forks: steel vs. carbon, straight vs. curved
#1
Gambe di sparviero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
forks: steel vs. carbon, straight vs. curved
Hi. I'm building a Gunnar Roadie and trying to decide between a Waterford steel fork (which appears to be offered as a straight blade only), and the BRC Profile and Reynolds Ouzo Pro, which are similar in geometry with a slight curve.
Aesthetically, I prefer the Waterford (retro-grouch in training!), but my questions are more about performance, so here goes:
1. Is it rake or trail that determines how stable the handling on a bicycle is? Or a combination of both?
2. Will a straight fork be more "squirrely" than a curved fork? I don't want to be thinking about/correcting my path as I ride down the road, but I don't want a Cadillac, either. (In motorcycle terms, I'm looking for a Ducati ST2, and not a 916....)
3. Will a straight fork ride as smoothly as a curved fork (steel or carbon)? It just doesn't look like it offers much in the way of compliance.
4. Will the Waterford be as laterally stiff as a carbon fork?
Thanks!
David
Aesthetically, I prefer the Waterford (retro-grouch in training!), but my questions are more about performance, so here goes:
1. Is it rake or trail that determines how stable the handling on a bicycle is? Or a combination of both?
2. Will a straight fork be more "squirrely" than a curved fork? I don't want to be thinking about/correcting my path as I ride down the road, but I don't want a Cadillac, either. (In motorcycle terms, I'm looking for a Ducati ST2, and not a 916....)
3. Will a straight fork ride as smoothly as a curved fork (steel or carbon)? It just doesn't look like it offers much in the way of compliance.
4. Will the Waterford be as laterally stiff as a carbon fork?
Thanks!
David
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
1. Rake and headtube angle (and wheel radius) determine trail and trail is the controlling factor in how a bike handles. For a given headtube angle and wheel size, more rake = less trail.
2. A straight fork can be more rigid, less rigid or the same as a curved fork. The rigidity is dependent on crown and blade thickness, not whether the blades are curved.
3. Same answer as #2. Remember, straight forks are raked too but the rake is set by the angle of the blade/crown interface, not by the blade curve.
4. Depends on the carbon fork.
2. A straight fork can be more rigid, less rigid or the same as a curved fork. The rigidity is dependent on crown and blade thickness, not whether the blades are curved.
3. Same answer as #2. Remember, straight forks are raked too but the rake is set by the angle of the blade/crown interface, not by the blade curve.
4. Depends on the carbon fork.
#3
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
1. Handling is determined by head tube angle and trail. Note that rake actually means head tube angle to some (although from vertical, not horizontal - i.e. a 73 deg head tube angle on a bicycle is a rake of 17 deg) and fork offset to others. In the motorcycle world, rake typically means HTAFV and in the bicycle world, it typically means fork offset. If you keep HTA and tire radius the same, increasing the offset decreases the trail and decreasing the offset increases the trail so I suppose you could also say that HTA and offset determine the handling.
2. No. A straight fork with the same offset as a curved fork will handle exactly the same.
3. Some people say no. I haven't noticed a difference.
Mmmmm, a straight steel fork? Is that truly retro?
2. No. A straight fork with the same offset as a curved fork will handle exactly the same.
3. Some people say no. I haven't noticed a difference.
Mmmmm, a straight steel fork? Is that truly retro?
#4
Gambe di sparviero
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 119
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gonzo Bob
Mmmmm, a straight steel fork? Is that truly retro?
Thanks for all the replies. I found this via Google, if anyone is interested:
www.tonyfoale.com/ Articles/RakeEx/RakeEx.htm
David
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Main diffs are that the Carbon fork will be a bit lighter, and more likely to snap (rather than bend) in a crash, and the carbon fork will probably do a little better job of dampening road buzz. Note that the latter characteristic is not about shock absorption, which is a physically different thing.
I actually love the look of steel forks, specifically curved ones. You should be able to get Waterford to get you a curved-blade steel fork. They certainly make enough of them, but they don't offer them as a typical option on the "modern-welded-steel" Gunnar line. But I think you'd be able to get a curved one if you want to - just ask a few times.
Curved steel blades should be able to be tuned to flex a bit in the vertical plane, better than straight-blade. But tests have always been inconclusive; straight-blade works just as well or the same from everything that I've seen. So go with what look you like on the curve question.
I actually love the look of steel forks, specifically curved ones. You should be able to get Waterford to get you a curved-blade steel fork. They certainly make enough of them, but they don't offer them as a typical option on the "modern-welded-steel" Gunnar line. But I think you'd be able to get a curved one if you want to - just ask a few times.
Curved steel blades should be able to be tuned to flex a bit in the vertical plane, better than straight-blade. But tests have always been inconclusive; straight-blade works just as well or the same from everything that I've seen. So go with what look you like on the curve question.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
Last edited by TallRider; 01-04-06 at 05:11 PM.
#7
the goal
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brixton, London
Posts: 457
Bikes: Bob Jackson track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by timcupery
Main diffs are that the Carbon fork will be a bit lighter, and more likely to bend (rather than snap) in a crash
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by Momentum
Are you sure about that?
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Concord, CA
Posts: 165
Bikes: late 80s Paramount MTB with Xtracycle, late 80s Paramount MTB converted to single speed, Bianchi Nuovo Record converted to fixie, custom Tom Board lugged steel racer, 1950s Claude Butler, 1950s Dawes, custom chopper built on 50s cruiser by me
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#12
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,302
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 724 Times
in
371 Posts
Originally Posted by timcupery
Carbon forks, in comparison to steel, are more likely to snap rather than bend in a crash. That's pretty clear, both from reports and from the nature and design of the material. I don't know if that actually makes steel any safer, though. A crash hard enough to snap a carbon fork or badly bend a steel fork is probably pretty dangerous regardless of whether the fork bends or snaps.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chesapeake Bay, MD
Posts: 434
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by HillRider
1. Rake and headtube angle (and wheel radius) determine trail and trail is the controlling factor in how a bike handles. For a given headtube angle and wheel size, more rake = less trail.
2. A straight fork can be more rigid, less rigid or the same as a curved fork. The rigidity is dependent on crown and blade thickness, not whether the blades are curved.
3. Same answer as #2. Remember, straight forks are raked too but the rake is set by the angle of the blade/crown interface, not by the blade curve.
4. Depends on the carbon fork.
2. A straight fork can be more rigid, less rigid or the same as a curved fork. The rigidity is dependent on crown and blade thickness, not whether the blades are curved.
3. Same answer as #2. Remember, straight forks are raked too but the rake is set by the angle of the blade/crown interface, not by the blade curve.
4. Depends on the carbon fork.
#14
cycles per second
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,930
Bikes: Early 1980's Ishiwata 022 steel sport/touring, 1986 Vitus 979, 1988 DiamondBack Apex, 1997 Softride PowerWing 700, 2001 Trek OCLV 110
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 44 Post(s)
Liked 71 Times
in
48 Posts
Originally Posted by Bob S.
Isn't there a slight variable in the "length" of the fork? Specifically, the stright line distance from where the fork seats in the head set & the axle center line. A difference in this length will slightly raise or lower the head tube & therefore change the rake. Correct? Or, have I have too many cups of coffe today? Bob
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SE Minnesota
Posts: 12,275
Bikes: are better than yours.
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
You will not be disappointed by the Roadie, regardless of which fork you choose.
The only objective reason to go with carbon is to save a non-trivial amount of weight. (And that is a legitimate consideration.)
The "road buzz" argument is mostly bogus IMO. Gunnars are amazing bikes. My wife rides a Sport with a steel fork and it's a truly fantastic ride. Way smoother and way less "road buzz" than on her old Trek 1200c with a carbon fork. Granted, we're talking about a significant jump in price point and quality, but it does show that carbon is not =inherently= smoother and will not, by itself, make a great ride.
If you buy the whole exploding carbon fork theory, you might want to stick with steel.
The only objective reason to go with carbon is to save a non-trivial amount of weight. (And that is a legitimate consideration.)
The "road buzz" argument is mostly bogus IMO. Gunnars are amazing bikes. My wife rides a Sport with a steel fork and it's a truly fantastic ride. Way smoother and way less "road buzz" than on her old Trek 1200c with a carbon fork. Granted, we're talking about a significant jump in price point and quality, but it does show that carbon is not =inherently= smoother and will not, by itself, make a great ride.
If you buy the whole exploding carbon fork theory, you might want to stick with steel.