Suspended to Rigid: How Important is Sag?
#1
2-Wheeled Fool
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
456 Posts
Suspended to Rigid: How Important is Sag?
So I bought this Marin 17" San Anselmo frame for my wife. She wants a bike with wider and taller tires for rail trails and unpaved roads.
I'm going to build this frame as a 1x, and with a rigid fork. Since I've never done a suspended-to-rigid conversion before, I've done some research about it, but now I've come up somewhat confused. My major question is, when choosing the correct axle-to-crown length on a rigid fork, how important is factoring sag of the original suspended fork? Is it THAT important?
What about bikes that have lockable forks, and people ride them locked? Is the geometry change THAT big of a deal? From everything I've read, the sag should be factored at 15-20%. Has anyone run across this dilemma?
These frames where apparently held as replacements for warranty issues and now they are up for sale cheap, so I bought one to give it a go. I had to do a bunch of searching for what sort of fork the original bike came with, and SR SUNTOUR NEX SUSPENSION FORK: 700C, 1-1/8" THREADLESS STEERER, 63MM TRAVEL, LINEAR PULL, BLACK is what I found. The axle-to-crown length on this fork is 477mm. If I subtract 15%, that makes it 405mm. I could really use some advice from someone who has been down this road before. Thanks for reading, and I'm looking forward to your comments!
I'm going to build this frame as a 1x, and with a rigid fork. Since I've never done a suspended-to-rigid conversion before, I've done some research about it, but now I've come up somewhat confused. My major question is, when choosing the correct axle-to-crown length on a rigid fork, how important is factoring sag of the original suspended fork? Is it THAT important?
What about bikes that have lockable forks, and people ride them locked? Is the geometry change THAT big of a deal? From everything I've read, the sag should be factored at 15-20%. Has anyone run across this dilemma?
These frames where apparently held as replacements for warranty issues and now they are up for sale cheap, so I bought one to give it a go. I had to do a bunch of searching for what sort of fork the original bike came with, and SR SUNTOUR NEX SUSPENSION FORK: 700C, 1-1/8" THREADLESS STEERER, 63MM TRAVEL, LINEAR PULL, BLACK is what I found. The axle-to-crown length on this fork is 477mm. If I subtract 15%, that makes it 405mm. I could really use some advice from someone who has been down this road before. Thanks for reading, and I'm looking forward to your comments!

#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,893
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 184 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 65 Times
in
51 Posts
and SR SUNTOUR NEX SUSPENSION FORK: 700C, 1-1/8" THREADLESS STEERER, 63MM TRAVEL, LINEAR PULL, BLACK is what I found. The axle-to-crown length on this fork is 477mm. If I subtract 15%, that makes it 405mm. I could really use some advice from someone who has been down this road before. Thanks for reading, and I'm looking forward to your comments!
Example:
A suspension fork with 500mm A/C measurement and 100mm travel.
If you ride with 20% sag, the axle to crown measurement will be 480mm
If you replaced the suspension fork with a suspension corrected rigid fork, it should have a A/C measurement of around 480mm (it doesn't have to be exactly that A/C measurement).
Mountain bike forks are often ridden with sag of 20 to 30%
Example:
29" fork with 100mm travel and A/C measurement of 510mm
https://manitoumtb.com/product/machete-pro/?cat_id=23
25% sag equals 485mm A/C measurement.
Here's a suspension corrected fork with 485mm A/C measurement to replace a 29" fork with 100mm travel
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...scv-canti-fork
I'd say you would need a fork with about with a A/C measurement of around 460mm.
.
Last edited by cobba; 07-31-19 at 06:00 AM.
Likes For cobba:
#3
2-Wheeled Fool
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
456 Posts
Subtract the % of the 63mm of fork travel, not off the A/C length.
Example:
A suspension fork with 500mm A/C measurement and 100mm travel.
If you ride with 20% sag, the axle to crown measurement will be 480mm
If you replaced the suspension fork with a suspension corrected rigid fork, it should have a A/C measurement of around 480mm (it doesn't have to be exactly that A/C measurement).
Mountain bike forks are often ridden with sag of 20 to 30%
Example:
29" fork with 100mm travel and A/C measurement of 510mm
https://manitoumtb.com/product/machete-pro/?cat_id=23
25% sag equals 485mm A/C measurement.
Here's a suspension corrected fork with 485mm A/C measurement to replace a 29" fork with 100mm travel
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...scv-canti-fork
I'd say you would need a fork with about with a A/C measurement of around 460mm.
.
Example:
A suspension fork with 500mm A/C measurement and 100mm travel.
If you ride with 20% sag, the axle to crown measurement will be 480mm
If you replaced the suspension fork with a suspension corrected rigid fork, it should have a A/C measurement of around 480mm (it doesn't have to be exactly that A/C measurement).
Mountain bike forks are often ridden with sag of 20 to 30%
Example:
29" fork with 100mm travel and A/C measurement of 510mm
https://manitoumtb.com/product/machete-pro/?cat_id=23
25% sag equals 485mm A/C measurement.
Here's a suspension corrected fork with 485mm A/C measurement to replace a 29" fork with 100mm travel
https://www.somafab.com/archives/pro...scv-canti-fork
I'd say you would need a fork with about with a A/C measurement of around 460mm.
.
Likes For cobba:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
The QR version is priced at $130.
FWIW, my math agrees w/your math.
Also, IMHO, go taller but never shorter. I've done several of these conversions and no one has ever complained about an extra centimeter or two of axle-to-crown. Most older frames benefit from being slacked out a bit anyway.
Salsa and Surly both have a wide range of forks in various axle-to-crown numbers. I used one of their other fork models on a rigid, 650b build last fall.
Likes For JonathanGennick:
#8
2-Wheeled Fool
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
456 Posts
Here's one at 468: https://www.jensonusa.com/Salsa-Cro-Moto-Grande-29-Fork
The QR version is priced at $130.
FWIW, my math agrees w/your math.
Also, IMHO, go taller but never shorter. I've done several of these conversions and no one has ever complained about an extra centimeter or two of axle-to-crown. Most older frames benefit from being slacked out a bit anyway.
Salsa and Surly both have a wide range of forks in various axle-to-crown numbers. I used one of their other fork models on a rigid, 650b build last fall.
The QR version is priced at $130.
FWIW, my math agrees w/your math.
Also, IMHO, go taller but never shorter. I've done several of these conversions and no one has ever complained about an extra centimeter or two of axle-to-crown. Most older frames benefit from being slacked out a bit anyway.
Salsa and Surly both have a wide range of forks in various axle-to-crown numbers. I used one of their other fork models on a rigid, 650b build last fall.
Thanks!
The Salsa Firestarter fork is 483. Do you think that's okay, Jon? She'll be riding this bike with the Jones Loop 1.5, and as bolt-upright as she can possibly get (don't ask).
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Munising, Michigan, USA
Posts: 4,131
Bikes: Priority 600, Priority Continuum, Devinci Dexter
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 685 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 55 Times
in
37 Posts
FWIW, I once ran a Salsa Fargo v1 fork on a Priority Eight bicycle. That represented close to 40 mm over the stock axle-to-crown. The bike rode fine. Going no hands was actually somewhat easier for me.
Forks are expensive. When I build a bike, I usually have it in mind that I might not like all my first part choices, that I might need to buy something twice.
#11
2-Wheeled Fool
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,486
Bikes: Surly Ogre, Brompton
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1385 Post(s)
Liked 675 Times
in
456 Posts
I'm right there with you, brother. I've got boxes of stuff that either didn't work with something, or didn't fit right. Try try again, right?