Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

View Poll Results: Which Group Should I build my Nevada City With?
Tiagra Double Group 11 68.75%
Tiagra Triple Group 5 31.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-03-03, 08:01 PM   #1
On Your Right
Thread Starter
ZackJones's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 1,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Gear Talk Anyone?


I've been sitting here trying to figure out if I want to put a double chain ring or triple chain ring on my Lemond Nevada City when I build it back up.

My K2 came with a triple configuration up front and 12/25 on the rear. I am finding that as I gain strength (and lose weight) I am using the granny ring less and less, but I like having it

What I've been thinking about trying is switching the current 12/25 cassette with a 14/25 cassette. I think I've put it in 53/12 once or twice and would really prefer to have gears I can use instead of sitting back there taking up space and not getting used.

So, has anyone out there with a 39/53 setup used a 14/25 cassette before? If so how did you like it compared to a 12/25?

If memory serves there's about 10 gear inches between a 30/25 and 39/25 - just how much of a difference is that when you're climbing a hill?

Also, does anyone know off the top of their heads how large of a cassette a short cage (tiagra) derailleur will handle?

Should I be considering other ratios on the chain rings instead of the industry standard 39/53?

Finally, just for grins, let's do a poll. Should I build my Nevada City with in double or triple?

"You never fail, you simply produce results. Learn from these" - Anonymous
ZackJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-03, 08:11 PM   #2
Crank Crushing Redneck
SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: A van down by the river.
Bikes: Bikes are environmentally damaging
Posts: 2,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Once you settle into a comfortable riding fitness level and are maintaining higher paces you will not want or need a triple on a road bike.

I have found that once you are at or close to 140 gear inches it is unlikely you will encounter a hill too much for you. Only in the mountains do I ever need much lower than this even when in moderate to poor shape.
SamDaBikinMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-03, 08:32 PM   #3
The Red Lantern
Rev.Chuck's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 5,965
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You can go down to a 38 in the front and up to a 27 in the back. That will get you 38 inches.
Are you a registered member? Why not? click here to register. Its free, and only takes 27 seconds!
Help out the forums, abide by our community guidelines.

I am in the woods and I have gone crazy.
Rev.Chuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-03, 08:54 PM   #4
John E
feros ferio
John E's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2000
Bikes: 1959 Capo; 1980 Peugeot PKN-10; 1981 Bianchi; 1988 Schwinn KOM-10;
Posts: 18,268
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 409 Post(s)
Personally, I do not care for the industry default 53-39 combination; I use 50-42 / 13-26, 48-45-34 / 13-23, 45-42 / 13-26, and 52-44 / 14-28, all of which give me fast shifting and great sets of ratios with a 2-tooth step in back. I normally shift a cog at a time while accelerating, but I can always shift both derailleurs to find a ratio in between, when needed. (For use with 53-39, I would build a 14-15-16-17-18-19-20-22-24 corncob.)

Here is one way to analyze how may gear combinations you need:
1) Identify the lowest gear you need in practice, say, 40 inches.
2) Identify the highest gear you really need, say, 100 inches.
3) With an average of a 6 percent jump from ratio to ratio, you can cover this range nicely with 17 ratios, or as few as 15 if you can accept larger gaps at the top and/or bottom of the range.
4) A properly-designed 2x9 setup will yield up to 14 or 15 usable gears, thereby just meeting our criterion. A 3x9 would leave you with plenty of room for unused cross-combinations, redundant ratios, etc.

For commuting, club cycling, and unloaded touring, I find a gear range of low 40s to high 90s perfectly adequate. In practice, I generally reserve the gears below about 50 inches for that last long hill climb after a tough ride or that occasional 15-19 percent grade. Offroad or with a heavy load, I definitely want a triple, however! I'm not proud -- I geared my mountain bike 48-40-24 / 13-26.
"Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing." --Theodore Roosevelt
Capo: 1959 Modell Campagnolo, S/N 40324
Capo: 1960 Sieger, S/N 42624
Peugeot: 1970 UO-8, S/N 0010468
Bianchi: 1981 Campione d'Italia, S/N 1.M9914
Schwinn: 1988 Project KOM-10, S/N F804069
John E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-03, 03:30 AM   #5
Senior Member
Bobatin's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Newnan, GA
Posts: 402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A triple would be good for Six Gap but not much else in the Georgia area.
Bobatin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-03, 08:26 AM   #6
Forum Admin
lotek's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: n.w. superdrome
Bikes: 1 trek, serotta, rih, de Reus, Pogliaghi and finally a Zieleman! and got a DeRosa
Posts: 17,712
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)

when I first got back into riding after an extended layoff
I appreciated the 53/39 combo, and that said I'd probably
keep it if I lived in a very hilly area (not much in the way
of hills in Dallas).
I also prefer the "old school" 53/42 with a 12-26 cluster
gets me almost anywhere I need to be.

Sono pił lento di quel che sembra.
Odio la gente, tutti.

Want to upgrade your membership? Click Here.
lotek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-03, 10:33 AM   #7
Veni, Vidi, Vomiti
SteveE's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Republic of Anaerobia
Bikes: Serotta Legend Ti, Romani Columbus SL, Soma Doublecross
Posts: 3,582
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)

Since you don't live in a mountainous area, I voted that you should opt for the double.

SteveE (currently riding 13-26/30-42-52)
SteveE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-03, 11:12 AM   #8
hehe...He said "member"
ChipRGW's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FLA
Posts: 630
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
I voted double, since you have a triple on the K2. If you are going to ride somewhere where there are serious hills, just take the K2.

Related question...

Once you have a bike with a triple, how hard is it to change it to a double?
Just the cranks, or BB too? FD? RD?
Sometimes you just let the rabbits run, but sometimes you gotta let the dogs run.
ChipRGW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-03, 11:36 AM   #9
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Parrish, FL
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The difference is pretty significant if you want to upgrade later. I vote triple, for that "it's there if you need it factor". Unless of course, you get into racing, but that may be cause for another bike anyways.

The differences include: New bottom brackett, with a longer spindle. Cranks (obviously), a new front derailleur, and a new front shifter. If you've got seperate shifter/levers (older bikes or bikes with downtube shifters) it's not a big deal, but if you've got the new integrated brake/shifter levers, this can be the most expensive item to upgrade.

Heck, you can get the triple, remove the granny gear and reset you stops on your front derailleur and have a double! (Although there is a slight sacrifice in chainline)

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:45 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.
  • Ask a Question
    get answers from real people!
Click to start entering your question.