Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

4 cross lacing question

Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

4 cross lacing question

Old 12-04-05, 06:31 PM
  #1  
ratrod
cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 35

Bikes: Transition, Felt, Peugeot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
4 cross lacing question

I have laced up a few wheels, but never with a 4 cross pattern. When I was talking to the LBS the mechanic told me that you need multiple spoke lengths to do this pattern. I understand that due to dish, you may need different spoke lengths for the left and right side of the rear wheel. The mechanic however told me that I will also need different spoke lengths with respect to one side of the wheel and that he didn't know why or how to figure out in advance what lengths. I can't find in any of my books or online a mention of different spoke lengths neccesary for a four cross pattern. Has anyone heard of needing multiple spoke lengths (with respect to one side of the wheel) for the four cross pattern? If so, how I can figure out the other lengths.
Thanks
ratrod is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Al1943
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I don't think so but have no experience with 4 X. Have you tried an online calculator like the one at DT Swiss?

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 06:36 PM
  #3  
Bike_13
lover ....
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 243
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Do a google search for spocalc.xls - it's great free spoke length calculator.
Bike_13 is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 06:38 PM
  #4  
mechBgon
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Switching to 4-cross won't require two lengths of spokes per side.
mechBgon is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 06:54 PM
  #5  
supcom
You need a new bike
 
supcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,433
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
The mechanic obviously doesn't design wheels. However, a 4-cross spoke pattern is not much stronger than a 3 cross, yet suffers from a serious deficiency in that each spoke is probably going to overlap another spoke head. If you ever break a spoke, replacing it may be a real pain. Just something to consider before you buy a bunch of spokes...
supcom is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 07:24 PM
  #6  
Retro Grouch 
Senior Member
 
Retro Grouch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,222

Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.

Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1567 Post(s)
Liked 628 Times in 353 Posts
I have experience building wheels for tandems. I use 4 cross on 40 spoke wheels and 5 cross on 48 spoke wheels. With fewer spokes at some point the spokes that go in one direction will overlap the heads of the spokes going in the opposite direction and create some unnecessary problems. I generally build 32 and 36 spoke wheels cross 3, and 28 spoke wheels cross 2.

If you think about it, the spokes on either side leave the hub flange at the same angle regardless of whether they face forward or backward. Consequently it's exactly the same distance from the hub flange to the rim. That's independent of the number of spokes.
Retro Grouch is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 07:30 PM
  #7  
531phile 
I'm Carbon Curious
 
531phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,194
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5 cross? whoa. I didn't know there was such a thing.
531phile is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 09:06 PM
  #8  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times in 568 Posts
Remember, a 36 hole hub is the minimum for 4X lacing.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 10:20 PM
  #9  
DannoXYZ 
Senior Member
 
DannoXYZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Saratoga, CA
Posts: 11,736
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 109 Post(s)
Liked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Remember also that the crossing only affects torsional rigidity of the wheel. Lateral and vertical stiffness or strength won't be any different.
DannoXYZ is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 10:43 PM
  #10  
toomanybikes
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Okanagan Valley, BC
Posts: 431

Bikes: Too Many

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ratrod
I have laced up a few wheels, but never with a 4 cross pattern. When I was talking to the LBS the mechanic told me that you need multiple spoke lengths to do this pattern. I understand that due to dish, you may need different spoke lengths for the left and right side of the rear wheel. The mechanic however told me that I will also need different spoke lengths with respect to one side of the wheel and that he didn't know why or how to figure out in advance what lengths. I can't find in any of my books or online a mention of different spoke lengths neccesary for a four cross pattern. Has anyone heard of needing multiple spoke lengths (with respect to one side of the wheel) for the four cross pattern? If so, how I can figure out the other lengths.
Thanks
In honour of sydney - Rubbish,

One length per side - number of spokes per side must be divisible by 4
toomanybikes is offline  
Old 12-04-05, 11:19 PM
  #11  
ratrod
cyclist
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 35

Bikes: Transition, Felt, Peugeot

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks everyone for the information. I figured the mechanic was in error.
ratrod is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 10:04 AM
  #12  
San Rensho 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,820
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 383 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times in 89 Posts
Originally Posted by DannoXYZ
Remember also that the crossing only affects torsional rigidity of the wheel. Lateral and vertical stiffness or strength won't be any different.
He's right, it only affects torsional rigidity. And thats why, if my memory serves me,a 4 cross rear is the way to go because with 4 cross, the spokes are coming off the hub in a perfect perpendicular direction, so that all the drive from the hub gets transfered to driving the rim. I also mirror lace the rear so that the driving spokes are on the inside of the hub, that way the drive spokes are bent the least amount and have less of a tendency to break.
San Rensho is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 10:17 AM
  #13  
mechBgon
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
The angle at which the spokes leave the flange is a bit more complex, involving the number of spokes the wheel has. But anyhow, a well-built, appropriately-spec'ed wheel of either design will last until you're sick of it. *glares across room at Cannondale full-tourer, still stuck in 7-speed land by its ca. 1997 wheelset *
mechBgon is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 10:35 AM
  #14  
Thrifty1
Senior Member
 
Thrifty1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OK
Posts: 780
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Website for Spocalc spoke length calculator. "Full" version includes good variety of rim and hub data.
https://damonrinard.com/spocalc.htm
Thrifty1 is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 12:24 PM
  #15  
Gonzo Bob
cycles per second
 
Gonzo Bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930

Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 70 Times in 48 Posts
Originally Posted by toomanybikes
... number of spokes per side must be divisible by 4...
Rubbish. You can build a 36 and 44 spoke wheels using a 4-cross pattern. That's 18 and 22 spokes per side which are not divisible by 4.
Gonzo Bob is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 01:11 PM
  #16  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times in 568 Posts
Originally Posted by toomanybikes... number of spokes per side must be divisible by 4...
Not correct. The number of spokes per side for cross-laced wheels must be divisible by 2. For radial laced wheels even this isn't necessary. There are several 18 spoke radial laced front wheels available with, obviously, 9 spokes per side.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 07:20 PM
  #17  
FarHorizon
Senior Curmudgeon
 
FarHorizon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Directly above the center of the earth
Posts: 3,856

Bikes: Varies by day

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by supcom
...a 4-cross spoke pattern...suffers from a serious deficiency in that each spoke is probably going to overlap another spoke head. If you ever break a spoke, replacing it may be a real pain...
Doesn't using a 4-cross pattern reduce the likelihood of breaking a spoke significantly? If the spokes'll never break, who cares if the heads are overlapped? I'm not arguing with you here, I'd honestly like your feedback on these questions. Thanks!
FarHorizon is offline  
Old 12-05-05, 08:25 PM
  #18  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times in 568 Posts
Originally Posted by FarHorizon
Doesn't using a 4-cross pattern reduce the likelihood of breaking a spoke significantly? If the spokes'll never break, who cares if the heads are overlapped? I'm not arguing with you here, I'd honestly like your feedback on these questions. Thanks!
No it doesn't. It's a bit easier on the hub flanges since with 36 hole rims, the spokes are almost perfectly tangential to the flange. However, there is no reason it should be easier on the spokes.

These days, spoke breakage using DT, Wheelsmith or Sipam spokes and a 32 hole 3x pattern properly laced and tensioned is so rare as to be a non-issue. The rims will wear through and crack at the brake tracks or pull through at the spoke beds before any of the spokes break. I've had 32 hole 3X wheels last 30,000 miles and be replaced because of rim failure and NEVER broken a name-brand spoke. Worries about spoke failure are a remnant of the old mild steel plated spokes of years ago or the result of very poor lacing technique.

In fact, the durability of modern spokes is what makes the current crop of very low spoke count boutique wheels possible.
HillRider is offline  
Old 12-06-05, 10:02 AM
  #19  
dooley
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 541
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I use 4x wheels on my 48 sole bmx wheels, and they are definitely tougher than 3x provided the hub flanges are big enough for the spokes not to cross the spoke heads. However when you start to factor in dishing then I'd be far less sure of the advantages.
dooley is offline  
Old 12-06-05, 01:26 PM
  #20  
Jason Curtiss
Senior Member
 
Jason Curtiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 144

Bikes: Bianchi Intenso

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have found that 4-cross wheels provide a slightly more compliant ride than say 3-cross. So, when I lace up a wheel for use on a touring bike, I use a 4-cross spoke pattern.

Jason
Jason Curtiss is offline  
Old 12-06-05, 04:57 PM
  #21  
HillRider
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,299

Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!

Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1841 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 788 Times in 568 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason Curtiss
I have found that 4-cross wheels provide a slightly more compliant ride than say 3-cross. So, when I lace up a wheel for use on a touring bike, I use a 4-cross spoke pattern.

Jason
This myth just won't go away.
HillRider is offline  
Old 09-16-15, 04:16 PM
  #22  
Timmi
Senior Member
 
Timmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: M0NTREAL - Canada
Posts: 177

Bikes: Turconi, made by Vanni Losa, and a roster of ever-changing other bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider View Post
This myth just won't go away.
Could you please explain why you say this?

I will explain why I never disputed this "myth", as you call it:
I do believe that a longer elastic can be stretched a longer distance than a shorter one (before breaking, and return to their original shape (please let me know if you disagree with this)... just like spokes.
Also, being beyond tangential, should also allow for more give-and-take in the wheel than precicely or pre- tangential.
Timmi is offline  
Old 09-16-15, 04:35 PM
  #23  
Timmi
Senior Member
 
Timmi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: M0NTREAL - Canada
Posts: 177

Bikes: Turconi, made by Vanni Losa, and a roster of ever-changing other bikes.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Resources

Some resources for those landing here:

Sheldon Brown's page on lacing spokes
Wheelbuilding

3 good online spoke length calculators:

simplest:
Spoke Length Calculator for Bicycle Wheels

with flange distance from center:
Spoke Length Calculator

(auf Deutsch) with flange distance from end:
Genaue Berechnung der Speichenlaenge
Timmi is offline  
Old 09-16-15, 05:43 PM
  #24  
fietsbob
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW,Oregon Coast
Posts: 43,599

Bikes: 8

Mentioned: 197 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7607 Post(s)
Liked 1,331 Times in 839 Posts
A 5 cross in a 48 spoke is like 4 cross for a 36 spoke .. The 1st cross is the spoke on the opposite side of the hub flange,
headed to the opposite side of the Rim.

I have Built several 4 cross wheels . my drum brake winter bike wheels are 4X

My Campag Hi-Low rear hub is 4x on the NDS , small flange,& 3 cross DS, to the large flange ..

Last edited by fietsbob; 09-16-15 at 06:48 PM.
fietsbob is offline  
Old 09-16-15, 05:49 PM
  #25  
FBinNY
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 35,964

Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter

Mentioned: 125 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4372 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 51 Times in 45 Posts
First of all, you need at least 36 spokes to do 4x lacing. If you try to 4x on 32 or fewer holes the spokes would pass beyond the diameter on the hub, and leave the flange on a secant instead of a near tangent.

But if you have 36 spokes 4x is actually easier than 3x because it's a true tangent, and flange size has just about zero effect on spoke length. This was always nice as a builder because it required few spokes in inventory to cover a variety of hubs.

So, I suspect that the mechanic was speaking purely from ignorance, and projecting issues relating to something which was foreign to him.
FBinNY is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.