32-spoke front wheel for touring?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 4,454
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
10 Posts
32-spoke front wheel for touring?
At some point I plan to build up a touring bike, and already have the stuff for my rear wheel: Ritchey OCR 36-hole asymmetrical rim, which has a bit wider profile than standard road rims.
For the front I've been planning to use a Sun CR18, a double-wall, single-eyeletted rim with a good reputation for durability and a similar width to the Ritchey I'll be using on the rear.
Here's the deal though: I've got a bunch of 32-hole front hubs sitting around, and would prefer to use one of them instead of buying a 36-hole (which are harder to find, esp. for good deals).
I suspect a 32-spoke front wheel would be fine for touring if it's well-built and uses a solid rim like the CR18. I build good wheels, and front rims undergo significantly less stress than rear wheels because
a) there's no torque transmitted from hub to rim by the spokes
b) the wheel is evenly dished so spokes on both sides have equal tension
Any thoughts?
For the front I've been planning to use a Sun CR18, a double-wall, single-eyeletted rim with a good reputation for durability and a similar width to the Ritchey I'll be using on the rear.
Here's the deal though: I've got a bunch of 32-hole front hubs sitting around, and would prefer to use one of them instead of buying a 36-hole (which are harder to find, esp. for good deals).
I suspect a 32-spoke front wheel would be fine for touring if it's well-built and uses a solid rim like the CR18. I build good wheels, and front rims undergo significantly less stress than rear wheels because
a) there's no torque transmitted from hub to rim by the spokes
b) the wheel is evenly dished so spokes on both sides have equal tension
Any thoughts?
__________________
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
"c" is not a unit that measures tire width
#5
Do I use too many commas?
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central New York
Posts: 621
Bikes: Giant Yukon SE
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I use 32 for both front and rear. I weigh 230. I commute 40 miles RT. No problems
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I agree that 32 hole front wheels should be perfectly suitable for touring use since front wheels are much more lightly loaded than rear under most conditions. The only caveat might be if you are going to use front panniers and load them very heavily.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,487
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 140 Post(s)
Liked 162 Times
in
89 Posts
Up until about eight years ago, I had always used 36 spoke wheels on mountain bikes. Then I decided to build up some 32 spoke wheels with XT hubs and Mavic X517 rims (these rims are quite light for mtb rims). So I built up one wheelset myself and bought another "mail order" set that was identical to the set I built (I change tires a lot and like the convenience of having an extra wheelset). I remember worrying about the 32 spoke thing at the time, because I do some fairly aggressive XC mountain biking. But after all this time with those wheels, having thrashed them with thousands of hard off-road miles, I've decided a good set of 32 spoke wheels is just fine. I've rarely even needed to true them. The wheels I built I've used almost exclusively off road, and more recently with the other set I keep a set of road slicks on the rims so that I can quickly convert for road use when needed. Now I realize this is a different situation than what you're talking about, and 26" wheels are inherently stronger, etc. But for a front wheel on a road bike, even for loaded touring, as long as it's a well built wheel I think you'll be fine with 32 spokes-
Last edited by well biked; 10-15-07 at 09:37 AM.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
Sheldon Brown says that, if your font and rear wheels have the same number of spokes, either the front is stronger than necessary or the rear is weaker than it needs to be.
That makes sense to me.
That makes sense to me.
#10
Elitist Troglodyte
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 6,925
Bikes: 03 Raleigh Professional (steel)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Six month old thread!
__________________
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
Stupidity got us into this mess - why can't it get us out?
- Will Rogers
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
The trend was started years ago by riders wanting less weight and better aerodynamics but at the expense of durability. Rim and spoke technology have now improved to the point where less is more than good enough.