![]() |
do i have a chainline problem?
on my double crank when i am in the small chain ring the chain rubs on the inside of the large ring when i shift to the smallest three cogs on the back. Is my spindle to short on the bottom bracket? everything else feels fine and it shifts fine?
|
Not necessarily a problem. If you've got short chainstays (most road racing bikes do) and crank/chainrings designed for 10-speed system (chainrings are closer together) you'll often get this sort of thing. Though most people only get it in the smallest cog, and slightly in the second-to-smallest. Not in the bottom three.
What you want is for the centerline of your chainrings to be lined up with the centerline of the cassette. And you have some leeway in either direction. Typically, for a road double crankset, you want the centerline of the chainrings (so, the imaginary line that's halfway between the large and small chainrings) to be 43.5mm from the bike's centerline. Measure this and see if you're off by much. |
You can move the crankset out by adding a bottom bracket spacer between the BB and the frame. These are available in 1, 1.5, and 2 mm thicknesses. This will relieve at least some of the rubbing, but will also increase the chain angle from the big ring to the larger cogs. If it was me I'd want to be able to use the second and third smallest cogs without the rub.
What size are the chainrings? Your problem is common with 50/34 compacts. Al |
I measured my chainline per the park tool website and I am at 43.5 so I guess thats about right. My front crank is a 53/39 rear is a 12-26. The spacer might be the way to go, I double checked the rub and it is only slight on the 3rd mostly on the first cog.
Any idea where I could get those spacers lbs? Mike |
I wouldn't worry about a spacer. "crossing the chain" (using the innermost cogs with outermost chainring, or vice versa) is generally not a good thing - the sharper angle at which chain comes off the teeth, the more it wears the chain and the teeth. By the time you get into that gear, you could instead just shift into your large chainring. So, I wouldn't mess with spacers - it sounds as if your chainline is where it's supposed to be.
|
Originally Posted by crowtee
I measured my chainline per the park tool website and I am at 43.5 so I guess thats about right. My front crank is a 53/39 rear is a 12-26. The spacer might be the way to go, I double checked the rub and it is only slight on the 3rd mostly on the first cog.
Any idea where I could get those spacers lbs? Mike With no spacers my 9-speed D-A has a slight drag on the big ring if cross-chained 39 to 13 (smallest). No drag on the 39-14 or 15. No reason Ultegra shouldn't be as good. Al |
thanks for the help, how did you know it was an ultegra crank?
mike |
Originally Posted by timcupery
I wouldn't worry about a spacer. "crossing the chain" (using the innermost cogs with outermost chainring, or vice versa) is generally not a good thing - the sharper angle at which chain comes off the teeth, the more it wears the chain and the teeth. By the time you get into that gear, you could instead just shift into your large chainring. So, I wouldn't mess with spacers - it sounds as if your chainline is where it's supposed to be.
|
Originally Posted by crowtee
thanks for the help, how did you know it was an ultegra crank?
mike I would not fully cross chain to small-small, but I think you should be able to occasionally use the second and third smallest cogs with your inside chainring. Al |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:07 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.