triple shifters for double cranks
#1
****
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
triple shifters for double cranks
I currently have a triple ultegra group, would it be possible to use the STI levers for a double cranks?
Btw, I'm replacing the FD.
Btw, I'm replacing the FD.
#2
Curmudgeon
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nausea, New Hamster
Posts: 1,572
Bikes: (see https://wildavis.smugmug.com/Bikes) Bianchi Veloce (2005), Nishiki Cascade (1992), Schwinn Super Sport (1983)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times
in
4 Posts
I know it works OK for Campy, but I'm not sure about Shimano - I seem to remember reading somewhere that it won't work…
- Wil
- Wil
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Depends. The 9-speed Shimano shifters are listed as double/triple compatable. Many of the others aren't.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quahog, RI
Posts: 1,509
Bikes: Giant TCR Comps, Cdale R5000, Klein Q-Pro, Litespeed Siena, Piasano 105, Redline Conquest Pro, Voodoo Bizango, Fuji Aloha
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Most newer stuff works both. How old is your Ultegra group?
#5
****
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by capwater
Most newer stuff works both. How old is your Ultegra group?
#6
Senior Member
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002psm
i have the ultegra 6603 10-speed, so i guess it's the latest one?
#8
YOU ARE NOW TUNED IN
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The City that Works
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
HIJACK!
I'm switching over from triple to double. I currently run 105 triple stuff. I want to use the new 105 Hollowtech cranks (mmm), but I just want to make sure that there is no difference between cranks for a 10 speed group and cranks for a 9 speed group? I'm almost certain there's no difference, but if someone could confirm this I'd be glad.
I know I also need to change derailleurs. Right?
I'm switching over from triple to double. I currently run 105 triple stuff. I want to use the new 105 Hollowtech cranks (mmm), but I just want to make sure that there is no difference between cranks for a 10 speed group and cranks for a 9 speed group? I'm almost certain there's no difference, but if someone could confirm this I'd be glad.
I know I also need to change derailleurs. Right?
#9
****
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Unfortunately for you, 10-speed stuff has different part numbers for triple and double shifters. ST-6603 is listed as a triple shifter, the part number for the 10-speed double is ST-6600.
#10
YOU ARE NOW TUNED IN
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The City that Works
Posts: 1,185
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by No_Minkah
HIJACK!
I'm switching over from triple to double. I currently run 105 triple stuff. I want to use the new 105 Hollowtech cranks (mmm), but I just want to make sure that there is no difference between cranks for a 10 speed group and cranks for a 9 speed group? I'm almost certain there's no difference, but if someone could confirm this I'd be glad.
I know I also need to change derailleurs. Right?
I'm switching over from triple to double. I currently run 105 triple stuff. I want to use the new 105 Hollowtech cranks (mmm), but I just want to make sure that there is no difference between cranks for a 10 speed group and cranks for a 9 speed group? I'm almost certain there's no difference, but if someone could confirm this I'd be glad.
I know I also need to change derailleurs. Right?
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Originally Posted by 2002psm
ok i shouldn't have said the 10-speed. But the model numbers are correct. So does this mean I can't use my ST-6603 shifters for a ST-6600 crank?
#12
Senior Member
Originally Posted by Retro Grouch
Honestly, I don't know. I haven't had the opportunity to fool around with any 10 speed stuff yet. There is this, however: I consider these to be high end components. When I'm building up a bike using high end parts, I expect it to work perfectly. If I was willing to settle for not exactly, I'd use cheaper components. While it might be possible to get the triple shifter to work, if it was my bike, I'd want to use all matching components.
There will be no problem with what you're doing, but I personally wouldn't want my shifter saying triple and my crank being double. Doesn't make for a professional-looking bike IMHO.
#13
bike rider
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 288
Bikes: 83 Trek 500, 2x 90s Novara Randonee, Zion 737, Specialized Rockhopper, Nishiki Colorado, Univega Specialissima
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Yes. The big difference between the ST-6600 and ST-6603 is the trim clicks. If you use your current triple shifter and set the limit stops to allow you to shift only two rings your trim click postitions won't be as good as if you had the actual double shifter. Not perfect, but you should be able to make it work OK withough spending for a new shifter.