo and Barnett's, but seems in their opinion, they make it less likely. Since you admit it can happen either way, I'm going with them. No disrespect intended.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Some recommend lubing. Some recommend dry mounting. Bike industry, IMO, is mostly about marketing, which mostly relies on looks and low mass (weight). Good engineers are in auto and aeroplane industry.
Not in the bike repair industry, apparently....

Originally Posted by Slaninar
I have quite strong hands. Never have I been able to tighten the bolts so that the cranks are split in one go, or they "climb" too high. Lubed, or not.
I never said it was a "one go" thing. It takes time. Fretting doesn't cause it, overtightening does. Greased tapers are more easily overtightened, which makes it more likely to happen faster.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
So, at least mine, experience confirms what I've said. Could it all be wrong? I guess it's possible. Only after 20 more years could I claim my experience to have any sort of statistically valid value - it's about big numbers.
Luckily for you, Campagnolo has "big numbers" after making alloy cranks and square taper BBs for 60 years. Barnett's has "big numbers" after 30 years of instruction, and countless years of combined experience of their faculty. You don't have to wait twenty more years.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
I still see no benefits in mounting them dry. Just (potential) problems.
You didn't appear to have acknowledged what I offered as "benefits" (which is a word I did not use.)
As I acknowledged, potential problems either way. The "benefit" is fewer long-term risks. Risk mitigation is playing the percentages.

I would say there is a sweet spot in the middle where it probably doesn't matter whether you grease or not. If you understand the risks and use the correct tools and torques, and adjust intelligently for your personal preference, things will probably be fine. How many home mechanics have either the tools or the knowledge? For that matter, how many shops do? That's why there are resources provided by manufacturers, and knowledge-gathering and instructional institutions like Sutherland's and Barnett's and UBI. Whether you choose to believe them or someone else like Jobst Brandt, well, that's a religious decision I suppose.

In the hands of a ham-fisted mechanic, whether professional or home, all bets are kind of off.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Why they wrote such manual is beyond me, really.
You said it, not me.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-08-18, 05:49 PM
  #43  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trail_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,046

Bikes: Soma B Side, Soma Wolverine, Salsa Fargo

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by davidad
If you properly torqued the arms don't retorque. The arms will climb up the taper slightly each time you torque the bolts until you may crack the arms.
Installing Cranks by Jobst Brandt

Yeah I believe Sheldon said the same thing.
trail_monkey is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 01:36 AM
  #44  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
In your opinion, dry tapers make this more likely. I don't want to speak for Campagnolo and Barnett's, but seems in their opinion, they make it less likely. Since you admit it can happen either way, I'm going with them. No disrespect intended.
Fretting damage can happen either way, but dry mounting makes it worse, with some (more) damage happening during the mounting process if mounted dry. Not putting much torque on the cranks does help as well. Heavy, strong rider that prefers mashing is more likely to suffer from improperly mounted cranks. Not recommending such riding style, just pointing out. Just like a light rider, taking it slow can work with weak(er) brakes without any problems, but it doesn't mean one shouldn't adjust their brakes properly.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
I never said it was a "one go" thing. It takes time. Fretting doesn't cause it, overtightening does. Greased tapers are more easily overtightened, which makes it more likely to happen faster.
This is not true. Try it on some old BB. Lube, and try overtightening the crank. See if the bolts threads strip first, or the crank moves too high up/splits. Your claim that lubing helps the "overtightening" is simply misinformed IMO. Could I be wrong? Possibly, but I'm yet to find theoretical, or practical evidence against lubing and/or towards dry mounting.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Luckily for you, Campagnolo has "big numbers" after making alloy cranks and square taper BBs for 60 years. Barnett's has "big numbers" after 30 years of instruction, and countless years of combined experience of their faculty. You don't have to wait twenty more years.
Doing something for long is not enough all by itself for one to become good at it. Learning and experimenting, in addition to practise is what does it. Don't know why they wrote such instructions. But they make no sense.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
I would say there is a sweet spot in the middle where it probably doesn't matter whether you grease or not. If you understand the risks and use the correct tools and torques, and adjust intelligently for your personal preference, things will probably be fine. How many home mechanics have either the tools or the knowledge? For that matter, how many shops do? That's why there are resources provided by manufacturers, and knowledge-gathering and instructional institutions like Sutherland's and Barnett's and UBI. Whether you choose to believe them or someone else like Jobst Brandt, well, that's a religious decision I suppose.
I don't think I'm the one being "religious". Religious would be holding a written book as gospel, without questioning it. I've tried various methods, read various opinions and books and came to some conclusions. Still being open to corrections. However, like I've said, so far I'm with the "lube first" method.

Last edited by Bike Gremlin; 02-09-18 at 02:49 AM.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 10:55 AM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Fretting damage can happen either way, but dry mounting makes it worse, with some (more) damage happening during the mounting process if mounted dry. Not putting much torque on the cranks does help as well. Heavy, strong rider that prefers mashing is more likely to suffer from improperly mounted cranks.
What holds a taper fit on? Friction. What causes fretting? Repeated relative motion. Grease effectively eliminates the former. If a crank is properly pressed onto the taper, you should not get any of the latter.
By the way, the bolt does not hold the crank on. It presses it on, but after that it serves to keep it from coming off. How? By preventing repeated relative motion.
This is easily verified experimentally.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
This is not true. Try it on some old BB. Lube, and try overtightening the crank. See if the bolts threads strip first, or the crank moves too high up/splits. Your claim that lubing helps the "overtightening" is simply misinformed IMO. Could I be wrong? Possibly, but I'm yet to find theoretical, or practical evidence against lubing and/or towards dry mounting.
Either you're not reading what I wrote, or I wrote it badly. Let me try again.

I claim that lubing tapers more easily enables overtightening of the crank (among other things.) Repeated overtightening eventually causes deformation of the taper hole in the crank. Repeated deformation eventually causes the crank to either bottom out on the cup, the bolt to bottom out on the spindle, or the crank to crack.
IMPE, the most common of these by far is for the bolt to bottom on the spindle. The other two are relatively rare. But I have seen both.

I am NOT claiming that lubing the tapers lets you overtighten the crank to failure in one go. You keep arguing against something I never wrote.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
Doing something for long is not enough all by itself for one to become good at it.
Again, you said it, not me.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Learning and experimenting, in addition to practise is what does it. Don't know why they wrote such instructions. But they make no sense.
Campagnolo didn't just make cranks and ship them off and never think about them again. They have for 60 years provided racers and racing teams with them, and also race support. They have experience with their products from production to the end of their service life. They've seen the mistakes and the failures along with the successes. They have big numbers.
If their instructions don't make sense to you, the problem might not be with the instructions.

Originally Posted by Slaninar
I don't think I'm the one being "religious". Religious would be holding a written book as gospel, without questioning it. I've tried various methods, read various opinions and books and came to some conclusions. Still being open to corrections. However, like I've said, so far I'm with the "lube first" method.
That's one way of being religious. Another way is to refuse to understand things that don't confirm your point of view.
You just quoted me saying basically, "if it's done with wisdom and experience, it probably doesn't matter whether you grease or not." What about that idea sounds religious to you? Again, I'm not sure you're actually reading what I wrote.

I'm happy to continue this, but only if you read, and respond to, and argue against, things I am actually writing. Thanks for the fun.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 01:29 PM
  #46  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
What holds a taper fit on? Friction.
No, not friction. The preload high enough to prevent movement even with some elastic deformation from pedaling torque is required to minimize fretting and the interface damage, cranks coming loose etc.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
If a crank is properly pressed onto the taper, you should not get any of the latter.
It does happen, due to elastic deformation and motion of metals. Grease reduces the effect, mounting paste even more so IMO.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
By the way, the bolt does not hold the crank on. It presses it on, but after that it serves to keep it from coming off. How? By preventing repeated relative motion.
This is easily verified experimentally.
Yes, the bolt prevents the crank from sliding off.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
I claim that lubing tapers more easily enables overtightening of the crank (among other things.)
This is not correct IMO, but I see no point in going round in circles.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Campagnolo didn't just make cranks and ship them off and never think about them again. They have for 60 years provided racers and racing teams with them, and also race support. They have experience with their products from production to the end of their service life. They've seen the mistakes and the failures along with the successes. They have big numbers.
And have failed to make corrections. One example is the pedal to crank interface being kept flat, instead of tapered, which also allows fretting damage and requires left hand thread on the left pedal to prevent it from loosening through use.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
If their instructions don't make sense to you, the problem might not be with the instructions.
Could be, but I don't think so.
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 02:52 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 790
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Slaninar
No, not friction. The preload high enough to prevent movement even with some elastic deformation from pedaling torque is required to minimize fretting and the interface damage, cranks coming loose etc.
A taper fit is a type of press fit, which depend primarily on friction to hold. There is some material deformation too but the friction of a press fit is doing the work.
I'm not saying fretting doesn't happen, nor am I saying fretting is OK. I'm saying the risk of damage from fretting is relatively less significant than the risk of other types of damage that a dry taper helps mitigate.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
It does happen, due to elastic deformation and motion of metals. Grease reduces the effect, mounting paste even more so IMO.
Sure, grease does reduce friction. No argument there. Whether that's a good thing or not is the question, isn't it?

Yes, there is some elastic deformation of course, but it's manageable; that's what torque values are for, for both the fastener and the taper fit. It's the plastic kind I'm concerned about, which reducing friction increases the risk of by requiring different (lower) torque values that are usually not followed if they are even known.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
Yes, the bolt prevents the crank from sliding off.
Glad that is settled, at least!
Originally Posted by Slaninar
This is not correct IMO, but I see no point in going round in circles.
That's what we bicyclists do, isn't it? We almost always end up back where we started.
Originally Posted by Slaninar
And have failed to make corrections. One example is the pedal to crank interface being kept flat, instead of tapered, which also allows fretting damage and requires left hand thread on the left pedal to prevent it from loosening through use.
That would be a handy solution, but this is hardly Campagnolo's fault. Pedals have been made that way since forever, so everyone who's ever made a pedal has failed to do this. Probably because it's not such a big deal if you don't overtighten them. (Not to start on another topic, but pedal overtightening is another pet peeve of mine.)
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 08:33 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,631
Mentioned: 32 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 499 Post(s)
Liked 63 Times in 48 Posts
I wonder if machinists also debate bitterly about installing tapered fittings w/without some sort of surface preparation? :

(The answer is yes, by the way)
wschruba is offline  
Old 02-09-18, 08:34 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
trail_monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,046

Bikes: Soma B Side, Soma Wolverine, Salsa Fargo

Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Liked 21 Times in 15 Posts
Originally Posted by wschruba
I wonder if machinists also debate bitterly about installing tapered fittings w/without some sort of surface preparation? :

(The answer is yes, by the way)
Sometimes there’s more than 1 way to skin a cat......
trail_monkey is offline  
Old 02-10-18, 02:26 AM
  #50  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,424

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1105 Post(s)
Liked 213 Times in 127 Posts
Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
A taper fit is a type of press fit, which depend primarily on friction to hold. There is some material deformation too but the friction of a press fit is doing the work.
Not at all. Torque is not transferred through friction. If it were a round interface, then I might agree with the friction argument.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
I'm not saying fretting doesn't happen, nor am I saying fretting is OK. I'm saying the risk of damage from fretting is relatively less significant than the risk of other types of damage that a dry taper helps mitigate.
Sure, grease does reduce friction. No argument there. Whether that's a good thing or not is the question, isn't it?
Won't explain the same thing for the 10th time.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Yes, there is some elastic deformation of course, but it's manageable; that's what torque values are for, for both the fastener and the taper fit. It's the plastic kind I'm concerned about, which reducing friction increases the risk of by requiring different (lower) torque values that are usually not followed if they are even known.
How does lubricating reduce the material strength to make plastic deformation easier? In fact, dry mounting increases the likeliness of fretting during the installation process itself.

Originally Posted by Ghrumpy
Glad that is settled, at least!

That's what we bicyclists do, isn't it? We almost always end up back where we started.
That would be a handy solution, but this is hardly Campagnolo's fault. Pedals have been made that way since forever, so everyone who's ever made a pedal has failed to do this. Probably because it's not such a big deal if you don't overtighten them. (Not to start on another topic, but pedal overtightening is another pet peeve of mine.)
Yes, not much of a big deal for most cyclists. But the argument was aimed towards using knowledge and experience to improve design and correct imperfections. It's not (always) done, not even by Campagnolo.
Bike Gremlin is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.