Suspension fork to rigid fork upgrade
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
Suspension fork to rigid fork upgrade
I'm converting my vintage MTB with into a frankencross commuting bike - drop bars, granny gears, 659b x 2.2“ tires, panniers, carrying laptop, clothes, etc. The total weight of the loaded bike is roughly 11kg without the loaf.
I unsuccessfully tried to use a low cost carbon fork on the bike, got the refund and started to look for a replacement. I liked how the bike hadled with that fork, too bad it couldn't keep the wheel straight all the time.
Carbon fork dropout problems
Unfortunately, there aren't many quality options in the UK for QR forks with A2C 445mm and straight steerer of 300mm. These numbers were given to me by my bike fitter, no reason for me to question them.
I can still use the original old Manitou suspension fork (around 2.4kg) and having little options is making me confused.
Q1: Surly ECR might fit the bill, but it's 1.4kg of weight, plus it's ugly, IMO. Does it make sense to switch from a suspension fork to a heavy rigid one? Are the benefits marginal?
Q2: There is a lot of relatively light aluminium forks that might fit (no name brands, Kinesis, maybe a few other options). Assuming they work as expected, will they give a good quality ride on 2.2“ tires or should I just keep the heavy suspension fork instead?
Here is the bike with the problematic carbon fork. It's rideable, but requires to resit the wheel once in a while.

I unsuccessfully tried to use a low cost carbon fork on the bike, got the refund and started to look for a replacement. I liked how the bike hadled with that fork, too bad it couldn't keep the wheel straight all the time.
Carbon fork dropout problems
Unfortunately, there aren't many quality options in the UK for QR forks with A2C 445mm and straight steerer of 300mm. These numbers were given to me by my bike fitter, no reason for me to question them.
I can still use the original old Manitou suspension fork (around 2.4kg) and having little options is making me confused.
Q1: Surly ECR might fit the bill, but it's 1.4kg of weight, plus it's ugly, IMO. Does it make sense to switch from a suspension fork to a heavy rigid one? Are the benefits marginal?
Q2: There is a lot of relatively light aluminium forks that might fit (no name brands, Kinesis, maybe a few other options). Assuming they work as expected, will they give a good quality ride on 2.2“ tires or should I just keep the heavy suspension fork instead?
Here is the bike with the problematic carbon fork. It's rideable, but requires to resit the wheel once in a while.

Last edited by alexk_il; 01-04-23 at 01:40 PM.
#2
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,426
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
2,270 Posts
I wouldn't buy cheap carbon forks. Get something decent This would probably fit the bill quite nicely https://mrpbike.com/products/rock-solid-carbon and have seen it for sale at UK shops. MRP used to be White Brothers and has been well known for quality stuff for a long time.
Q1: It is a fine fork would work well and great for touring and mounting racks and such. If the suspension fork works and you aren't needing to mount racks or anything I would just keep that though but if not Surly forks are great.
Q2: You are already having issues with cheap no-name stuff don't buy more expecting different results. A good aluminum fork is not going to be as comfortable as the other options would stick with suspension, steel or carbon.
Q1: It is a fine fork would work well and great for touring and mounting racks and such. If the suspension fork works and you aren't needing to mount racks or anything I would just keep that though but if not Surly forks are great.
Q2: You are already having issues with cheap no-name stuff don't buy more expecting different results. A good aluminum fork is not going to be as comfortable as the other options would stick with suspension, steel or carbon.
Likes For veganbikes:
#3
Habitual User
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 6,650
Bikes: 2019 Trek Procliber 9.9 SL, 2018 Storck Fascenario.3 Platinum, 2017 Bear Big Rock 1, 2003 Time VX Special Pro, 2001 Colnago VIP, 1999 Trek 9900 singlespeed, 1977 Nishiki ONP
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4054 Post(s)
Liked 6,498 Times
in
3,093 Posts
Running 2.2 tires, I am doubtful you would notice any ride quality difference between rigid fork materials.
__________________
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
"Swedish fish. They're protein shaped." - livedarklions
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 1,882
Bikes: 1996 Trek 970 ZX 2x11
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 596 Post(s)
Liked 528 Times
in
401 Posts
A little heavy (if your 3lbs mark is too muvch), but Jones Bicycles might have one that you might like the look of.
Plus LWB Unicrown, from Jones Bicycles -- 450mm A2C, 1-1/8" 350mm steerer, 150x15mm thru-axle, chromoly steel, 1535 gr (3 lbs 6 oz).
https://www.jonesbikes.com/unicrown-fork-for-plus-lwb/
Plus LWB Unicrown, from Jones Bicycles -- 450mm A2C, 1-1/8" 350mm steerer, 150x15mm thru-axle, chromoly steel, 1535 gr (3 lbs 6 oz).
https://www.jonesbikes.com/unicrown-fork-for-plus-lwb/
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 2,129
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 927 Post(s)
Liked 1,159 Times
in
687 Posts
ouch - 2.4 kg Manitou suspension fork ?
not related to the fork ... consider a zero offset seatpost - could have problems with the seat moved up as far as it is the picture you provided
not related to the fork ... consider a zero offset seatpost - could have problems with the seat moved up as far as it is the picture you provided
Likes For t2p:
#6
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
I wouldn't buy cheap carbon forks. Get something decent This would probably fit the bill quite nicely https://mrpbike.com/products/rock-solid-carbon and have seen it for sale at UK shops...
#8
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,426
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
2,270 Posts
Most saddles have a min and max setback so they have proper support and aren't putting too much stress on only one part of the rails.
Likes For veganbikes:
#9
Mostly harmless ™
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Novi Sad
Posts: 4,329
Bikes: Heavy, with friction shifters
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1049 Post(s)
Liked 134 Times
in
93 Posts
For a front disc brake, the "thru axle" design solves the problem of the brake trying to pull the wheel out of the dropout.
Also, it helps with the wheel's alignment when mounting it.
So, in this case, I'd look for a thru-axle rigid fork - with the axle-to-crown length that compensates for a suspension fork length. Note that the thru axle mount will also require a new hub - either via a completely new wheel, or by reusing the existing rim with a new hub and very likely new spokes as well (depending on the new hub's flange diameter basically).
Surly Krampus fork looks like a decent solution.
Also, it helps with the wheel's alignment when mounting it.
So, in this case, I'd look for a thru-axle rigid fork - with the axle-to-crown length that compensates for a suspension fork length. Note that the thru axle mount will also require a new hub - either via a completely new wheel, or by reusing the existing rim with a new hub and very likely new spokes as well (depending on the new hub's flange diameter basically).
Surly Krampus fork looks like a decent solution.
#10
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
For a front disc brake, the "thru axle" design solves the problem of the brake trying to pull the wheel out of the dropout.
Also, it helps with the wheel's alignment when mounting it.
Also, it helps with the wheel's alignment when mounting it.
At the moment, my guts tell me to find a good quality used pre-cut QR rigid fork with an alloy steerer and use a handlebar stem riser to get the steerer length I need. Should be cheaper than relacing the wheel and getting a top quality modern fork. Really hope it will work

#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,534
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3967 Post(s)
Liked 3,328 Times
in
2,016 Posts
Moving the seat far forward opens up the angle between one's legs and their torso. This affects both the power you can apply to the pedals and the ability to use one's hips to maneuver the bike. With the bars so high up and the stem so short I will speculate that the seat forward is an attempt to reduce the stretch your arms need to reach the bars. As long as you are happy with how this feels this is not wrong. However, many riders find that having their hips set back behind their feet, by more than your position seems to have, aids their riding with efficiency, increases the ability for their core muscles to support their upper body weight and to enhance their handling/steering. When I see the style of fit that your bikes shows I think that the length of the top tube is too long for the rider's torso/arm combo. This is why some bikes have smaller wheels, to allow the shortening of the top tube without ending up with one's feet contact the front wheel. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#12
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
When I see the style of fit that your bikes shows I think that the length of the top tube is too long for the rider's torso/arm combo. This is why some bikes have smaller wheels, to allow the shortening of the top tube without ending up with one's feet contact the front wheel.
The fitting session however started with handlebar removed, the position of the seat was chosen without any reference to the bike length. This advanced forward seat position doesn't make a lot of sense to me now, though the bike feels comfy. I'm confused now, I will doublecheck it's position and compare it to the notes I received from the fitting session.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,534
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3967 Post(s)
Liked 3,328 Times
in
2,016 Posts
I didn't catch the converted MtB to drop bar aspect initially. No wonder the reach is long.
Are there other flexibility, injury arthritic issues? Andy
Are there other flexibility, injury arthritic issues? Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For sweeks:
#15
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
I actually don't remember the seat being pushed that far forward by the bike fitter; also can't imagine it moving forward under the load when I ride it. Strange...
...
I will doublecheck it's position and compare it to the notes I received from the fitting session.
...
I will doublecheck it's position and compare it to the notes I received from the fitting session.
Ex-fencer here with a couple of abused muscles/tendons. They used to get inflammed after unnecessary quick (out of saddle) race up a steep hill, though granny gears and slowing down solved that problem now.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,534
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3967 Post(s)
Liked 3,328 Times
in
2,016 Posts
As example my BB center to saddle top (with 170 arms) is about 67.5cm and my saddle set back is about 45mm. I'm 5'6" tall. When i was younger i had less set back but have found a bit more rearward a saddle works better for me. I still spin pretty well, always did.
Fencing- I've know a few people who practice at that. They could be pretty intense and focused. Guess you need to be in a sport who's competitions might only last a few seconds. Andy
Fencing- I've know a few people who practice at that. They could be pretty intense and focused. Guess you need to be in a sport who's competitions might only last a few seconds. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 2,129
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 927 Post(s)
Liked 1,159 Times
in
687 Posts


Last edited by t2p; 01-07-23 at 08:09 PM.
Likes For t2p:
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 652
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 244 Post(s)
Liked 209 Times
in
164 Posts
I'm wondering why you're using a drop handlebar with so much stack - certainly not for the aero tuck. I'd have thought a butterfly handlebar would be more appropriate for that sort of setup.
#20
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,426
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
2,270 Posts
Likes For veganbikes:
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 2,129
Bikes: Cannondale - Gary Fisher - Giant - Litespeed - Schwinn Paramount - Schwinn (lugged steel) - Trek OCLV
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 927 Post(s)
Liked 1,159 Times
in
687 Posts

exposed steerer length (or extension ?) is greater than the length of the steerer length inside the head tube ... that’s not a good thing
consider a different stem - riser stem / stem with a greater angle (whatever) to increase height
Likes For t2p:
#22
Full Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2022
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 142 Post(s)
Liked 34 Times
in
26 Posts
Anyway, one of the goals of this project for me is to learn, so can you maybe explain why exactly this is not a good thing on a franken-bike? Any safety issues?

#23
Method to My Madness
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,963
Bikes: Trek FX 2, Cannondale Synapse, Cannondale CAAD4, Santa Cruz Stigmata GRX
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1519 Post(s)
Liked 1,102 Times
in
781 Posts
Bike Forums - View Single Post - Cannondale Bottom Bracket for Quick 4
Almost all bikes specify the maximum total height of headset spacers installed below the stem. This total height corresponds to a length of the steerer which the manufacturer of the bike (or fork) is comfortably certain would withstand normal riding conditions. By using an extender, you are likely exceeding that length, thus increasing the leverage through which you apply any force to the steerer.
Likes For SoSmellyAir:
#24
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 12,426
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 52 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3915 Post(s)
Liked 3,380 Times
in
2,270 Posts
Likes For veganbikes:
#25
Disco Infiltrator
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Folsom CA
Posts: 13,716
Bikes: Stormchaser, Paramount, Tilt, Samba tandem
Mentioned: 69 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3090 Post(s)
Liked 2,052 Times
in
1,335 Posts
I think you need a Fargo
__________________
Genesis 49:16-17
Genesis 49:16-17
Likes For Darth Lefty: