Setting F&R V-brakes to engage at the same lever-pull-distance.
#1
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 196 Times
in
144 Posts
Setting F&R V-brakes to engage at the same lever-pull-distance.
This is a safety issue. My front brake shoes start contact with the rim when the lever is pulled only about halfway to the handlebar while the rear does this when lever is much farther in than that. I want them to engage at the same pull distance, or, with the rear engaging even before the front (i.e. the opposite from how it is now).
It took me awhile to track down the difference between the two brakes and this is what I've come up with: The brake shoes on the F brake are 5mm farther away from the pivot than how they are on the R brake.
How can I address this discrepancy, which is apparently the cause of the problem? On one of the brakes, should I try a different set of holes for the pins on the return-springs, and if so, which one?
The calipers are V-brakes setup with identical distances between the arms. The spring pins are each in the middle hole of their respective mounts. The mounts on the frame and fork are identical distance apart.
The levers are long-pull for drop-bars (Tektro RL520).
All parts are new and matching, including the rims.
It took me awhile to track down the difference between the two brakes and this is what I've come up with: The brake shoes on the F brake are 5mm farther away from the pivot than how they are on the R brake.
How can I address this discrepancy, which is apparently the cause of the problem? On one of the brakes, should I try a different set of holes for the pins on the return-springs, and if so, which one?
The calipers are V-brakes setup with identical distances between the arms. The spring pins are each in the middle hole of their respective mounts. The mounts on the frame and fork are identical distance apart.
The levers are long-pull for drop-bars (Tektro RL520).
All parts are new and matching, including the rims.
Last edited by Nyah; 01-31-23 at 08:51 PM.
#2
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 9,859
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2458 Post(s)
Liked 2,840 Times
in
1,735 Posts
#3
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 196 Times
in
144 Posts
Alright, thanks. I'll try taking out some slack on the rear cable.
Likes For Nyah:
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 3,117 Times
in
1,904 Posts
With the shorter cable length, and often the more direct path it takes, a front brake will pretty much always have less mush once the pads make contact with the rim. So even with the initial pad contact happening with the same amount of lever pull the rear lever will seem to need more pull amount. If the bike has cable length adjusters (often found on the levers and actually adjusting the cable casing length) one can play with the lever pull amounts while one rides. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
Likes For Andrew R Stewart:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 8,317
Bikes: '93 Trek 750, '92 Schwinn Crisscross, '93 Mongoose Alta
Mentioned: 30 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1437 Post(s)
Liked 1,085 Times
in
720 Posts
As Andrew Stewart points out, getting very different braking systems to act identically is going to be a tough job. Just having them both work well is sufficient for safe operation.
Likes For dsbrantjr:
#6
Really Old Senior Member
This is a safety issue. My front brake shoes start contact with the rim when the lever is pulled only about halfway to the handlebar while the rear does this when lever is much farther in than that. I want them to engage at the same pull distance, or, with the rear engaging even before the front (i.e. the opposite from how it is now).......
.
.
Think of a near nose stand just as the rear wheel is leaving the ground.
Likes For Bill Kapaun:
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 37,185
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5031 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
676 Posts
First of all ---- There is no safety issue here.
Secondly, you're obsessing over nothing and wasting your time "fixing" what ain't broke.
Third, it helps to understand how human controlled braking works.
We humans operate using biofeedback rather than fixed programming to control motion. By example, if we reach out to pick up an apple, it doesn't matter where the apple is, we simply reach out until we touch it, then close our hand until we have grasped it tight enough to move before lifting. We have no idea we're doing this because it's a fully automatic subroutine of our motion control system.
Looking at your braking "imbalance" issue, I suggest you think back to the times you crossed a street on a hill. In that situation one leg was closer to the ground than the other, and you barely noticed, and didn't consciously make any effort to compensate. The same would apply to the unmatched braking. Each hand quickly squeezes it's respective lever until registering contact, then increases grip force until it has the desired effect, while also modulating to maintain control without excessive brake force. All that happens in micro seconds, without conscious attention to the process.
You learned this a long time ago, the same way you learned to ride a bike in the first place. So there's no need for you to try to make a reliable, fully automatic control system "better" or "safer: It works now, has worked in the past, and can be relied on to work in the future.
Note, since nothing was said otherwise, I assumed you were dealing with a typical two brake, two lever system. OTOH - if dealing with two brakes on the same lever, please disregard most of the above,
Secondly, you're obsessing over nothing and wasting your time "fixing" what ain't broke.
Third, it helps to understand how human controlled braking works.
We humans operate using biofeedback rather than fixed programming to control motion. By example, if we reach out to pick up an apple, it doesn't matter where the apple is, we simply reach out until we touch it, then close our hand until we have grasped it tight enough to move before lifting. We have no idea we're doing this because it's a fully automatic subroutine of our motion control system.
Looking at your braking "imbalance" issue, I suggest you think back to the times you crossed a street on a hill. In that situation one leg was closer to the ground than the other, and you barely noticed, and didn't consciously make any effort to compensate. The same would apply to the unmatched braking. Each hand quickly squeezes it's respective lever until registering contact, then increases grip force until it has the desired effect, while also modulating to maintain control without excessive brake force. All that happens in micro seconds, without conscious attention to the process.
You learned this a long time ago, the same way you learned to ride a bike in the first place. So there's no need for you to try to make a reliable, fully automatic control system "better" or "safer: It works now, has worked in the past, and can be relied on to work in the future.
Note, since nothing was said otherwise, I assumed you were dealing with a typical two brake, two lever system. OTOH - if dealing with two brakes on the same lever, please disregard most of the above,
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Last edited by FBinNY; 02-01-23 at 08:34 PM.
Likes For FBinNY:
#8
Senior Member
You can squeeze the rear arms together, loosen the cable anchor bolt a bit, pull the cable through a bit, tighten the bolt, release your hand from the arms. This will leave your pads a little closer to the rim and your braking will start sooner in the back.
BUT..I set my bikes up like yours is now. The braking force all shifts to the front, so it's easier to lock up the rear if they're set identically and I pull both levers the same distance. I prefer that my rear brake feels "softer", I have to pull the lever way back to lock it up.
BUT..I set my bikes up like yours is now. The braking force all shifts to the front, so it's easier to lock up the rear if they're set identically and I pull both levers the same distance. I prefer that my rear brake feels "softer", I have to pull the lever way back to lock it up.
#9
Captain Dorkdisk
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The CV of California
Posts: 978
Bikes: More than I need, less than I want.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
300 Posts
If you want them "right" and the same, then I would suggest starting over from go.
Remove the brakes from the mounting posts, and use a bit of steel wool on the mounting posts to remove whatever may be there.
Do the same to the bushing inside the brake.unscrew the leveling screw (pre-tensioner) put a bit of light grease on the posts and reassemble making sure the brake springs are in the same location on your.mount. Do them one pair at a time so parts don't intermingle.
Practice makes perfect.
Remove the brakes from the mounting posts, and use a bit of steel wool on the mounting posts to remove whatever may be there.
Do the same to the bushing inside the brake.unscrew the leveling screw (pre-tensioner) put a bit of light grease on the posts and reassemble making sure the brake springs are in the same location on your.mount. Do them one pair at a time so parts don't intermingle.
Practice makes perfect.
#10
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 41,824
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10655 Post(s)
Liked 5,688 Times
in
2,959 Posts
Indeed. I typically prefer my rear to be slightly "detuned" so I don't lock it up as much.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 3,117 Times
in
1,904 Posts
My front brake lever is on the side that my dominate hand is on. Being righthanded this means that my brakes are not CPSC acceptable. The reasoning I decided on way back in high school is that the hand that has better fine muscle control is the one I want to use to save my life with (should I have to stop suddenly, which I have "tested" too many times since). The BS reason was when riding two bike at the same time (I believe ghost riding is the current term) I would not want to stop too quickly as with only one hand on the bars of the bike I was pedaling the chance of steering abruptly when that weight shift happened. Having a less effective initial braking force reduced this chance. That my bike was then set up different from almost all others helped me to think I was unique, so important when young
Andy

__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 37,185
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5031 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
676 Posts
What makes it a bit ironic is that back then I got tons of grief about my bike set up wrong, and it was 10 years later that the CPSC tossed a cold and made me right.
IMO, while left [edit ]front is SOP for new bikes, there's no wrong way to set up your own bike
Last edited by FBinNY; 02-03-23 at 10:56 PM.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 17,341
Bikes: Stewart S&S coupled sport tourer, Stewart Sunday light, Stewart Commuting, Stewart Touring, Co Motion Tandem, Stewart 3-Spd, Stewart Track, Fuji Finest, Mongoose Tomac ATB, GT Bravado ATB, JCP Folder, Stewart 650B ATB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3889 Post(s)
Liked 3,117 Times
in
1,904 Posts
"IMO, while right front is SOP for new bikes, there's no wrong way to set up your own bike" Francis
I think you mean left front.
Agreed that for one's own bike there is no wrong way to set up brakes/levers. But when a right front would come into the shop and I was doing the service write up and the situation looked like the rider didn't chose I often (being human I can't say "always") asked if this was intentional. If the customer wished to retain the right front set up I tried to make a note on the service ticket. Andy
I think you mean left front.
Agreed that for one's own bike there is no wrong way to set up brakes/levers. But when a right front would come into the shop and I was doing the service write up and the situation looked like the rider didn't chose I often (being human I can't say "always") asked if this was intentional. If the customer wished to retain the right front set up I tried to make a note on the service ticket. Andy
__________________
AndrewRStewart
AndrewRStewart
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 37,185
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 132 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5031 Post(s)
Liked 1,163 Times
in
676 Posts
"IMO, while right front is SOP for new bikes, there's no wrong way to set up your own bike" Francis
I think you mean left front.
Agreed that for one's own bike there is no wrong way to set up brakes/levers. But when a right front would come into the shop and I was doing the service....
I think you mean left front.
Agreed that for one's own bike there is no wrong way to set up brakes/levers. But when a right front would come into the shop and I was doing the service....
You're right that it's best practice to keep a bike the way it's owner is used to it, especially if he owns multiple bikes.
OTOH I'm not convinced it makes any difference, except maybe for the first few minutes. 99% of bike control is via the autopilot at the base of our brains, and it adapts unbelievably quickly.
Personally, I've never registered any difference riding bikes with brakes configured opposite my own.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
Likes For FBinNY:
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,862
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 120 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4159 Post(s)
Liked 3,151 Times
in
2,045 Posts
I wished I'd grown up with right lever - front brake bikes, being very right handed. Until I had my head injury with its right side motor skill loses. Now, my left hand still wasn't very "bright" but it was far more capable than my right which had to re-learn everything.
To the OP - adjust those cables until your brakes work best for you. What the rest of us say doesn't matter one hoot until they need to ride your bike. (Then they can lay down the law. "I won't take one pedal stroke on your bike until you adjust those brakes to ...!"
To the OP - adjust those cables until your brakes work best for you. What the rest of us say doesn't matter one hoot until they need to ride your bike. (Then they can lay down the law. "I won't take one pedal stroke on your bike until you adjust those brakes to ...!"

#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 3,992
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1635 Post(s)
Liked 1,732 Times
in
997 Posts
You're right that it's best practice to keep a bike the way it's owner is used to it, especially if he owns multiple bikes.
OTOH I'm not convinced it makes any difference, except maybe for the first few minutes. 99% of bike control is via the autopilot at the base of our brains, and it adapts unbelievably quickly.
Personally, I've never registered any difference riding bikes with brakes configured opposite my own.
OTOH I'm not convinced it makes any difference, except maybe for the first few minutes. 99% of bike control is via the autopilot at the base of our brains, and it adapts unbelievably quickly.
Personally, I've never registered any difference riding bikes with brakes configured opposite my own.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,188
Mentioned: 38 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3227 Post(s)
Liked 678 Times
in
451 Posts
This is a safety issue. My front brake shoes start contact with the rim when the lever is pulled only about halfway to the handlebar while the rear does this when lever is much farther in than that. I want them to engage at the same pull distance, or, with the rear engaging even before the front (i.e. the opposite from how it is now).
It took me awhile to track down the difference between the two brakes and this is what I've come up with: The brake shoes on the F brake are 5mm farther away from the pivot than how they are on the R brake.
How can I address this discrepancy, which is apparently the cause of the problem? On one of the brakes, should I try a different set of holes for the pins on the return-springs, and if so, which one?
The calipers are V-brakes setup with identical distances between the arms. The spring pins are each in the middle hole of their respective mounts. The mounts on the frame and fork are identical distance apart.
The levers are long-pull for drop-bars (Tektro RL520).
All parts are new and matching, including the rims.
It took me awhile to track down the difference between the two brakes and this is what I've come up with: The brake shoes on the F brake are 5mm farther away from the pivot than how they are on the R brake.
How can I address this discrepancy, which is apparently the cause of the problem? On one of the brakes, should I try a different set of holes for the pins on the return-springs, and if so, which one?
The calipers are V-brakes setup with identical distances between the arms. The spring pins are each in the middle hole of their respective mounts. The mounts on the frame and fork are identical distance apart.
The levers are long-pull for drop-bars (Tektro RL520).
All parts are new and matching, including the rims.
On most V brakes, there are splined "washers" that are used on each side of the slot in the brake arm. One washer is thin, the other thicker. By swapping the location of those washers you can set your pads further or closer to the brake arm/pivot. So you might check how those washers are set up - since it is common to have the rear brake bosses narrower than the fork bosses, the brakes may have come set up different front and rear.
Something to look at.

I'm talking about the matte aluminum conical washers you can see in this picture. The outer one is half as thick as the inner, but you can mount them either way.
Last edited by Kontact; 02-04-23 at 11:02 AM.
Likes For Kontact:
#19
Captain Dorkdisk
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: The CV of California
Posts: 978
Bikes: More than I need, less than I want.
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 369 Post(s)
Liked 563 Times
in
300 Posts
Thanks for correction, I wentback and fixed it.
You're right that it's best practice to keep a bike the way it's owner is used to it, especially if he owns multiple bikes.
OTOH I'm not convinced it makes any difference, except maybe for the first few minutes. 99% of bike control is via the autopilot at the base of our brains, and it adapts unbelievably quickly.
Personally, I've never registered any difference riding bikes with brakes configured opposite my own.
You're right that it's best practice to keep a bike the way it's owner is used to it, especially if he owns multiple bikes.
OTOH I'm not convinced it makes any difference, except maybe for the first few minutes. 99% of bike control is via the autopilot at the base of our brains, and it adapts unbelievably quickly.
Personally, I've never registered any difference riding bikes with brakes configured opposite my own.
I don't have any trouble processing the difference when I hop on a motorcycle.
Likes For Schweinhund:
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 2,355
Bikes: Airborne "Carpe Diem", Motobecane "Mirage", Trek 6000, Strida 2, Dahon "Helios XL", Dahon "Mu XL", Tern "Verge S11i"
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 912 Post(s)
Liked 438 Times
in
320 Posts
Many years ago I swapped the brake levers on all my bikes L-for-R because they were that way on my motorcycles. I also like having my best brake available in case I need it when signalling with the hand that's most visible to traffic. I've also never had trouble riding bicycles set up the standard way.
#21
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 196 Times
in
144 Posts
First of all ---- There is no safety issue here.
Secondly, you're obsessing over nothing and wasting your time "fixing" what ain't broke.
Third, it helps to understand how human controlled braking works.
We humans operate using biofeedback rather than fixed programming to control motion. By example, if we reach out to pick up an apple, it doesn't matter where the apple is, we simply reach out until we touch it, then close our hand until we have grasped it tight enough to move before lifting. We have no idea we're doing this because it's a fully automatic subroutine of our motion control system.
Looking at your braking "imbalance" issue, I suggest you think back to the times you crossed a street on a hill. In that situation one leg was closer to the ground than the other, and you barely noticed, and didn't consciously make any effort to compensate. The same would apply to the unmatched braking. Each hand quickly squeezes it's respective lever until registering contact, then increases grip force until it has the desired effect, while also modulating to maintain control without excessive brake force. All that happens in micro seconds, without conscious attention to the process.
You learned this a long time ago, the same way you learned to ride a bike in the first place. So there's no need for you to try to make a reliable, fully automatic control system "better" or "safer: It works now, has worked in the past, and can be relied on to work in the future.
Secondly, you're obsessing over nothing and wasting your time "fixing" what ain't broke.
Third, it helps to understand how human controlled braking works.
We humans operate using biofeedback rather than fixed programming to control motion. By example, if we reach out to pick up an apple, it doesn't matter where the apple is, we simply reach out until we touch it, then close our hand until we have grasped it tight enough to move before lifting. We have no idea we're doing this because it's a fully automatic subroutine of our motion control system.
Looking at your braking "imbalance" issue, I suggest you think back to the times you crossed a street on a hill. In that situation one leg was closer to the ground than the other, and you barely noticed, and didn't consciously make any effort to compensate. The same would apply to the unmatched braking. Each hand quickly squeezes it's respective lever until registering contact, then increases grip force until it has the desired effect, while also modulating to maintain control without excessive brake force. All that happens in micro seconds, without conscious attention to the process.
You learned this a long time ago, the same way you learned to ride a bike in the first place. So there's no need for you to try to make a reliable, fully automatic control system "better" or "safer: It works now, has worked in the past, and can be relied on to work in the future.
Note, since nothing was said otherwise, I assumed you were dealing with a typical two brake, two lever system. OTOH - if dealing with two brakes on the same lever, please disregard most of the above,
Both brakes had the same amount of cable between the arms. Since my 2nd post though, I've pulled more cable out from between the rear brake arms. Now the rear engages first. It does tend to skid more now than before. I figure though, during a downhill emergency-stop, if I were to skid it would be just minimal, because my front brake will take over the stopping function and prevent me from losing control.
Last edited by Nyah; 02-04-23 at 03:35 PM.
#22
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 196 Times
in
144 Posts
I don't know if anyone actually addressed your concern about the location of the pads.
On most V brakes, there are splined "washers" that are used on each side of the slot in the brake arm. One washer is thin, the other thicker. By swapping the location of those washers you can set your pads further or closer to the brake arm/pivot. So you might check how those washers are set up - since it is common to have the rear brake bosses narrower than the fork bosses, the brakes may have come set up different front and rear.
Something to look at.
{image}
I'm talking about the matte aluminum conical washers you can see in this picture. The outer one is half as thick as the inner, but you can mount them either way.
On most V brakes, there are splined "washers" that are used on each side of the slot in the brake arm. One washer is thin, the other thicker. By swapping the location of those washers you can set your pads further or closer to the brake arm/pivot. So you might check how those washers are set up - since it is common to have the rear brake bosses narrower than the fork bosses, the brakes may have come set up different front and rear.
Something to look at.
{image}
I'm talking about the matte aluminum conical washers you can see in this picture. The outer one is half as thick as the inner, but you can mount them either way.
Last edited by Nyah; 02-04-23 at 03:15 PM.
#23
Really Old Senior Member
There's no such thing as an all condition ABS on bikes.
Learn to use your brain to react, not think about it. You don't have time to analyze until afterwards.
#24
QR-disc must die!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: Shenandoah Valley, Northern Virginia.
Posts: 703
Bikes: '99 Trek 520, '20 Kona Sutra (FOR SALE 48cm), '21 Simon-Bikes mini-velo and a chromoly-framed folding bicycle with drop-bars and V-brakes, that rolls even while folded.
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 396 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 196 Times
in
144 Posts
There's no such thing as an all condition ABS on bikes.
Learn to use your brain to react, not think about it. You don't have time to analyze until afterwards.
Learn to use your brain to react, not think about it. You don't have time to analyze until afterwards.
Last edited by Nyah; 02-04-23 at 03:39 PM.
#25
Really Old Senior Member
To prevent any future.