Check my math, please
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Check my math, please
I had posted earlier about how to measure chain stretch and found out (thanks to urban assault) that the stretch limit is 1/16 of an inch (.0625 inches) for every 12 inches of chain. As Svloid mentioned, 12 inches is hard to measure with calipers.
So my question is, to calculate the max amount of stretch for any given legnth of chain is the equation
(.0625/12)(any given chain legnth being measured)=max stretch? Thanks.
So my question is, to calculate the max amount of stretch for any given legnth of chain is the equation
(.0625/12)(any given chain legnth being measured)=max stretch? Thanks.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks. By the way if anyone is going to use this, convert to metric! Tried doing it in inches and the caliper reads in fractions of an inch (including vernier at 128ths in.!) and its a real PITA to convert all thos fractions.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
That's what wives are for. I have my wife pull the chain tight by holding the rear wheel and preasuring up on a pedal. Then I measure a foot of chain with a good steel ruler.
The Park chain checker works OK once you get the feel of it. You take the slack out and avoid too much pressure on the tool.
There is no magic amount of stretch we should tolerate. The 1/16th rule is a rule of thumb. It really depends on how much chance of cassette wear you want to take. I try to catch mine before the 1/16th.
Al
The Park chain checker works OK once you get the feel of it. You take the slack out and avoid too much pressure on the tool.
There is no magic amount of stretch we should tolerate. The 1/16th rule is a rule of thumb. It really depends on how much chance of cassette wear you want to take. I try to catch mine before the 1/16th.
Al
#5
53 miles per burrito
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,489
Bikes: Land Shark, Trek 1000, Iron Horse Rogue, Novara Randonee
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for the props, but, as I think I mentioned in the original thread, credit should go to Mr. Sheldon Brown for the well written explanation.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,190
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 114 Post(s)
Liked 118 Times
in
91 Posts
Originally Posted by San Rensho
...12 inches is hard to measure with calipers.
Thanks.
Thanks.
FWIW, Park tool sells a go / no go chain gauge. If the tool can fit into the chain, then it's time to change.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,281
Bikes: Cannondale R600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MudPie
FWIW, Park tool sells a go / no go chain gauge. If the tool can fit into the chain, then it's time to change.
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Thanks all. What I'm doing is using a cheapo vernier caliper (I think it was less than 10 bucks at home depo) that reads to .1mm. Using the inside measurement part of the vernier, I set it to 106mm and put it between the links, as I open the vernier, it stretches the chain automatically and then I just set it till I get a little friction as I remove the vernier, much like using a feeler guage. The stretch limit on the legnth I'm measuring is .55mm, so the cheapo vernier is more than accurate enough.
#9
Senior Member
Beware that, if I'm actually reading this right, what you're measuring isn't actually a pin center to pin center measurement. You're measuring inside to inside, including play in the rollers. It's an important distinction that should be reflected in the pass/no pass algorithm that you're using.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Yes, I'm measuring inside to inside. I'm assuming that once you take the slack out of the chain, you can measure from any two points and compare that same measurement from the same points on a new chain and you will get an accurate reading on the stretch. Even if you measure pin to pin, you must still remove slack (play) to measure. Is my assumption wrong?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,735
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times
in
1 Post
It should not matter much if I understand your concern DiegoFrogs. I think you are saying that the measurement could be inaccurate if the rollers have a difference in the amount of play/wear, meaning the rollers have worn unevenly. From Sheldons explanation, what is being measures is not physical stretching of the plates but mainly the amount of wear at the pivot points. The difference in wear of one roller compared to another should be statistically small. If in doubt, you would probably be better off changing the chain. Letting it go could mean a more extensive drivetrain overhaul and replacement.
In pre-index days I used to tighten up my shifting by removing some of the deflection from the chains. I would do this by pressing the sideplates slightly tighter. I did do it a little to much on occasion but it was readily obvious when I had problems getting to the higher deflection gears. I don't have time to mess with that anymore, plus index shifting is much better than I need at my aged level .
In pre-index days I used to tighten up my shifting by removing some of the deflection from the chains. I would do this by pressing the sideplates slightly tighter. I did do it a little to much on occasion but it was readily obvious when I had problems getting to the higher deflection gears. I don't have time to mess with that anymore, plus index shifting is much better than I need at my aged level .
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438
Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times
in
6 Posts
I think your caliper technique is OK since you are comparing the worn chain to a new chain. My experience has been that my chains do not wear evenly but if you check various links around the chain, and use the greatest stretch as the determinate, you should have the right answer.
Al
Al
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portland, OR metro area
Posts: 984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I use the caliper technique, measuring inside to inside. I found that the unstretched dimension over 10 links (10? 11?) is 5.2 inch. I found this by measuring the diameter of the rollers new (0.3 inch), and offseting the pitch by the diameter (5.5 inch minus .3 inch = 5.2 inch. Given that, I calculated what 0.75% stretch and 1.0% stretch would amount to, and I made a little table showing % stretch vs. actual measurement. Here it is:
0.50% 5.226
0.55% 5.229
0.60% 5.231
0.65% 5.234
0.70% 5.236
0.75% 5.239
0.80% 5.242
0.85% 5.244
0.90% 5.247
0.95% 5.249
1.00% 5.252
So I measure the chain in 3 or 4 spots, take an average, and look up the % stretch.
I toss the chain if it runs rough no matter what the dimension say.
0.50% 5.226
0.55% 5.229
0.60% 5.231
0.65% 5.234
0.70% 5.236
0.75% 5.239
0.80% 5.242
0.85% 5.244
0.90% 5.247
0.95% 5.249
1.00% 5.252
So I measure the chain in 3 or 4 spots, take an average, and look up the % stretch.
I toss the chain if it runs rough no matter what the dimension say.
#14
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by tanguy frame
I use the caliper technique, measuring inside to inside. I found that the unstretched dimension over 10 links (10? 11?) is 5.2 inch. I found this by measuring the diameter of the rollers new (0.3 inch), and offseting the pitch by the diameter (5.5 inch minus .3 inch = 5.2 inch.
Last edited by Brian; 11-05-05 at 02:00 AM. Reason: Fixed quote