Fixed AND Free
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fixed AND Free
What would be the potential result of having a fixed cog on the standard drive side (right side) with a freewheel on the non-standard side (left side), of a fixed wheel. My bottom bracket spindle is the same length on both sides, and I would run the same gearings on each (though this makes me wonder what the result of having different gear ratios within the same drivetrain would be...).
Potentially, wouldn't this act standard-fixed style, with the drive-side cog tightening under standard pedalling while the freewheel would be on its freeside... yet under backpressure and skidding, the freewheel would engage and add stopping power? This is barring any eventually breakage within the freewheel, since they tend to do that.
If you were wondering, this is a posting coming from the same shop that made this bike.
Potentially, wouldn't this act standard-fixed style, with the drive-side cog tightening under standard pedalling while the freewheel would be on its freeside... yet under backpressure and skidding, the freewheel would engage and add stopping power? This is barring any eventually breakage within the freewheel, since they tend to do that.
If you were wondering, this is a posting coming from the same shop that made this bike.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
So, the idea is that you'd have the back-pedaling, braking-with-the-rear-wheel force distributed over both cogs? I think it'd be adding a lot of weight for little to no gain. Because, the lockring on a track hub is reverse-threaded, so when the cog tries to rotate backwards when the rider resists forward motion of pedals to slow the bike, the cog can't rotate backwards because doing so would only tighten the lockring.
Anyway, I don't see the point of running two freewheels, compared to just running a single fixed cog. Unless you like the clicking sound of freewheels, and the sensation of a slightly loose chain.
Anyway, I don't see the point of running two freewheels, compared to just running a single fixed cog. Unless you like the clicking sound of freewheels, and the sensation of a slightly loose chain.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#3
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 49
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you could run two different gear ratios on you double freewheel bike, but I don't think that would work on a "fixed-n-free" bike, cause no matter what direction you apply pressure to the pedals, the fixed side is always "fixed" to the cranks. But I'm not completely sure, and you obviously have more experience with dual chainlines than me (very cool bike, by the way!).
-Will
-Will
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 396
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Strange, but cool. I had thought of doing something similar on a BMX cruiser. I was thinking of using a flip-flop with a LSD and RSD freewheel (BMX bikes can be left side drive, if you've never seen it) connected up with a L and R driveside crank arm (BMX crank arms can also sometimes be had single as well). Not fixie, but simply double driveline. No good reason other than just the cool factor of a doubled driveline. I also thought it might be cool to find the same exact ratio in a different gearset for one side (44-16 on the right, 33-12 on the left for instance). Curious oddity, but no real practical value.
-Paul
-Paul
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 339
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by timcupery
So, the idea is that you'd have the back-pedaling, braking-with-the-rear-wheel force distributed over both cogs? I think it'd be adding a lot of weight for little to no gain. Because, the lockring on a track hub is reverse-threaded, so when the cog tries to rotate backwards when the rider resists forward motion of pedals to slow the bike, the cog can't rotate backwards because doing so would only tighten the lockring.
Anyway, I don't see the point of running two freewheels, compared to just running a single fixed cog. Unless you like the clicking sound of freewheels, and the sensation of a slightly loose chain.
Anyway, I don't see the point of running two freewheels, compared to just running a single fixed cog. Unless you like the clicking sound of freewheels, and the sensation of a slightly loose chain.
Also, the idea is to run fixed on the standard drive side but free on the typical non-drive side.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
The first part of my reply was talking about a fixed+freewheel combo, the second part about two freewheels. Sorry to be confusing.
I don't think a fixed+freewheel would add more stopping power, unless your fix cog tends to loosen. But, if it's done correctly, with a track lockring, that won't happen.
I don't think a fixed+freewheel would add more stopping power, unless your fix cog tends to loosen. But, if it's done correctly, with a track lockring, that won't happen.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#8
pacifist-vegetarian biker
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Posts: 178
Bikes: Iron Horse Triumph, Trek 800, KHS XC604
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
From a practical point of view I think that the minimal addition stoping power proably doesn't warrent the added complexity. But looking at your other dual-drive, I say who cares about the complexity, just builld it for the pure fun of it. Obviously you like to play with your tools.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by UCSDbikeAnarchy
From a practical point of view I think that the minimal addition stoping power proably doesn't warrent the added complexity.
-
Originally Posted by UCSDbikeAnarchy
But looking at your other dual-drive, I say who cares about the complexity, just builld it for the pure fun of it. Obviously you like to play with your tools.
#10
Long haired freak.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Still stuck in hell.
Posts: 6,281
Bikes: 2011 SE Old Man Flyer.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I _WANT_ that bike.
I have often thought about building on kinda like it.
I have often thought about building on kinda like it.
__________________
"the bus came by and I got on, that's when it all began...there was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land."
"the bus came by and I got on, that's when it all began...there was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land."
#11
如果你能讀了這個你講中文
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Hey Spencer--I think I used to know you back in Santa Cruz--I'm Drew, and I lived in the Barn and worked at Slug Books. Good to see you building such hot bikes at the coop!
Anyway, heres what I always wanted to try, similar to what the OP did:
--Similar setup with two drivetrains, both with freewheels
--Right (forward) side has steep ratio, say 52x15 or something.
--Left (backward) freewheel has easy ratio, say 43x22
----Something with a lot of skid patches
The left side would freewheel when the bike is moving, and the right side would freewheel when skidding. Super-easy skids on the left, and a hefty gear for going fast on the right. Wouldn't help anybody to get up hills, but it would be *somewhat* more reasonable than a normal brakeless fixie. I'm surprised that SB hasn't tried this yet.
Anyway, heres what I always wanted to try, similar to what the OP did:
--Similar setup with two drivetrains, both with freewheels
--Right (forward) side has steep ratio, say 52x15 or something.
--Left (backward) freewheel has easy ratio, say 43x22
----Something with a lot of skid patches
The left side would freewheel when the bike is moving, and the right side would freewheel when skidding. Super-easy skids on the left, and a hefty gear for going fast on the right. Wouldn't help anybody to get up hills, but it would be *somewhat* more reasonable than a normal brakeless fixie. I'm surprised that SB hasn't tried this yet.