Is my track crank arm/spider bent?
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Is my track crank arm/spider bent?
on my track bike: the chain is rather loose when the right crank arm is straight forward; and the chain is very tight when the arm is straight back. rear hub, cog, chain, BB, chainring are all new; the crankset i picked up used on ebay... the set is suntour superbe pro 172.5mm. the square tapers look perfect, so i am assuming the crank arm and/or spider is bent, but i cant see it other than in the chain tension. whats the best way to actually measure whether it is indeed bent, and is there something i am overlooking?
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
A bent spider or bb spindle would probably be noticed as lateral run-out rather than changes in chain tension. Either your chainring is not perfectly round or it is not mounted perfectly centered on the spider.
Try loosening the chainring bolts and turning the crank to center the ring, then tighten them again.
Try loosening the chainring bolts and turning the crank to center the ring, then tighten them again.
#3
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
is it possible that the spider could be off-centered?
Last edited by digitane; 09-05-08 at 07:57 AM. Reason: to clarify
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
I guess the crank spider could be slightly asymetric or the mounting holes not perfectly centered. Since the crank is that old, you really can't do much with a warranty claim so the only "cure" is to use a round file to either elongate the holes in the chairing and flat file or modify the chainring's mounting tabs or to file the spider itself.
BTW, is the rear cog round?
BTW, is the rear cog round?
#5
Senior Member
Could be the CR is bent. Take the chain off and spin the cranks as you look at them. The chainring should be true, no wobble side to side, as you sight along the legnth of the CR. If it has a lot of wobble, lay the CR on a glass table and see if it is fairly flat. If it is, then one of the spider arms could be bent in or out. You can bend them by very carefully and slowly bending the arm with a BFAW (big f@cking adjustable wrench). Grab the arm with the jaws of the adjustabe and slowly bend.
__________________
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
Il faut de l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace
1980 3Rensho-- 1975 Raleigh Sprite 3spd
1990s Raleigh M20 MTB--2007 Windsor Hour (track)
1988 Ducati 750 F1
#6
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
yeah, after inspection cog is round too, brand new EAI cog. i had anticipated the answer might be having to file the holes and/or mounting tabs. i'm still wondering: is there any way that a mildly bent crank (perhaps from use on the track over the years) could cause the chain tension problem?
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ok, found a good flat surface, doublechecked ring for flatness (its flat,) put crank and chainring back on to track lateral movement of the ring again, took my time getting a good solid control point to track it against and there is a slight 1/2mm movement inward right at the top spider arm that i didn't notice before. the chain goes from tight at that point to loose opposite that point with at least 10mm of up-down movement. could that little movement cause the chain tension problem?
#9
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
chainring is good on all fronts, chain is new too.
i dont think that tiny lateral movement in the ring is causing such a big tension problem. i just put the chain back on and theres no way thats the problem. chainline is straight btw.
i think Hillrider nailed it with the idea of filing the ring and/or spider to get it centered. i think i'll chase after some very precise measurments of the spider holes against the spindle hole and the ring holes against its center to figure out what is truely off and what should be filed. busy now though so it will have to wait. i'll post again later once i get it figured out.
thank you all
i dont think that tiny lateral movement in the ring is causing such a big tension problem. i just put the chain back on and theres no way thats the problem. chainline is straight btw.
i think Hillrider nailed it with the idea of filing the ring and/or spider to get it centered. i think i'll chase after some very precise measurments of the spider holes against the spindle hole and the ring holes against its center to figure out what is truely off and what should be filed. busy now though so it will have to wait. i'll post again later once i get it figured out.
thank you all
Last edited by digitane; 09-05-08 at 09:48 AM.
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 33,656
Bikes: '96 Litespeed Catalyst, '05 Litespeed Firenze, '06 Litespeed Tuscany, '20 Surly Midnight Special, All are 3x10. It is hilly around here!
Mentioned: 39 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2026 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1,096 Times
in
742 Posts
One last thought; try reorienting the chainring around the spider. You have 5 choices. Maybe you can find a position where the radial run-out of the chainring compansates for the radial run-out of the spider and that fixes the problem.
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
good idea, ill try that too before any filing, thanks again
#14
Senior Member
Most likely it's a sloppy fit between the chainring, the chainring-bolts and the spider.
1. How much radial-play do you have between the chainring-bolts and the hole in the spider?
2. How much radial-play is there between the chainring-bolts and the chainring?
3. Is there a ledge on the spider-arms where the chainring sits to centre it?
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#16
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
so, i thought the chainring was good, but hillrider was right on the first post: the chainring is out of round and needed to be centered properly on the spider. here's what i did:
i measured the crank and found the spiders holes are precisely centered around the spindle hole. so i left the crank alone. then, i took hillriders advice and changed the chainring position on the spider to see if that helped, and it did: i found that the chain didn't have nearly as big a tension issue after rotating the ring 2 positions on the spider. so, something in the way the ring sat on the spider helped there. last, i used sheldon's method of centering the ring; that helped a lot too. there is still a slight tension change when i rotate the cranks, but, compared to what it was like, its hardly there now at all. after a test ride around the block: chain doesn't bind or get loose, rides smooth, and its quite
problem solved for now as far as im concerned, but i'll be investing in a(nother) new chainring soon.
thank you very much everyone!
Last edited by digitane; 09-06-08 at 04:39 PM.
#17
messenger
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WLA
Posts: 599
Bikes: pinarellos and a colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I disagree with the notion or "fact"that a hub that is not centered will "not" cause elipse--
I have seen this with my own three eyes that when a wheel is not tensioned properly --- wsp
on the non drive side--- it caused elipses( a condition that can be cured with a wheel building class and a couple of shots)
I have seen this with my own three eyes that when a wheel is not tensioned properly --- wsp
on the non drive side--- it caused elipses( a condition that can be cured with a wheel building class and a couple of shots)
#18
messenger
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WLA
Posts: 599
Bikes: pinarellos and a colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
bent rings( bent back to sight) cause slop--- cranking backwards for stopping causes dead spots--- crispy creams and coka cola in the morning causes me to nap in the afternooon
#19
Senior Member
I disagree with the notion or "fact"that a hub that is not centered will "not" cause elipse--
I have seen this with my own three eyes that when a wheel is not tensioned properly --- wsp
on the non drive side--- it caused elipses( a condition that can be cured with a wheel building class and a couple of shots)
I have seen this with my own three eyes that when a wheel is not tensioned properly --- wsp
on the non drive side--- it caused elipses( a condition that can be cured with a wheel building class and a couple of shots)
#20
messenger
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: WLA
Posts: 599
Bikes: pinarellos and a colnago
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I humbly disagree --- If the issue is a "dead spot" where the chain becomes slack at any given
point around the cog--- I see this as a factor to be looked at--- is the frame bent?
are the stays straight-- I know everybody gonna jump on this here post-- but I built a few ss's
and I sense something simple--- also I never had no perfect line on no bike yet--- always gonna hve some slop--- unless it be a big money bike-- you all talk funny
point around the cog--- I see this as a factor to be looked at--- is the frame bent?
are the stays straight-- I know everybody gonna jump on this here post-- but I built a few ss's
and I sense something simple--- also I never had no perfect line on no bike yet--- always gonna hve some slop--- unless it be a big money bike-- you all talk funny