Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Different width tires - front and rear

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Different width tires - front and rear

Old 03-20-19, 08:14 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Different width tires - front and rear

It's time for new tires and I'm looking for a more comfortable ride. I currently have 23s and I'd like to get something a little wider. The front fork will accommodate a 25 and the rear will take 28. Will a wider rear tire be more comfortable? or should I just get a pair of 25s? Any other issues in mis-matched widths I should be aware of? ... rims should take 28s.
Sahn is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:18 PM
  #2  
It's MY mountain
 
DiabloScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mt.Diablo
Posts: 10,001

Bikes: Klein, Merckx, Trek

Mentioned: 70 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4334 Post(s)
Liked 2,977 Times in 1,614 Posts
It'll be fine, you can probably convince yourself that it's a smoother ride, but you'll probably be fooling yourself.
DiabloScott is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:28 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,054

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4194 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times in 2,295 Posts
Many have run slightly wider rear tires for decades. It's just like differing tire pressures. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is online now  
Old 03-20-19, 08:34 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 37
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 14 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by DiabloScott
It'll be fine, you can probably convince yourself that it's a smoother ride, but you'll probably be fooling yourself.
Do you think I'll notice the difference between 23 and 25s?
Sahn is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:40 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Meridian, ID
Posts: 2,333

Bikes: '96 Trek 850, '08 Specialized Roubaix Comp, '18 Niner RLT RDO

Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 569 Post(s)
Liked 123 Times in 83 Posts
Originally Posted by Sahn
Do you think I'll notice the difference between 23 and 25s?
if you run the 25s at lower pressure, yes you should notice.
jimincalif is offline  
Old 03-20-19, 08:45 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
79pmooney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,890

Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder

Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4789 Post(s)
Liked 3,915 Times in 2,546 Posts
~!

It hardly matters. The old racing rule of thumb: put your fastest tire in back. For speed/efficiency/winning races, that matters. For $$ savings - put your most delicate tire in front. For safety, put your most likely to fail tire in back. You will notice you cannot do more than two of these (usually).

I rode 25c in front (well ridden Corsa) and a 28c in back (Nearly new Corsa G+, a sweet, sweet tire) yesterday. Crossed my mind maybe twice in 35 miles.

Edit: Oh, yes, you do have to think about this pumping up. I usually run rears ~5 psi more but yesterday had a couple more psi in front.

Ben
79pmooney is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 04:47 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Williston FL
Posts: 531

Bikes: 1988 Panasonic, 1989 Fuji, Schwinn Beach Cruiser

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 115 Post(s)
Liked 60 Times in 45 Posts
I have been running 28 rear and 25 front for a while. Works well, no noticeable drop in avg speed and quite comfy.
FlMTNdude is offline  
Old 03-21-19, 08:41 AM
  #8  
Generally bewildered
 
WizardOfBoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Eastern PA, USA
Posts: 3,037

Bikes: 2014 Trek Domane 6.9, 1999 LeMond Zurich, 1978 Schwinn Superior

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1152 Post(s)
Liked 341 Times in 251 Posts
The rear wheel bears more weight. I'm guessing that this would work fine, but try it. Getting the inflation right will be an interesting experiment.

It's a well-established principle in other disciplines:

WizardOfBoz is offline  
Old 03-22-19, 07:27 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,674

Bikes: too many sparkly Italians, some sweet Americans and a couple interesting Japanese

Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 567 Post(s)
Liked 562 Times in 405 Posts
I run a 23s front and 25s rear on my Tommasinis as the Air Forks don't have room for 25s. 90psi front and 100psi back at my weight and the frames front to back weight distribution. While I can feel a difference when going from 23s to 28s on bikes, tire pressure and the brand/model of the tires absolutely make a noticeable difference.
easyupbug is offline  
Old 03-22-19, 10:59 AM
  #10  
Me duelen las nalgas
 
canklecat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Texas
Posts: 13,513

Bikes: Centurion Ironman, Trek 5900, Univega Via Carisma, Globe Carmel

Mentioned: 199 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4559 Post(s)
Liked 2,802 Times in 1,800 Posts
Sure, I've done it several times, no problems. It's a personal feel thing so you'll need to experiment with tire/tread combos.

On my '89 Centurion Ironman with 622x14 rims, I tried 700x23 and 700x25 tires. The x25 tires were more comfortable, especially with my old neck injury, but felt squishy and squirrely on fast curves. I suspect the narrow rims didn't adequately support the x25 tire and the front felt splashy. I switched to 700x23 front (Schwalbe One V-Guard), 700x25 rear (Continental Ultra Sport 2), and was happy with that combo for a year. No problems in any conditions, including fast curves on less than smooth pavement.

This year when the 700x25 rear tire had noticeable wear (mostly flat topped from lots of hours on the Cycleops trainer, rather than road wear), I switched the Ironman to new 700x23 front and rear. So far, so good, haven't decided whether to switch back to 700x25 for the rear. My old neck injury seems to be responding to physical therapy so I may not need the plusher rear tire, but I might go back to that combo anyway because my average speed and power are the same. No real advantage to the narrower, lighter rear tire.

On my hybrids I've swapped around various tire combos, ranging from 700x25 to 700x42 front, with wider 700x32 to 700x45 rear. No problems. I'm not taking any sweeping curves at 40 mph on those bikes so I don't notice any handling issues.

With those hybrid tires any difference in handling is usually more due to tread design than width. Last week I paired my favorite hybrid tire, the Continental Speed Ride (nominally 700x42, actually measures a bit narrower at 700x38) on the rear with a 700x32 Conti Sport Contact 2 up front. No problems. But I don't like the Sport Contact 2 tire very much -- it's grippy on wet roads but feels heavy and sluggish at lower pressure, harsh and unforgiving at higher pressure. Just don't care for that tire. The mismatched tires didn't make it any worse. If anything the wider, fatter Speed Ride on the back improved things. It's a lighter, plush, smoother rolling tire than the Sport Contact 2.

This week I'm running 700x25 Conti Ultra Sport 2 on the hybrid, front and rear. Just a lark, probably won't keep the bike set up that way. I was just curious to try some lightweight, practical and cheap road tires on the hybrid. Felt great, although handling was a bit twitchy until I got accustomed to it. My hybrid has albatross bars and the balance is different from my drop bar road bike when I stand to pedal. Sure felt light and quick, especially on climbs or in stop and go urban riding.
canklecat is offline  
Old 03-22-19, 08:04 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
I'd go for 28s all-around but my rig won't accept more than a 25 on the rear.
McBTC is offline  
Old 03-22-19, 08:55 PM
  #12  
Heft On Wheels
 
sdmc530's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 3,123

Bikes: Specialized,Cannondale,Argon 18

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 887 Post(s)
Liked 560 Times in 346 Posts
I tun 28 on rear and 25 on fromt. Ride is great never had an issue
sdmc530 is offline  
Old 03-22-19, 09:07 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
CliffordK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,547
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18349 Post(s)
Liked 4,502 Times in 3,346 Posts
Originally Posted by Sahn
Do you think I'll notice the difference between 23 and 25s?
I really don't notice much difference between 23 and 25.

I haven't been running 28mm tires.

I do notice the difference between road 25mm tires and commuting/touring grade 35mm tires.

I doubt you'd notice much difference between 25/28 on the rear. Much of the vibration issues you might have would be on the front. Although the larger rear tire might be more resilient against pinch flats.

If you can't physically run 28mm on the front, then one advantage of running 25 on both the front and rear is in case you choose to rotate the tires for one reason or another.
CliffordK is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 09:17 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Originally Posted by CliffordK
I really don't notice much difference between 23 and 25.

I haven't been running 28mm tires.

I do notice the difference between road 25mm tires and commuting/touring grade 35mm tires.

I doubt you'd notice much difference between 25/28 on the rear. Much of the vibration issues you might have would be on the front. Although the larger rear tire might be more resilient against pinch flats.

If you can't physically run 28mm on the front, then one advantage of running 25 on both the front and rear is in case you choose to rotate the tires for one reason or another.
Going from 23 to 25 is noticeable-- 11.5×π= 36.1 vs 12.5×π= 39.3 or nearly a 9% increase in the area but, going to 35 is...54.9778714




...instead of, 36.1 which is a 52% increase in area.


Correction-- whoops… area of a circle is actually the radius times pi - square, and not just pi, e.g., 11.5×(π^2)= 113.5 (although, going to a 35 still is >50% larger in area).

Last edited by McBTC; 03-23-19 at 09:49 AM.
McBTC is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 09:25 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
McBTC's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,889

Bikes: 2015 22 Speed

Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1543 Post(s)
Liked 51 Times in 39 Posts
Interestingly, going to a 28 just on the front will increase the trail a tad... which, tends to make the bike a 'lil less twitchy (e.g., more of a 'cruiser,' if that's an issue). And, it's easier on the hands.
McBTC is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 09:40 AM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bristol, R. I.
Posts: 4,340

Bikes: Specialized Secteur, old Peugeot

Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 663 Post(s)
Liked 496 Times in 299 Posts
I use 25s in front and 28 in the back with different pressure in each, as one would expect. The pressure is as recommended in this chart. https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl...DYAyUQ9QEILjAA
berner is offline  
Old 03-23-19, 11:59 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Andrew R Stewart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 18,054

Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4194 Post(s)
Liked 3,837 Times in 2,295 Posts
Originally Posted by McBTC
Interestingly, going to a 28 just on the front will increase the trail a tad... which, tends to make the bike a 'lil less twitchy (e.g., more of a 'cruiser,' if that's an issue). And, it's easier on the hands.
The greater rotating weight of the wider tire also contributes to the sense of stability. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
Andrew R Stewart is online now  
Old 03-23-19, 01:25 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Hampton Roads
Posts: 143

Bikes: Cannondales: '85 ST400, '86 SR800, '87 SM600

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 55 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 7 Posts
My experience is opposite of the others, put the widest or most supple tire on front, This is where you'll notice improved ride, handling, and comfort! YMMV, but if you have the room give it a try. I always put my less supple tire on back where it can wear longer, may have higher pressure, and comfort is less noticeable. Dragster analogy doe not apply to bicycles, unless you can push 500 HP!
cannonride15 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Baron1946
Bicycle Mechanics
9
09-24-18 06:16 PM
mcours2006
Road Cycling
25
10-08-14 06:35 PM
EdIsMe
Road Cycling
3
07-07-11 09:11 AM
mikedm
Mountain Biking
9
03-19-11 09:13 PM
zigmin
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
8
08-27-10 01:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.