Rear axle dropout width for touring?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Rear axle dropout width for touring?
I've been debating a new tourer like an Atlantis or Co-Motion, or a build up of an Surely LHT to replace my old Schwinn Transit.
One thing I noticed is that Co-Motion advertises an 145mm rear dropout (tandem sized) which allows them to build a rear wheel with a mimum of dish in the spokes. This seems to make a lot of sense for a dedicated touring bike with a load on the back and my extra lard on top. Every spoke I've ever broken has been on the cog side of the rear wheel.
What about the LHT? Would you have to cold-work the rear triangle to get 145 mm back there?
One thing I noticed is that Co-Motion advertises an 145mm rear dropout (tandem sized) which allows them to build a rear wheel with a mimum of dish in the spokes. This seems to make a lot of sense for a dedicated touring bike with a load on the back and my extra lard on top. Every spoke I've ever broken has been on the cog side of the rear wheel.
What about the LHT? Would you have to cold-work the rear triangle to get 145 mm back there?
__________________
#2
Senior Member
You should be able to cold set a LHT frame for 145mm rear dropout spacing. That's only 5mm per side on a long chainstay bike.
Sheldon Brown has a good article on his site about how to cold set a rear triangle to accept a larger hub spacing. Usually, it's done to upgrage an old bike to new (wider) hubs with more gears, but I don't see why you can't do it for your purposes.
Link to Sheldon' article.
Sheldon Brown has a good article on his site about how to cold set a rear triangle to accept a larger hub spacing. Usually, it's done to upgrage an old bike to new (wider) hubs with more gears, but I don't see why you can't do it for your purposes.
Link to Sheldon' article.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
I think rear spacing of 135mm is plenty strong for a loaded-touring bike, especially if you use a rear rim with off-center drilling that also helps to minimize dish. You can go 40 or 48 spokes if you really want more strength.
One of the problems with 145mm rear spacing is that it messes with your chainline - you would also need to get a bottom bracket that's 10mm wider (15mm if it's for a crank designed for 130mm road-bike rear spacing) and puts your pedals significantly further apart.
One of the problems with 145mm rear spacing is that it messes with your chainline - you would also need to get a bottom bracket that's 10mm wider (15mm if it's for a crank designed for 130mm road-bike rear spacing) and puts your pedals significantly further apart.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Which hub/rim combinations have 40 or more holes with 130 or 135 mm dropouts?
__________________
#5
Year-round cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Hubs:
I think Shimano still has one, but I'm not sure.
Phil Wood and Chris King are available almost any width you want.
DTHugi also makes one.
However, Unless you weigh 300 lb and carry bricks in your panniers, you don't need to go beyond 36 spokes. A well built 36 spoke wheel is most likely stronger than a poorly built 48-spoke wheel, and for the price of a 40 or 48 spoke wheel at your LBS, you could call Peter White Cycles or Sheldon Brown and get a hand built 36-spoke wheel that will be stronger than a 48-spoke wheel built by somebody who doesn't know what he or she does (i.e. most bike shops).
Rims:
Mavic A719 have been the best for me. Many others like the Velocity Dyads, but I had a poor experience with them. Both come in 36, 40 and 48.
I think Shimano still has one, but I'm not sure.
Phil Wood and Chris King are available almost any width you want.
DTHugi also makes one.
However, Unless you weigh 300 lb and carry bricks in your panniers, you don't need to go beyond 36 spokes. A well built 36 spoke wheel is most likely stronger than a poorly built 48-spoke wheel, and for the price of a 40 or 48 spoke wheel at your LBS, you could call Peter White Cycles or Sheldon Brown and get a hand built 36-spoke wheel that will be stronger than a 48-spoke wheel built by somebody who doesn't know what he or she does (i.e. most bike shops).
Rims:
Mavic A719 have been the best for me. Many others like the Velocity Dyads, but I had a poor experience with them. Both come in 36, 40 and 48.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Originally Posted by Michel Gagnon
, you could call Peter White Cycles or Sheldon Brown and get a hand built 36-spoke wheel that will be stronger than a 48-spoke wheel built by somebody who doesn't know what he or she does (i.e. most bike shops).
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
There is another thread on this today. One problem with wide dropout spacing is that your heels will hit the chainstays unless they are very long.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 2,053
Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3291 Post(s)
Liked 827 Times
in
583 Posts
Why try for 145mm? Why not go for an off-set rear triangle which will do away with the need for a dished wheel altogether.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
Originally Posted by onbike 1939
Why try for 145mm? Why not go for an off-set rear triangle which will do away with the need for a dished wheel altogether.
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 450
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HillRider
There is another thread on this today. One problem with wide dropout spacing is that your heels will hit the chainstays unless they are very long.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fife Scotland
Posts: 2,053
Bikes: Airnimal Chameleon; Ellis Briggs; Moulton TSR27 Moulton Esprit
Mentioned: 37 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3291 Post(s)
Liked 827 Times
in
583 Posts
Originally Posted by timcupery
Because, as HillRider noted in the other thread that he referenced in the post above yours, your heels will hit the drive-side dropouts. Unless you widen the crank spacing for proper chainline, in which case you've got a significantly wider Q-factor.
#12
Year-round cyclist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Montréal (Québec)
Posts: 3,023
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
There are a few good reasons to build a bike with 145-mm dropout spacing:
- Extra wheel strength : the rear wheel is totally symmetrical.
- Possibility to install a drum brake on the axle.
- Greater frame rigidity, especially when loaded, because the stays are further apart. (I was able to experience the difference first hand when I respaced an old steel frame from 126 to 135 mm).
The negatives are mainly related to the fact parts are much less common and much more expensive, so I don't think it's worthed for single-bike loaded touring.
As for heels hitting the seatstays, I don't think it's an issue if you keep your feet relatively straight, but if you pedal with heels inboard, it could become one. I find I have more issues on a mountain bike with fatty stays and a very long axle than when stoking a tandem that has 145-mm spacing.
- Extra wheel strength : the rear wheel is totally symmetrical.
- Possibility to install a drum brake on the axle.
- Greater frame rigidity, especially when loaded, because the stays are further apart. (I was able to experience the difference first hand when I respaced an old steel frame from 126 to 135 mm).
The negatives are mainly related to the fact parts are much less common and much more expensive, so I don't think it's worthed for single-bike loaded touring.
As for heels hitting the seatstays, I don't think it's an issue if you keep your feet relatively straight, but if you pedal with heels inboard, it could become one. I find I have more issues on a mountain bike with fatty stays and a very long axle than when stoking a tandem that has 145-mm spacing.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
Originally Posted by Michel Gagnon
As for heels hitting the seatstays, I don't think it's an issue if you keep your feet relatively straight, but if you pedal with heels inboard, it could become one. I find I have more issues on a mountain bike with fatty stays and a very long axle than when stoking a tandem that has 145-mm spacing.