Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

How to calculate tire diameter?

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

How to calculate tire diameter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-27-18, 01:06 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: corpus christi,texas
Posts: 423

Bikes: canondale silk trail--92 schwinn criss cross--sun atlas x type--fugi odessa--2018 trek domane ALR5 disc

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How to calculate tire diameter?

Am I doing this right? Rim diameter + tire width + tire width = diameter? So a 700X23 would be: 622mm + 23mm +23mm = 668mm or 26.3 inches? Or is there a more accurate formula?
carlton is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 01:13 PM
  #2  
Really Old Senior Member
 
Bill Kapaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mid Willamette Valley, Orygun
Posts: 13,863

Bikes: 87 RockHopper,2008 Specialized Globe. Both upgraded to 9 speeds. 2019 Giant Explore E+3

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1789 Post(s)
Liked 1,266 Times in 873 Posts
Most accurate would be to run a tape measure around the tire and divide by PI.
Bill Kapaun is online now  
Old 03-27-18, 01:14 PM
  #3  
Mostly harmless ™
 
Bike Gremlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,430

Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters

Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1107 Post(s)
Liked 216 Times in 130 Posts
Originally Posted by carlton
Am I doing this right? Rim diameter + tire width + tire width = diameter? So a 700X23 would be: 622mm + 23mm +23mm = 668mm or 26.3 inches? Or is there a more accurate formula?
Mark it with a chalk, or something. Mark a starting point. Roll it on the ground for one full turn and mark the end (full circle).

Diameter = measured length / Pi
(Pi aproximates to = 3.14)
Bike Gremlin is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 01:27 PM
  #4  
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,002

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4337 Post(s)
Liked 2,980 Times in 1,617 Posts
Originally Posted by carlton
Am I doing this right? Rim diameter + tire width + tire width = diameter? So a 700X23 would be: 622mm + 23mm +23mm = 668mm or 26.3 inches? Or is there a more accurate formula?
That is the correct relationship... but it won't be accurate because tire widths are inaccurate and the bead seat diameter isn't where the tire "starts".

Some bike computers will want you to enter the diameter, and others will want you to enter the circumference... usually the example charts that come with the manual are close enough - maybe closer than your "formula". But lots of people like to get it down to the millimeter.




2105mm circ = 670mm dia so your estimate was pretty close.
DiabloScott is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 01:32 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: corpus christi,texas
Posts: 423

Bikes: canondale silk trail--92 schwinn criss cross--sun atlas x type--fugi odessa--2018 trek domane ALR5 disc

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 47 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the quick answers guys. Don't know why I didn't remember about the old pi formula. I haven't used that method in over 50 years. When you get my age you usually more interested in eating pie than using it in a mathematical equation. And thanks for the chart Diablo.
carlton is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 01:58 PM
  #6  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,598

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,355 Times in 862 Posts
3/14/17 was a year and 10 days ago..
fietsbob is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 02:11 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 786
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 384 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by carlton
Am I doing this right? Rim diameter + tire width + tire width = diameter? So a 700X23 would be: 622mm + 23mm +23mm = 668mm or 26.3 inches? Or is there a more accurate formula?
Your concept is basically correct. But the accuracy of the calculation might leave a little to be desired. Clincher tires' nominal section width is measured across the sides, and won't necessarily equal the tire's height measurement from the bead to the crown of the tread.

If you can roll out the wheel and divide by pi, you can much more easily directly measure the diameter with a measuring tape or meter/yardstick. No need to calculate anything unless you just want to freshen up your math skills.
Ghrumpy is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 04:34 PM
  #8  
Mechanic/Tourist
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 7,522

Bikes: 2008 Novara Randonee - love it. Previous bikes:Motobecane Mirage, 1972 Moto Grand Jubilee (my fave), Jackson Rake 16, 1983 C'dale ST500.

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 486 Post(s)
Liked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Originally Posted by fietsbob
3/14/17 was a year and 10 days ago..
If this were 2015 you'd have pi to 4 decimal places. I'm old enough that when I learned Basic I had to memorize pi to 10 decimal places for coding punch cards.
cny-bikeman is offline  
Old 03-27-18, 05:55 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 4,400

Bikes: Bianchi Infinito (Celeste, of course)

Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 754 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 77 Posts
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
That is the correct relationship... but it won't be accurate because tire widths are inaccurate and the bead seat diameter isn't where the tire "starts".

Some bike computers will want you to enter the diameter, and others will want you to enter the circumference... usually the example charts that come with the manual are close enough - maybe closer than your "formula". But lots of people like to get it down to the millimeter.


2105mm circ = 670mm dia so your estimate was pretty close.
The bigger issue is that you typically want the "effective" diameter. Which it the tire of the when the contact patch is compressed due to weight. Typically that's around a 10-15% decrease in the tire height (tire only, not the wheel).
gsa103 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Money D
Road Cycling
9
07-25-19 08:53 AM
raywood
Bicycle Mechanics
11
03-15-19 08:13 PM
rajdude
Bicycle Mechanics
29
10-21-17 03:59 PM
hchoy
Bicycle Mechanics
6
09-03-14 09:23 PM
Yo Spiff
Electronics, Lighting, & Gadgets
9
09-26-13 12:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.