Is it worth (100g for $80)
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Is it worth (100g for $80)
Getting some carbon aero wheels and there's an option for Sapim CX-Ray spokes for $79 extra (and weight saving from 1781g to 1684g). Given that these wheels are mainly for straight speeds (I have my lighter aluminum C17 Zondas if I wanna hit some hills), do you reckon I'll even be able to feel these extra 97grams? I know there's this whole debate on "rotating weight" and how "MUCH MORE" pronounced it is on the wheels etc, but I'm curious about how the real people feel about this 
PS.
I guess this answers my question

PS.
I guess this answers my question
Last edited by spilot101; 08-02-21 at 08:13 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,189
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 684 Times
in
513 Posts
Are the other spokes bladed? Might be 80 extra for lighter and more aero which makes for a better overall value. If you did two wheelsets and ran them back to back on the same climb with the same bike you'd possibly notice the difference but otherwise you won't really notice much of anything at all. If weight is a concern are you already running alloy nipples for a better weight savings? Some people are anti them as they are less durable than brass but at the end of their lives I haven't had any wheels who's failure was due to nipples, alloy or brass. For just lighter, I wouldn't, for lighter and more aero I would.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Are the other spokes bladed? Might be 80 extra for lighter and more aero which makes for a better overall value. If you did two wheelsets and ran them back to back on the same climb with the same bike you'd possibly notice the difference but otherwise you won't really notice much of anything at all. If weight is a concern are you already running alloy nipples for a better weight savings? Some people are anti them as they are less durable than brass but at the end of their lives I haven't had any wheels who's failure was due to nipples, alloy or brass. For just lighter, I wouldn't, for lighter and more aero I would.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,335
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2431 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
389 Posts
A professional wheel builder told me that aluminum is no more prone to breaking than brass. The only real advantage of brass is that it's harder to accidentally round them off with a spoke wrench and they cost less.
Likes For Lazyass:
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,486
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2045 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times
in
1,092 Posts
I generally cut it at $2 per gram. Anything under a buck a gram is a no brainer for me
Nonetheless, the benefit of cxrays are aerodynamics and tensile strength. I only use those on my wheels. Do it.
Nonetheless, the benefit of cxrays are aerodynamics and tensile strength. I only use those on my wheels. Do it.
Likes For GhostRider62:
#8
Zip tie Karen
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
Posts: 7,005
Bikes: '13 Motobecane Fantom29 HT, '16 Motobecane Turino Pro Disc, '16 Motobecane Gran Premio Elite, '18 Velobuild VB-R-022, '21 Tsunami SNM-100
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1464 Post(s)
Liked 1,537 Times
in
804 Posts
The $79 for 80 grams is really a 4% weight savings overall for the wheelset. While $/gram is a meaningful metric, it might be helpful to know what the overall price of the wheelset is with the standard spokes. $80 out of $800 is substantial. $80 out of $1600, less so.
As for aluminum spoke nipples, don't. I have been forced to replace dozens of failed or corroded aluminum spoke nipples over the years. So, remove the tire, remove the rim strip, replace with brass nipple, re-tension and true And it's usually several per wheel. What a pain in the rear. Ugh. Do the future owner/maintainer of the wheelset a favor and use brass from the onset.
As for aluminum spoke nipples, don't. I have been forced to replace dozens of failed or corroded aluminum spoke nipples over the years. So, remove the tire, remove the rim strip, replace with brass nipple, re-tension and true And it's usually several per wheel. What a pain in the rear. Ugh. Do the future owner/maintainer of the wheelset a favor and use brass from the onset.
Likes For Phil_gretz:
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mountain View, CA USA and Golden, CO USA
Posts: 6,341
Bikes: 97 Litespeed, 50-39-30x13-26 10 cogs, Campagnolo Ultrashift, retroreflective rims on SON28/PowerTap hubs
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 549 Post(s)
Liked 320 Times
in
223 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 6,016
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1814 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 919 Times
in
567 Posts
Spokes contribute a substantial part of the aerodynamic drag of a wheel, so I would look for the benefit there as opposed to weight.
They are also said to have more flex, making for a more durable and "stay-true" wheel.
They are also said to have more flex, making for a more durable and "stay-true" wheel.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,491
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 119 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3980 Post(s)
Liked 2,868 Times
in
1,869 Posts
Is the weight savings due to aluminum nipples or butted (thinner through the middle portion) spokes. If it is because the spokes are butted, then next question - are the spokes strong enough and stiff enough for your riding and weight? If the answer is "yes", the answer to your thread question is a no-brainer - yes. Wheels with butted spokes are simply better. A touch faster aerodynamically, a hair light AND longer lasting, better feeling wheels.
I weigh 155. I build all my wheels with butted spokes and have for 45 years. (I use Wheelsmith or DT spokes in 2.0-1.8-2.0 for my city wheels and either 2.0 or 1.8-1.6 or 1.5 for my good wheels with 2.0-1.8-2..0 on the right rear.)
I weigh 155. I build all my wheels with butted spokes and have for 45 years. (I use Wheelsmith or DT spokes in 2.0-1.8-2.0 for my city wheels and either 2.0 or 1.8-1.6 or 1.5 for my good wheels with 2.0-1.8-2..0 on the right rear.)
#13
Really Old Senior Member
What "standard" spokes are we comparing to?
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 3,486
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2045 Post(s)
Liked 1,707 Times
in
1,092 Posts
CX-Ray spokes are nearly 2 grams lighter (each) than DT 14/15 Comps.
It is probably a 20/24H build or maybe 18/24H
It is probably a 20/24H build or maybe 18/24H
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,189
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 823 Post(s)
Liked 684 Times
in
513 Posts
Also hasn't been a problem for me. Copper anti-sieze on the Ti spokes, spoke prep on the steel spokes.
#16
Full Member
OP, what kind of riding do you do? When I was 15 to 50 years younger, 1/5 lb of rotating weight meant a lot to me, even though I was doing minimal racing and mostly Tues and Thurs World Championships six month each year. Notwithstanding the other benefits mentioned.
As Drew said, corrosion (and especially freezing) of nipples is mitigated by proper spoke prep when building a wheel. I have over 50k miles on different sets of wheels all with alloy nipples and that hasn't been a deterrent. I live in the SE and have stifling humidity and have had little NC (nipple corrosion). I suppose if I lived on the coast my answer may differ slightly. I do seem to corrode my handlebar stem bolts in no time.
As Drew said, corrosion (and especially freezing) of nipples is mitigated by proper spoke prep when building a wheel. I have over 50k miles on different sets of wheels all with alloy nipples and that hasn't been a deterrent. I live in the SE and have stifling humidity and have had little NC (nipple corrosion). I suppose if I lived on the coast my answer may differ slightly. I do seem to corrode my handlebar stem bolts in no time.
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Posts: 3,042
Bikes: Homebuilt steel
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2009 Post(s)
Liked 390 Times
in
308 Posts
Untrue. Aluminum spoke nipples are prone to seizing on the threads and to outright breakage. I've witnessed this firsthand on wheels build with aluminum nipples where once the nipples start to fail there are others close behind.
Last edited by Nessism; 08-04-21 at 09:15 PM.
#18
:D
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Mich
Posts: 6,151
Bikes: RSO E-tire dropper fixie brifter
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Liked 2,173 Times
in
1,455 Posts
fpr carbon wheels, I'd select brass over aluminum. at roughly 1/4lb savings, yea.
__________________
-Oh Hey!
-Oh Hey!
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Minas Ithil
Posts: 9,335
Mentioned: 66 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2431 Post(s)
Liked 630 Times
in
389 Posts
Perhaps but I've had more wheels with aluminum nipples than I'll ever remember and problems are so rare that when I choose a wheelset it's not even a consideration for me.