Columbus Thron Steel or 7005 Aluminum ??? Comments please...
#1
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Columbus Thron Steel or 7005 Aluminum ??? Comments please...
Columbus Thron - low-end standard steel tubing
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by georgiaboy
Columbus Thron - low-end standard steel tubing
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
#3
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by sydney
It's actually a question with no answer. Besides being highly subjective, it's more about how it's built, the fit and geometry, than about just steel or aluminum.
Two frames the exact same geometry and they both fit me perfectly. Which frame material is better Columbus Thron or 7005 Aluminum?
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by georgiaboy
Two frames the exact same geometry and they both fit me perfectly. Which frame material is better Columbus Thron or 7005 Aluminum?
#5
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Thanks for responding. I looking for a comment from someone who may know about or has experience with frame materials. I have actually rode a bike with 7005 aluminum. Its just the Columbus Thron I don't know much about. And this material is not readily available to test out on a frame in a bike shop. So I threw the question out.
#6
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
Thorn is a medium thick tubeset that would be ideal for touring in my opinion. You could load it up and not have to worry about handling instability.
7005 is a type of aluminum, more information about thickness and butting configuration is needed before assessing it's suitability for your purpose.
If it was me, I'd just go Thorn and be done with it.
Good luck.
Ed
7005 is a type of aluminum, more information about thickness and butting configuration is needed before assessing it's suitability for your purpose.
If it was me, I'd just go Thorn and be done with it.
Good luck.
Ed
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by georgiaboy
Thanks for responding. I looking for a comment from someone who may know about or has experience with frame materials. I have actually rode a bike with 7005 aluminum. Its just the Columbus Thron I don't know much about. And this material is not readily available to test out on a frame in a bike shop. So I threw the question out.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Nessism
Thorn is a medium thick tubeset that would be ideal for touring in my opinion. You could load it up and not have to worry about handling instability.
7005 is a type of aluminum, more information about thickness and butting configuration is needed before assessing it's suitability for your purpose.
If it was me, I'd just go Thorn and be done with it.
Good luck.
Ed
7005 is a type of aluminum, more information about thickness and butting configuration is needed before assessing it's suitability for your purpose.
If it was me, I'd just go Thorn and be done with it.
Good luck.
Ed
#9
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Okay Sydney thanks for responding
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 1,152
Bikes: 1990 Burley Bossa Nova, 1992 Paramount PDG-70, 1993 Specialized Stumpjumper, 2005 Jamis Dakar XC Pro, 2007 Rivendell Bleriot
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
3 Posts
I would guess that the steel frame would be somewhat heavier, but if the weight difference isn't a big deal (should be negligible for a touring bike that's going to be loaded anyway), i would go with the steel. It'll probably ride a bit more comfortably, and can be easily repaired, you can have extra fastners brazed on, etc.
I don't know about Thron tubing specifically, but the above applies to any quality cro-mo frame.
I don't know about Thron tubing specifically, but the above applies to any quality cro-mo frame.
#11
Banned.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,061
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2193 Post(s)
Liked 425 Times
in
337 Posts
Originally Posted by sydney
Beleive Thron to be available in standard and oversize, with different butting. One may be more appropriate depending on rider size and weight and specific intended use.
https://ceeway.com/Thron.htm
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 9,428
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Nessism
Thorn is OS and only comes in one butting configuration. Check the link below for more info.
https://ceeway.com/Thron.htm
https://ceeway.com/Thron.htm
#13
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Nessism
Thorn is OS and only comes in one butting configuration. Check the link below for more info.
https://ceeway.com/Thron.htm
https://ceeway.com/Thron.htm
#14
Senior Member
Unless you are going to have the frame custom made, I'm guessing your not, give us the make and models you are thinking about buying. This should make the decision easier.
Tim
Tim
#15
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
for touring I would think a steel frame would be preferable because it can be repaired by anyone with a MIG welder or even with an oxyacetylene torch and some brass.
Whereas welding aluminum is a little trickier.
This would only really be an issue if you were doing some fairly remote touring.
I wonder though, can you repair a frame with JB weld?
Whereas welding aluminum is a little trickier.
This would only really be an issue if you were doing some fairly remote touring.
I wonder though, can you repair a frame with JB weld?
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 253
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by georgiaboy
Columbus Thron - low-end standard steel tubing
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
7005 aluminum - lightweight strong
Question: In choosing a frame material for touring and long riding distances is steel although low-end to be preferred over any grade aluminum tubing?
#17
Retro-nerd
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by cs1
Unless you are going to have the frame custom made, I'm guessing your not, give us the make and models you are thinking about buying. This should make the decision easier.
I was looking at the Marin Eldridge Grade. One of the few steel hardtail complete bikes.
https://www.marinbikes.com/bicycles_2...dge_grade.html
Last edited by georgiaboy; 07-21-05 at 02:44 AM.