21.1mm Schwinn stem questions
#1
Live not by lies.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 920
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
345 Posts
21.1mm Schwinn stem questions
I have 2 bikes with 21.1mm stems.
So I don’t need to drive the bearing cups out…
Is the head tube on an old Schwinn also a thinner ID? Or is the difference made up with different cups, cones, and bearing sizes? Thank you.
So I don’t need to drive the bearing cups out…
Is the head tube on an old Schwinn also a thinner ID? Or is the difference made up with different cups, cones, and bearing sizes? Thank you.
#2
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9,698
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2394 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,656 Posts
The standard Schwinn size between 1966 and 1982 for headsets are.
Crown race ID (inside diameter) 26.4mm
bearing cup OD (outside diameter) 32.7mm
quill diameter OD 21.15mm or .833
thread pitch 24 TPI (threads per inch)
1" old BMX threaded headset is what you need.
May need your old top nut with .833 hole
Crown race ID (inside diameter) 26.4mm
bearing cup OD (outside diameter) 32.7mm
quill diameter OD 21.15mm or .833
thread pitch 24 TPI (threads per inch)
1" old BMX threaded headset is what you need.
May need your old top nut with .833 hole
#3
biked well
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,435
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 126 Times
in
69 Posts
It's just the 21.15mm inside diameter of the steerer tube and the 21.15mm diameter quill stem that are oddities. Schwinn did this so that the wall thickness of the steerer tube was thicker (at the expense of smaller diameter quill stems).
#5
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9,698
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2394 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,656 Posts
Likes For dedhed:
#6
biked well
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,435
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 131 Post(s)
Liked 126 Times
in
69 Posts
Again, you already have a 1" fork,. But if you want to get away from the oddity of the 21.15mm ID of the fork's steerer tube and the 21.15mm quill stem by replacing those items with the more common 22.2mm ID fork and 22.2mm quill stem, all you would need to replace in regard to the headset is the locknut. The ID of your current locknut matches your 21.15mm stem, so a 22.2mm stem won't fit. You would need a locknut with an ID matched to the larger diameter 22.2mm stem. If you want to replace the whole headset with one designed for a 22.2mm quill, you can do that, too, along with the fork replacement.
#8
Live not by lies.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 920
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
345 Posts
If the steering tube wall thickness is increased maybe I can tighten the quill like crazy and still avoid bulging the fork.
#9
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9,698
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2394 Post(s)
Liked 2,719 Times
in
1,656 Posts
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,123
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3790 Post(s)
Liked 2,938 Times
in
1,799 Posts
One more tidbit about steel, strength and wall thicknesses is that those thick walled steerers (25.4mmOD and 21.1mm ID) are generally made of rather low strength steels (which costs less to source and is faster to fabricate than high strength 4130). I would want to push the math to find out if these thick walled steerers are actually more bulge resistant. I've seen more that a few steerers with damage from bad stem use/maintenance. The first time was when I was 10 years old and my Columbia balloon tire bomber's steerer broke off completely just above where the stem's wedge was. (And I weighed all of about 60 lbs back then). Others seen in my LBS life had both bulged and broken OEM steerers, most all IIRC were on low cost bikes of both 22.2 and 21,1 stem fits. This might be due to this grade of bike often isn't as well assembled/maintained as better bike shop grade bikes are. I have seen good quality replacement forks suffer from cracks in the threaded portion due to the stem not being inserted far enough and the wedge was tightened where the threads are. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#11
Live not by lies.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 920
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 532 Post(s)
Liked 450 Times
in
345 Posts
Why would you want to tighten the stem's quill bolt "like crazy"? Is there a problem with the current set up not keeping tight or does the stem move about while riding? The usual way to tighten a stem is to only use enough torque to maintain the stem's position during the usual riding situations. There's a philosophy about this called "race tight". Parts like stems and seats are only tightened enough to not move under usual forces but can rotate upon impacts (crashes) and thus be able to be realigned w/o tools so the rider could continue their race.
One more tidbit about steel, strength and wall thicknesses is that those thick walled steerers (25.4mmOD and 21.1mm ID) are generally made of rather low strength steels (which costs less to source and is faster to fabricate than high strength 4130). I would want to push the math to find out if these thick walled steerers are actually more bulge resistant. I've seen more that a few steerers with damage from bad stem use/maintenance. The first time was when I was 10 years old and my Columbia balloon tire bomber's steerer broke off completely just above where the stem's wedge was. (And I weighed all of about 60 lbs back then). Others seen in my LBS life had both bulged and broken OEM steerers, most all IIRC were on low cost bikes of both 22.2 and 21,1 stem fits. This might be due to this grade of bike often isn't as well assembled/maintained as better bike shop grade bikes are. I have seen good quality replacement forks suffer from cracks in the threaded portion due to the stem not being inserted far enough and the wedge was tightened where the threads are. Andy
One more tidbit about steel, strength and wall thicknesses is that those thick walled steerers (25.4mmOD and 21.1mm ID) are generally made of rather low strength steels (which costs less to source and is faster to fabricate than high strength 4130). I would want to push the math to find out if these thick walled steerers are actually more bulge resistant. I've seen more that a few steerers with damage from bad stem use/maintenance. The first time was when I was 10 years old and my Columbia balloon tire bomber's steerer broke off completely just above where the stem's wedge was. (And I weighed all of about 60 lbs back then). Others seen in my LBS life had both bulged and broken OEM steerers, most all IIRC were on low cost bikes of both 22.2 and 21,1 stem fits. This might be due to this grade of bike often isn't as well assembled/maintained as better bike shop grade bikes are. I have seen good quality replacement forks suffer from cracks in the threaded portion due to the stem not being inserted far enough and the wedge was tightened where the threads are. Andy