Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Bicycle Mechanics
Reload this Page >

Chainring upgrade procedure

Search
Notices
Bicycle Mechanics Broken bottom bracket? Tacoed wheel? If you're having problems with your bicycle, or just need help fixing a flat, drop in here for the latest on bicycle mechanics & bicycle maintenance.

Chainring upgrade procedure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-07, 08:21 AM
  #1  
beer disposal technician
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Chainring upgrade procedure

The wife has a relatively new Felt F85. She doesn't seem to like the 50/36 crankset and complains that she maxes out too easily on the relatively flat MUP we spend most of our pedaling time on.

My initial solution is "pedal faster." She didn't respond too kindly to the suggestion...

So I did some reading about gear inches and whatnot and figure a new 53t outer chainring will have the desired placebo effect for a lot less than a full crankset+cassette upgrade.

As far as I can tell, the process will require a new chain and a new FD cable job as it's bottom-pull (I think) and will need to be moved up a bit. Is there anything else I'm forgetting?

Thanks!

(I still think the real solution is to pedal faster, but this way I get to buy new shiny tools as well as log some time with a wrench. )
VA_Dave is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 08:32 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
well biked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times in 89 Posts
Are you sure she's not pedaling in the 36t ring instead of the 50t? Because my gosh, assuming she's got an 11 or 12 tooth small cog, a 50t on a flat MUP should be more than she'd ever need. It will go fast. Seriously. If she's really pedaling in the 50t, with an 11 or 12t small cog, on a flat MUP, and she feels like she's not going fast enough, then yeah, she REALLY DOES need to pedal faster. If she's pedaling with any reasonable cadence at all, she should be flying. Tell her it's better for her knees to learn to spin (which it is)-
well biked is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 08:42 AM
  #3  
beer disposal technician
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by well biked
Are you sure she's not pedaling in the 36t ring instead of the 50t?
Yeah, that was my first thought too, but sure enough, she's at 50-12. It's only an issue for her when we're descending from an overpass, and I don't think she's spinning faster than about 60 RPM.

Originally Posted by well biked
Tell her it's better for her knees to learn to spin (which it is)-
We're approaching our 10th anniversary, so I've learned to accept the fact that I can't tell her anything. So here's what's going to happen: I'll slap on a 53t chainring and she'll stay happy. Two or three years from now, she'll have more road experience (and will have listened enough to everyone but me) and she'll want to go back to the compact crank. It's win-win!
VA_Dave is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 08:46 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by well biked
Are you sure she's not pedaling in the 36t ring instead of the 50t? Because my gosh, assuming she's got an 11 or 12 tooth small cog, a 50t on a flat MUP should be more than she'd ever need. It will go fast. Seriously. If she's really pedaling in the 50t, with an 11 or 12t small cog, on a flat MUP, and she feels like she's not going fast enough, then yeah, she REALLY DOES need to pedal faster. If she's pedaling with any reasonable cadence at all, she should be flying. Tell her it's better for her knees to learn to spin (which it is)-
+1
The 50 is more than enough, suggest you get her a computer with a cadence meter. My 63 year old wife spins 100+ rpm for hours on the open road, mostly on her 39t middle ring. A 50t chainring and 12t cassette cog is good for at least 33 mph. A higher cadence is much better for joints, especially the knees, also better for the cardiovascular system.
A 53t chainring combined with a 50t would likely cause shifting problems due to the big size difference. And the 53 would have to have a 110 BCD to bolt up to the crankset.

Al
Al1943 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:06 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
smurf hunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Auburn, WA
Posts: 622

Bikes: 2006 LeMond Croix de Fer, 2005 Kona Dew Deluxe

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This is one of those rare circumstances where the wife is actually wrong.
smurf hunter is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:25 AM
  #6  
that bike nut
 
BikingGrad80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago north
Posts: 939

Bikes: 2010 Motobecane Immortal Force 90' Trek 1400; 90' Trek 850; 06' Trek 520; 01 Iron Horse Victory

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Tell her you aren't paying for her knee surgery.
BikingGrad80 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:30 AM
  #7  
bac
Senior Member
 
bac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 7,481

Bikes: Too many to list!

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
A 50t chainring and 12t cassette cog is good for at least 33 mph.
I think this says it all.

... Brad
bac is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:38 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
It may be easier to just swap the cassette for one with an 11 tooth little cog. It will give a bigger gear than a 53/12 and you won't run the risk of having crappy shifting from the big chainring size difference.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:39 AM
  #9  
beer disposal technician
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
So, um, back to the procedure at hand. Assuming the 53t ring will replace the 50t ring without issue*, new chain and FD cable and we're good to go?

* - I need to measure. The Felt specs don't jive with the Gossamer configurations on FSA's site. If it is indeed a CC then this whole post was an exercise in futility.
VA_Dave is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:43 AM
  #10  
beer disposal technician
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ashburn, VA
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
It may be easier to just swap the cassette for one with an 11 tooth little cog. It will give a bigger gear than a 53/12 and you won't run the risk of having crappy shifting from the big chainring size difference.
That sounds promising. Using Sheldon Brown's online calculator thingy I'm looking at 119.5" using the existing 50t ring and a new, 11-21 cassette. I was looking at 116.1" using the 53t ring and the old 12-25 cass. Seems like I should be able to use the existing chain too. Savings abound!
VA_Dave is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:48 AM
  #11  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by VA_Dave
Yeah, that was my first thought too, but sure enough, she's at 50-12. It's only an issue for her when we're descending from an overpass, and I don't think she's spinning faster than about 60 RPM.


We're approaching our 10th anniversary, so I've learned to accept the fact that I can't tell her anything. So here's what's going to happen: I'll slap on a 53t chainring and she'll stay happy. Two or three years from now, she'll have more road experience (and will have listened enough to everyone but me) and she'll want to go back to the compact crank. It's win-win!
As Nancy Regan recommended -

'Just say NO!'

EvilV is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 09:52 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by VA_Dave
So, um, back to the procedure at hand. Assuming the 53t ring will replace the 50t ring without issue*, new chain and FD cable and we're good to go?

* - I need to measure. The Felt specs don't jive with the Gossamer configurations on FSA's site. If it is indeed a CC then this whole post was an exercise in futility.
Most likely, even if you have a compact crank, your bike still has a regular derailler which will shift to a 53 tooth chainring just fine obviously. Depending on how your bike was set up, you may or may not need a new chain. Sometimes, chains that are set up conservatively (basically, doing it by the book) will allow for a couple tooth difference +/- without issue. It really depends on the derailler and the gear combinations used. The cable is almost definitely long enough to deal with the raised derailler height unless it was cut very close to the derailler pinch bolt.

FSA makes 52 tooth 110 BCD chainrings: https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...&category=2628 but that's the biggest I could find.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 01:11 PM
  #13  
Road, MTB and SS Rider
 
spdrcr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 524

Bikes: Trek 5200, Yeti Kokopelli, Clockwork

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You'll need to replace both the 36 and the 50. Going from a 52 or a 53 down to a 36 might be too large of a difference for the FD to handle. You also have the 110 vs 130 bolt hole spacing issue to deal with.
spdrcr5 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 01:22 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Reston, VA
Posts: 2,369

Bikes: 2003 Giant OCR2

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One question - on the site, it mentioned the Felt comes in a 650C and 700C version. Does she have the 650C? Because that would make the larger gears somewhat less insane. Somewhat.
Mr. Underbridge is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 02:30 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Most likely, even if you have a compact crank, your bike still has a regular derailler which will shift to a 53 tooth chainring just fine obviously.
Not so obvious when you're shifting up from a 36.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 03:17 PM
  #16  
Blissketeer
 
HokuLoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,335
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
??? Switching to bigger ring just doesn't make any sense at all. Especially for a MUP. Frankly it is a horrible waste of money and time. If it is really that troublesome that she feels she is spinning out then chances are there is something else wrong. I'd be willing to bet she is poorly fitted to the bike which is leading to poor pedaling. Before you break down and switch the chain ring you really should do her (and yourself) a favor by figuring out what the REAL problem is. It can only result in a more rewarding cycling experience.

Why bother with a "placebo" solution if the REAL problem will remain unsolved?? Usually that means the same or worse problems will just crop up later....

Oh yeah, and send her to BF or any wrench worth a dime if she "needs convincing."
HokuLoa is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 08:49 PM
  #17  
rebmeM roineS
 
JanMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Metro Indy, IN
Posts: 16,216

Bikes: Bacchetta Giro A20, RANS V-Rex, RANS Screamer

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 653 Post(s)
Liked 347 Times in 226 Posts
60 rpm is not spinning
JanMM is offline  
Old 10-03-07, 01:39 AM
  #18  
Bicycling Gnome
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 55.0N 1.59W
Posts: 1,877
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by smurf hunter
This is one of those rare circumstances where the wife is actually wrong.
But is that really possible? Don't they know everything?




Below is some good advice:

Originally Posted by HokuLoa
??? Switching to bigger ring just doesn't make any sense at all. Especially for a MUP. Frankly it is a horrible waste of money and time. If it is really that troublesome that she feels she is spinning out then chances are there is something else wrong. I'd be willing to bet she is poorly fitted to the bike which is leading to poor pedaling. Before you break down and switch the chain ring you really should do her (and yourself) a favor by figuring out what the REAL problem is. It can only result in a more rewarding cycling experience.

Why bother with a "placebo" solution if the REAL problem will remain unsolved?? Usually that means the same or worse problems will just crop up later....

Oh yeah, and send her to BF or any wrench worth a dime if she "needs convincing."
EvilV is offline  
Old 10-03-07, 09:02 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
Not so obvious when you're shifting up from a 36.
Good point. I had made a comment about that earlier in my first post but probably should have reiterated. My point was just that 52/53 is the "designed-for" large chainring size for a standard road derailler.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 10-03-07, 10:31 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 9,438

Bikes: Trek 5500, Colnago C-50

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Originally Posted by joejack951
Good point. I had made a comment about that earlier in my first post but probably should have reiterated. My point was just that 52/53 is the "designed-for" large chainring size for a standard road derailler.
Yeah, OK, but I really think the reason road bikes typically come with 52 or 53 big rings is because that's what the pros use so that's what sells. But they spend a lot of time at speeds above 30 mph and sprint at 45 mph or more.
Al1943 is offline  
Old 10-03-07, 08:01 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
joejack951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 12,100

Bikes: 2016 Hong Fu FM-079-F, 1984 Trek 660, 2005 Iron Horse Warrior Expert, 2009 Pedal Force CX1, 2016 Islabikes Beinn 20 (son's)

Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1242 Post(s)
Liked 94 Times in 65 Posts
Originally Posted by Al1943
Yeah, OK, but I really think the reason road bikes typically come with 52 or 53 big rings is because that's what the pros use so that's what sells. But they spend a lot of time at speeds above 30 mph and sprint at 45 mph or more.
No argument from me there. I could easily live with a 42/11 as my largest gear. By "designed for", I referring to the shape of the derailler cage and nothing more.
joejack951 is offline  
Old 10-03-07, 08:29 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NY state
Posts: 1,311

Bikes: See Signature...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
your dérailleur cage is going to be set to the 50t, and IF it was set up properly, you WILL need to re-position the dérailleur if you dont, you most likely will find the front der. will hit the inside of the 53t ring when upshifting...

again, this is all if it was set up PROPERLY. if it wasnt, well...then it might work?

even my 18 year old girlfriend knows that pedalling at a higher cadence means less hard effort, and less pain (she has a bad knee from a soccer incident). she cruises along on her comfort/hybrid easily at 12mph using 38/20t while i am probably at 32/16 on my mtb...of course i could pedal that mtb all day at that gearing...very easy

sounds like the wife needs to bump her cadence up to 85-90. she will be amazed at what it accomplishes.
nymtber is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.