Brakes Lever
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Brakes Lever
Hi,im just wondering if Brake Lever for V-brakes can be also use on a Cantilever brakes are they compatible? And what their differences. THANX in advancce.
#3
that bike nut
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Chicago north
Posts: 939
Bikes: 2010 Motobecane Immortal Force 90' Trek 1400; 90' Trek 850; 06' Trek 520; 01 Iron Horse Victory
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 25 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
2 Posts
No V-brake levers pull more cable than canti levers.
#4
Insane Bicycle Mechanic
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: other Vancouver
Posts: 9,841
Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 806 Post(s)
Liked 709 Times
in
378 Posts
As Danno said, using V-brake levers with "standard" levers will result in a very hard pull at the lever and possibly minimal braking power. Using "standard" brake levers with V-brakes will result in adjustment issues (the shoes need to be very close to the rim) and possibly overly aggressive braking power.
__________________
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
Jeff Wills
Comcast nuked my web page. It will return soon..
#5
Senior Member
It's all about leverage. Do the following to compute mechanical advantage:
1. Db = Distance between pivot and cable on brake-lever
2. Dc = Distance between pivot and cable on brake-caliper
Leverage = Dc/Db
V-brakes have a longer distance between their pivots and the cable. To maintain roughly the same lever-travel and leverage, they have larger distance between the lever's pivot and cable.
When you put normal levers on V-brakes, you get incredible leverage, you can implode rims at will and lock up the front-tyre with a single finger. You're basically putting a lot of brake-lever travel into a little caliper-travel to multiply the force (think of a crowbar's different-length levers around the pivot). The thing is, you need to have the pads very close to the rim and there's less tolerance for out-of-true wheels.
Now, doing the reverse results in lower-leverage than normal. You put a lot less lever-travel (due to the longer cable-pull), into a larger amount of caliper-travel. You end up with just 1/2 the force at the pads compared to the previous arrangement. The really annoying thing is you have to put a lot of slack in the cable and the pads will be very far away from the rims order for the lever to move to the 50-70% range where you have more control and modulation; the initial pull feels like there's no brake connected.
1. Db = Distance between pivot and cable on brake-lever
2. Dc = Distance between pivot and cable on brake-caliper
Leverage = Dc/Db
V-brakes have a longer distance between their pivots and the cable. To maintain roughly the same lever-travel and leverage, they have larger distance between the lever's pivot and cable.
When you put normal levers on V-brakes, you get incredible leverage, you can implode rims at will and lock up the front-tyre with a single finger. You're basically putting a lot of brake-lever travel into a little caliper-travel to multiply the force (think of a crowbar's different-length levers around the pivot). The thing is, you need to have the pads very close to the rim and there's less tolerance for out-of-true wheels.
Now, doing the reverse results in lower-leverage than normal. You put a lot less lever-travel (due to the longer cable-pull), into a larger amount of caliper-travel. You end up with just 1/2 the force at the pads compared to the previous arrangement. The really annoying thing is you have to put a lot of slack in the cable and the pads will be very far away from the rims order for the lever to move to the 50-70% range where you have more control and modulation; the initial pull feels like there's no brake connected.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
Never found that to be a problem. Sure, the brakes get fairly powerful, but it's no worse than, say getting back on a bike with aluminum rims after having ridden a steel-rimmed bike, or the differences encountered when braking in rain. All within the rider's margin of adaptation.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,688
Mentioned: 46 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1074 Post(s)
Liked 295 Times
in
222 Posts
I suppose the one-finger-lockup could happen given a specific set of circumstances (lightweight rider with strong hands riding on loose gravel or something), but for a slightly more average set of circumstances it's been nowhere near as bad.
In fact, if it wasn't for the frequent adjusting needed to keep the lever from bottoming out when pads wear I rather liked the performance of a front V-brake together with a canti lever. Would do me fine for a bike that didn't have to travel long distances in one go.
Out-of-true wheels is a manageable issue, but reducing slack/slop in the system enough for the rear brake both to run clean and still provide decent braking w/o the lever bottoming out was a considerably bigger challenge. I'd probably try it again if ever I got hold of some Nokon cables to play around with.