![]() |
Originally Posted by MacMwnci
(Post 22294143)
Here's a diagram, to further expand the question ((hey, I'm on a roll with these puns now)
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/bikefor...bf4d90ccc.jpeg |
Some good points. Thanks for all your responses. I'll cable the bike up and take it for a test ride when I get the chance. Unless I'll need to substantially raise the stem it should be ok as it is then. One of those things that you need to be sure of before putting some fresh bar tape on!
Happy cycling all! |
I've just come across this now, quite by chance, on Rivendell's website:
https://www.rivbike.com/blogs/grant-...-thwack-update (scroll down for the non-Brad Pitt relevant bit) Interesting, eh? |
also a wedge type stem is a little kinder to the steerer tube than a cone (Cinelli)
the setup you've described here looks fine. /markp |
watch it !!
keep a big amount clearance..
one would think that weakest link is the stem ... but you should keep in mind that the bike frame was build for a system ...if you have the same hardware to replace the smaller stem ..ok. keep compatibility up...or loose safety... if it's alluminium keep to alluminium or steel same thing ..even the weight difference can be effective and cause a deffect or crash... they made alluminium parts for like forever so newer hardware could just right INSTANTLY KILL your old SYSTEM ALLUMINUM or other ... be well !!!✌🤏 |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.